Yes, but our internal RSC doesn't support #pragma once ;)
On 19.03.2013 07:53, vincent wrote:
HI,
I found some wiki about #pragma once compiler support
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragma_once#Portability
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragma_once#Portability
Compiler#pragma once
Clang
On 2013-03-20 12:16, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
Yes, but our internal RSC doesn't support #pragma once ;)
Maybe we could make that a Medium Hack project?
Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html
___
LibreOffice mailing list
On 20/03/13 12:41, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2013-03-20 12:16, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
Yes, but our internal RSC doesn't support #pragma once ;)
Maybe we could make that a Medium Hack project?
i've already filed https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55324
about the CPP proliferation
Hi,
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/2875/
At least on Linux with
--without-java --enable-werror
works for me.
I only replaced guards like *_HXX_, *_HXX__ and *_HXX_INCLUDED which are
not used at any other place. Those are ~8700 matches. Approx. 500 look
like guards, but don't match the
On Tuesday 19 of March 2013, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
On 19.03.2013 00:02, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
otoh, #pragma once is supported by all the compiler we use isn't it ?
so if we are going to change it, why not use that instead.
There are some discussions about that on the Internet. Most
On 19.03.2013 00:02, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz wrote:
On Monday 18 of March 2013, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Sounds great to me too; though of course I'd prefer to keep the diff
smaller and not replace all the header guards:
#ifndef
Lunak
Subject: Re: #ifdef vs #if for feature checks
otoh, #pragma once is supported by all the compiler we use isn't it ?
Excellent! Let's do that, unless somebody comes up with a
counter-argument in a week or so.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Hi Tor, *,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
otoh, #pragma once is supported by all the compiler we use isn't it ?
Excellent! Let's do that, unless somebody comes up with a
counter-argument in a week or so.
This doesn't help when the same file is used from two
On 19/03/13 16:25, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi Tor, *,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
otoh, #pragma once is supported by all the compiler we use isn't it ?
Excellent! Let's do that, unless somebody comes up with a
counter-argument in a week or so.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Tor, *,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
otoh, #pragma once is supported by all the compiler we use isn't it ?
Excellent! Let's do that, unless somebody comes
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Arnhold píše v Út 19. 03. 2013 v 05:55 +0100:
There are some discussions about that on the Internet. Most interesting:
Some kind of benchmark comparison at
http://tinodidriksen.com/2011/08/31/cpp-include-speed/
Looks like header guards as we have them are the best
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote:
That's a good point; so I think the person doing the script should check
the build time of the entire LO with #pragma before pushing, but
otherwise I wouldn't block the change just based on the benchmark - the
benchmark
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz wrote:
The problem with this change is that there still may be some cases where
#ifdef is used, either because some system #defines work that way (so those
would be valid but different), or people would still use #ifdef out of
13 matches
Mail list logo
