On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 10:41:26PM +0100, Guillaume Poussel wrote:
Hi everybody,
I've started to look at the huge
listhttp://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/of defects that Cpp Check
show. I have corrected few things in bootstrap.
The rest should be false positive or errors in dmake/ folder.
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:10:51AM +0100, David Tardon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 10:41:26PM +0100, Guillaume Poussel wrote:
Hi everybody,
I've started to look at the huge
listhttp://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/of defects that Cpp Check
show. I have corrected few things in
On 04/01/11 23:43, Christoph Noack wrote:
The main issue is, that we do have two different input methods (one
being WYSIWYG, the other one being the formula syntax) that have to be
synced somehow. The content itself isn't the main problem, but things
like cursor position and selection. We can
Would you also like to comment my updated method sent yesterday? Thanks!
Well, it was not clear to me why you want to expand only initial tabs.
Presumably when somebody uses tab characters in a source file, they intend them
to tab to the next multiple of four columns regardless where on the
Hi,
NoOp píše v Út 04. 01. 2011 v 20:42 -0800:
Can LibORC3 include an updated libstdc++.so.6 so that others do not have
the same issue? Thanks.
No response on the list. Would it help if I filed a bug report, or are
LibO devs already aware of the issue? IMO this would be a blocking
Hello Kohei, others,
I have created a bug report for this (fdo#32840)... and fixed it in
master branch.
Could someone review it for a possible integration in 3.3 ?
Regards,
--
Cedric
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 16:09 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 22:04 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi there,
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 11:23 -0800, NoOp wrote:
(soffice:22820): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin
'/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstffmpeg.so':
/opt/libreoffice/program/../basis-link/ure-link/lib/libstdc++.so.6:
Gack; another instance of our internal libstdc++ biting
Hi Kohei,
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 16:06 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Could someone please give me a quick sign-off of this
Done - looks great :-)
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Hi Soeren,
Soeren Moeller píše v Út 04. 01. 2011 v 19:48 +0100:
Another small removal of dependencies on tools/solar.h, this time in
sc/inc/waitoff.h
Pushed, thank you! :-)
Regards,
Kendy
___
LibreOffice mailing list
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:38 AM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
On 12/24/2010 03:26 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 12/24/2010 11:32 AM, Jesús Corrius wrote:
...
I see, I was able to reproduce it after making a few tests. Let me
investigate this further.
Scenarios that work (for me)
Hi Joseph
On -10/01/37 20:59, Joseph Powers wrote:
The attached patch compiles and stands up to my limited testing; however, it's a
large patch and touches a lot of sensitive code so I want someone with better
knowledge of the Basic Macro Editor environment to review test it before I
try
Hi Julien,
thanks for your patches. They look OK so I pushed them.
Cheers
Radek
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 00:51 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
Hello,
Here are 2 new patches for cppcheck cleaning in svx
Compiling was ok
Remarks :
I had this with the last git version of cppcheck :
1)
Hi Jean,
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 21:11 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Jonas wrote:
Assuming someone cares to implement it... and you're are welcome to
step up to the plate :)
..
I strongly disagree : it is you who must not to destroy what is working
very well.
Jean - this sort of
Hi Takeshi,
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 14:30 +0900, KUROSAWA, Takeshi wrote:
I wrote patches for SVG export filter.
Nice ! :-) thes look great. Having said that - I suggest we wait for
Thorsten to review them (who gets back from holiday tommorrow).
Is that ok ?
Really great
Hi every one,
This my first message to the list, hopping it will be a fruitful
experience :)
I was trying to debug fdo#31016[1] since it breaks almost all my fonts,
it toke me few months but I think I finally got the root of it (I
started working on it few weeks before libreoffice was announced,
Hi Robert,
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 02:16 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
- aStyleSet.SetToolbarIconSize( STYLE_TOOLBAR_ICONSIZE_LARGE );
+aStyleSet.SetToolbarIconSize( nDispDPIY 160 ?
STYLE_TOOLBAR_ICONSIZE_LARGE
: STYLE_TOOLBAR_ICONSIZE_SMALL );
On large
On (2011-01-05 14:27), Michael Meeks wrote:
So - I would prefer to stick with large icons; and not use the DPI
setting. I suggest instead, that we only use large icons if the true Y
resolution 768 - how does that sound ?
ATB,
Michael.
That would work fine too, I
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 21:12 +0100, Jonas Finnemann Jensen wrote:
I have installed RC2 now, but I see no difference in formula editor.
I don't think everything from master is merged into the release candidate...
And since this is still an experimental feature we're slow at pushed
things
Hi Soeren,
Sören Möller píše v Út 04. 01. 2011 v 20:20 +0100:
Replaced datatypes from tools/solar.h with corresponding types from
sal/types.h in drawpage.hxx/.cxx and added missing include of sal/types.h in
docparam.hxx
Pushed, thank you! :-) I've just changed one thing, and that is that
Hi Meeks, Robert,
2011-01-05 15:27 keltezéssel, Michael Meeks írta:
Hi Robert,
On large numbers of machines, nDispDPI is just broken - it is fetched
(AFAIR) from Xft - and is ~hard-coded to 75 everywhere to save lots of
grief from X servers getting it horribly wrong.
So - the
Hi Sören,
Thanks for the patch. Is there a reason why this one is not an
attachment? :-)
Anyway, I have some comments.
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 20:20 +0100, Sören Möller wrote:
Replaced datatypes from tools/solar.h with corresponding types from
sal/types.h in drawpage.hxx/.cxx and added
On (2011-01-05 14:27), Michael Meeks wrote:
So - I would prefer to stick with large icons; and not use the DPI
setting. I suggest instead, that we only use large icons if the true Y
resolution 768 - how does that sound ?
Oh wait, I misunderstood. That is wrong. I am on a 1920x1080
Hi Peter,
Jan Holesovsky píše v Út 04. 01. 2011 v 11:13 +0100:
I'm attaching a patch I somehow managed to patiently pull out of git :-)
As I'm new to C++, libxslt, git and a few other things involved in
creating the patch I feel it must be full of warts and cause random
crashes, but
Hi Michael,
2011/1/5 Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com
No problem; there is one known branding bug inside the MSI, that we
need to work around before release.
Have you also solved https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32389 (MSI
installer is always in English regardless
Hi,
Could somebody tell me how to update to the latest git release?
There used to be a bin/g scvript that did that but it's gone.
Thanks,
--
Grega Fajdiga
Hacquetova 5
1113 Ljubljana
Slovenia
GSM: +386 40 923 635
E-pošta: gregor.fajd...@guest.arnes.si
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 22:26 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
...some more translations.
Nice work! Pushed.
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
kyosh...@novell.com
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi Kami,
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 18:28 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote:
Please review the attached patch that provide updated support for
Ligthproof extension integration for 3.3.x series.
Looks lovely :-) but can we punt this for 3.3.1 ? I think we need to be
getting into some really
Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai píše v Pá 31. 12. 2010 v 10:17 +0100:
Hi All,
Patches attached to issue, please review.
Ah, we use Novell.dic in our build. It includes just
language-independent names of Novell products, so it should not cause
any harm to anyone. I attached different patches to the
Hi Kami,
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 18:22 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote:
Sorry, my mistake. Attached.
You sure these need review ? :-) your work looks nice - and no doubt it
can be tweaked later if there are problems ? :-)
/me feels bad about leaving this un-reviewed so long.
type ./g pull -r in the boot strap directory let me know if it works.
On 1/5/11 2:40 PM, Grega Fajdiga wrote:
Hi,
Could somebody tell me how to update to the latest git release?
There used to be a bin/g scvript that did that but it's gone.
Thanks,
Hi Kami,
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 08:17 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote:
I attaching two patch that:
* refreshing some OxygenOffice related patches
* disable few OxygenOffice only patches from apply file
Look fine to me for libreoffice-3-3; they only touch Oxygen pieces,
pushed them
Hi!
2011-01-05 17:01 keltezéssel, Petr Mladek írta:
Ah, we use Novell.dic in our build. It includes just
language-independent names of Novell products, so it should not cause
any harm to anyone. I attached different patches to the issue. KAMI,
could you please review them?
Can we introduce
Hi,
this time a brief summary of what happened the 13th and 14th week on
LibreOffice
repos and two living branches:
bugfixes-master-week-51-52.txt lists all commits that reference a proper
bug id (from a variety of trackers - #i... referring to the OpenOffice
issuezilla, fdo# to freedesktop,
Hi Kami,
Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai píše v St 05. 01. 2011 v 17:41 +0100:
PS. we have all those font's licenses in the license files right ?
Sorry I really don't know the rules for this so I just wanted to
review all changes that I made after I got warned ;o)
I am sorry, that is probably my
Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai píše v St 05. 01. 2011 v 17:39 +0100:
Hi!
2011-01-05 17:01 keltezéssel, Petr Mladek írta:
Ah, we use Novell.dic in our build. It includes just
language-independent names of Novell products, so it should not cause
any harm to anyone. I attached different patches to
Oh well then Linux is broken, again. :)
In gedit the icons are bigger than the small ones but not as huge
as in LibreOffice.
Here you can see (LO with small icons):
http://blade2k.humppa.hu/2011-01-05-182917_1920x1080_scrot.png
(ws robert 22435)$ xdpyinfo | egrep (dimensions|dots per inch)
It seems to me that gedit uses GTK_ICON_SIZE_MENU which is 16x16.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Robert, *,
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Robert Nagy rob...@openbsd.org wrote:
It seems to me that gedit uses GTK_ICON_SIZE_MENU which is 16x16.
On GNOME it follows the theme, wich in turn follows the gconf-setting
/desktop/gnome/interface/toolbar_icons_size
so whatever your theme defines
Hi Andras,
Andras Timar píše v Ne 02. 01. 2011 v 14:47 +0100:
same typo in module_langpack.ulf
Thank you, pushed to libreoffice-3-3.
Regards,
Kendy
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi
We should just ignore all the theming here since a lot of people are not
running gnome or whatever window manager and just use stock gtk.
On (2011-01-05 18:59), Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi Robert, *,
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Robert Nagy rob...@openbsd.org wrote:
It seems to me
Hi Robert, *,
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Robert Nagy rob...@openbsd.org wrote:
We should just ignore all the theming here
No way - as gtk is always themed. Your screenshot demonstrate that
your gedit is not using 16x16 for icons.
So either you're not using small-toolbar setting at all,
Hi
I am *not* using any themes, it's the default GTK one. Anyways that does not
matter now.
On (2011-01-05 19:15), Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi Robert, *,
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Robert Nagy rob...@openbsd.org wrote:
We should just ignore all the theming here
No way - as gtk
Hi Robert, all!
Am Mittwoch, den 05.01.2011, 18:32 +0100 schrieb Robert Nagy:
Oh well then Linux is broken, again. :)
In gedit the icons are bigger than the small ones but not as huge
as in LibreOffice.
Here you can see (LO with small icons):
On 01/05/2011 02:06 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi there,
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 11:23 -0800, NoOp wrote:
(soffice:22820): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin
'/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstffmpeg.so':
/opt/libreoffice/program/../basis-link/ure-link/lib/libstdc++.so.6:
Gack;
On 01/05/2011 12:14 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Robert,
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 16:24 +0100, Robert Nagy wrote:
On (2011-01-05 14:27), Michael Meeks wrote:
So - I would prefer to stick with large icons; and not use the DPI
setting. I suggest instead, that we only use large icons if the
On 01/05/2011 02:55 AM, Jesús Corrius wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:38 AM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
...
Any progress on this? Would it help if I filed a bug report?
This issue is (to me) critical regarding any further RC or full release
of LibO.
Sorry, I have been in Norway for
Hi,
the configure options --with-intro-bitmaps, --with-about-bitmaps did not
longer worked. I think that nobody needs more pictures. The attached
patches rename the above options to pass only one picture and fix the
stuff to work.
KAMI, could you sign it off for libreoffice-3-3 branch?
Best
Hi and thank you for your comments
2011/1/5 Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com:
Hi Sören,
Thanks for the patch. Is there a reason why this one is not an
attachment? :-)
It is not an attachment as I used git send-email to send it to the
mailing list, but the result seems a bit wierd when
Hi,
our build service found broken RPATH in libicudata.so.42.1; it is fixed
by the attached patch
Cedric, could you please sign it off for libreoffice-3-3.
It works well on Linux with bash. I think that it can't be worse on
other systems ;-)
Best Regards,
Petr
From
Title: Szalai Kálmán
Hi Michael,
Sorry for bugging you but it seems I sent it two times, and David
already pushed in:
Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Updates for LightProof extension
handling
It is required If someone packs LightProof because of changed
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 20:22 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
Hi,
our build service found broken RPATH in libicudata.so.42.1
That libicudata is the biggest nuisance, causes all sorts of problems on
different platforms. Rather an odd use of an elf file as data storage
IIRC and manually created by icu
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Bug 31865 depends on bug 32133, which changed state.
Bug 32133 Summary: Overlapping controls on Tools - Options - General panel
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32133
What|Old Value |New Value
Michael,
Sorry that I used the background color directly. I just do not known jet how
to use themes.
Is there a theme for displaying a warning label in a dialog?
The color of the warning was inspired by the spec:
Hi Christian!
Am Mittwoch, den 05.01.2011, 19:40 +0100 schrieb Christian Lohmaier:
Hi Christoph, *,
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Christoph Noack christ...@dogmatux.com
wrote:
[...]
Mmh, I'm unsure how much it helps to compare the different applications.
* gedit is a native
Hi Christoph, *;
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Christoph Noack christ...@dogmatux.com wrote:
[...]
Thus, we have to take care that our default settings work well for the
majority of users working in very different working conditions.
[...]
Yes, and that surely is the setting they use for
Hi Kohei,
Am Mittwoch, den 05.01.2011, 13:02 -0500 schrieb Kohei Yoshida:
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 21:12 +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Thoughts?
I think this is a pretty interesting project worth consideration.
One thing I noticed; you've chosen Vala as the language for this
library. Is
Ah...got more reading. `expand` is smarter than I have thought ( I
misunderstood it as only fixed space characters can be provided to replace
tabs), so to keep the source file looks the same as it used to be. This should
be enough to:
$ cat /tmp/tabfile | while read fn ; do expand $fn
57 matches
Mail list logo
