[Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove commented code in connectivity/workben/testmoz/main.cxx

2010-12-18 Thread Julien Nabet
Hello, Here is a patch for removing commented code in connectivity/workben/testmoz/main.cxx Julien. (LGPLv3+ / MPL) commit 4cb5ca82032dfd7cb0c3deb784790f1587046500 Author: serval Date: Sun Dec 19 08:45:42 2010 +0100 Removing commented code diff --git a/connectivity/workben/testmoz/ma

Re: [Libreoffice] sw: numbering misbehaviour

2010-12-18 Thread Wols Lists
On 17/12/10 20:28, Caolán McNamara wrote: > Btw, if you were interested in fixing that numbering problem, You might > be interested in this similar bug, e.g. > > 1) Type some text, select it, change the formatting, e.g. font size to 18. > Now press end to deselect the text and move to the end of th

Re: [Libreoffice] backport bad copy ctor fix, missing slide color transitions to 3.3

2010-12-18 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Caolan McNamara wrote: > 963c6b655032b4e5d0f26555f3c26a129a9efb03 in slideshow. The RGBColor copy > constructor is wrong, which means that colors in e.g. font color > transitions are always black to black, i.e. transitions appear to get > lost. > > I reckon we should stick this into 3.3, what do y

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] call-catcher / bloat removal in sc module part1

2010-12-18 Thread Julien Nabet
Le 18/12/2010 19:47, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit : On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:07 AM, Julien Nabet wrote: Le 18/12/2010 03:28, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit : On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Julien Nabetwrote: Hello, Remove call-catcher / bloat removal with sc module Compiling

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Remove unused code

2010-12-18 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 14:06 +0100, Anders Jonsson wrote: > Some more blocks of unused code in libs-gui and libs-core. All have been > commented out since at least 2006. All looks good, into the bin with it, thanks for this. Pushed now. C. ___ LibreOffi

Re: [Libreoffice] helpcontent2.zip not found, and can't be made

2010-12-18 Thread imacat
Caolán McNamara said: > On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 01:11 +0800, imacat wrote: >> On 2010/12/18 20:42, Caolán McNamara said: >>> On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 11:44 +0800, imacat wrote: >>> Honestly, this sounds like the same problem you had back in the >>> beginning with a missing/empty l10n clone dir. I though

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] call-catcher / bloat removal in sc module part1

2010-12-18 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:07 AM, Julien Nabet wrote: > Le 18/12/2010 03:28, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit : >> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Julien Nabet  wrote: >> >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Remove call-catcher / bloat removal with sc module >>> Compiling sc was ok. >>> >> >> The .bz2 format means o

Re: [Libreoffice] sw: numbering misbehaviour

2010-12-18 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 23:54 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > I brute-forcedly narrowed it down to the following patch, but I'm REALLY > unsure of it. Well, firstly that's awesome work, 99% of the battle is generally finding the code in the first place. > I don't know I should change it to FALSE (

Re: [Libreoffice] [Windows Build] Oh man, please, help-me.

2010-12-18 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 09:21 -0800, Kayo Hamid wrote: > > and, again.. ./autogen.sh --disable-mozilla > --with-psdk-home=/cygdrive/c/psdk/ > > Result? Nothing... Why? I do not know. And the Wiki don't told me > anything about this. AND, i can't go ahead. Just FYI, I have this in my configure scr

[Libreoffice] backport bad copy ctor fix, missing slide color transitions to 3.3

2010-12-18 Thread Caolán McNamara
963c6b655032b4e5d0f26555f3c26a129a9efb03 in slideshow. The RGBColor copy constructor is wrong, which means that colors in e.g. font color transitions are always black to black, i.e. transitions appear to get lost. I reckon we should stick this into 3.3, what do you think ? C. >From 963c6b655032b4

Re: [Libreoffice] Change executable/sh names

2010-12-18 Thread NoOp
On 12/18/2010 03:48 AM, Jesús Corrius wrote: >> Right-click the .odt and select 'Open With' (WinXPPro); the 'Programs' >> window shows only option for LibO, not OOo. It does show options for >> Word if MS Word is installed and has the odf converter installed. I've >> repeated this on my WinXPro VM

[Libreoffice] [Windows Build] Oh man, please, help-me.

2010-12-18 Thread Kayo Hamid
So, hello guys, i'm trying to build LO at Windows and i know that anyone of us don't like to see it, but i really, --really--, needs help to do it because i can't, today, do it alone. The facts:  - LO Build Page not solve the problem, she says 'hey, my FRIEND, you only need to download your li

Re: [Libreoffice] Improved man page

2010-12-18 Thread Philipp Weissenbacher
Hi Takeshi, Thanks for your suggestions. I tried to incorporate them into the attached new version. Cheers, -- Philipp On 18 December 2010 07:20, Takeshi Abe wrote: > Hi Philipp, > > On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:30:18 +0100, Philipp Weissenbacher > wrote: >> As I've promised on IRC some time ago,

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] call-catcher / bloat removal in sc module part1

2010-12-18 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 09:07:49AM +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > I put in this zip the 2 last patches I sent. > Just for my information, would the format tar.gz have been an obstacle too ? Please just attach your patches and do not compress them. Doing so makes inline comments for patches impossi

Re: [Libreoffice] hsqldb update

2010-12-18 Thread Denny
Am Mittwoch, 15. Dezember 2010, 13:49:57 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:27:16AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > So 2.0 will even more break... (Besides that it probably will need many > > adaptions) > > Note that OOo already works on that; see cws hsqldb19. The amou

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove unused code

2010-12-18 Thread Anders Jonsson
Some more blocks of unused code in libs-gui and libs-core. All have been commented out since at least 2006. Anders Jonsson (LGPLv3+,MPL) 0001-Remove-large-blocks-of-commented-code.patch Description: application/mbox 0002-Remove-large-blocks-of-commented-code.patch Description: application/mbo

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for framework properties

2010-12-18 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 02:41 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > Hello, > > Here is a patch for properties.h of framework > framework compiles ok. Looks good, thanks for this. Pushed. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://li

Re: [Libreoffice] Error compilation in vcl module

2010-12-18 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 00:40 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > Hello, > > After a : > ./autogen.sh && make clean && make > it works now ! > Thank you ! Next time i'll try to think about ./autogen.sh && make > before adding make clean With a bit of luck the recent changes to the toplevel Makefile will

Re: [Libreoffice] helpcontent2.zip not found, and can't be made

2010-12-18 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 11:44 +0800, imacat wrote: > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making > /usr/local/src/libreoffice-3.3.0.1-zh_TW-20101216/build/libreoffice-3.3.0.1/sysui/util > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making > /usr/local/src/libreoffice-3.3.0.1-zh_TW-20101216/build/libreoffice-3.3.0

Re: [Libreoffice] Change executable/sh names

2010-12-18 Thread Jesús Corrius
> Right-click the .odt and select 'Open With' (WinXPPro); the 'Programs' > window shows only option for LibO, not OOo. It does show options for > Word if MS Word is installed and has the odf converter installed. I've > repeated this on my WinXPro VM by: > > 1. Uninstalling all instances of OOo and

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Embedded parts and wikihelp/HC2

2010-12-18 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
On the new features page at test site I think this should be changed: - Made Help system available via the WikiHelp; into: Made Help system also available via the WikiHelp; Having Help system just available via the WikiHelp is not a feature but a stolen feature. What's the news on the localizatio

Re: [Libreoffice] Extensions manager improvement

2010-12-18 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
Hi Caolán, I did a pull to check the files you said, but the project structure changed dramatically. This is a exponential growth :-D Where is the working tree? I think is bootstrap/clone/, correct? I'm trying to find desktop/source/deployment/gui in build directory too, but without success. --