On Thursday 31 of January 2013, Michael Stahl wrote:
> i haven't measured it but i guess the majority of the problem is first
> writing the Object .d files,
I have. Replacing concat-deps calls with mkdir+touch (for which there is a
builtin) cuts the [build DEP] phase in tail_build to almost a ha
On 31/01/13 14:33, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Thursday 31 of January 2013, Michael Stahl wrote:
>> On 31/01/13 08:01, Michael Meeks wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I was digging for the latest information on the size cost of our
>>> dependencies, and was interested to see things like:
>>>
>>> work
On Thursday 31 of January 2013, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 31/01/13 08:01, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I was digging for the latest information on the size cost of our
> > dependencies, and was interested to see things like:
> >
> > workdir/unxlngi6.pro/Dep/LinkTarget/Library/l
On 31/01/13 08:01, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I was digging for the latest information on the size cost of our
> dependencies, and was interested to see things like:
>
> workdir/unxlngi6.pro/Dep/LinkTarget/Library/libfwklo.so.d
>
> contain only lots of:
>
> /data/opt/
Hi guys,
I was digging for the latest information on the size cost of our
dependencies, and was interested to see things like:
workdir/unxlngi6.pro/Dep/LinkTarget/Library/libfwklo.so.d
contain only lots of:
/data/opt/libreoffice/master/workdir/unxlngi6.pro/CxxObject/fram
