Re: libcmis and GDrive status

2023-10-10 Thread Mattia Verga
Il 09/10/23 18:09, Caolán McNamara - caolan.mcnamara at collabora.com ha scritto: > On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 12:28 +, Mattia Verga wrote: >> For a long time in Fedora we have been reverting a few LO changes >> because it relies to a libcmis built specifically with LO embedded >> patches. Libcmis

Re: libcmis and GDrive status

2023-10-09 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 12:28 +, Mattia Verga wrote: > For a long time in Fedora we have been reverting a few LO changes > because it relies to a libcmis built specifically with LO embedded > patches. Libcmis has not seen a recent release since 2018. Github > code resides under The Document

Re: libcmis and GDrive status

2023-10-04 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 12:28 +, Mattia Verga wrote: > For a long time in Fedora we have been reverting a few LO changes > because it relies to a libcmis built specifically with LO embedded > patches. Libcmis has not seen a recent release since 2018. Github > code resides under The Document

libcmis and GDrive status

2023-10-04 Thread Mattia Verga
Hello, I'd like to raise awareness of the status about libcmis and Google Drive feature support. For a long time in Fedora we have been reverting a few LO changes because it relies to a libcmis built specifically with LO embedded patches. Libcmis has not seen a recent release since 2018.