[Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] fix for i#115716 fdo#33964

2011-02-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Noel, On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 20:08 +, Noel Power wrote: a) libreoffice-3-3 ( one ack please ) Ack :-) though I was initially concerned about this relying on a \0 after the end of an OString - it seems that we are using the cha * pointers as iterators in this case; so - makes

Re: [Libreoffice] deliver.pl defaulting to strip

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 09:32 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Caolan, On 2011-02-11 at 20:27 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: deliver.pl now defaults to stripping binaries / libraries when it delivers to solver, unless you export DISABLE_STRIP. It doesn't strip if you have

[Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] crashing oosplash and malformed picture (bnc#652562)

2011-02-15 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 20:23 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Ugh. Yep, would absolutely like to have that in -3-3-1. Good catch. And another ack for 3.3.1 - it should really go there; I guess with Kendy's approval (the fixes look trivial) we should be good. Thanks,

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation and bundled extensions

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 08:44 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: It seems that bundled extensions have not been build : pdfimport.oxt does not exist. Even after having done Ah, I assumed you'd already *built* them, but wondered why they weren't auto-installed, use --enable-ext-pdfimport, etc. to

[Libreoffice] On-web Help Basic ?

2011-02-15 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi *, I noticed that our on-web Help is missing the Basic text: http://help.libreoffice.org/Main_Page Was that decided, or did it just slip through? Best, Cor -- - giving openoffice.org its foundation :: The Document Foundation - ___ LibreOffice

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation and bundled extensions

2011-02-15 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 15/02/11 10:14, Caolán McNamara a écrit : Hi, Ah, I assumed you'd already *built* them, but wondered why they weren't auto-installed, use --enable-ext-pdfimport, etc. to build them. C. Is there no single switch to build them all in one go ? I was looking through the autogen.sh

Re: [Libreoffice] On-web Help Basic ?

2011-02-15 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Cor, On 2011-02-15 at 10:18 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: I noticed that our on-web Help is missing the Basic text: http://help.libreoffice.org/Main_Page Was that decided, or did it just slip through? Not at all, just an omission; what is the best entry page for Basic, please? Regards, Kendy

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Reworking build.pl: What to do with the --html and --interactive parameters

2011-02-15 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Michael, On 2011-02-02 at 19:39 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: I don't have strong feelings about having the actual html page or not. When I started building, I used it quite a bit, but now I do automated builds, so I don't sit and wait man, when it is finished :-) [...] I made a deeper

Re: [Libreoffice] Issues building LO on Linux prior to attempting on Android

2011-02-15 Thread Andrew Wafaa
On 14 February 2011 11:03, Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org wrote: Andrew Wafaa wrote: I'm trying to build LO on openSUSE 11.3, but get a failure with make. The steps I've taken are: Hi Andrew, um, looks like a bigger cock-up - can you re-do that, pipe all the make output to a

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] O(U)StringBuffer::toString()

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 22:30 +0100, Sébastien Le Ray wrote: Actually I'm gonna start adding missing methods from UniString/ByteString to O(U)String and StringBuffer There are some original design thoughts behind O(U)String FWIW, e.g it's roughly based on the immutable java String so apart from

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Christoph, On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 23:03 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: === Usage Data === Useful numbers indeed. .. * All Applications: 2063 How does this compare to eg. File-Open or Format-Paragraph or something frequently used ? Of course, these are only relative

[Libreoffice] [Bug 32894] [Task] LibreOffice 3.3.1 release blockers / stoppers

2011-02-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894 Bug 32894 depends on bug 34226, which changed state. Bug 34226 Summary: Calc, Drawing borders with Frame drop down in Format menu - bug in EDITING https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34226 What|Old Value

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] BorderLine conversion fix

2011-02-15 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi all, I just fixed the bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34226. Could anyone review the fix that I pushed to master for inclusion in 3.3 and 3.3.1. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=4da3c4b2874fba5451d391a13e8443d451712bbe My apologies for not having

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Translation of German comments in libs-core/editeng

2011-02-15 Thread Albert Thuswaldner
Hi, Just wanted to highlight this in case it went under the radar: https://bugs.freedesktop.org//show_bug.cgi?id=34196 If already noted, sorry for the double post. /Albert ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] BorderLine conversion fix

2011-02-15 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 11:12 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: I just fixed the bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34226. Could anyone review the fix that I pushed to master for inclusion in 3.3 and 3.3.1. As per the bug; ack'd by me - David it'd be great if you could look

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] More Default Formatting -- Clear Direct Formatting

2011-02-15 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi Octavio, On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 22:33 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: Hi! Sorry for the long time gap between the two patch sets. In the following two patches I continue the work on renaming Default Formatting to Clear Direct Formatting. In the past patchset, Cédric reported problems

[Libreoffice] Patch

2011-02-15 Thread Bálint Dózsa
Hi, I have removed some dead code form */writerperfect* and */xmerge*. Regards, Balint Dozsa From 60150a3a38b68188b9edeb17a5fb7a49bb0c514e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?B=C3=A1lint=20D=C3=B3zsa?= dozsabal...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:35:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove dead

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] More Default Formatting -- Clear Direct Formatting

2011-02-15 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Forgot to change the subject On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 11:42 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: Hi Octavio, On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 22:33 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: Hi! Sorry for the long time gap between the two patch sets. In the following two patches I continue the work on renaming Default

Re: [Libreoffice] Easy Hacks: Migrate module descriptions to our wiki

2011-02-15 Thread Christoph Herzog
On 02/14/2011 10:20 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: And in this context: Can some text from other parts of the OOo Wiki be copied and pasted? In a word; no - not unless it is fair use, or written by a friendly, non-Oracle contributor [ at least, that is my take ]. ATB,

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for EMF+ on 3-3 and 3-3-1

2011-02-15 Thread Radek Doulík
Hi, I would like to have EMF+ support fixed in 3.3. The following two commits are needed to fix it on libreoffice-3-3 (1 review needed) libreoffice-3-3-1 (3 reviews needed) branches. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=7de8695f19626c764a4b43cfb30179525d9a5956

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: Patch

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 12:16 +0100, Bálint Dózsa wrote: Hy! I have removed this unused method: writerfilter::dmapper::ConversionHelper::convertDateTime(rtl::OUString const) Yeah, looks good, removed now. Thanks for this. C. ___ LibreOffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Easy Hacks: Migrate module descriptions to our wiki

2011-02-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Christoph, On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 21:45 +0100, Christoph Herzog wrote: I'm busy with this easy hack, i.e. filling http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Code_Overview. Great to see that completed ! and looking pretty :-) I updated this easy hack:

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for EMF+ on 3-3 and 3-3-1

2011-02-15 Thread Jesús Corrius
Hi, 2011/2/15 Radek Doulík r...@novell.com: Hi, I would like to have EMF+ support fixed in 3.3. The following two commits are needed to fix it on libreoffice-3-3 (1 review needed) libreoffice-3-3-1 (3 reviews needed) branches.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix for i#115716 fdo#33964

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 20:08 +, Noel Power wrote: (reposting with [PATCH] keyword although the fix for this issue will appear from dev300m98 onwards it would be worth I think getting this into a) libreoffice-3-3 ( one ack please ) and possibly b) libreoffice-3.3.1 ( 3 acks please )

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: Dragonfly patches

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 17:21 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: Here's a second batch. With these ones, and by disabling some cppunit tests, I am now able to complete a LibreOffice build on DragonFly. Looks sane, pushed. You really need to debug those cppunit tests however :-). Maybe you've gotten

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation and bundled extensions

2011-02-15 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Le 15/02/2011 10:14, Caolán McNamara a écrit : On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 08:44 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: It seems that bundled extensions have not been build : pdfimport.oxt does not exist. Even after having done Ah, I assumed you'd already *built* them, but wondered why they weren't

Re: [Libreoffice] Easy Hacks: Migrate module descriptions to our wiki

2011-02-15 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Michael Meeks wrote: to link to there, and then wondered: could we not (perhaps) automate the creation of those README files from the wiki with some shell / perl script ? such that we could update all the READMEs at once, and use the wiki as the authoritative location, and the README

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix for i#115716 fdo#33964

2011-02-15 Thread Noel Power
Hi Caolán On 15/02/11 12:01, Caolán McNamara wrote: Is it guaranteed that str is NULL terminated, i.e. getStr() has always claimed that it might not actually be NULL terminated, and this assumes a NULL terminator exists and can be pushed into blob. yeah, I think we can pretty much assume that

Re: [Libreoffice] deliver.pl defaulting to strip

2011-02-15 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Caolán, On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:09:48 + Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: Are symbols insanely large under windows ?. I'd randomly guess that in an ideal world we default symbols on when building with gcc and strip them at the very last stage when making the final .rpms/.debs

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix for i#115716 fdo#33964

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 12:42 +, Noel Power wrote: yeah, I think we can pretty much assume that the strings are null terminate Sure, +1 then. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] fix for i#115716 fdo#33964

2011-02-15 Thread Noel Power
Hi Petr On 15/02/11 09:04, Michael Meeks wrote: Fine for that too; if we can collect another ack then fwd. to Petr for merging it'd be great:-) 2 acks now, can you have a look then for 3.3.1 ? note the patch associated with the commit id ( from master ) won't do ( filenames changed ),

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][REVIEWED] crashing oosplash and malformed picture (bnc#652562)

2011-02-15 Thread Petr Mladek
Michael Meeks píše v Út 15. 02. 2011 v 09:11 +: On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 20:23 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Ugh. Yep, would absolutely like to have that in -3-3-1. Good catch. And another ack for 3.3.1 - it should really go there; I guess with Kendy's approval (the fixes look

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] fix for i#115716 fdo#33964

2011-02-15 Thread Petr Mladek
Noel Power píše v Po 14. 02. 2011 v 20:08 +: (reposting with [PATCH] keyword although the fix for this issue will appear from dev300m98 onwards it would be worth I think getting this into a) libreoffice-3-3 ( one ack please ) and possibly b) libreoffice-3.3.1 ( 3 acks please )

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: Patch

2011-02-15 Thread Bálint Dózsa
Hi, Yes, my code is under the LGPLv3+/MPL dual license. Balint 2011. február 15. 12:35 Caolán McNamara írta, caol...@redhat.com: On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 11:41 +0100, Bálint Dózsa wrote: Hi, I have removed some dead code form /writerperfect and /xmerge. Looks good, pushed. Can you confirm

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for EMF+ on 3-3 and 3-3-1

2011-02-15 Thread Radek Doulík
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 12:30 +0100, Radek Doulík wrote: Hi, I would like to have EMF+ support fixed in 3.3. The following two commits are needed to fix it on libreoffice-3-3 (1 review needed) libreoffice-3-3-1 (3 reviews needed) branches.

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for EMF+ on 3-3 and 3-3-1

2011-02-15 Thread Petr Mladek
Jesús Corrius píše v Út 15. 02. 2011 v 12:42 +0100: Related to this bug, make sure to consider this one to for the 3.3.1 branch, too (AFAIK it's only in 3.3) http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-3id=a4848e8cebe712f96f409f8687fc76cef22b640f It has already

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix for i#115716 fdo#33964

2011-02-15 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 12:01 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: Is it guaranteed that str is NULL terminated, i.e. getStr() has always claimed that it might not actually be NULL terminated Right - it is not NULL terminated. Then again I read this: std::vector char * blob =

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Reworking build.pl: What to do with the --html and --interactive parameters

2011-02-15 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Jan, *, On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote: On 2011-02-02 at 19:39 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: BTW - calling 'cat' is a curious thing, can we change that to something more Perl? ;-) Well, not sure whether it is really preferable, but instead of system(cat

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix for i#115716 fdo#33964

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 14:50 +, Michael Meeks wrote: std::vector char * blob = data.newBlob(); blob-insert(blob-begin(), str.getStr(), str.getStr() + str.getLength() + 1) As passint a char * start and end iterator to the stl insert. The end iterator is not used, we terminate the

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for EMF+ on 3-3 and 3-3-1

2011-02-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Radek, You missed the patch disabling EMF+ rendering for Win32. On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 15:44 +0100, Radek Doulík wrote: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=229df81b920ddee5a1b057af75db7b293f88e3bd

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix for i#115716 fdo#33964

2011-02-15 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 15:04 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: Yes, ::insert don't dereference the final end iterator, but it does use Hah - quite right ;-) I only got past the double bluff to get suckered at the next fence; so this is duff; we should append getLength() and then push_back a

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for EMF+ on 3-3 and 3-3-1

2011-02-15 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Do I take it that these two then fix win32 ? These are the same two diffs I tested on Friday (I think it was), aren't they? They did not help. Of course, it might be that my quick testing was flawed in some way. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for EMF+ on 3-3 and 3-3-1

2011-02-15 Thread Radek Doulík
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 15:21 +, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Radek, You missed the patch disabling EMF+ rendering for Win32. I hope not. My patches fix it on all the platforms where EMF+ is enabled. EMF+ was broken on unx for quite some time, basically when impress started using drawing

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix for i#115716 fdo#33964

2011-02-15 Thread Noel Power
On 15/02/11 15:28, Michael Meeks wrote: The original problem to be fixed is a lack of a zero terminator in the *output* blob, its just an issue of copying it from the original string or adding a new one, just making sure that if we go with copying it from the original string, that the original

[Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, i stumbled across some precompiler checks for several (deprecated?) arches: HP9000 (already removed some parts of this) SINIX RM400 ... And another thing, in combination with GCC: C272 (occurs with GCC) i.e. at impress/sd/source/ui/view/zoomlist.cxx:#if ( defined GCC defined C272 ) .

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] disable EMF+ in 3-3-1 on all platforms

2011-02-15 Thread Radek Doulík
Hi, please review this patch for inclusion in 3-3-1. Because the previous fix seemed too risky, we will disable the EMF+ altogether for this release. Cheers Radek diff --git a/svtools/source/filter.vcl/wmf/enhwmf.cxx b/svtools/source/filter.vcl/wmf/enhwmf.cxx index 1dd5c64..4bb7643 100644 ---

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] disable EMF+ in 3-3-1 on all platforms

2011-02-15 Thread Petr Mladek
Radek Doulík píše v Út 15. 02. 2011 v 18:22 +0100: Hi, please review this patch for inclusion in 3-3-1. Because the previous fix seemed too risky, we will disable the EMF+ altogether for this release. Patch looks fine. We will get better results than with LO-3.3.0 with it. The real fix

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] disable EMF+ in 3-3-1 on all platforms

2011-02-15 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Radek Doulík wrote: please review this patch for inclusion in 3-3-1 ACKed. Go for it. -- Thorsten pgpr2mvXzvM4l.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi, On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 06:14:36PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: i stumbled across some precompiler checks for several (deprecated?) arches: HP9000 (already removed some parts of this) SINIX RM400 ... There is a full list of this stuff at bootstrap/solenv/bin/modules/osarch.pm We

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] GentooOnly cleanup and 64bit jdk server path (sun/oracle jdk)

2011-02-15 Thread Andreas Proschofsky
Hi everyone, Could someone please take a look at it and commit it for us (Gentoo), we'd really like to get the broken stuff out of the tree ;-) bye Andreas On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 13:31 +0100, Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote: Hi all, attached is one patch to libreoffice/build tree branch

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-15 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, On 02/12/2011 10:01 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 23:08 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: what the heck do we do with Tools - Media Player? Do we need this within an office suite? Is anyone using this?! :-) My suspicion is that ~no-one is using it. I think the same.

Re: [Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-15 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 09:10:03PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 22:02 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: You're right with ww8toolbar.* We need to make a list of the ones that belong to LibreOffice solely and have no copyright attribution and nag the initial committer to

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix for i#115716 fdo#33964

2011-02-15 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 16:17 +, Noel Power wrote: On 15/02/11 15:28, Michael Meeks wrote: Which it doesn't, so good catch; Noel we should fix that :-) well as it turns out it does, rtl_string_ImplAlloc always creates a mea culpa :-) I was too quick, and forgot the char

[Libreoffice] DirEntryStack not used?

2011-02-15 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Hi, I'm trying to figure out whether DirEntryStack is necessary or not. This is what I did already: 1. ./g grep DirEntryStack: found class implementation in dirent.cxx and TOOLS_DLLPRIVATE USHORTImpTryUrl( DirEntryStack rStack, const String rPfad, FSysPathStyle eStyle );

Re: [Libreoffice] DirEntryStack not used?

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 20:45 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: Hi, I'm trying to figure out whether DirEntryStack is necessary or not. This is what I did already: 1. ./g grep DirEntryStack: found class implementation in dirent.cxx and TOOLS_DLLPRIVATE USHORTImpTryUrl(

Re: [Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 19:50 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: Is there a correct header example somewhere ? See TEMPLATE.SOURCECODE.HEADER, adjust the /* to # for .mk files. By the way, should it be there ? AFAIK, unxobsd.mk was created after LibreOffice was forked... Well, I guess it was

[Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED 4/54] translated comments

2011-02-15 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Hi, pushed 8 more diffs. Christina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Undo Redo Re: [REVIEW] Re: SmNodeToTextVisitor Fixes

2011-02-15 Thread Jonas Finnemann Jensen
Hi Luke, Would be cool, would be a bit difficult to document it when I don't know what it's supposed to be doing though. That isn't an excuse though, I don't mind trying to work out a few of them. Well, lets just think about writing a note for the next guy, if we find a solution :)

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix for i#115716 fdo#33964

2011-02-15 Thread Noel Power
Hi Caolan On 15/02/11 16:17, Noel Power wrote: On 15/02/11 15:28, Michael Meeks wrote: Which it doesn't, so good catch; Noel we should fix that :-) well as it turns out it does, rtl_string_ImplAlloc always creates a buffer 1 bigger than the requested len and stuffs a '\0' in it. Strange

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 18:14 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Hi, i stumbled across some precompiler checks for several (deprecated?) arches: HP9000 (already removed some parts of this) SINIX RM400 Yeah, those can all go. And another thing, in combination with GCC: C272 (occurs with GCC)

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 18:34 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: We also have at least msdos and Atari ST in dmake/ That's just the imported and hacked up third party dmake tool, so can be ignored. - i386 / amd64 - power / powerppc - sparc / sparc64 - arm - mips - alpha Everything else is

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fdo#32552 (alt key opens File-menu)

2011-02-15 Thread Julien Nabet
Hello, Here is small patch to close the tracker 32552 (alt key opens File-menu). I removed the block quoted in the comments, it compiles but I didn't test it. I use Gnome and so Gtk on my Debian. Could someone confirm it's ok (or not) ? Julien. (LGPLv3+ / MPL) commit

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:05:15PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 18:34 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: - i386 / amd64 - power / powerppc - sparc / sparc64 - arm - mips - alpha http://porting.openoffice.org/ might help btw. FWIW We (Red Hat, Inc.) build/ship

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] GentooOnly cleanup and 64bit jdk server path (sun/oracle jdk)

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 13:31 +0100, Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote: Hi all, attached is one patch to libreoffice/build tree branch libreoffice-3-3 that just cleans up the Gentoo patchset. You may merge it to the libreoffice-3-3-1 branch as well, please. I pushed to master anyway, I guess we'd need

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 22:22 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: Of the ports listed on http://porting.openoffice.org/ , Tru64 is dead and I would be surprised if VMS and Linux/m68k were much alive. Yeah, only take the completed one, VMS and Tru64 never actually happened. m68k only exists emulated

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fdo#32552 (alt key opens File-menu)

2011-02-15 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Julien, I've compiled and tested it. Works fine. I read the bug description and there was said, that on Windows Alt works as F6 on Linux - to set focus on the menubar. Now we completely got rid of this with Alt on Linux. Is this intentionally, say that Alt alone has no effect at all? I

Re: [Libreoffice] Undo Redo Re: [REVIEW] Re: SmNodeToTextVisitor Fixes

2011-02-15 Thread Luke Dixon
Hi Jonas, On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 21:51 +0100, Jonas Finnemann Jensen wrote: Well, lets just think about writing a note for the next guy, if we find a solution :) I suppose the EditEngine::SetText functions would be be a good place to start. I noticed that 0x is used in

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove legacy Addin mechanism from calc

2011-02-15 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Alfonso, Alfonso Eusebio schrieb: Hi, Please find attached two patches for the removal of the legacy Addin Mechanism from calc. One of the patches removes the code from binfilter. I have now read what this module is about and I guess it might not have been necessary to remove stuff from

[Libreoffice] Please help us fix this Writer autocorrect bug

2011-02-15 Thread Samphan Raruenrom
I'm going to work on this bug. Anyone have any idea about the problematic auto-style T1 in the bug report? Bug 33092 Autocomplete display double character for this word [CTL / Thai] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33092 Step to reproduced:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] fixed spelling menues - menus

2011-02-15 Thread David Tardon
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 08:42:42PM +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: diff --git a/svtools/source/config/menuoptions.cxx b/svtools/source/config/menuoptions.cxx index a12f1e0..4e814a7 100644 --- a/svtools/source/config/menuoptions.cxx +++ b/svtools/source/config/menuoptions.cxx @@ -62,13