On Jul 31, 2011, at 12:32 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:45:03 +0200
> Stephan Bergmann
>
> wrote:
>
>> No. While linking wants the unversioned libFOO.so (thanks to passing
>> them as -lFOO to the linker), running the unit tests wants the
>> versioned libFOO.so.3 (thanks to
Here is the patch for EasyHack 32719. I have also discovered another bug
relating to Impress Templates, documented here:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39705
I am submitting this under the LGPLv3+/MPL 1.1 license.
Thanks,
--
--Jeffrey Chang
From cc0eaea9cbb38dfab3ac92641b29822a963
+1 There is no point to invest insane amounts of time in weird
compatibility voodoo magic for something that will be fixed in 1-2 weeks.
Marc-André Laverdière
Software Security Scientist
Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services
Hyderabad, India
On 07/30/2011 05:27 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> O
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Rain Forest wrote:
>
>
> From: Rain Forest
> To: Cor Nouws
> Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 10:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] Can developers create add-in for Calc in Libre as
> we did in OpenOffice?
>
> Hello
> There is anothe
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Markus Mohrhard <
markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> can someone from the Thai community check whether these two patches cause
> any problems.
>
We're reading this discussion and patches.
___
LibreOffice mailing
Hi Swagat,
I had such an error before, because I was running make dev-install
without running make before.
Actually, things have changed a little in the build system now, and we
are supposed to run make dev-install only after the first build is done.
After that, make does the job.
Is that what w
Hi,
I just hit this:
$ file libreoffice-artwork-3.4.2.3.tar.bz2
libreoffice-artwork-3.4.2.3.tar.bz2: gzip compressed data, from Unix, last
modified: Sat Jul 30 22:28:37 2011
Did I miss something or there seems to be a bug maybe in
bin/lo-pack-sources?
Thanks.
pgpKFRxkkDUfN.pgp
Description: P
Hi there,
Short report:
I was converting modules to gbuild.
Something has been already pushed, something will be next week.
Hopefully I did not break too much but it's possible, especially on Windows.
Regards,
Matus
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOff
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 02:00:45AM +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
>
> In tracing a reproducible bug
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36843
> on a Debian squeeze box, I stumbled on missing 'libadabaslo.so' while
> 'libadabasuilo.so' is installed.
> Because LibO 3.3.2 came with both 'l
Hi all,
In tracing a reproducible bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36843
on a Debian squeeze box, I stumbled on missing 'libadabaslo.so' while
'libadabasuilo.so' is installed.
Because LibO 3.3.2 came with both 'libadabasli.so' and 'libabadasuili.so',
I am wondering whether somethin
2011/7/29 Knut Olav Bøhmer :
> 2011/7/28 Knut Olav Bøhmer :
>> 2011/7/28 Knut Olav Bøhmer :
>>> 2011/7/28 Caolán McNamara :
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:31 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote:
> On 28 July 2011 15:22, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:16 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhme
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Rainer Bielefeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||39510
--
Configure bugmail: https://
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
--- Comment #178 from Rainer Bielefeld
2011-07-31 02:24:41 PDT ---
Nominate Bug 39510 - CRASH closing document with footnotes, makes LibO unusable
for scientific texts or other ones with many footnotes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freed
The following message to was undeliverable.
The reason for the problem:
5.1.1 - Bad destination email address 'reject'
Reporting-MTA: dns; cnc.cn.pilship.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;bing.yu@nkg.pilship.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0 (permanent failure)
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 5.1.1 - Bad destina
14 matches
Mail list logo
