Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH/REVIEW-3-4] Backport reading AES-encrypted ODF 1.2 documents (as genereated by LibO 3.5)

2011-11-20 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 11/19/2011 09:40 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: So for the release notes something as follows would be appropriate: " 3.4.5 In LibreOffice 3.5 a new stronger encryption will be introduced. As consequence files encrypted in LibreOffice 3.5 can not be opened by LibreOffice 3.4.4 and earlier. LibreOffice 3

Re: [Libreoffice] PostgreSQL-SDBC in LO: build system help

2011-11-20 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:16:07AM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 00:21 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> Thanks; this being applied, I have pushed to master. > Lovely - glad it landed finally. Any chance of mentioning it > (and some of the other nice fixes & database

Re: [Libreoffice] .: bin/get-bugzilla-attachments-by-mimetype

2011-11-20 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:37:07AM -0800, Caolán McNamara wrote: > add script to download documents from various bugzillas Thanks for putting this script to the tree. I got an earlier version of this before the Paris conference, where I mentioned it detected various issues in the new RTF tok

Re: [Libreoffice] Registry keys for Windows compilation

2011-11-20 Thread Mat M
Le Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:37:25 +0100, Mat M a écrit: Le Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:02:56 +0100, julien2412 a écrit: Hello, I'm trying to compile on Windows Vista (usually I compile without pb on a Debian testing) and had error messages : checking the Perl version... checked (perl 5) checking fo

Re: [Libreoffice] Registry keys for Windows compilation

2011-11-20 Thread julien2412
Hello Matm. About checking the reality, I agree with you but I'm not at all at this point for the moment. I just want to improve the automatic detection for Windows compilation and my 2 small patches are definitely not the "absolute fixes" (hope too they don't break anything :-) ). For the priorit

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] try to improve automatic detection for Windows building

2011-11-20 Thread julien2412
Just some rethinking of ANT detection. If the ant home is provided by command line, we should use it. We try to retrieve ANT_HOME only if we found nothing and if it's windows os. This patch replaces the former one. http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3523407/patch_configure_in_version2.txt

[Libreoffice] Will the real creator of "Easy Hack 39596 - use the CLang++ static analyser to find bugs" please stand up

2011-11-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi all, will the real creator of this Easy Hack: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39596 please stand up (aka CC himself on the bug). There has been a reply recently and some mentoring might be helpful. CC'ing Michael as the Easy Hack sounds suspiciously like his creation to me (or

Re: [Libreoffice] Registry keys for Windows compilation

2011-11-20 Thread Mat M
Hello Le Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:42:04 +0100, julien2412 a écrit: Hello Denis and Matm (I had already answered to Jonathan :-) ) Thanks about your answer. Between the moment I had posted on this thread and your answer, I was trying another way. On this thread http://nabble.documentfoundation

Re: [Libreoffice] Registry keys for Windows compilation

2011-11-20 Thread julien2412
Jonathan: I agree with you but since regtool is included by default in Cygwin, I thought about the quickest fix first. Right now, autogen passed. I disabled junit and dbgutils but I enabled most of extension + symbols. Now i runned make and wait for the result. I had some bt during compilation in o

Re: [Libreoffice] cross reference

2011-11-20 Thread Cor Nouws
[ forwarded this to the users list ] Kees Kriek wrote (20-11-11 13:29) When I use a cross reference in Writer to for example another item, the [...] -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.

Re: [Libreoffice] mac users and trouble with libreoffice urgent help

2011-11-20 Thread Pedro
You should post this on the Users mailing list http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/mailing_list/MailingListOptions.jtp?forum=1639498 Please provide more details on the LibreOffice and MacOS versions you are using. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/mac-users

Re: [Libreoffice] Registry keys for Windows compilation

2011-11-20 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 20/11/2011 09:42, julien2412 wrote: Hello Denis and Matm (I had already answered to Jonathan :-) ) Thanks about your answer. Between the moment I had posted on this thread and your answer, I was trying another way. On this thread http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/REVIEW-try-to-improve-auto

[Libreoffice] mac users and trouble with libreoffice urgent help

2011-11-20 Thread olivia adams
Dear AS a mac users here we try to save documents as .doc or .txt or .rtf and nothing is working and is turn it to ODF or the current format we need advance help as it is urgent Regards Olivia Adamou ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.

[Libreoffice] cross reference

2011-11-20 Thread Kees Kriek
Hi When I use a cross reference in Writer to for example another item, the cross reference to a 'reference' seems OK but a reference to a 'page' results in the reference name again. It went well in version 3.3 but it goes wrong from version 3.4.. I use Windows Vista. One of my Dutch contacts u

Re: [Libreoffice] help asked/offered for bug 36555

2011-11-20 Thread Alex Thurgood
Le 20/11/2011 10:49, Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit : Hi all, So fixing this should be easier than addressing the SQLite/mdbtools situation cleanly! I would tend to agree. It worked before in 3.3.x, and then it stopped working when 3.4 was branched, so if my addled brain is not too rotten, tha

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Help files for new Math symbols

2011-11-20 Thread Andras Timar
Hi Olivier, 2011/11/20 Olivier Hallot : > Please find attached the help files for the new Math symbols as described in > > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.5#Math > Pushed, thanks. Andras ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.f

Re: [Libreoffice] help asked/offered for bug 36555

2011-11-20 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 01:54:56PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > So - indeed, the first step is to get a build. After you have that, > resurrecting the old mdbtools CWS / patch set would be a good idea. That's not the best way to fix this bug. As I read it, bug#36555 is about accessing Access fil

[Libreoffice] System nss headers define FREEBSD, break build

2011-11-20 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi, I've just been bitten by this issue and thought this warranted some sort of warning. Just to be clear, I am _not_ trying to build on a FreeBSD system. I've not done a complete build since the required dependencies to the mozilla libraries and headers were introduced and I was quite surprised

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] translate German -> English

2011-11-20 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 09:17:21AM +0100, Luc Castermans wrote: > Yes. I confim LPLv3+MPL 1.1 are applicable for previous + future > work. OK, thanks. I pushed the patch. I also changed a few things in the translation, see http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=007a00589d750a84

Re: [Libreoffice] MinGW cross-compilation fails in i18npool, why?

2011-11-20 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi, On Sunday, 2011-11-20 01:41:16 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote: > localedata_%_invis.cxx : $(realpath > $(SRC_ROOT)/i18npool/source/localedata/data)/%.xml saxparser.rdb \ > $(OUTDIR_FOR_BUILD)/bin/saxparser$(gb_Executable_EXT) For the records, gb_Executable_EXT_for_build does it. Thanks to Nor

Re: [Libreoffice] Registry keys for Windows compilation

2011-11-20 Thread julien2412
Hello Denis and Matm (I had already answered to Jonathan :-) ) Thanks about your answer. Between the moment I had posted on this thread and your answer, I was trying another way. On this thread http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/REVIEW-try-to-improve-automatic-detection-for-Windows-building-tp35

Re: [Libreoffice] translate German -> English

2011-11-20 Thread Luc Castermans
Yes. I confim LPLv3+MPL 1.1 are applicable for previous + future work. Regards Luc 2011/11/19 Norbert Thiebaud > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Joop Kiefte wrote: > > Sorry for being a nitpicker, but you mean LGPL/MPL ? > > actually LGPLv3+/MPL 1.1 , please. > > Norbert > -- Luc Cas