regards
>From f5aac0dd10c586fbcdcd8e6a86e396601db8ad27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?=
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:20:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] trivial warning cleaning in binfilter - unocore (1)
---
.../source/core/unocore/sw_SwXTextDefaults.cxx |
regards
>From 09642903881c193ff01f2801461dcddeae0931ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?=
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:13:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] trivial warning cleaning in binfilter - unocore (2)
---
binfilter/bf_sw/source/core/unocore/sw_unodraw.cxx |
regards
>From 94ae830669bfc1df7b4235c45d0a6a72def30be2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?=
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:09:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] trivial warning fixes within binfilter bf_sw doc
---
.../bf_sw/source/core/doc/sw_SwStyleNameMapper.cxx |2
regards
>From 29737dab0202b18c1326841e449e1640b9bd5561 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?=
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:40:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] trivial warning fixes in binfilter
---
binfilter/bf_sw/source/core/attr/sw_calbck.cxx |2 +-
binfilter/
Hello,
here some patches trying to make the compiler less verbose within
binfilter.
Currently, I catch only warning produced without debugging
regards
>From a36afe0088b28590dc07e8da7a8d380810640ad0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?=
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
tbehr...@novell.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoff...@lists.freedeskt
This is a heads-up about a change in the way we build the product that
is about to be pushed.
Current Situation
=
Right know there are 2 main way to build the product. Both of them
rely on pulling the 'build' repo and using ./download in that repo to
pull the 19 others git repos.
The
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 11:48 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote:
> On 30 November 2010 11:34, Joe Smith wrote:
> > I was also having a lot of trouble learning anything from running OOo under
> > gdb. Gdb was acting weird and I couldn't step through the code and poke
> > around. I ended up trying to do i
On 30 November 2010 11:34, Joe Smith wrote:
> I was also having a lot of trouble learning anything from running OOo under
> gdb. Gdb was acting weird and I couldn't step through the code and poke
> around. I ended up trying to do it by adding a printf, rebuild, run, rinse,
> repeat. No fun; less p
On 11/29/2010 06:39 PM, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
...
However, looking at textsearch.cxx in Open Grok --
http://opengrok.go-oo.org/xref/libs-gui/i18npool/source/search/textsearch.cxx#165
-- can see this comment before the various types of calls to a search
routine:
// use transliteration here,
Hi Chris,
you wrote:
> Just to be sure - did you also update the position of the progress bars?
>
Yep.
> And, looking at the files list below, it seems that the original
> filenames (picked from the OOo UI project) changed a bit. Would it be
> helpful to rename the icons within the artwork packa
Hi Thorsten!
Thanks for that!!! Today, we got some guests (we are the new
neighbors...), so I was unable to come up with a dedicated issue in the
bug tracker.
Just to be sure - did you also update the position of the progress bars?
And, looking at the files list below, it seems that the original
I like the idea of replacing the internal regexp in favor of a more fully
developed regexp evaluator. The goal should be to get rid of the weaker
regexp module. A question I don't know how to answer is which is the best
replacement. As Thorsten points out, ideally the replacement should be
enab
Hi,
since we decided to label the next release RC1
(http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2010-November/003452.html),
just updated our artwork from
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibreOffice-Initial-Artwork-Package.zip
(differences: removed "beta" text, text / paper is visual
I find the language selector on the bottom of the writer UI not so
efficient.
I have installed just a few languages, but still "all the wrong"
languages show up.
Could it be an idea to show the
-last used languages first
or
-installed languages first
in that box?
Also, I don't see the logic
Hi
I have
LibreOffice 3.3.0
OOO330m9 (Build:1)
libreoffice-build 3.2.99.2
It hangs when I do "libreoffice extension.oxt" from the command line. No
error messages on stdout.
Adding the extension from the menu Tools | Extension manager works fine.
Arno
signature.asc
Description: This is
So, I'm happy, this patch finish my work to clean code around writer,
everything inside sw. Sending for review (large patch).
revol_
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libr
Hi Kami,
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 20:30 +0100, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote:
> I would like to put OxygenOffice extras as a configurable content to
> LibreOffice git tree. Currently it is enabled only when the one
> selects OxygenOffice as distro conf.
Okay.
> My plan is to add --with-extra-galle
Hi Kami,
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 20:34 +0100, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote:
> Can you explain me what patches will got to git tree in the timeframe
> of libreoffice-3-3 release and int the future? When rawbuild will take
> over the simple build? How patches will added from apply file?
Well - we sh
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 20:04 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> There's another, (in my opinion more interesting), class of dead-code
> and that's the stuff that's compiled in but isn't called by anything.
Ah yes.
> I've yet to get in gear and get up-to-date runs for LibreOffice, but see
> h
Hi Norbert,
got the mac booted & configure line (for the "build" repo)
extracted:
./configure --with-distro=LibreOfficeMacOSX --with-lang="en-US af ar be-BY bg
br ca cs cy da de el en-GB en-ZA es et fi fr ga gl gu he hi-IN hu hr it ja ka
km ko lt mk nb nl nn nr pa-IN pl pt pt-BR ru rw sh sk sl
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 16:56 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> That's all of base scanned. Unless I've missed something (and I've
> deliberately skipped a few bits, eg that marked with TODO), there
> shouldn't be any dead code or end-of-if/end-of-switch type comments left
> there.
Nice :-) is it
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 16:56 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> That's all of base scanned. Unless I've missed something (and I've
> deliberately skipped a few bits, eg that marked with TODO), there
> shouldn't be any dead code or end-of-if/end-of-switch type comments left
There's another, (in my opinion m
On 29/11/10 16:14, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 15:48 +, Wols Lists wrote:
>> Cheers,
> Looks good, pushed, thanks for that.
>
> C.
>
That's all of base scanned. Unless I've missed something (and I've
deliberately skipped a few bits, eg that marked with TODO), there
shouldn't
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 20:34 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> I've been struggling a little bit with converting tests from
> testautomation/math/required/includes/m_002_.inc e.g. tmEditMarker into
> a build-time cppunit test
Figured this out now. Can test SmEditWindow standalone now.
C.
__
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 15:48 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> Cheers,
Looks good, pushed, thanks for that.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 15:14 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> Cheers,
Looks good to me. Pushed this. Thanks.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 16:34 +0200, timo wrote:
> Hopefully works for you!
Yes, all looks good. Now pushed, thanks for this.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 23:33 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another cleanup on base.
Looks good, pushed this. Thanks.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Cheers,
Wol
>From fa312399900437d13fabc456c851be6f971ab3d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wol
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:47:37 +
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] More comment deletions
---
reportdesign/source/ui/report/DesignView.cxx |4
reportdesign/source/ui/report/ReportController.cxx |
Cheers,
Wol
>From 804f503777bff780d82226f37843f3b614a5d5f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wol
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:10:42 +
Subject: [PATCH] More deleted comments
../../../dbaccess/source/core/misc/0001-More-translations-and-comment-deletion-for-Base.patch
---
reportdesign/sourc
Hopefully works for you!
Timo
--
.../controller/drawinglayer/DrawViewWrapper.cxx| 38
.../itemsetwrapper/AxisItemConverter.cxx |2 -
.../CharacterPropertyItemConverter.cxx |9 -
.../itemsetwrapper/DataPointItemConverter.cxx |1
Hi,
Another cleanup on base.
Cheers,
-- Takeshi Abe
>From 63a8fe4b01f142df496219baa85bd64204382bfe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Takeshi Abe
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:29:33 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Remove undesirable comments
---
.../source/core/dataaccess/databasecontext.cxx |2 +-
dba
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 02:13:49PM +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:39:22PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky
> wrote:
> > So you propose to rename rawbuild to bootstrap, when the build-based
> > method is used, right? As only the distro maintainers are the potential
> > users for thi
Hi,
this time a brief summary of what happened the 9th week on LibreOffice
repos and two living branches:
bugfixes-master-week-47.txt lists all commits that reference a proper
bug id (from a variety of trackers - #i... referring to the OpenOffice
issuezilla, fdo# to freedesktop, rhbz# to RedHat b
Petr Mladek wrote:
> I like the idea about adding libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org into CC
> of the meta bug. IMHO, it is worth to have the discussion about blocker
> bugs on the dev mailing list. Others might help to provide more details
> if we are in doubts...
>
> Thorsten, Kendy, others, wha
Hello,
I reproduced the segmentation fault with the same file
(blibs-gui/vcl/source/helper/canvasbitmap.cxx) by activating
"enable=all" for cppcheck.
I made a tracker on cppcheck (#2252
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/cppcheck/ticket/2252).
Julien.
__
Hi Miklos,
On 2010-11-29 at 14:13 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> > So you propose to rename rawbuild to bootstrap, when the build-based
> > method is used, right? As only the distro maintainers are the potential
> > users for this, I am taking this to the ML; but I suppose nobody is
> > going to b
Joe Smith wrote:
> I've looked at the code a bit, and it seems like there is indeed only one
> point
> of contact with the rest of the suite, textsearch.cxx, which handles all types
> of text searches (normal, regexp & fuzzy), and calls Regexpr::re_search(),
> which
> calls re_match2() to run the
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:39:22PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> So you propose to rename rawbuild to bootstrap, when the build-based
> method is used, right? As only the distro maintainers are the potential
> users for this, I am taking this to the ML; but I suppose nobody is
> going to be agai
Hi Norbert,
On 2010-11-27 at 18:50 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> 18:25:23 shm_get kendy: I pushed a new branch: merging the work we did
> on your branch + stuff the integrate with the build repo
> 18:26:18 shm_get kendy: we I did not feel confident enough to push
> directly to master... there
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:34 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Oh nice; not something I had noticed. Can we do a big global hunt & fix
> for all these instances ?
cppcheck lists these for us, hmm, at least cppcheck *was* listing them
for us. Until very recently http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.co
Yi Fan Jiang píše v So 27. 11. 2010 v 19:07 -0700:
> Hi Petr,
>
> The blocker criteria would be quite useful ;-) Thank you!
>
> For the process to nominate a blocker, is there a specific reason to
> report a nomination
> twice (1 in mailing list, 2 in bugzilla)?
>
>
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 02:20 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
> During the Easy Hacking, I have enjoyed ton of "occured" occurred and
> some occurrences of "occurance" in the code base.
> Why not come and join with `git grep -i occured` if you get tired of
> working hard in a miserable world ;)
>
> Well,
Hi there,
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 06:57 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> > So - I tend to think that time will tell if we need to change this. The
> > seven day period seems long to me.
>
> Seven days is a not so long period when you have to organize manual testing.
> As you can see with OOo
Hi Peter,
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 19:15 +0100, Peter Lairo wrote:
> Well, in the English version, unfortunately they are not localized. It's
> kinda ironic. We are stuck with A A A (which isn't even an interesting
> acronym: "American Automobile Association").
Again; if you can spend the
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 17:29 +, Andrew wrote:
> I wouldn't worry about it getting into Ubuntu. At UDS it was confirmed
> that LibreOffice would be in the default install, as well as Mark
> Shuttleworth saying it would replace OpenOffice.
And - I guess more positively; we have high hope
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 21:02 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> As Takeshi pointed out in another mail, the postfix form returns a copy
> of the iterator as it was before the increment, while the prefix form
> returns a reference to the current value after its increment. So postfix
> requires an extra
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 01:36 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> That is my "baby" :-) - it is for all distros that support the
> freedesktop specifications/recommendations.
Nice work :-)
> Nowadays more or less every distro follows them/supports them, so that
> one should be usable on any
Hi Jonathan,
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 07:41 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Funny you post this on the list i was asking about optimization of LO in
> irc the other day.
Great ;-) the more minds we have on the problem the better I think.
> Thanks for this interesting read :)
My
50 matches
Mail list logo
