I still have two 32 bit machines which using KDE4 which run LO 6.2.8.
Might be wrong but I don't think LO 6.3 will run on a KDE4 machine.
Alex
On 19/07/2020 16:00, Michael H wrote:
I'd say that it's likely that a majority of computers still running
win7 are running 32bit.
I'd also suggest
I'd say that it's likely that a majority of computers still running win7
are running 32bit.
I'd also suggest that all those users would prefer a stable 6.0 or 6.1 (or
maybe 6.3) (no big interface changes from LO 3.2) to remain installable and
maintained for security, rather than installing LO 7
I'd say that it's likely that a majority of computers still running win7
are running 32bit.
I'd also suggest that all those users would prefer a stable 6.0 or 6.1 (or
maybe 6.3) (no big interface changes from LO 3.2) to remain installable and
maintained for security, rather than installing LO 7
On 7/19/2020 7:27 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi Dante,
Dante Doménech wrote:
Isn't it time to start removing windows 32 support?
I believe that would be premature. There's still a sizeable fraction
of users running Windows 7 [1], which itself likely has a sizeable
fraction of x86
Hi Dante,
Dante Doménech wrote:
> Isn't it time to start removing windows 32 support?
>
I believe that would be premature. There's still a sizeable fraction
of users running Windows 7 [1], which itself likely has a sizeable
fraction of x86 installations - no hard data though [2].
There's also
Isn't it time to start removing windows 32 support?
Some changes led me to some types.h and noticed win32 stuff.
If and only if we won't make win32 of the 7.1 I can remove it.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
