Re: [Libreoffice] libreoffice -quickstart

2010-12-07 Thread David Tardon
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:19:02AM +0100, Miguel (ON) wrote: > Hi : ) > > I've noticed that a process is added at the startup when LibreOffice is > installed. The process is > > libreoffice -quickstart -nologo -nodefault > > and it must be removed in LibreOffice options ("enable quick start in S

[Libreoffice] Patch for Bug 32209 awaiting peer-review

2010-12-07 Thread Kohei Yoshida
I have another patch awaiting peer-review, to go into the 3.3 branch. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32209 This one makes one hard-coded English string (ouch) localizable. It's a simple change. I understand we are way past string freeze, but the worst case outcome will be the same

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch review for Bug 32196 requested

2010-12-07 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 21:38 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: >> > Hi Norbert, >> > >> > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 17:03 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Koh

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch review for Bug 32196 requested

2010-12-07 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 21:38 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > Hi Norbert, > > > > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 17:03 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > >> > I've attached a patch awaiting peer

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2010-12-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Kohei Yoshida changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|32209 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.fre

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2010-12-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Kohei Yoshida changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||32209 --- Comment #27 from Kohei Yoshida

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch review for Bug 32196 requested

2010-12-07 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Hi Norbert, > > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 17:03 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: >> > I've attached a patch awaiting peer-review. >> > >> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32196 >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: SmNodeToTextVisitor Fixes

2010-12-07 Thread Luke Dixon
Hello Jonas, > By the way, is the SmNodeToTextVisitor as good as it gets now? > Or is it possible to do more improvements ? and if so, should we leave > as an easy hack we or someone can pickup later? (if not lets remove it > from the wiki). > I don't know how good it is with regards to minimizing

[Libreoffice] libreoffice -quickstart

2010-12-07 Thread Miguel (ON)
Hi : ) I've noticed that a process is added at the startup when LibreOffice is installed. The process is libreoffice -quickstart -nologo -nodefault and it must be removed in LibreOffice options ("enable quick start in System Tray"). I would like to know if this issue is known by the developers

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch review for Bug 32196 requested

2010-12-07 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi Norbert, On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 17:03 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > I've attached a patch awaiting peer-review. > > > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32196 > > > > The change is simple and innocuous enough that I would a

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch review for Bug 32196 requested

2010-12-07 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > I've attached a patch awaiting peer-review. > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32196 > > The change is simple and innocuous enough that I would almost commit it > without review, but I'd like someone to take a quick look and give

[Libreoffice] Patch review for Bug 32196 requested

2010-12-07 Thread Kohei Yoshida
I've attached a patch awaiting peer-review. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32196 The change is simple and innocuous enough that I would almost commit it without review, but I'd like someone to take a quick look and give me a go. Thanks, Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2010-12-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Kohei Yoshida changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||32196 -- Configure bugmail: https://bug

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-07 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:45:28PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > http://help.libreoffice.org is now up and running. As explained above, > it is not open for public editing yet. Hi, I must miss something really trivial, but I do not see where to start reading. :) The only way to find pages fro

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2010-12-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 --- Comment #26 from Kohei Yoshida 2010-12-07 12:56:34 PST --- Nominating Bug 32196 (Data Form shows corrupted string) as a blocker. This is just ugly, plus the fix will be relatively safe and easy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesk

Re: [Libreoffice] 10th week development summary

2010-12-07 Thread Florian Effenberger
Thanks a lot! Petr Mladek wrote on 2010-12-07 16.21: Great idea! Any volunteer to implement some scripting around it?;-) I added this idea to the related easy task at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks#Weekly_summary_.2F_Release_summary -- Florian Effenberger Steering

Re: [Libreoffice] LibO download size [was: Comments on RC1]

2010-12-07 Thread Bernhard Dippold
Hi Michael, all, sorry for stepping in so late - my previous subscription to the libreoff...@freedesktop list didn't work (and I didn't have the time to search the archives) so I don't know if this has already been discussed... Michael Meeks schrieb: > [...] The rational here was to ensure th

Re: [Libreoffice] RC1 / size redux ...

2010-12-07 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-12-07 12:55, Michael Meeks a écrit : Hi there, So - as we all know, RC1 is too large; and there are a complicated set of reasons why that is so, which includes some tradeoff between install time disk space, download size[1], fairness between languages, mirror capacity, build and

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-07 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-12-07 12:44, Michael Meeks a écrit : So - how do you get data to your users ? as Tor says, if you are downloading 160Mb over a modem currently, 300Mb will take twice as long - but are you going to just sit there watching it ? After having lived through long downloads through

[Libreoffice] [rft 24] : nursing homes - 31, 589 senior administrators, 11, 288 nursing directors in over 14, 706 nursing homes (full contact info no emails)

2010-12-07 Thread bateau Burr
100% optin lists, Unlimited use rights Special List Pricing only until Friday: [ HEALTHCARE ] Any 4 lists below $319 - Individual List Price: $115 ea * Complete US Physicians Database * Chiropractic Doctors in the USA * American Holistic Medicine Providers/Clinics * General Dentists in the USA *

[Libreoffice] RC1 / size redux ...

2010-12-07 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, So - as we all know, RC1 is too large; and there are a complicated set of reasons why that is so, which includes some tradeoff between install time disk space, download size[1], fairness between languages, mirror capacity, build and up-load times, and so on and so on. An

Re: [Libreoffice] new bootstrap: How do the devellop[ install?

2010-12-07 Thread Joost Eekhoorn
Great, it works!! Joost 2010/12/7 Joost Eekhoorn > Yes, it is mentioned after ./configure > I was not sure what is was going to do, but that can be seen with "make -n > dev-install", which display what it is going to do, without doing it. > > Thanks, I will try it this evening. > > Joost > > 20

Re: [Libreoffice] Help on removing a DECLARE_LIST()

2010-12-07 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi Joseph, On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 06:37 -0800, Joseph Powers wrote: > Kohei, > > > Help! > > > From calc/sc/inc/rangelst.hxx: > > > typedef ScRange* ScRangePtr; > typedef ::std::vector< ScRangePtr > ScRangeListBase; > class SC_DLLPUBLIC ScRangeList : public ScRangeListBase, public > SvRefBase

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-07 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Olivier, On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 08:11 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote: > Oh please, lets for a moment think that LibreOffice is not restricted to > Europe-USA. Quite. The rational here was to ensure that everyone's language is treated equally. Incidentally, as an aside - the problem space

Re: [Libreoffice] Release tag convention

2010-12-07 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Petr Mladek wrote: > Hi, > > there is a proposal to use the tag "libreoffice-3.3.0.1" instead of > "LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1" and mention it in the LibreOffice/About dialog as > is. It is more clear and understandable. > > Would you mind if we do this change for LibO-3.3

Re: [Libreoffice] Release tag convention

2010-12-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:36:33PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > there is a proposal to use the tag "libreoffice-3.3.0.1" instead of > "LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1" and mention it in the LibreOffice/About dialog as > is. It is more clear and understandable. > > Would you mind if we do this change for LibO-3

Re: [Libreoffice] Release tag convention

2010-12-07 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 16:36 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > Hi, > > there is a proposal to use the tag "libreoffice-3.3.0.1" instead of > "LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1" and mention it in the LibreOffice/About dialog as > is. It is more clear and understandable. > > Would you mind if we do this change for LibO

Re: [Libreoffice] 10th week development summary

2010-12-07 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi Petr, On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 16:09 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > commit-log-libreoffice-3-3-week-48.txt, > bugfixes-libreoffice-3-3-week-48.txt lists the same summary for the > libreoffice-3-3 branch. I'm curious as to how this bugfix list is created. I ask because I've fixed 6 or 7 bugs during

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-documentation] Re: LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-07 Thread David Nelson
Hi Kendy, :-) On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 23:45, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi all, > > On 2010-12-06 at 17:04 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > >> Either way, the good news is that I am currently uploading the files, >> and I'll make the site online as soon as it finishes, and I do few >> trivial checks; i

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-07 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:58 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 16:45 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > > > http://help.libreoffice.org is now up and running. > > Can someone post the IP address of that site? For me, that leads to the > old go-ooo source code documentation by dox

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-07 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 16:45 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: >> >> http://help.libreoffice.org is now up and running. > > Can someone post the IP address of that site? help.libreoffice.org. 86365 IN A 195.135.221.70 ciao Ch

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-07 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 16:45 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > http://help.libreoffice.org is now up and running. Can someone post the IP address of that site? For me, that leads to the old go-ooo source code documentation by doxygen. It could be a DNS caching issue if we are trying to change th

Re: [Libreoffice] Release tag convention

2010-12-07 Thread Robert Nagy
sure On (2010-12-07 16:36), Petr Mladek wrote: > Hi, > > there is a proposal to use the tag "libreoffice-3.3.0.1" instead of > "LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1" and mention it in the LibreOffice/About dialog as > is. It is more clear and understandable. > > Would you mind if we do this change for LibO-3.3-r

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-07 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi all, On 2010-12-06 at 17:04 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Either way, the good news is that I am currently uploading the files, > and I'll make the site online as soon as it finishes, and I do few > trivial checks; it should be later today (ETA 5 more hours, I am > populating the database thr

[Libreoffice] Release tag convention

2010-12-07 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, there is a proposal to use the tag "libreoffice-3.3.0.1" instead of "LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1" and mention it in the LibreOffice/About dialog as is. It is more clear and understandable. Would you mind if we do this change for LibO-3.3-rc2? Note that the uppercase- and underscore-naming scheme co

Re: [Libreoffice] new bootstrap: quick stop

2010-12-07 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 07:17:28PM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Thomas Klausner wrote: > > I found the simplest fix for it: > > diff --git a/Makefile.in b/Makefile.in > > index 9e05c70..4fbbf4a 100644 > > --- a/Makefile.in > > +++ b/Makefile.in > > @@ -1,7 +1,7

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2010-12-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Bug 31865 depends on bug 32133, which changed state. Bug 32133 Summary: [RC1] overlapping controls on Tools - Options - General panel https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32133 What|Old Value |New Value -

Re: [Libreoffice] 10th week development summary

2010-12-07 Thread Petr Mladek
Florian Effenberger píše v Út 07. 12. 2010 v 16:11 +0100: > Hi, > > Petr Mladek wrote on 2010-12-07 16.09: > > > this time a brief summary of what happened the 10th week on LibreOffice > > repos and two living branches: > > thanks a lot for the summary! It would be cool if we could have those >

Re: [Libreoffice] 10th week development summary

2010-12-07 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi, Petr Mladek wrote on 2010-12-07 16.09: this time a brief summary of what happened the 10th week on LibreOffice repos and two living branches: thanks a lot for the summary! It would be cool if we could have those nice contributor graphs every week -- marketing is keen on it :-) Florian

[Libreoffice] 10th week development summary

2010-12-07 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, this time a brief summary of what happened the 10th week on LibreOffice repos and two living branches: bugfixes-master-week-48.txt lists all commits that reference a proper bug id (from a variety of trackers - #i... referring to the OpenOffice issuezilla, fdo# to freedesktop, rhbz# to RedHat

[Libreoffice] Help on removing a DECLARE_LIST()

2010-12-07 Thread Joseph Powers
Kohei, Help! From calc/sc/inc/rangelst.hxx: typedef ScRange* ScRangePtr; typedef ::std::vector< ScRangePtr > ScRangeListBase; class SC_DLLPUBLIC ScRangeList : public ScRangeListBase, public SvRefBase { ... } I'm changing the definition of ScRangeListBase from a DECLARE_

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-07 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Tor they wont, but what if they need a quick solution for something they need to work on at work, the could be in a lot of trouble. On 12/07/2010 01:24 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: Does it really matter a lot if downloading the LibreOffice installer takes four or eight hours on some specific slow

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-07 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Marc you mentioned a lack of a spell checker. what bout on any OS using another dictionary like Aspell or something of the sort? On 12/07/2010 07:33 AM, Marc Paré wrote: Le 2010-12-06 17:10, Michael Meeks a écrit : ingos usWell - we are looking again at how best to re-package it. The 'obvi

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-07 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Chris, Jean-Baptiste, all, Chris Carpenter wrote (07-12-10 06:26) On 12/06/2010 05:15 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: Why not grouping all installation tasks in the language pack ? 1/ the user download the language pack he want 2/ he installs this language pack and its installer ask the use

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

2010-12-07 Thread David Tardon
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:39:19PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi David, > > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:54 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > > > I think the simplest thing here is to run SessionManagerClient::open > > > when initializing the quickstarter (the function is exported, so there > > > should

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for dbaccess/source/ui/dlg

2010-12-07 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 12:53 +, Noel Power wrote: > presumeably RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM would try to take sizeof( > ConstAsciiString ) in that case Soon enough I'll commit in a compile time test that will catch if that happens by accident. Though it can only be enabled with gcc 4.5.0 and

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for dbaccess/source/ui/dlg

2010-12-07 Thread Noel Power
Hi Julien On 06/12/10 21:40, Julien Nabet wrote: Hello, Here's a small patch for dbaccess/source/ui/dlg This is a strange one, it seems SERVICE_UI_FOLDERPICKER is not a simple const char but an instance of ConstAsciiString ( defined in dbaccess/source/inc/constasciistring.hxx ) so I changed t

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-07 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi, On 07/12/2010 15:24, Tor Lillqvist wrote: Does it really matter a lot if downloading the LibreOffice installer takes four or eight hours on some specific slow connection? Are people going to sit by the computer staring at the download progress bar doing nothing else during the time? Yes,

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

2010-12-07 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi David, On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:54 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > > I think the simplest thing here is to run SessionManagerClient::open > > when initializing the quickstarter (the function is exported, so there > > should be no problem with that), but there might be a cleaner solution. > > What

Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] Some dirty stuffs around styles in calc

2010-12-07 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi again, (after a short lunch, a second thought ;-) ) Christoph Noack wrote (06-12-10 23:54) Example 1.1: Simple Dialog If a protected cell style shall be changed, a dialog is raised to explain that it is used on a protected sheet. Nothing can be changed (or even v

Re: [Libreoffice] new bootstrap: How do the devellop[ install?

2010-12-07 Thread Joost Eekhoorn
Yes, it is mentioned after ./configure I was not sure what is was going to do, but that can be seen with "make -n dev-install", which display what it is going to do, without doing it. Thanks, I will try it this evening. Joost 2010/12/7 Sebastian Spaeth > On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:39:41 +0100, Joos

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-07 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Does it really matter a lot if downloading the LibreOffice installer takes four or eight hours on some specific slow connection? Are people going to sit by the computer staring at the download progress bar doing nothing else during the time? --tml _

Re: [Libreoffice] new bootstrap: How do the devellop[ install?

2010-12-07 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:39:41 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > bin/ooinstall is not mentioned on the new webpage. yep, I removed it. > Can you mention "make dev-install" on the webpage? Done, although everything going beyond there real basic instructions is supposed to be in the w

Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] Some dirty stuffs around styles in calc

2010-12-07 Thread Cor Nouws
Christoph Noack wrote (06-12-10 23:54) Example 1.2: Introducing Some Good Manner Like Example 1.2 plus: The restrictions only apply to the cell styles that are really used on protected sheets. All remaining cell styles work like usual. Mind the inheritance of style

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2010-12-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Tor Lillqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||31716 --- Comment #25 from Tor Lillqvist

Re: [Libreoffice] config.log problem

2010-12-07 Thread Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai
Hi, Sorry, probably my mistake, but when I edited config log manually the ./autgen.sh has picked up. I am trying it now by adding new --with-parameter and autogen.sh got it... Regards, KAMI On 12/07/2010 11:29 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> I have got a problem with config.log configuration reusin

Re: [Libreoffice] config.log problem

2010-12-07 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> I have got a problem with config.log configuration reusing with the old > "build" method on libreoffice-3-3 branch: > > When run ./autogen.sh --with-lang="en-US de hu it fr" > it stored as: > --with-lang=en-US de hu it fr config.log is a log file. Just for information. The command line is not

Re: [Libreoffice] Developers, Designers and Vice Versa?

2010-12-07 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Christoph, On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 01:22 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: > just a short question - is there anybody of you (developers) on the > Design mailing list as well? I'm curious, because people (there) start > to discuss ideas and sometimes it would be great to get instant feedback > on the

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-07 Thread Olivier Hallot
Oh please, lets for a moment think that LibreOffice is not restricted to Europe-USA. I may reconsider strongly to follow LO if Broadband is a luxury in everyelse country I know. Including Brazil, where it is scandalously expensive and available to a very few of the richest in large cities. S

Re: [Libreoffice] new bootstrap: How do the devellop[ install?

2010-12-07 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Joost, On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 09:19 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > I have build on a new installed Ubuntu (because of harddisk problems). Phew :-) sorry pardon, I've been meaning to get back to you wrt. the analysis of your strace of the failed build, and still not got to it (sorry) - r

Re: [Libreoffice] new bootstrap: How do the devellop[ install?

2010-12-07 Thread Wols Lists
On 07/12/10 09:39, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > bin/ooinstall is not mentioned on the new webpage. > > Can you mention "make dev-install" on the webpage? > Can you also mention it in the bash, when the build is ready? Is there an autogen option to tell it where to install? I'm sure th

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

2010-12-07 Thread David Tardon
> The problem is that SessionManagerClient is only initialized with the > first sal frame (IOW, GtkSalFrame::Show calls > SessionManagerClient::open). Obviously, if there has never been any > frame opened, which, I suppose, happens in a lot of cases, this hadn't > happened. So the app is not aware

Re: [Libreoffice] new bootstrap: How do the devellop[ install?

2010-12-07 Thread Joost Eekhoorn
Hi Sebastian, bin/ooinstall is not mentioned on the new webpage. Can you mention "make dev-install" on the webpage? Can you also mention it in the bash, when the build is ready? Thanks for your quick responce. Joost 2010/12/7 Sebastian Spaeth > On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:19:52 +0100, Joost Eekhoo

Re: [Libreoffice] How to commit commit-hook?

2010-12-07 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:29:25AM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > .git/hooks/pre-commit uses "/usr/bin/perl -w" as shebang instead of > "/usr/bin/env perl". When I change it and try to commit, git tells me > the file is unknown. How can I change it? Found it, it's in git-hooks. Doh :) Thomas __

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

2010-12-07 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 09:53 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > Bah, the header where it's declared is not public :( Make it public then :-) C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreo

Re: [Libreoffice] new bootstrap: How do the devellop[ install?

2010-12-07 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:19:52 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > Now I want to do something like: > bin/ooinstall -l /home/joost/work/libretest > > But there is no bin/ooinstall ooinstall should actually be available in the path after a build as the Linux*.sh file gets sourced during build. But it's

[Libreoffice] How to commit commit-hook?

2010-12-07 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! .git/hooks/pre-commit uses "/usr/bin/perl -w" as shebang instead of "/usr/bin/env perl". When I change it and try to commit, git tells me the file is unknown. How can I change it? Thomas ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.or

[Libreoffice] BOOL conflict

2010-12-07 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! I'm building with external iodbc (3.52.7) and it fails with: /usr/pkg/include/iodbcunix.h:136: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef int BOOL' .../libreoffice/solver/330/unxbsdx3.pro/inc/tools/solar.h:58: error: 'BOOL' has a previous declaration as 'typedef sal_Bool BOOL' Suggestions? Th

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

2010-12-07 Thread David Tardon
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 09:34:52AM +0100, David Tardon wrote: > The problem is that SessionManagerClient is only initialized with the > first sal frame (IOW, GtkSalFrame::Show calls > SessionManagerClient::open). Obviously, if there has never been any > frame opened, which, I suppose, happens in a

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

2010-12-07 Thread David Tardon
Hi, Michael, On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:59:17PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi David, > > On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 15:18 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:08:36PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > > > Really ? as soon as the X server dies, we'll get all manner of XErrors > >

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-07 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Michael, On 07/12/2010 01:10, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Sophie& Wols, On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:57 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: Like some other members of the L10n project, I'm not very happy with the RC1 we provided: :-) - the Windows multilanguage installer is really a pain when

[Libreoffice] new bootstrap: How do the devellop[ install?

2010-12-07 Thread Joost Eekhoorn
I have build on a new installed Ubuntu (because of harddisk problems). The 2 build threads are ready without errors, but there is not the message in the bash-shell that it is all OK. Now I want to do something like: bin/ooinstall -l /home/joost/work/libretest But there is no bin/ooinstall How mu

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-07 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-12-06 17:10, Michael Meeks a écrit : Well - we are looking again at how best to re-package it. The 'obvious' solutions are not very pleasant ones though. So - with only ten languages (all of my Catalan, Hungarian, friends start screaming) - we can cover some huge proportion o