Re: OK to get rid of scaddins?

Hi Michael, On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 16:06 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > >> (of course i don't care if you do it for a special "merged libs" mode, > >> but C++ development is already a sufficiently unproductive activity that > >> we shouldn't make it even more so...) > > > > Is it necessary to b

[REVIEW-3-5][REVIEW-3-4] fdo#45995 & fdo#45992

Some cherry picking appreciated handle imported picture attribute from MSO Dialog ( fdo#45995 ) needed for 3.5 ( and possibly 3.4... I need to check that ) core:58255c47b1d540fd2493b4ed132aa7fa82da156e fix support for embedded images for basic Dialogs ( fdo#45992 ) needed for 3.5 ( and defini

Re: Patch for Easy Hack 45033

Hi Italo, On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:27:26PM +0100, Italo Vignoli wrote: > I have patched the biblio.odb document with LibreOffice entries (got rid > of the old OOo entries). The patch is below to be checked, but I do not > understand if I have to attach the patched document as well. Please > he

[REVIEW] fix RTF import of text frames with exact height

Hi, See http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=e0328096dc21ce12d15db2045074e7860872570f Could someone review and cherry-pick to -3-5, please? Thanks, Miklos ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.f

RE: [REVIEW] [PATCH]bug 44516 improved label and business card document creation

Olivier Hallot wrote (14 februari 2012) >The new schema with the paper size will work with older versions of >LibreOffice and OpenOffice? In other words, if I replace Labels.xcu from >older OOo, with the new one, is it going to break the label feature or >not of OOo? It will work with 'old style'

[REVIEW 3-5] Adapt SDK to changed paths in LO installation

Please review and cherry-pick to libreoffice-3-5 the commit "Resolves rhbz#789622: Adapt SDK to changed paths in LO installation". Without it, SDK fails to build even simple examples, cf.

Re: [REVIEW] [PATCH]bug 44516 improved label and business card document creation

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Em 14-02-2012 04:44, Winfried Donkers escreveu: > Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well? > The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at > least). > > > Winfried Just a question... The new schema w

Re: AOOo Issues [From Symphony]

Hi Thorsten, Rainer, On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 09:39 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > > Leave a comment in AOOo bug concerning your result: > > "LibO also affected" > > "LibO not affected" > > If you use exactly those strings we can avoid double work easily > > with a clever query, oyu find it on my W

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [PATCH] fdo#37775 - EasyHack: Recent Documents not updated by Save & Save As...

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Cor Nouws wrote: > Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote (12-02-12 13:30) > > IMHO the case which 'file open' would be useful is already described >> in the bug comment 0 and 4: saving with a new name doesn't get old >> name into the list. >> > > Yes, if that is the techni

Re: [EasyHack] #44681 port to CLucene from java/Lucene

Thanks for the answers, responses below. On 13-02-12, Caolán McNamara wrote: > The xmlhelp/source/com/sun/star/help/*.java route is the one that sets > the "bExtensionMode". I think this one is which third party extensions > can insert their help into our help system. The cxxhelp is the > straig

Re: AOOo Issues [From Symphony]

Hi Rainer, you wrote: > That's a fruitfully source, we should check that systematically. > absolutely - just did for the presentation bugs, those which I could test (one had a non-public bug document) are fixed for LibO. > Leave a comment in AOOo bug concerning your result: > "LibO also affecte

Re: [EasyHack] #44681 port to CLucene from java/Lucene

On 13-02-12, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > first of all: thanks for this effort, which should have been done when this > lucene dependency was introduced in the first place in OOo times. > > But... > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:17:49PM +0100, Radek Doulik wrote: > > >   * This implementatio

Re: [REVIEW] smoketest -> gbuild, TestExtension.idl needed ?

On 02/13/2012 11:21 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: On 12 February 2012 23:51, Matúš Kukan wrote: Do not push them without improvement, make check fails for me. Attached diff solves one problem but still there is something wrong. Well, I was fooled by smoketest/com/sun/star/comp/smoketest/makefile.mk

AOOo Issues [From Symphony]

Hi all, Hi Markus, in AOOo Bugzilla I find lots of bugs with [From Symphony] in Subject line, I just took to That's a fruitfully source, we should check that systematically. I recomme

R: minor autogen.sh (windows /cygwin) bug [SOLVED (?)]

Yesterday, after a system reboot and a new clone, the build was completed without errors using jobs=1 cpus=1 On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 17:18 +0100, walter wrote: > Using --with-max-jobs=1 --with-num-cpus=1 > fails generating vfork error. Nasty :-) did you get past that ? vfork errors sound

Re: New tool for better understanding the codebase, to complement the wiki.

On 02/03/2012 03:56 AM, Josh Heidenreich wrote: It uses cgit to download the README or readme.txt files in all of the top-level directories, and it generates some HTML files for easy viewing. The first paragraph (everything before an empty line) is considered the "short description", and is shown

<    1   2