[Libreoffice] [PATCH] removed more blank lines/reordered #include's

Hi, in addition to my last patch for sd_unomodel.cxx I've removed an unnecessary comment, more blank lines and reordered the #include lines. There are at least three different stlpool.hxx in different directories of LO, but it is included just as "#include ". I think that ../../../../inc/bf_

Re: [Libreoffice] Need help to debug with Visual C++ 2008

>2. start Visual Studio and open exe with File > Open > Project/Solution >and choose soffice.exe in program folder. It is not soffice.exe that is the actual LibreOffice program, it's soffice.bin. (Which despite its odd .bin suffix is a totally normal .exe file.) Soffice.exe is just a th

Re: [Libreoffice] template "missing"

On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 07:44 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > ... exists yet, it just points to a nonexistent file. LibO sees the > (symlink) file, so it doesn't allow to import a template with the same > name, but it cannot open it as a template, so it doesn't list it in the > dialog. Elementary, my de

Re: [Libreoffice] template "missing"

On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 06:57:00PM -0500, Arno Teigseth wrote: > Hi > > This might be a corner case, but I have this problem: > > To not have to go through the "import template" process every time I > change a template, I symlinked it. So, Is there any reason why you cannot just import the templ

[Libreoffice] Need help to debug with Visual C++ 2008

Hi all, I have a problem when I was debug LO with Visual C++ 2008. My step to debug is: 1. build the module(vcl) with "debug=true" and copy dll file to LO Installaion directory/program. 2. start Visual Studio and open exe with File > Open > Project/Solution and choose soffice.exe in

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Removed blank lines, dead code; Translated comments from German->English

Hi Christina, On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 22:30 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: > usually I can push translations of comments on my own. But I mixed > removal of double line spacing and dead code with translation so I > thought it is safer to send the whole patch to the list. Next time I'll > eithe

[Libreoffice] ure cppcheck, variableScope.

Hi guys, it's minor change, sending for review. revol_ diff --git a/sal/osl/w32/diagnose.c b/sal/osl/w32/diagnose.c index 1990164..fb97a91 100644 --- a/sal/osl/w32/diagnose.c +++ b/sal/osl/w32/diagnose.c @@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ void SAL_CALL osl_breakDebug(void) void SAL_CALL osl_trace(const sal_Char*

Re: [Libreoffice] Bug in bulleted/numbered list functions

On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 18:39 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > > If you have a paragraph with some formatted text (bold, italic etc), put > > the cursor inside the paragraph and press the Bullet list or the > > Numbered list buttons, all the formatting is lost and goes back to > > "normal" (is it call

[Libreoffice] template "missing"

Hi This might be a corner case, but I have this problem: To not have to go through the "import template" process every time I change a template, I symlinked it. So, ln -s mynicetemplate.ots ~/.libreoffice/3/user/template/ That worked fine until I moved the template. Of course it disappeared fro

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Build fails in i18npool

On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:47:07PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 02:32:32PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 15:10 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > > The attached patch prints the exception message in saxparser.cxx. > > > > It would be useful to h

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Mac builds / lang-packs ...

I am providing a dmg with German on my DVD. http://www.libreofficedvd.info7.49 usd includes shipping. Dave Johnson On Feb 6, 2011 11:35 AM, "Martin Srebotnjak" wrote: Hi, 2011/2/6 Nguyen Vu Hung > > Not a big deal if we already have all languages included in a single pack. Most hassle-free

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Removed blank lines, dead code; Translated comments from German->English

Hi, usually I can push translations of comments on my own. But I mixed removal of double line spacing and dead code with translation so I thought it is safer to send the whole patch to the list. Next time I'll either translate or do some code cleanup but not both... This is LGPLv3+/MPL. Chr

[Libreoffice] Fix cppcheck errors and warnings

Some non-compiladed code have been deleted as well. Grettings From 04b66c4fc3bfdf6a95d3933a813868c1e28cf195 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xisco Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 21:33:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] fix cppcheck errors and warnings --- i18npool/source/localedata/localedata.cxx | 77 ++

[Libreoffice] Fwd: [tdf-discuss] feature request, calc cell content copy behaviour

FYI -- Forwarded message -- From: Simon Cropper Date: Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:52 AM Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] feature request, calc cell content copy behaviour To: disc...@documentfoundation.org Hi All, +1 This is the biggest reason why some people I have tried to convert from

Re: [Libreoffice] "Upgrade" packages for windows

* Arno Teigseth schrieb: > For the independent end user it's probably easier just telling > him to install the new package, than installing a packet > management system to his computer. The unqualified user will get some "installer" program, which automatically sets up the package management (i

Re: [Libreoffice] Kicking off 3rdparty packages

* Michael Meeks schrieb: > Luckily we have a micro-distro now; complete with our own build system, > and method of packaging; it is called the "onebigblob" microdistro - and > it works as badly as can be expected when trying to target all distros. No. It works as good as possible with the

Re: [Libreoffice] Kicking off 3rdparty packages

* Wols Lists schrieb: > The system is called GUB (for Grand Universal Binary). static linking ? > And it's pretty successful. Well, up to the point where it unnecessarily eats up resources due massive code duplication and security holes in ancient bundled libraries open up your system like a

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Removed unused functions and classes from calc 3last

Hi, Please find attached a new patch that removes several unused functions and classes from calc. Both functions and classes have been found through the call-catcher list. Please notice that this patch removes three entire classes: ScSummableCompressedArray, ScVbaCharts and ScVbaSeriesCollectio

[Libreoffice] Fwd: [tdf-discuss] 1. Correspondence of LO with odt files 2. Crash when Math formula document.

FYI, -- Forwarded message -- From: Epaminondas Diamantopoulos Date: 2011/2/6 Subject: [tdf-discuss] 1. Correspondence of LO with odt files 2. Crash when Math formula document. To: disc...@documentfoundation.org Some remarks for LibreOffice 3.3. 1. At Win XP (SP3) after uninstal

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] Remove bogus comments in writer

I pushed this one, as it looks good. On 02/04/2011 11:15 PM, Guillaume Poussel wrote: > According to this easy hack: > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks#remove_all_the_bogus_comments_lying_around > I have tried to remove few bogus comments, but I don't know if I could > cle

Re: [Libreoffice] Kicking off 3rdparty packages

* Caolán McNamara schrieb: > > Trivial: your own microdistro. (prefix build approach, etc). > > Honestly, how is that supposed to work. With Briegel: quite simple. Just properly state the dependencies in the package descriptors, tell the target-config to use different installation pathes, swi

Re: [Libreoffice] git submodule

* Norbert Thiebaud schrieb: > Note that the main drawback of our current approach is indeed the > bisection problem. It would be certainly be convinient to be able to > bisect on the entire set of repos... but how much pain/risk do we want > to take to improve that aspect of things ? I wouldn't

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Mac builds / lang-packs ...

Hi, 2011/2/6 Nguyen Vu Hung > Not a big deal if we already have all languages included in a single pack. Most hassle-free (and Mac-like) would really be to have a single full-lang pack with all gui and help languages. The install process would offer possibility of languages to be installed and

[Libreoffice] Easy hack patch!

Now with fewer blank lines! - Steve>From 00de1629fedf860847061e78e44eb25c85408e2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephen Wille Padnos Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 11:55:37 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Removed extra blank lines between includes --- binfilter/bf_sd/source/ui/unoidl/sd_unomodel.cxx | 25 +---

[Libreoffice] Some changes for the "Getting Involved

Hello, all I am just getting started with LibreOffice development, and was following the instructions at . I noticed that a couple of things should be added: On my Ubuntu system (10.04), you need to install libgnomevfs2-dev in addition to the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Build fails in i18npool

On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 02:32:32PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 15:10 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > The attached patch prints the exception message in saxparser.cxx. > > > It would be useful to have it in tree. > Looks reasonable to me, pushed, thanks for this. Great

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Build fails in i18npool

On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 15:10 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > The attached patch prints the exception message in saxparser.cxx. > > > > It would be useful to have it in tree. > > Sorry, forgot to attach the file. Looks reasonable to me, pushed, thanks for this. Though Fridrich tracked down the f

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac builds / lang-packs ...

On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi guys, > >        At FOSDEM I was approached by someone annoyed with having to download > the main binary and a language pack to get the Mac version to work in > German; and I was wondering - are we assuming our Mac users are that > technica

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Build fails in i18npool

On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:05:43PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:52:33PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 08:52:19PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 04:00:39PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2011-02-05

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Build fails in i18npool

On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:52:33PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 08:52:19PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 04:00:39PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > > On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 08:43 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > > > > > > I can't get the b

Re: [Libreoffice] win32 build errors in svtools modules

On 6 February 2011 21:28, Steven Butler wrote: >   Creating library ../wntmsci12.pro/lib/ifwi.lib and object > ../wntmsci12.pro/lib/ifwi.exp > ifwi.exp : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _real@3f80 > ifwi.exp : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _real@41efffe0 > ifwi.e

Re: [Libreoffice] git submodule

On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 03:39:41PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky > wrote: >> Can you please do a bit of research in that regard, and summarize how we >> would gain from using git submobule? > > To my understanding, in short: > > Con: build.git has to

Re: [Libreoffice] win32 build errors in svtools modules

On 6 February 2011 15:32, Steven Butler wrote: > I will see how much further into the build I can get now svtools is building. > I am now trying to build framework and it all compiles okay but I'm getting really strange undefined symbol errors that I can't figure out. Creating library ../wnt

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac builds / lang-packs ...

On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi guys, > >        At FOSDEM I was approached by someone annoyed with having to download > the main binary and a language pack to get the Mac version to work in > German; and I was wondering - are we assuming our Mac users are that > technica

Re: [Libreoffice] git submodule

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 03:39:41PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Can you please do a bit of research in that regard, and summarize how we > would gain from using git submobule? To my understanding, in short: git submodules are not like how svn externals are usually used. svn externals usually c

Re: [Libreoffice] flaw/bug cross reference

Hi John, John Gustavsson wrote (06-02-11 10:13) I have a problem when using cross references. If I make a cross reference to the number in a list it looks like this: Birds can fly [2.] [..] It's just wrong to use dots after the number when referring to your literature list. Thanks for mailin

[Libreoffice] flaw/bug cross reference

Hello, I have a problem when using cross references. If I make a cross reference to the number in a list it looks like this: Birds can fly [2.] It should look like: Birds can fly [2] It's just wrong to use dots after the number when referring to your literature list. Libreoffice does that auto

[Libreoffice] Mac builds / lang-packs ...

Hi guys, At FOSDEM I was approached by someone annoyed with having to download the main binary and a language pack to get the Mac version to work in German; and I was wondering - are we assuming our Mac users are that technical ? [ his point was, that his Father was not ;-]. Would