Hi
I don't know is that helpful information.
Symantec delete that files in my case
- writerfilter\qa\cppunittests\rtftok\data\pass\
sf_508f4e169fb76c80745d3541bd01b0a2-73462-minimized.rtf
Virus:Trojan.Mdropper
- d:\bld\deb\workdir\UnpackedTarball\icu\source\bin\
genrb.exe
On 06/10/14 16:45, Juergen Funk Mailinglist wrote:
Hi
I don't know is that helpful information.
Symantec delete that files in my case
- writerfilter\qa\cppunittests\rtftok\data\pass\
sf_508f4e169fb76c80745d3541bd01b0a2-73462-minimized.rtf
Virus:Trojan.Mdropper
hi Juergen,
i
If it needs forensics to find out what was blocked, then the
av-solution is crap
My thesis is that all av-solutions are deeply flawed =)
So only way is to do as already written in the buildinstructions and
common sense when actually looking at the AV-solutions' reports:
Disable
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 08:38 -0400, nicholas ferguson wrote:
[nicholas ferguson]
I was able to reproduce Norton killing of genrb.exe ... This will give you
an example to consider a proper solution. And this highlights the gravity.
genrb.exe is a major player in building even a release
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 08:38 -0400, nicholas ferguson wrote:
[nicholas ferguson]
I was able to reproduce Norton killing of genrb.exe ... This will
give you an example to consider a proper solution. And this highlights
the gravity.
genrb.exe is a major player in building even a release
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Michael Meeks
michael.me...@collabora.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 08:38 -0400, nicholas ferguson wrote:
git grep genrb
suggests that it's not used.
It is built and used by icu itself to generate data resource files.
cd
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 08:38:35AM -0400, nicholas ferguson wrote:
I was able to reproduce Norton killing of genrb.exe ... This will give you
an example to consider a proper solution.
Uh huh? Some crappy virus detector thinks that a legitimate executable
created from legitimate source code
On 01/10/14 19:55, Michael Meeks wrote:
Ideally we could find a reproducer that we could check during configure
and print out:
You have a (typically) rubbish AV product installed -
please un-install and or disable it ;-)
I think this is not about AV products being rubbish.
On 2014-10-01 11:55 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Wow. So I did a forensic on the env. And I discovered that Norton
Antivirus was isolating state files and some executables being built by the
LibreOffice build system.
Most anti-virus products have a way of excluding specific folder
why isn't this wiki page referenced in the readme? Isn't that wiki a
page for develpers. What kind of developer in your world, doesn't
build a debug version, first?
We used to recommend a debug version AFAIR, but the build tree on Linux
with debuginfo is 30Gb small - and
with
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Michael Meeks
michael.me...@collabora.com wrote:
Dear Nicholas,
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 17:19 -0400, nicholas ferguson wrote:
I duplicated their directory structure. And my build still failed.
Grief; we should certainly document turning off AV more
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:50:50AM -0400, nicholas ferguson wrote:
Where is it mentioned how not to keep downloading the tar files? for
3rd party dependencies. That alone is a HUGE COST OF ENTRY...to
discover how to turn that off.
The automatic download saves manually downloading
Hi Nicholas, *,
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:50 PM, nicholas ferguson
nicholasfergu...@wingarch.com wrote:
[...]
Where is it mentioned how not to keep downloading the tar files? for
3rd party dependencies. That alone is a HUGE COST OF ENTRY...to
discover how to turn that off.
The
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1331887/detect-antivirus-on-windows-using-c-sharp
At the end of the Windows configure; and warning hard may have helped people
like Nicholas save quite a chunk of time.
[nicholas ferguson]
This is an example of the high cost of doing a build and development
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 08:21 -0400, nicholas ferguson wrote:
This is an example of the high cost of doing a build and development
work with LibreOffie.
Great example.
Most developers,download the sofware. Look at the ReadME file and then
proceed.
I don't think we have a
The high cost of entry only comes because you just didn't follow the
instructions on setting up a windows build system.
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Windows_Build_Dependencies
So you are the one responsible for not putting up on that wiki how to build a
debug version. You
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 13:15 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Listed quite prominently in the windows build instructions.
Great :-)
BitDefender/Security Essentials blocks some of the CVE test-files.
Caolan kindly committed a fix to turn off the CVE tests on Windows by
default
17 matches
Mail list logo
