Re: ide-integration project files placement

Hi > On 24 Feb 2017, at 11:50, Federico Bassini wrote: > > Hi! > > we are 3 italian's student of Osvaldo, he assign us to the IDE project, we > work on the class testVS2013Ide so we don't change the > VisualStudioIntegratorGeneration... we have the tasks that Jan gave

Re: ide-integration project files placement

Hi! we are 3 italian's student of Osvaldo, he assign us to the IDE project, we work on the class testVS2013Ide so we don't change the VisualStudioIntegratorGeneration... we have the tasks that Jan gave us... we are ready to work! now we resolve this... so we need to create a new directory where

Re: ide-integration project files placement

Hi, On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:54:42AM +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > I don't really use that, but - always feels wrong to write stuff into > the source tree, any reason not to use workdir or instdir? I agree in general. Note that I likely started this unhealthy trend as for kdevelop, it

Re: ide-integration project files placement

On 2/21/2017 5:54 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Kaganski Mike wrote: currently vs201[35]-ide-integration places its generated output into windows subdirectory in core. [...] I don't really use that, but - always feels wrong to write stuff into the source tree, any reason not to use workdir or

Re: ide-integration project files placement

Kaganski Mike wrote: > currently vs201[35]-ide-integration places its generated output into > windows subdirectory in core. > > [...] > I don't really use that, but - always feels wrong to write stuff into the source tree, any reason not to use workdir or instdir? Cheers, -- Thorsten

ide-integration project files placement

Hi, currently vs201[35]-ide-integration places its generated output into windows subdirectory in core. I an not convinced that it is sensible in the cross-platform project like LO. And anyway VS != Windows. My proposal is to use something like this for e.g. vs2013-ide-integration results: