On 2013-06-23 17:24, V Stuart Foote wrote:
Thanks! The zip'd packaging is fine for testing, have grabbed a copy.
Will run with it and a JRE 1.7u25 and JAB 2.0.3, but noticed for starters
that the build target for the Java bytecode is still set to major/minor
49.0, or J2SE 5. Is that a javac
On 2013-06-23 19:25, V Stuart Foote wrote:
Issue of bytecode target interaction with JRE becomes more troubling if you
consider that the default Java JRE update settings on Windows systems
replace all JRE 6 installations with current JRE 7 builds. In other words
the percentage of total
David,
David Ostrovsky-3 wrote
But anyway i can conduct a new and shiny 51 byte code version of LO if
you would like to try it and see if we have any improvements with JAB
with it?
I would still very much like to explore this further if you are able to
generate viable Java 1.7 bytecode of
Noel,
You have continued to say that simply changing the byte code does nothing.
Even if we accept that, the issue remains that there are functional
differences between the current feature set represented by J2SE 5.0 targeted
bytecode and the current feature set that JDK SE 7 is configured to
Hi
I am quite happy for us for produce Java7 bytecode, if producing Java7
bytecode will actually make something work better.
But so far I have seen no signs of that.
And I'm speaking here, not as some random hacker, but as a person with
10+ years experience of writing 1Mloc+ Java
On Sat Jun 22 Stuart Foote wrote:
[...]
Could anyone spin up a TB to build Windows (possibly OSX) master using
JDK 7
[...]
Any takers?
just uploaded a very recent LO debug build (from the last Hackathon,
June 16) with that endless loop fix applied [1]:
David,
Thanks! The zip'd packaging is fine for testing, have grabbed a copy.
Will run with it and a JRE 1.7u25 and JAB 2.0.3, but noticed for starters
that the build target for the Java bytecode is still set to major/minor
49.0, or J2SE 5. Is that a javac compatibility mode setting of some
David,
Yes! I will happily work with your JDK 7 based build with Java 7 bytecode to
see if that restores the JAB function Oracle clobbered when they moved Java
Access Bridge into the base JRE at 1.7u6.
Thanks for the history...
Can't fault Tor's work on fixing the compiler java_target_version
Le 22/06/2013 18:45, V Stuart Foote a écrit :
Hi Stuart,
Could anyone spin up a TB to build Windows (possibly OSX) master using JDK
7, or possibly even Open JDK 8 beta (which has been marked M7 Feature
Complete as of 2013/06/13 ) and build Libreoffice with J2SE 7 classes?
And, if not too
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 08:10:42PM +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote:
On Sun Jun 23 08:24:32 PDT 2013 Stuart Foote wrote:
Will run with it and a JRE 1.7u25 and JAB 2.0.3, but noticed for
starters that the build target for the Java bytecode is still set
to major/minor 49.0, or J2SE 5. Is that a
10 matches
Mail list logo
