Hi Christoph,
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 01:15 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote:
> A first look ... did that help anyhow?
Yes, that helped a lot! :-)
Thanks a lot for the very detailed analysis on this. If I read your
analysis correctly, we can probably safely remove this without upsetting
too many user
Cor Nouws wrote (14-11-10 21:25)
Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote (14-11-10 18:11)
It is easy way to inset links
Yes indeed, I realised that is allows working with hyperlinks without
being kept in a modal dialogue :-)
Well, that is what I thought it is. Reading the mail from Camille, I
realised
On 14/11/2010 18:11, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote:
> 2010-11-14 17:35 keltezéssel, Sebastian Spaeth írta:
>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:46:19 +, Michael Meeks
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 11:12 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Heh! The short story is that this dialog code still *is* used, a
Hi Kami,
Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote (14-11-10 18:11)
It is easy way to inset links
Yes indeed, I realised that is allows working with hyperlinks without
being kept in a modal dialogue :-)
But to be honest, close to all hyperlinks I create is just by typing and
autoformatting the URL.
Do
Title: Szalai Kálmán
It is easy way to inset links
KAMI
2010-11-14 17:35 keltezéssel, Sebastian Spaeth írta:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:46:19 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 11:12 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:46:19 +, Michael Meeks
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 11:12 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Heh! The short story is that this dialog code still *is* used, as a
> > Hyperlink *toolbar*.
+1 for removing that beast anyway.
Sebastian
pgpiwvdu3P3U0.pgp
Description: PGP
Just to add my 'Aye' to Michaels comments (as a humble user).A quick Google
reveals that predominately the full insert hyperlink function is referenced in
online guides.I think this is a fair reflection of the expected UX and the
toolbar is redundant.
Cheers,Andrew
Hi Michael, hi Kohei, all!
Am Freitag, den 12.11.2010, 16:46 + schrieb Michael Meeks:
> On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 11:12 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Heh! The short story is that this dialog code still *is* used, as a
> > Hyperlink *toolbar*.
>
> ;->
Yep, it also looks a bit dated ...
Michael Meeks wrote (12-11-10 17:46)
Riight - on the other hand, using that toolbar I'm somewhat appalled by
it. Christoph - any chance of some quick review of that hyperlink bar ?
it looks to me as if it is some legacy cruft from the days when
StarOffice was an HTML editor.
Wor
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 11:12 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Heh! The short story is that this dialog code still *is* used, as a
> Hyperlink *toolbar*.
;->
> Go to View -> Toolbars -> Hyperlink Bar to enable
> a new toolbar to allow some sort of quick insertion of URL buttons.
> That too
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 11:12 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 15:32 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 08:35 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > > Yes, I was aware of this, and even SvxHyperlinkDlgWrapper is never
> > > instantiated. It is registered by the applica
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 11:12 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Did you do the unwinding to satisfy yourself that whatever mapping
> > between SID_HYPERLINK_INSERT and this dialog is never exploited ?
>
> Heh! The short story is that this dialog code still *is* used, as a
> Hyperlink *toolbar*.
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 15:32 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 08:35 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Yes, I was aware of this, and even SvxHyperlinkDlgWrapper is never
> > instantiated. It is registered by the applications on startup, but
> > that's the only place I see it being u
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 08:35 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Yes, I was aware of this, and even SvxHyperlinkDlgWrapper is never
> instantiated. It is registered by the applications on startup, but
> that's the only place I see it being used.
Ah true ;-) I see there is a new cui/ hyperlink d
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 12:26 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 09:28 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 00:51 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > > Does anyone know if SvxHyperlinkDlg* is still used?
> >
> > Did a full git grep SvxHyperlinkDlg on all
Hi there,
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 09:28 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 00:51 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Does anyone know if SvxHyperlinkDlg* is still used?
>
> Did a full git grep SvxHyperlinkDlg on all repos
It looks to me, that we just use the SvxHyperlinkDlgWra
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 00:51 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Does anyone know if SvxHyperlinkDlg* is still used?
Did a full git grep SvxHyperlinkDlg on all repos and I'm more confident
that the answer is 'no'. Though it is still referenced (via
SvxHyperlinkDlgWrapper) here and there i
17 matches
Mail list logo
