Hi Christina,
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 14:59 +0100, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
as suggested on IRC I've removed the whole StrictSO52Compatibility
stuff. It builds successfully - make test is on its way. git grep
reported some test documents matching as well, so I expect some tests to
fail.
Am 14.03.2012 15:42, schrieb Michael Meeks:
Hi Christina,
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 14:59 +0100, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
as suggested on IRC I've removed the whole StrictSO52Compatibility
stuff. It builds successfully - make test is on its way. git grep
reported some test documents matching as
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 21:03 +0100, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
static const sal_Char pProlog[] and static const sal_Char
pSO52CompatProlog[] share about 90% of their content (2 out of 84 lines
differ).
Wow - that is really horrible :-)
I could split the prolog in three parts: part 1
Hi,
as suggested on IRC I've removed the whole StrictSO52Compatibility
stuff. It builds successfully - make test is on its way. git grep
reported some test documents matching as well, so I expect some tests to
fail.
Christina
Am 05.03.2012 12:41, schrieb Michael Meeks:
On Fri, 2012-03-02
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 11:41 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
Caolan - I notice the option seems to be mentioned in:
qadevOOo/testdocs/ttt.sda
Which you touched last :-) is this a feature we need to keep ?
Originally the smoketest just wrote out some .sdX files and reloaded
