Re: [Libreoffice] make check fails in i18npool

2011-10-18 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Regina, On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 18:10 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: I think, that my last working build has at last commit e024f616934bb78fba8c8101264806d507068d7e Author: Christoph Lutz chrl...@googlemail.com Date: Tue Sep 6 19:01:19 2011 +0200 i#118224: kill O(n^2) complexity of

Re: [Libreoffice] make check fails in i18npool

2011-10-17 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Regina, On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 18:50 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: after 'make build' I rum 'make check' and it fails in i18npool ... Oh dearl that is really bad of course, this line: R=c:/git O=$R/LO35SEPT/solver/wntmsci12.pro W= $R/LO35SEPT/workdir/wntmsci12.pro

Re: [Libreoffice] make check fails in i18npool

2011-10-17 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Michael, Michael Meeks schrieb: Hi Regina, On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 18:50 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: after 'make build' I rum 'make check' and it fails in i18npool ... Oh dearl that is really bad of course, this line: R=c:/git O=$R/LO35SEPT/solver/wntmsci12.pro W=

Re: [Libreoffice] make check fails in i18npool

2011-10-17 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Regina, On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 15:53 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: R=c:/git O=$R/LO35SEPT/solver/wntmsci12.pro W= $R/LO35SEPT/workdir/wntmsci12.pro S=$R/LO35SEPT mkdir -p $W/CppunitTest/ (PATH=`cygpath -u $S/solver/wntmsci12.pro`/bin: ${PATH} STAR_RESOURCEPATH=$O/bin/

Re: [Libreoffice] make check fails in i18npool

2011-10-17 Thread Noel Grandin
Michael Meeks wrote: I suppose (since you're not doing huge global changes); would it be a solution to have a note or tag on the last-known-good windows compile that you could checkout and work on top of ? perhaps we could do that. Oh yes please I've been trying to build this thing

Re: [Libreoffice] make check fails in i18npool

2011-10-17 Thread Tor Lillqvist
I suppose (since you're not doing huge global changes); would it be a solution to have a note or tag on the last-known-good windows compile that you could checkout and work on top of ? Yes, but our git repo administrators have made it quite hard to push tags;) (For good reasons, presumably.)

Re: [Libreoffice] make check fails in i18npool

2011-10-17 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Tor, On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 18:32 +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote: Yes, but our git repo administrators have made it quite hard to push tags;) (For good reasons, presumably.) Ah ! right ... yes, we had problems with legacy tags getting re-pushed left and right and a fight to get rid of

Re: [Libreoffice] make check fails in i18npool

2011-10-17 Thread Tor Lillqvist
(if you still have your tag locally) ? I assume it was before OneGit, but let me check...  Then I'll add a 'g' feature to pull the notes for everyone, and find the last good windows build (unless you want to) ? Please go ahead;) --tml ___

Re: [Libreoffice] make check fails in i18npool

2011-10-17 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Michael, Michael Meeks schrieb: [..] I wish, the MSVCCygwin problems could be solved. Me last working build is from 2011-08-30. Yes; one good piece of news is that Kris did some work to make LibO compiler under LLVM, which has some very precise error / warning support - so

Re: [Libreoffice] make check fails in i18npool

2011-10-17 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Michael, Michael Meeks schrieb: Hi Regina, On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 15:53 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: R=c:/git O=$R/LO35SEPT/solver/wntmsci12.pro W= $R/LO35SEPT/workdir/wntmsci12.pro S=$R/LO35SEPTmkdir -p $W/CppunitTest/ (PATH=`cygpath -u $S/solver/wntmsci12.pro`/bin:

Re: [Libreoffice] make check fails in i18npool

2011-10-17 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi all, Regina Henschel schrieb: [..] I think, that my last working build has at last commit e024f616934bb78fba8c8101264806d507068d7e Author: Christoph Lutz chrl...@googlemail.com Date: Tue Sep 6 19:01:19 2011 +0200 i#118224: kill O(n^2) complexity of unique bookmark name creation But i'm not

Re: [Libreoffice] make check fails in i18npool

2011-10-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 18:50 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi all, after 'make build' I rum 'make check' and it fails in i18npool with a lot of lines: last bunch of lines are the important ones, looks like another case of the unit test itself actually passing ok, but then probably crashing