> -// OD 09.01.2003 #i6467# - adjust view shell option to the same as for
> print
> +// adjust view shell option to the same as for print
We generally want to leave the #iX#-style comments around, as they
point to the publicly accessible OpenOffice.org issue tracker. OTOH, the
#X#
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 16:38 -0500, drew wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 20:40 +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
>
> Updated readme file attached.
Well, sorry for the static noise on that - in pulling files together for
a distribution disc (as it seemed to be the day for everyone to do that)
I see now th
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 02:52:24AM +0300, Alexander wrote:
> When user insert formula, LO can be use LaTeX and make vector graphics (SVG ?
> Or may be EPS),
> keep LaTeX source, put vector graphics in ODx and display it. This does
> system-independent.
>
> In ODx can keep preamble and user can e
Hi!
Is there any possibility to build the LibreOffice under the FreeBSD?
Now I get this error:
Config: --disable-binfilter --disable-crashdump --with-lang=""
--disable-fetch-external --with-vba-package-format=builtin --disable-epm
--with-openldap --with-build-version="tag libreoffice-3.3.0.
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 22:36 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > To me it looks a bit ugly, but it could be just a question of replacing
> > the binaries/files that differ from last version. I don't know enough
> > about this to say if it's a Good Idea or a Bad Idea (tm)
>
> Inherently unreliable. The
On 31/01/11 10:32, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Ron House wrote:
On 28/01/11 17:14, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
[...]
I assume that's about right. But:
git-checkout libreoffice-3.3.0 origin/libreoffice-3.3.0
Said:
error: pathspec 'libreoffice-3.3.0' did not match a
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Enrico Weigelt schrieb:
>> * Jesús Corrius schrieb:
>>
>> > > Actually, I'm think I'm quite well informed, and I'm really
>> > > *serious* about this.
>> >
>> > Windows is not an old legacy platform.
>>
>> It is. Look at their concepts w
* Enrico Weigelt schrieb:
> * Jesús Corrius schrieb:
>
> > > Actually, I'm think I'm quite well informed, and I'm really
> > > *serious* about this.
> >
> > Windows is not an old legacy platform.
>
> It is. Look at their concepts which are outdated for decades.
And look at their development t
* Caolán McNamara schrieb:
> That's the argument in favour for using --with-system-libs and its
> definitely the right choice for distros.
The right choice for everybody who's not completely lobotomized ;-P
> Little bit trickier when putting on a ISV hat and trying to target
> all Linux distros
* Jesús Corrius schrieb:
> > Actually, I'm think I'm quite well informed, and I'm really
> > *serious* about this.
>
> Windows is not an old legacy platform.
It is. Look at their concepts which are outdated for decades.
cu
--
--
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Tor Lillqvist schrieb:
>> > For old legacy platforms like Windows, prefix distros frameworks
>> > like cygwin could be used.
>>
>> Hopefully you are not serious, just uninformed.
>
> Actually, I'm think I'm quite well informed, and I'm re
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Ron House wrote:
> On 28/01/11 17:14, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
[...]
>
> I assume that's about right. But:
>
> git-checkout libreoffice-3.3.0 origin/libreoffice-3.3.0
>
> Said:
>
> error: pathspec 'libreoffice-3.3.0' did not match any file(s) known to git.
> error:
* Tor Lillqvist schrieb:
> > For old legacy platforms like Windows, prefix distros frameworks
> > like cygwin could be used.
>
> Hopefully you are not serious, just uninformed.
Actually, I'm think I'm quite well informed, and I'm really
*serious* about this.
cu
--
On 28/01/11 17:14, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Ron House wrote:
Hi, sorry for a beginner's question, but I downloaded the libreoffice code
base from git about a month ago, and I want to update it to be the same as
the recently released version 3.3 without having to
> For old legacy platforms like Windows, prefix distros frameworks
> like cygwin could be used.
Hopefully you are not serious, just uninformed.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/l
On 30.01.2011 22:51, Guillaume wrote:
Can someone explain me why my patch has not been pushed ?
If I were wrong somewhere, I don't want to make the same mistake twice.
It was my first (really easy/small) patch, to learn how to procede fine.
__
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 22:26 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Caolán McNamara schrieb:
>
> > For a distro build configuring with --with-system-libs will generally
> > do-the-right-thing.
>
> What happens when the software depends on some ancient, long solved
> bug that's maybe still in the old bu
Can someone explain me why my patch has not been pushed ?
If I were wrong somewhere, I don't want to make the same mistake twice.
It was my first (really easy/small) patch, to learn how to procede fine.
--- Begin Message ---
Hi, I removed some empty lines in few files for my first patch.
I'll conti
* Arno Teigseth schrieb:
> Someone pointed out that on linux, the distribution is (can be)
> package-based, so that he would avoid that.
ACK. But that still requires some refactoring of the whole build
process. See the thread on removing 3rdparty packages as a first start.
For old legacy platfo
* Arno Teigseth schrieb:
> I guess it would be different if the whole windows system was set up
> with packages, with version controls and "this-package-depends-on"
> stuff. And real super-user privileges that normal lusers could not take
> on...
I really wonder why Windows still has no proper p
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 10:51 +0100, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> Hello good people, could someone review and cherry-pick
done.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 01:35 +0100, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this removes the unreadVariable lame_frame_size
> in ./filters/filter/source/flash/swfwriter.cxx
lame_get_framesize seems to have no side-effects, so can be removed
entirely rather than just discard its unused return value.
Yup,
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 20:40 +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
> 2011.01.30. 19:53 keltezéssel, drew írta:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Received a message from a user today regarding the install instructions
> > within the en_US readme file covering Mandriva:
> >
> > 'Doing commands like "su urpmi *.rpm" won't work;
* Caolán McNamara schrieb:
> For a distro build configuring with --with-system-libs will generally
> do-the-right-thing.
What happens when the software depends on some ancient, long solved
bug that's maybe still in the old bundled version ? You'll have to
support both the ancient bundled and th
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 01:11 +0100, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> hi,
>
> this removes unread variable pTargetPage
> from ./impress/sd/source/core/drawdoc2.cxx
It does, but do we know for a fact that it should be
-pTargetPage = GetSdPage(nPage, PK_STANDARD);
and not
-pTargetPage = GetSdPage(nPage, PK_
Hi,
lines already striked out in the list.
Christina
>From c81b66bcbbb4179d64815ecdcc744267c8e999af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christina Rossmanith
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:23:57 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Easy hacks: removed double line spacing
---
.../source/config/svt_extendedsecurityopti
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 22:49 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> Just done a ./g pull -r followed by make, and I'm getting the following :-(
do a
export VERBOSE=true
and follow the build how-to at the end of the message and post that data
what this suggests is that the dir with libjawt.so in it is not in y
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 22:44 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
> ... forgot to attach the patch in my previous posting.
Pushed the removal of unused headers. I'm sort of wary, against the
removal of the admittedly odd /*N*/, /*?*/ lines in binfilter because
a) there are *so* many of them
b) there
* Francois Tigeot schrieb:
> Should LO be including 3rd party software to facilitate the work of people who
> don't know what they are doing ?
At the cost of everybody else ? (from devs through package/dist maintainers
to end users who all have to waste lots of their resources)
> > But I do thi
* Tor Lillqvist schrieb:
> Please, are you talking about third-party source code included
> in the LibreOffice source code (git repositories), source code
> downloaded as part of the build process (unless one tells it
> to use a "system" library), or binaries from either of those
> included in a
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 22:30 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll strike out the files I've fixed on the list.
Pushed, thanks for this.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/l
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 18:03 +, Andy Holder wrote:
> More simple cpp check clean ups.
All looks good, thanks for these, pushed.
The methods whose return values were taken but unused don't seem to have
any other side effects so appears that removing them, rather than just
not taking their retur
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 14:00 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> one of the things which always unnverved me most in OO is the fact
> that it ships own copies of dozens of standard 3rd-party packages,
> often very outdated and patched-to-death.
For a distro build configuring with --wi
Hi,
is there a reason why you don't use "git submodule" for managing the
other repos in the build repo?
Greetings
Tobias
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
2011.01.30. 19:53 keltezéssel, drew írta:
> Hi,
>
> Received a message from a user today regarding the install instructions
> within the en_US readme file covering Mandriva:
>
> 'Doing commands like "su urpmi *.rpm" won't work; it either has to be
> "sudo urpmi *.rpm" or "su -c urpmi *.rpm"'
su
Hi,
Received a message from a user today regarding the install instructions
within the en_US readme file covering Mandriva:
'Doing commands like "su urpmi *.rpm" won't work; it either has to be
"sudo urpmi *.rpm" or "su -c urpmi *.rpm"'
I have never used Mandriva so don't know and thought I'd as
On 01/29/11 14:35, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> 2011/1/28 Michael Meeks
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 20:55 +0100, Kenneth Venken wrote:
>>> these patches remove some comments
>>> from ./filters/binfilter/bf_svx/source/editeng/svx_editobj.cxx and
>>
>> I've pushed these two.
>>
>>
Hey, I have found a strange bug. I don't know where there is the right
place, so I put it here.
I have an document written in MS Office 2007 (docx) witch can't be opened
in SOME cases:
- Opening it in LibreOffice 3.3 (or OO.org 3.3 RC 9) under Linux
=> works well
- Opening it in OpenOffice 3.2
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 09:25 -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > Now, is it possible/interesting to have such a feature, that people can
> > download "fixes" (Microsoft would call them hotfixes) to Libreoffice?
>
> "hotfixes" are a completely different technology, not suitable for upgrades
> of large
> Now, is it possible/interesting to have such a feature, that people can
> download "fixes" (Microsoft would call them hotfixes) to Libreoffice?
"hotfixes" are a completely different technology, not suitable for upgrades of
large complex software libe OOo or LibreOffice at all.
What exists, and
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Arno Teigseth wrote:
> A microsoft fanboy/employee complains on a norwegian discussion site
> that "you have to download the whole openoffice to upgrade or to fix
> problems"
+1
I agree that the idea making small patch / bug fix / enhancement and a
service pack
i
Hi
This might be the correct list to post this:
A microsoft fanboy/employee complains on a norwegian discussion site
that "you have to download the whole openoffice to upgrade or to fix
problems"
(guess this applies to libreoffice too)
That is, he's complaining that to go from 3.2 to 3.2.1 he h
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Kenneth Venken
wrote:
>> what's the point passing cont as a parameter if you are going to
>> override it's value right away ? (note: ok so, patch 0005 actually fix
>> that...)
>
> these patches should be viewed as a wholel. The refactoring was a process.
> But you'
On 29/01/2011 04:10, r_ouellette wrote:
I checked with LO 3.3 final version (RC4) and the problem remains... It is a
regression from previous OpenOffice.org (before LO) where the file was
correctly calculated.
Using your test file from OOo bug, i've seen it doesn't hang but it's
terrible slow.
Hello good people and others,
Could someone please review and cherry-pick for libreoffice-3-3 branch
this commit:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=affa15b894b66b3d12d00ab1ad3c567ade88800e
It basically fixes the collation for Catalan language, so it's important :)
Chee
Norbert,
thanks for the feedback.
2011/1/30 Norbert Thiebaud
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Kenneth Venken
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i came across gendict.cxx while fixing a possible memleak. It took me
> some
> > time to figure out what the code did.
> > I notice a lot of very very long fu
Le 30/01/2011 13:34, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
> wrote:
>> In my message, the problem is not the size of the installer, it is about
>> the number of dictionaries the MS-Win end-user has on his PC. Many of
>> these dictionaries being not usefu
> No, no need for an algorithm. No need to remove a dictionary from the
> installer. Only ask the user what he want to have on his computer.
Try clicking the "custom" installation button.
But note that it is a fallacy to think that just because *some* features (like
dictionaries for individual l
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
wrote:
> In my message, the problem is not the size of the installer, it is about
> the number of dictionaries the MS-Win end-user has on his PC. Many of
> these dictionaries being not useful for him.
Is there a severe disk-shortage issue on MS
Le 30/01/2011 12:29, Tor Lillqvist a écrit :
>> Yes, but why ~20 dictionaries ? Do you know peoples who need and are
>> able to write twenty different languages ?
> Why not? What does it hurt? (It is always possible to do a custom
> installation and deselect those dictionaries one doesn't want.)
>
Le 30/01/2011 12:35, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
> wrote:
>> Le 30/01/2011 10:54, Jesús Corrius a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
>>> wrote:
Hi all,
Many MS-Windows users are surprised that Libre
Le 30/01/2011 10:49, Tor Lillqvist a écrit :
>> Is it a bug or a feature ?
> It is a feature until somebody provides working code to do otherwise, and
> explains why it is better.
Which software is used to do the MS-Windows installer ?
> It is an useful feature, even. See below.
>
> Are you sugges
Hi Norbert,
>
> I have only skimmed this thread, so forgive me if i missed the mark but:
>
> why not generate the index at install time ?
> that will still achieve the goal of reducing the size of the
> installer, without the performance hit at runtime no?
>
The option to build the index at insta
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 11:01:13AM -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> >> IMHO, there's no reason to include old versions of third-party packages in
> >> LibreOffice proper.
>
> Please, are you talking about third-party source code
> - included in the LibreOffice source code (git repositories),
> - sour
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
wrote:
> Le 30/01/2011 10:54, Jesús Corrius a écrit :
>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Many MS-Windows users are surprised that LibreOffice default
>>> installation contains all dictionaries
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Steve Butler wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 29 January 2011 21:45, Steve Butler wrote:
>
> Here's some comparison timings on the above system (measured with
> gettimeofday either side of the call in swriter).
>
> Using an INDEX FILE:
> US Thesaurus - cold OS cache
>
> Yes, but why ~20 dictionaries ? Do you know peoples who need and are
> able to write twenty different languages ?
Why not? What does it hurt? (It is always possible to do a custom installation
and deselect those dictionaries one doesn't want.)
Can you come up with an algorithm for de-selecting
Jean-Baptiste, it's not a matter of how many languages a user is able to
write but the possible combinations (e.g. for a Canadian English and French
for a Swiss English and German, etc)
What I think would make sense is that the installer by default selects
English and the locale language for both
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Kenneth Venken
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i came across gendict.cxx while fixing a possible memleak. It took me some
> time to figure out what the code did.
> I notice a lot of very very long function bodies in LO-code, gendict was no
> exception. So i refactored the code, d
Le 30/01/2011 10:54, Jesús Corrius a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Many MS-Windows users are surprised that LibreOffice default
>> installation contains all dictionaries although they have the UI only in
>> their locale and English.
>> I t
Hi Michael,
On 29 January 2011 21:45, Steve Butler wrote:
> I thought I would discuss your idea about not using the index at all
> to see what reception it gets, but I think you may also have been
> suggesting a similar thing:
> are the index files even useful on modern gear?
>
> I can populate
> Threatening? You're kidding right?
That's how it sounded to me. "If you don't do this, I won't use your software,
neener neener"
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libr
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Many MS-Windows users are surprised that LibreOffice default
> installation contains all dictionaries although they have the UI only in
> their locale and English.
> I think that default installation should contain only dict
Hello good people, could someone review and cherry-pick for
libreoffice-3-3 branch with -s option this commit
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/filters/commit/?id=c90c5d503543a960a05b43752a5dff9ccf4bcd30
?
It basically silences warnings of casts from double to float since
libwpd's API does
> Is it a bug or a feature ?
It is a feature until somebody provides working code to do otherwise, and
explains why it is better.
It is an useful feature, even. See below.
Are you suggesting that we should automatically in a de-select the writing aids
for languages that don't get the UI instal
Threatening? You're kidding right?
-Original Message-
From: Tor Lillqvist [mailto:tlillqv...@novell.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 10:33 AM
To: Markus Stenzel; libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: RE: [Libreoffice] In need of windows packaging team...
> Changing the installer
> Changing the installer will invalidate the digital signature so it also is
> not an option.
What digital signature? We don't use any (yet).
> I won't sign a third party package with my own cert...
Oh well, your choice.
> I can only say, the OpenOffice.org(tm) team did it until 3.3.
Yes, but
Changing the installer will invalidate the digital signature so it also is not
an option. I won't sign a third party package with my own cert...
I can only say, the OpenOffice.org(tm) team did it until 3.3. There aren't many
releases of the package considering the huge amount of work involved in
Hi all,
Many MS-Windows users are surprised that LibreOffice default
installation contains all dictionaries although they have the UI only in
their locale and English.
I think that default installation should contain only dictionaries in
the same languages as the UI.
Is it a bug or a feature ? ;-
69 matches
Mail list logo
