Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] LO status bar annoyances

2010-12-04 Thread Wols Lists
On 30/11/10 15:24, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 16:11 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: >> Kohei Yoshida wrote: b) We warn when closing a modified doc anyway, so there is no need to always warn me and use up precious space. I propose to just do away with it.

Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] LO status bar annoyances

2010-12-04 Thread Wols Lists
On 30/11/10 16:25, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > I too think that the title bar would be the most logical place to put > this info if we were to find a replacement location. But I'm not sure > if it can be easily identified by those users who currently rely on the > save icon status. The save icon is bi

Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject) -> is one PATCH to clean code at impress.

2010-12-04 Thread Kayo Hamid
Sorry, some times it happens. --- Em dom, 5/12/10, Kayo Hamid escreveu: De: Kayo Hamid Assunto: [Libreoffice] (no subject) Para: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org Data: Domingo, 5 de Dezembro de 2010, 1:32 Covering sd/source/{filter,helper}. Someone can look if I build the patch in a correct

[Libreoffice] Developers, Designers and Vice Versa?

2010-12-04 Thread Christoph Noack
(Note: This mail is cross-posted to both libreoff...@... and des...@...) Hi all, just a short question - is there anybody of you (developers) on the Design mailing list as well? I'm curious, because people (there) start to discuss ideas and sometimes it would be great to get instant feedback on t

Re: [Libreoffice] "bad value (atom) for -mtune= switch" on boostrap build

2010-12-04 Thread Takeshi Abe
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 16:52:23 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Takeshi Abe wrote: (snip) >> $ gcc --version >> gcc (Debian 4.4.5-8) 4.4.5 >> Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is N

Re: [Libreoffice] High contrast issue

2010-12-04 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Andrew, hi all! Thanks for the HC graphics ... now the issue feels a bit more relaxed :-) However, I started to re-doing some of the graphics, but this might need a bit more time (or some people might jump in...). Thus, I added this to the current (and unfortunately till mixed, both marketing

[Libreoffice] FOSDEM DevRoom speakers wanted

2010-12-04 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hello, LibreOffice has its own DevRoom at this years' FOSDEM in Brussels. Our Call for Papers is still open. :-) Do you want to share your experience in starting to hack the code, or tell about the tweaks in your build environment, talk about the code changes you have done or those that you

Re: [Libreoffice] "bad value (atom) for -mtune= switch" on boostrap build

2010-12-04 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Takeshi Abe wrote: > Hi Norbert, > > On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 16:18:38 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud > wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Takeshi Abe wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> In recent bootstrap build I got an error as follows. >>> It seems something wrong happened with

Re: [Libreoffice] "bad value (atom) for -mtune= switch" on boostrap build

2010-12-04 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Takeshi Abe wrote: > Hi Norbert, > > On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 16:18:38 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud > wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Takeshi Abe wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> In recent bootstrap build I got an error as follows. >>> It seems something wrong happened with

Re: [Libreoffice] "bad value (atom) for -mtune= switch" on boostrap build

2010-12-04 Thread Takeshi Abe
Hi Norbert, On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 16:18:38 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Takeshi Abe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In recent bootstrap build I got an error as follows. >> It seems something wrong happened with mtune=atom, since my machine has flags >> like: >> $ grep '^flag

Re: [Libreoffice] Enable build of ure and extension

2010-12-04 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 01:32:45PM +, Wols Lists wrote: > On 04/12/10 12:57, Gert Faller wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Still working on the 'RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM' task and I have some > > problems. > > > > I've some changes left in : 'clone/ure', 'clone/extension', > > 'clone/filters/binfilte

Re: [Libreoffice] "bad value (atom) for -mtune= switch" on boostrap build

2010-12-04 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Takeshi Abe wrote: > Hi, > > In recent bootstrap build I got an error as follows. > It seems something wrong happened with mtune=atom, since my machine has flags > like: > $ grep '^flags' /proc/cpuinfo > flags               : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic

[Libreoffice] "bad value (atom) for -mtune= switch" on boostrap build

2010-12-04 Thread Takeshi Abe
Hi, In recent bootstrap build I got an error as follows. It seems something wrong happened with mtune=atom, since my machine has flags like: $ grep '^flags' /proc/cpuinfo flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 tm nx up pn

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified?

2010-12-04 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Wols Lists wrote: > Dunno how to fix it, but I think I've found out what's wrong with my > build ... the following is output from autogen > > checking whether to build with Java support... yes > checking for java... /usr/bin/java > checking the installed JDK... chec

Re: [Libreoffice] Scrolling while cursor on a note

2010-12-04 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Andy, all! Thanks for having a look at that - I've never experienced that issue. In fact, I cannot reproduce this issue on within OOo 3.2 (Oracle Version, on Ubuntu 10.04). But it's there in LibreOffice (running in VirtualBox, Ubuntu 9.04, no graphic acceleration). Maybe this helps ... Am Fre

[Libreoffice] Java build problem identified?

2010-12-04 Thread Wols Lists
Dunno how to fix it, but I think I've found out what's wrong with my build ... the following is output from autogen checking whether to build with Java support... yes checking for java... /usr/bin/java checking the installed JDK... checked (JDK 1.6.0_20) checking for target java bytecode version..

Re: [Libreoffice] binfilter and features...

2010-12-04 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 16:43 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > Would someone mind if I track down the call of such functions, remove > the calls and at the end remove the function? Sure, if you want. Watch out for virtual methods however, e.g. removing an empty virtual that overrides something

Re: [Libreoffice] crossing strange code: a little help

2010-12-04 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 21:22 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > With and without debugging option on, if the if is entered, then > this is an endless loop? Indeed. > Does it means that the IF is never taken? Logically that must be the case. Well, clearly its also possible that its to

Re: [Libreoffice] Enable build of ure and extension

2010-12-04 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 20:02 +0100, Gert Faller wrote: > Hi, > > well I've enabled many things, but no, 'make' does not see anything. > > Wathever, I've pushed two patches in binfilter (checked many times manually > and > with cppcheck) because with those two terminate 'RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARA

[Libreoffice] crossing strange code: a little help

2010-12-04 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Hi within filters/binfilter/bf_sw/source/core/txtnode/sw_thints.cxx line 955, I crossed this code construct: if() { . while (TRUE) { DBG_BF_ASSERT(0, "STRIP"); } } With and without debugging option on, if the if is entered, then this is an endless loop? Does it m

Re: [Libreoffice] Enable build of ure and extension

2010-12-04 Thread Gert Faller
Hi, well I've enabled many things, but no, 'make' does not see anything. Wathever, I've pushed two patches in binfilter (checked many times manually and with cppcheck) because with those two terminate 'RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in filters'. For 'ure' and 'extentions' I will try to enable build

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice-Plug-In for Netbeans?

2010-12-04 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi Kami, Am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2010, 17:28:13 schrieb Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai: > Which version of netbeans with which version of OOo plugin have you tried? I used Netbeans 6.8 - Build 101202 on openSuSE 11.3-x64 with the OOo-Plug-In 2.0.6. Regards, Andreas -- ## Developer LibreOffice ## Freie O

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice-Plug-In for Netbeans?

2010-12-04 Thread Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai
Title: Szalai Kálmán Which version of netbeans with which version of OOo plugin have you tried? KAMI 2010-12-04 17:13 keltezéssel, Andreas Mantke írta: Hi, there is already a Netbeans-Plug-In for OOo. But this plug-in doesn't work for me with LibreOffi

[Libreoffice] LibreOffice-Plug-In for Netbeans?

2010-12-04 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi, there is already a Netbeans-Plug-In for OOo. But this plug-in doesn't work for me with LibreOffice and it's SDK. Because of this I'm curious, if someone is working on such a plug-in for LibreOffice. Regards, Andreas -- ## Developer LibreOffice ## Freie Office-Suite für Linux, Mac, Window

Re: [Libreoffice] More java fun

2010-12-04 Thread Wols Lists
On 04/12/10 15:44, Wols Lists wrote: > On 04/12/10 14:13, Caolán McNamara wrote: >> On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 12:04 +, Wols Lists wrote: >>> ../../unxlngx6.pro/slo/nativethreadpool.o: In function >>> `Java_com_sun_star_lib_uno_environments_remote_NativeThreadPool_create': >>> nativethreadpool.cxx:(

Re: [Libreoffice] More java fun

2010-12-04 Thread Wols Lists
On 04/12/10 14:13, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 12:04 +, Wols Lists wrote: >> ../../unxlngx6.pro/slo/nativethreadpool.o: In function >> `Java_com_sun_star_lib_uno_environments_remote_NativeThreadPool_create': >> nativethreadpool.cxx:(.text+0x56c): undefined reference to >> `jv

[Libreoffice] binfilter and features...

2010-12-04 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Hi, currently trying to reduce the number of warning coming from binfilter, I found quite a lot functions like: func(var x) {} or func(var x) { ASSERT ("lksd") }. sometimes func (var x) {return false} Would someone mind if I track down the call of such functions, remove the calls and at the end re

Re: [Libreoffice] Enable build of ure and extension

2010-12-04 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 14:49 +0100, Gert Faller wrote: > For 'extension', make simply answers 'Presenter Screen build disabled' > and things like that. That one is likely --enable-ext-presenter-console anyway. If you look at the makefile.mk which spits out "build disabled" you should see above it t

Re: [Libreoffice] More java fun

2010-12-04 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 12:04 +, Wols Lists wrote: > ../../unxlngx6.pro/slo/nativethreadpool.o: In function > `Java_com_sun_star_lib_uno_environments_remote_NativeThreadPool_create': > nativethreadpool.cxx:(.text+0x56c): undefined reference to > `jvmaccess::VirtualMachine::VirtualMachine(_Jv_Java

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] making binfilter compiling again

2010-12-04 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 02:14 +0100, Gert Faller wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for that, I just changed lines as : No biggy. Building the binfilter by default got toggled off a day or two ago. You can autogen with --enable-binfilter to toggle building it on again. C.

[Libreoffice] (no subject)

2010-12-04 Thread Gert Faller
Hi, @Wol thanks for your answer. I've already configured with '--enable-binfilter'. binfilter builds except some sub-dirs 'bf_sd', 'bf_svx' and 'bf_xmloff' (and some others) and I have changes ready in there but not tested. For 'extension', make simply answers 'Presenter Screen build disabled' a

Re: [Libreoffice] Enable build of ure and extension

2010-12-04 Thread Wols Lists
On 04/12/10 12:57, Gert Faller wrote: > Hi, > > Still working on the 'RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM' task and I have some > problems. > > I've some changes left in : 'clone/ure', 'clone/extension', > 'clone/filters/binfilter/bf_sd', 'clone/filters/binfilter/bf_svx' and > 'clone/filters/binfilter/bf_x

[Libreoffice] Enable build of ure and extension

2010-12-04 Thread Gert Faller
Hi, Still working on the 'RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM' task and I have some problems. I've some changes left in : 'clone/ure', 'clone/extension', 'clone/filters/binfilter/bf_sd', 'clone/filters/binfilter/bf_svx' and 'clone/filters/binfilter/bf_xmloff' The problem is that, build is disabled in th

Re: [Libreoffice] occured occurred

2010-12-04 Thread Takeshi Abe
Hi, On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:35:29 +0900 (JST), Takeshi Abe wrote: > OK, I end up getting sane so that replacing them with git & sed has done > by the attached script. After runnging it on each git working dir and > double checking, I made up the attached patch with some tweaks. Sorry, I found mor

[Libreoffice] More java fun

2010-12-04 Thread Wols Lists
Hoping this'll give a bit more info to the build guys, but I tried the following ... autogen'd without java, make, then autogen'd with and make again ... I got an l10n problem at the start, but then it bombed out with this ... note the undefined reference ... Cheers, Wol Making:all_javavm.

Re: [Libreoffice] New bootstrap: another stop

2010-12-04 Thread Wols Lists
On 04/12/10 00:05, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi Wols, *, > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Wols Lists wrote: >> Replying to myself again ... >> >> And it appears to be a java problem ... changing the autogen arguments >> to --without-java and it's gone away ... > Sure that this is the reason,

[Libreoffice] config.log problem

2010-12-04 Thread Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai
Title: Szalai Kálmán Hi LibreOffice Hackers, I have got a problem with config.log configuration reusing with the old "build" method on libreoffice-3-3 branch: When run ./autogen.sh --with-lang="en-US de hu it fr" it stored as: --with-lang=en-US de hu it fr