Re: Pushing to LibO-5-2

2016-06-23 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 06/21/2016 10:07 PM, Laurent BP wrote: sberg wrote All three of the mentioned https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/26117;, https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/26118;, https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/26119; refer to https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94004; The history of the

Re: Pushing to LibO-5-2

2016-06-21 Thread Laurent BP
Best regards, Laurent BP - LibreOffice 5.1.4.1 -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Pushing-to-LibO-5-2-tp4186528p4186832.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: Pushing to LibO-5-2

2016-06-21 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 06/21/2016 01:46 PM, jan iversen wrote: And as Stephan pointed out: Only bugfixes go in. And since this is a bugfix it should not be a problem ? All three of the mentioned , ,

Re: Pushing to LibO-5-2

2016-06-21 Thread Christian Lohmaier
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:46 PM, jan iversen wrote: > On 21 Jun 2016, at 13:03, Christian Lohmaier > wrote: > > Only in beta phase does a x-y branch not require review. after that it > needs one review. > > Maybe the text should be corrected

Re: Pushing to LibO-5-2

2016-06-21 Thread jan iversen
> On 21 Jun 2016, at 13:03, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:07 AM, jan iversen > wrote: >> >> As a new committer (thanks again for your confidence), I don't know yet all >> the rules and I prefer to ask before

Re: Pushing to LibO-5-2

2016-06-21 Thread Christian Lohmaier
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:07 AM, jan iversen wrote: > > As a new committer (thanks again for your confidence), I don't know yet all > the rules and I prefer to ask before breaking something. > > Asking is clearly better than breaking :-) > > As it is for 5-2 branch,

Re: Pushing to LibO-5-2

2016-06-20 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 06/19/2016 09:07 AM, jan iversen wrote: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Branches ...states, for "libreoffice-X-Y": "Only fixes go in, no features". I'd encourage everyone to read that as "only fixes to recently introduced featues or recently introduced regressions, or

Re: Pushing to LibO-5-2

2016-06-19 Thread jan iversen
Hi > As a new committer (thanks again for your confidence), I don't know yet all > the rules and I prefer to ask before breaking something. Asking is clearly better than breaking :-) > As it is for 5-2 branch, do they require review from someone else than me, > before they can be pushed?

Pushing to LibO-5-2

2016-06-18 Thread Laurent BP
in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Pushing-to-LibO-5-2-tp4186528.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice