Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] build system patches

On 09/07/2011 03:14 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Peter Foley wrote: Hi, Here are some patches for various problems I encountered while building libreoffice. 0001-libcrnf.a is that a consequence of http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=291b857

Re: [Libreoffice] fix for fdo#33960 "cross reference to a list number, dot bug" makes sw/qa/complex/writer fail

On 09/06/2011 11:17 PM, Troy Rollo wrote: On Wednesday 07 September 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote: final String FldResult1 = "*i*"; final String FldResult2 = "+b+*i*"; final String FldResult3 = "-1-+b+*i*"; -final String FldResult4 = "1."; -

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] build system patches

On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 07:27:38PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Peter Foley wrote: >> Here are some patches for various problems I encountered while >> building libreoffice. >>From 913ba23fd2552436c7c48e83fd1d6ec7de6c2e96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>From: Peter

[Libreoffice] Returned mail: see transcript for details

The original message was received at Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:04:46 +0700 from lists.freedesktop.org [210.14.5.204] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - - Transcript of the session follows - ... while talking to lists.freedesktop.org.: 554 5.0.0 Service unavailable;

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] build system patches

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Peter Foley wrote: > Hi, > > Here are some patches for various problems I encountered while building > libreoffice. BTW, can you make a statement to the list about your patches being MPL 1.1/LGPLV3+ ? or point me to the appropriate post if you've already done so an

Re: [Libreoffice] config.parms vs autogen.lastrun

On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Peter Foley wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Both autogen.lastrun and config.parms seem to have the same purpose, to > > store the ./configure command line. > > Not quite. autogen.last run save the command line given to > au

Re: [Libreoffice] [Partial PUSH] [PATCH] build system patches

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Peter Foley wrote: > Hi, > > Here are some patches for various problems I encountered while building > libreoffice. > so, I've pushed 0003 and 0005 so far. Thanks. I'm not sure I understand the rational (what problem does it 'fixes' what are the gains ?) for 0004

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] build system patches

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Peter Foley wrote: > Hi, > > Here are some patches for various problems I encountered while building > libreoffice. 0001-libcrnf.a is that a consequence of http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=291b85778669b4e4e276faab22add9d0e80046df ? (I'm try

Re: [Libreoffice] config.parms vs autogen.lastrun

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Peter Foley wrote: > On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Peter Foley wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > Both autogen.lastrun and config.parms seem to have the same purpose, to >> > store the ./configure command line. >> >> N

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] build system patches

On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Peter Foley wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here are some patches for various problems I encountered while building > > libreoffice. > > > > 0002... > > >From 913ba23fd2552436c7c48e83fd1d6ec7de6c2e96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] build system patches

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Peter Foley wrote: > Hi, > > Here are some patches for various problems I encountered while building > libreoffice. > 0002... >From 913ba23fd2552436c7c48e83fd1d6ec7de6c2e96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Peter Foley >Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:39:22 -0400 >Subject

Re: [Libreoffice] config.parms vs autogen.lastrun

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Peter Foley wrote: > > Hi, > > Both autogen.lastrun and config.parms seem to have the same purpose, to > store the ./configure command line. Not quite. autogen.last run save the command line given to autgogen.sh. that is _before_ substitution of things like -with-c

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] build system patches

Hi, Here are some patches for various problems I encountered while building libreoffice. Thanks, PeterFrom 35e4d0715604a6337ddf36db5562af96bfdfc61c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Foley Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:38:47 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/7 ] deliver libcrmf.a Mozilla needs libcrmf.a t

[Libreoffice] config.parms vs autogen.lastrun

Hi, Both autogen.lastrun and config.parms seem to have the same purpose, to store the ./configure command line. We should only need one, but I'm not sure which one would be better to get rid of. Suggestions? Thanks, Peter ___ LibreOffice mailing lis

Re: [Libreoffice] fix for fdo#33960 "cross reference to a list number, dot bug" makes sw/qa/complex/writer fail

On Wednesday 07 September 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > > > final String FldResult1 = "*i*"; > > final String FldResult2 = "+b+*i*"; > > final String FldResult3 = "-1-+b+*i*"; > > > > -final String FldResult4 = "1."; > > -final St

[Libreoffice] Curso de Qualificação Neo Natal / Pediátrico e Adulto - Escola Politécnica de Enfermagem - Anna Nery

O email do seu cliente não pode ler esta mensagem. Para ver online por favor clique aqui:http://mktpremium.com.br/mkt/display.php?M=439570&C=0b8585030d065b2bc8b18863858cb331&S=63&L=36&N=27 Para deixar de receber nossas novidades clique http://mktpremium.com.br/mkt/unsubscribe.php?M=439570&C=0b858

[Libreoffice] 3.5 release from QA to point-zero

[resend of my post from 2011-09-04, 20:38 UTC with one little change] Hi *, Some time ago there was a discussion about the release for 3.5. The sub-optimal situation with the release of 3.4.0, was food for the discussion on the 3.5 release. Quite a lengthy and interesting discussion at that

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

Michael Meeks wrote (06-09-11 17:56) As you have seen, I posted some overview on the subject to the list two days ago I didn't see that, (no wonder, it was a Sunday evening ;-) ) any chance of a re-send; if you give enough details no doubt we can discuss it ourselves, thoug

Re: [Libreoffice] cppcheck git version

On 09/06/11 13:03, serval2...@yahoo.fr wrote: > Hello Jesse, > > Would it be possible before each cppcheck run to add this in the script : > - cd > - git pull -r > - make clean && make > ? > The goal is obviously to run the last git version each time. The time of > these few steps would be qu

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] undo/redo inserting cells in merged cells with shadows result in strange behavior

Hello, this patch removes some code that resulted in strange behavior with merged areas and shadows. The code extended the merged area by one column/row which resulted in strange behavior with undo/redo. It seems that the code was an old hack for the ui part that is no longer needed. Regards, Mar

Re: [Libreoffice] fix for fdo#33960 "cross reference to a list number, dot bug" makes sw/qa/complex/writer fail

On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:27:07 -0300 Neil Leathers wrote: > The approach is too simple. The first problem is that the level > separator is not necessarily a "." (and is configurable at each level > in other word processors). Its allowed for the test to assume an default config -- as it always tests

Re: [Libreoffice] fix for fdo#33960 "cross reference to a list number, dot bug" makes sw/qa/complex/writer fail

> The question is, is the below patch (which makes that subsequentcheck > failure go away) right in adapting the failing test to the new code, or > does this failure actually uncover unwanted side effects of the new code > (I'm esp. unsure about changing "A. 1." to "A 1")? The approach is too s

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSOC] how to call python code from the menu

Hello, I've tried to follow your steps but placing the code in wizards/com/sun/star/wizards/fax/CallWizard.py. So far I haven't been able to build it successfully. It complains and says: ERROR: File not found: CallWizard.py I attach a file with the changes I've done. Greetings 2011/8/17 Caolán

[Libreoffice] fix for fdo#33960 "cross reference to a list number, dot bug" makes sw/qa/complex/writer fail

At least with recent git trunk builds, make subsequentcheck fails in sw with 1) checkCrossReferences(complex.writer.CheckCrossReferences) org.junit.ComparisonFailure: set reference field format doesn't result in correct field result expected:< 1[.]> but was:< 1[]> at org.junit.Assert.as

Re: [Libreoffice] map files: how to update? [was: cppu::OPropertySetHelper ABI backwards compatibility]

On 09/06/2011 06:39 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:57:30AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: - For the question of which symbols for OPropertySetHelper2 to list in the various map files, see (you probably need acc

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Patch for MarkManager

On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:36:18 +0200 Christoph Lutz wrote: > today I managed to improve the patch again. The patch now speeds up > our mailmerge-Szenario enormously and seems to eliminate the > exponential waste of cpu-cycles. Would you please have a look at it? > > here some measurings: > > Mail

[Libreoffice] TF_POOLABLE in SfxItemPool

Hi there, While looking into SfxItemPool, trying to understand how this thing works, I've noticed that it has #ifdef TF_POOLABLE stuff all over the place. Is there any reason why we need to have this, or is it okay to just pick one variant and remove the other? Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOff

[Libreoffice] Returned mail: see transcript for details

(# ¾´9ìÕ"?m‹ b8ž¥£FÚWÝþ‘àf†ÙêëE#™Û·¨_§>˜­?65Çx¨TéU2j›üŠdϧ~úð›j(—³5TcCgyÊGý¶qЩX‘ ¸ â¶|žl®6}¹øüZeöR%}ds ל>Ë$â>‡ö 2âÎëâV___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] map files: how to update? [was: cppu::OPropertySetHelper ABI backwards compatibility]

On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:57:30AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >>> - For the question of which symbols for OPropertySetHelper2 to list >>> in the various map files, see >>> (you >>> probably need access to builds on the various platforms

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||39365 --- Comment #10 from Rainer Bie

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

Hi Cor, On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 07:16 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: > So thanks for putting this at the agenda. (But of course note that it is > not stated fully correct.) As you have seen, I posted some overview on > the subject to the list two days ago I didn't see that, any chance of a re-sen

Re: [Libreoffice] python is now also required for windows build

On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:54:13 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Caolan McNamara wrote: I hacked it earlier to use our internal python on windows, should work again out-of-the-box. Not that having a working python would be a bad thing - though if that script is the only reason it's required, we

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch for MarkManager

Hi Björn, today I managed to improve the patch again. The patch now speeds up our mailmerge-Szenario enormously and seems to eliminate the exponential waste of cpu-cycles. Would you please have a look at it? here some measurings: MailMerge-Time (in ms) without patch for 10, 50, 100, 150 datasets

[Libreoffice] SID_DOC_MODIFIED, booleans/strings/whatever it feels like

After much digging around, I've come to the conclusion that at some time in the past the SID_DOC_MODIFIED property could be basically anything, especially a string, e.g. "*" to indicate a modified doc. Then probably there was some clean up to give it a Boolean modified/unmodified state, with most t

Re: [Libreoffice] python is now also required for windows build

Caolan McNamara wrote: > I hacked it earlier to use our internal python on windows, should work > again out-of-the-box. > Not that having a working python would be a bad thing - though if that script is the only reason it's required, we should switch it to perl ... Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpH30Si

Re: [Libreoffice] Updated [Patch] new BITxxx functions for ODF 1.2

Hello all, On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 20:08, Niko Rönkkö wrote: > Hi > >> Wonderful, great stuff - I have to apologize, the many whitespace >> changes in the calc part of the patch are because of my substandard >> mentoring - cleaned-up version of the first patch attached. > > I was in the belief tha

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||40449 --- Comment #9 from Rainer Biel

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW-3-4] Fix for hang in slideshow

Hi, could someone please review & cherry-pick for 3-4 this fix: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=044c534b2deb985052e7977bba3290c5d2c3ad77 Thanks, -- Thorsten pgp2s2bIebMGl.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 32861, which changed state. Bug 32861 Summary: Impress hangs part way through slide show https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32861 What|Old Value |New Value -

Re: [Libreoffice] python is now also required for windows build

Thanks, build progressing again. --- Noel Grandin Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 13:22 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: >> Hi >> >> I note that filters/source/svg runs a python script, which means that >> python needs to be installed from cygwin in order to do a build on >> windows. > I

Re: [Libreoffice] Updated [Patch] new BITxxx functions for ODF 1.2

Hi Wonderful, great stuff - I have to apologize, the many whitespace changes in the calc part of the patch are because of my substandard mentoring - cleaned-up version of the first patch attached. I was in the belief that we shall use spaces instead of tabs. Corrected patches attached. -- RN

Re: [Libreoffice] python is now also required for windows build

On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 13:22 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: > Hi > > I note that filters/source/svg runs a python script, which means that > python needs to be installed from cygwin in order to do a build on > windows. I hacked it earlier to use our internal python on windows, should work again out-of

[Libreoffice] python is now also required for windows build

Hi I note that filters/source/svg runs a python script, which means that python needs to be installed from cygwin in order to do a build on windows. http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Windows_Build_Dependencies should probably be updated. Regards, Noel Grandin Disclaimer: http://

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] frm::OInterfaceContainer::insertByIndex must not crash for null argument.

On 09/06/2011 12:25 PM, Noel Power wrote: Hi Stephan, On 06/09/11 10:07, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Found a regression from a recent "Disable fake VBA events for the old-style form controls" commit that causes the forms/qa/unoapi check to fail. Attached patch fixes it. -Stephan thanks for fixing,

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] frm::OInterfaceContainer::insertByIndex must not crash for null argument.

Hi Stephan, On 06/09/11 10:07, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Found a regression from a recent "Disable fake VBA events for the old-style form controls" commit that causes the forms/qa/unoapi check to fail. Attached patch fixes it. -Stephan thanks for fixing, ( I see Caolán pushed ) btw what exactly

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] frm::OInterfaceContainer::insertByIndex must not crash for null argument.

On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:00:26 +0100 Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 11:07 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > Found a regression from a recent "Disable fake VBA events for the > > old-style form controls" commit that causes the forms/qa/unoapi > > check to fail. Attached patch fixe

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] cppcheck scope

On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 23:28 +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote: > This patch should fix the cppcheck style warnings for grfmgr.cxx: Pushed, thanks for this. C. (p.s. clarified off-list LGPLv3+/MPLv1.1) ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedeskt

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] frm::OInterfaceContainer::insertByIndex must not crash for null argument.

On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 11:07 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Found a regression from a recent "Disable fake VBA events for the > old-style form controls" commit that causes the forms/qa/unoapi check to > fail. Attached patch fixes it. pushed, this is part of getting the subsequent tests working

Re: [Libreoffice] cannot build with ATL, cannot build without

Hi Caolán Thanks, that was the magic sauce. My new configure command line is $ ./configure --without-junit --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/Components/apache-ant-1.8.0/ --disable-mozilla --disable-activex --disable-atl And the build is now making it's way past the extensions folder. Could someone p

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] Honor --disable-strip in gbuild.

On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 09:51 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Unlike the old dmake build system, solenv/gbuild/platform/unxgcc.mk sets > -Wl,--strip-all depending on --enable-symbols only, and ignores > --disable-strip altogether. Attached patch fixes that. Pushed. C. _

[Libreoffice] planned DOWNTIME of e-mail, mailing lists, downloads, rsync, wiki, QAtrack and planet

Hello, as the LibreOffice project grows, we have to add some extra hardware to cope with the number of downloads and website access. ;-) In order to add two SSD disks for improving mirroring speed to one of our server, there will be a planned DOWNTIME today, September 6th, at

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] frm::OInterfaceContainer::insertByIndex must not crash for null argument.

Found a regression from a recent "Disable fake VBA events for the old-style form controls" commit that causes the forms/qa/unoapi check to fail. Attached patch fixes it. -Stephan >From 9bea29af5a3fd86031e28bb8b4ca3f445f3eca96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephan Bergmann Date: Tue, 6 Sep 20

Re: [Libreoffice] cannot build with ATL, cannot build without

On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 08:51 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: > Hi Regina > > I'm using Visual Studio 2008 Express Edition and my configure > parameters are: > > $ ./configure --without-junit > --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/Components/apache-ant-1.8.0/ > --disable-mozilla --disable-activex-component Firs

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Petr Mladek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||39313 --- Comment #8 from Petr Mladek 201

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Honor --disable-strip in gbuild.

On 09/06/2011 09:58 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Unlike the old dmake build system, solenv/gbuild/platform/unxgcc.mk sets -Wl,--strip-all depending on --enable-symbols only, and ignores --disable-strip altogether. Attached patch fixes that

[Libreoffice] Länkerbjudande

Hej, Låt mig presentera mig själv, mitt namn är Peter Karlsson och jag arbetar som SEO manager. I samband ett uppdrag för en av mina kunder fann jag http://www.libreoffice.org/ och jag vill därför berätta lite om vad jag kan erbjuda dig. I min portfolio har jag många hemsidor som på daglig basi

[Libreoffice] Fwd: [PATCH] Honor --disable-strip in gbuild.

Damn the gmail interface! I demand reply-to-list :) @Stephan: sorry for doublemail :) -- Přeposlaná zpráva -- Od: Tomáš Chvátal Datum: 6. září 2011 10:00 Předmět: Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Honor --disable-strip in gbuild. Komu: Stephan Bergmann Nice, I was planning to look to

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Honor --disable-strip in gbuild.

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Unlike the old dmake build system, solenv/gbuild/platform/unxgcc.mk sets > -Wl,--strip-all depending on --enable-symbols only, and ignores > --disable-strip altogether.  Attached patch fixes that. doesn't that also apply to macosx.mk ? No

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Honor --disable-strip in gbuild.

Unlike the old dmake build system, solenv/gbuild/platform/unxgcc.mk sets -Wl,--strip-all depending on --enable-symbols only, and ignores --disable-strip altogether. Attached patch fixes that. (To avoid confusion: I recently switched my git email address, but my contributions are still under t

[Libreoffice] Watch out for 64 bit errors

Hi everyone, I saw this article in a security mailing list, and I thought it was relevant for all the LO devs too, as our code needs to work both on 32 and 64 bits :) http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/collection-of-examples-of-64-bit-errors-in-real-programs/ Sadly, the code samples are fo

Re: [Libreoffice] Autogen.sh demands "Mozilla build tooling" although building Mozilla is disabled

Hi, What about to provide the link in configure? Or even better to do the download process automatically. May I put it to the master? KAMI On 09/06/2011 09:11 AM, Noel Grandin wrote: Hi Norbert Could you update the wiki http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Windows_Build_Dependenc

Re: [Libreoffice] Autogen.sh demands "Mozilla build tooling" although building Mozilla is disabled

Hi Norbert Could you update the wiki http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Windows_Build_Dependencies with the new location of the mozilla prebuilt binaries? Thanks, Noel Grandin Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Regina Henschel > wrote: >> Hi Norbert, >> >> No