[Libreoffice] feature/gbuild_extensions

So, I've run test on MacOSX... I ran in a couple of issues.. I pushed patches for them on the branch The last commit ( 381bed81e43d7fdd541115e0ab4213b0609e7ac0 ) is a hack and is probably wrong... but it get me to the end of the build + package Norbert __

Re: [Libreoffice] bug 36874 (label printing) further improvement?

>> My calculation is based on the assumption (presumption?) that the >> page containing the labels is symmetrical, i.e. rotating the page >> 180 degrees is not a problem, left margine equals right margin and >> top margin equals bottom margin. >some labels paper that I bought last year (I guess of

Re: [Libreoffice] make dev-install error, dict-xx.oxt files not found

>>The error is that dict-xx.oxt (today they were dict-an.oxt, dict-be.oxt, >>dict-el.oxt, dict-gd.oxt, dict-si.oxt and dict-te.oxt) files cannot be found. >I think running "git pull -r" in core/dictionaries should fix this. Thanks, it helped. Still strange that git pull -r from core doesn't/didn

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 3/8][PUSHED] Easyhack fdo#38831 remove SvStrings

On 01/04/2012 06:01 AM, Lubos Lunak wrote: On Saturday 31 of December 2011, Brad Sowden wrote: On 12/29/2011 10:26 PM, Brad Sowden wrote: Hi, See attached. Actually, this patch causes "make dev-install -o build" to fail. I have no idea why as the patch looks extremely innocent. If I drop th

Re: [Libreoffice] libvisio: how can I help?

On 03/01/12 21:34, Fridrich Strba wrote: Hello, Bruno, If you are looking at something cool to do inside libvisio, I might have an idea or two :) For the while, libvisio is converting binary MS Visio files in versions 6 (Visio 2000 and 2002) and 11 (Visio 2003 -> 2010). There is another for

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] (3.5 Beta2) Fix for fdo#44280 [GUI] wrong position of 'Adding extension...' at Extension Manager dialog

On 29/12/11 19:10, Olivier Hallot wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi > > Please find enclosed a patch to fix fdo#44280 > > The patch was done in master and should be cerry picked in 3.5 ASAP thanks, looks much better with the patch! pushed to master and libreoffice-

[Libreoffice] Updating Italian dictionaries

(I follow this list, but please do CC me explicitly on replies) The Italian dictionary in LibreOffice master is not the latest version, that includes some bugfixes and a detailed history of contributions that was missing from the version shipped in OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 and imported into LibreO

Re: [Libreoffice] libvisio: how can I help?

Hello, Bruno, If you are looking at something cool to do inside libvisio, I might have an idea or two :) For the while, libvisio is converting binary MS Visio files in versions 6 (Visio 2000 and 2002) and 11 (Visio 2003 -> 2010). There is another format that Visio can export to, and it is th

Re: [Libreoffice] Build Failure: Error in module icu

Hi Eike, > > > "/media/..." makes me wonder what medium Ash is and the file system used > thereon. It's not by chance some kind of USB stick with a FAT file > system? Such a constellation when building on Linux already caused > trouble in the past. > Ash is, indeed, a USB stick, but it is formatt

[Libreoffice] Python Bridge on MacOS x64 with python default

Hello i am start using the python bridge in mac, i am work in OSS ERP[1] it has a report tool based in python bridge I want to know if there is any plan to get LO for x64, python comes in LO was built in x32. In another hand is posible get python bridge standalone installation ? Or get the source

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Easy patch on l10ntools

Hi Andras, On Tuesday, 2012-01-03 20:09:42 +0100, Andras Timar wrote: > >> diff --git a/l10ntools/source/export.cxx b/l10ntools/source/export.cxx > >> @@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ void Export::InsertListEntry( const ByteString > >> &rText, > >> const ByteString &rLine ) > >>              (*pCurEntry)[

Re: [Libreoffice] bug 36874 (label printing) further improvement?

Hello, Just to mix in the middle: from this and a previous mail from you: >> It would be much better if the label-definitions contain all dimensions, i.e. yes > My calculation is based on the assumption (presumption?) that the > page containing the labels is symmetrical, i.e. rotating the p

Re: [Libreoffice] libvisio: how can I help?

Hi Bruno, On 2012-01-03 at 19:23 +, Bruno Girin wrote: > > Fridrich is in vacation this week, so I'll step in :-) > > I think you can build Lo and test the heck out of libvisio, fill bug > > report when you find some ( > > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport ) and even better post >

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.4.5.2 tag created (3.4.5-rc2)

> do you mean 3.4.5-rc1 ? No. That was almost a month ago :) http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/ANNOUNCE-libreoffice-3-4-5-1-tag-created-3-4-5-rc1-tt3585973.html ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.o

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [REVIEW] quick patch for extensions ole part

Thanks Eike ! I commited and pushed on master. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/REVIEW-quick-patch-for-extensions-ole-part-tp3619208p3630063.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Build Failure: Error in module icu

Hi Ashwini, On Monday, 2012-01-02 22:37:04 +0530, Ashwini Oruganti wrote: > My LibreOffice build is failing repeatedly and the error seems to be in > the module "icu". Strange.. > log for /media/Ash/zcodes/zzlibre-office/git/libo/icu "/media/..." makes me wonder what medium Ash is and the fil

Re: [Libreoffice] libvisio: how can I help?

On 03/01/12 18:59, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Bruno Girin wrote: Hi all, I discovered the existence of libvisio [1] while building LibO this morning. So first I'd like to thank Fridrich and Eilidh for the code and then I'd like to know: how can I help? I'm happy to

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Easy patch on l10ntools

2012/1/3 Eike Rathke : > Hi julien2412, > > On Wednesday, 2011-12-28 14:31:21 -0800, julien2412 wrote: > >> Cppcheck report tells this : >> 1474  duplicateBranch style   Found duplicate branches for if and else >> for l10ntools/source/export.cxx >> >> >> Even if this seems easy, perhaps it could be

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Patch for "Same expression on both sides of '&&'" in basegfx module

Hi julien2412, On Wednesday, 2011-12-28 13:13:43 -0800, julien2412 wrote: > On cppcheck report, there were 2 "Same expression on both sides of '&&'" on > b2dpolypolygoncutter.cxx > > I don't know how this part works so I recognize it's just guessing. > > diff --git a/basegfx/source/polygon/b2d

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Easy patch on l10ntools

Hi julien2412, On Wednesday, 2011-12-28 14:31:21 -0800, julien2412 wrote: > Cppcheck report tells this : > 1474 duplicateBranch style Found duplicate branches for if and else > for l10ntools/source/export.cxx > > > Even if this seems easy, perhaps it could be something else than just > "rTex

Re: [Libreoffice] libvisio: how can I help?

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Bruno Girin wrote: > Hi all, > > I discovered the existence of libvisio [1] while building LibO this morning. > So first I'd like to thank Fridrich and Eilidh for the code and then I'd > like to know: how can I help? I'm happy to work on code or test cases: I use >

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] quick patch for extensions ole part

Hi julien2412, On Thursday, 2011-12-29 08:38:31 -0800, julien2412 wrote: > Another "Same expression on both sides of '||'" > detected by cppcheck. > > I supposed this patch but I made a research of "INVOKE_PROPERTYPUT" on the > file, either it's not the only location where INVOKE_PROPERTYPUTREF

Re: [Libreoffice] Another code finesse I may have missed

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Norbert So it went. Kind regards Olivier Em 03-01-2012 15:31, Norbert Thiebaud escreveu: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Olivier Hallot > wrote: >> 636 OUnoObject::OUnoObject(const uno::Reference< >> report::XReportComponent>& _xCompo

Re: [Libreoffice] Another code finesse I may have missed

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Olivier Hallot wrote: > 636 OUnoObject::OUnoObject(const uno::Reference< > report::XReportComponent>& _xComponent > 637  ,const ::rtl::OUString& rModelName > 638  ,sal_uInt16 _nObjectType) > 639 

Re: [Libreoffice] product-name in title bar of the office ?

On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 22:23 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > Hi Eike, > > Eike Rathke wrote (02-01-12 22:18) > > On Wednesday, 2011-12-28 17:18:02 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > > >> But that does not change the title bar of the window? > > > > It does, but apparently only in an --enable-dbgutil build. Sorry

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 3/8][PUSHED] Easyhack fdo#38831 remove SvStrings

On Saturday 31 of December 2011, Brad Sowden wrote: > On 12/29/2011 10:26 PM, Brad Sowden wrote: > > Hi, > > > > See attached. > > Actually, this patch causes "make dev-install -o build" to fail. I have > no idea why as the patch looks extremely innocent. > > If I drop this patch (and patch 8 which

[Libreoffice] Another code finesse I may have missed

636 OUnoObject ::OUnoObject (*const* uno

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 2/8][PUSHED] Easyhack fdo#38831 remove SvStrings

On Thursday 29 of December 2011, Brad Sowden wrote: > Hi, > > See attached. > > Note 1 > -- > I made the following change in one place. Is this ok or should I call > reserve(10) to be safe? > > -SvStrings aArr( 10, 10 ); > +std::vector aArr; The same like before. Pushed. --

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 1/8][PUSHED] Easyhack fdo#38831 remove SvStrings

On Thursday 29 of December 2011, Brad Sowden wrote: > Hi, > > See attached. > > Note 1 > -- > I assume casting from size_t to sal_uInt16 is reasonable in the > following scenario (I didn't want to update all callers in this patch)? > > sal_uInt16 SwGlossaries::GetGroupCnt() > { > -retur

[Libreoffice] How to write an import filter?

Hello Libre-office developers, I'm interested in learning how to write an import filter for some legacy document formats. I tried to figure out by myself but failed. Could you point some documents / wiki pages, or even some files in the source code repository? Especially I need to know how to reg

Re: [Libreoffice] .: sot/Library_sot.mk

On 21/12/11 16:16, Caolán McNamara wrote: > sot/Library_sot.mk |2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > New commits: > commit 56c0d3b569ba62eafe94f79299e5afb83f2f891b > Author: Caolán McNamara > Date: Wed Dec 21 15:16:26 2011 + > > disable min as macro under msvc

[Libreoffice] MUHTEŞEM FIRSATLAR YENİ YILDA DA DEVAM EDİYOR

Ana Sayfa Ana Sayfa Referanslarımız Ev Tipi Modellerimiz Ticari Modellerimiz İletişim Masaj koltuğu sektöründe 15. yılımızı doldurmaktayız. Ürünleri

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Online update service up & running

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Kendy Em 03-01-2012 13:15, Jan Holesovsky escreveu: > Hi Olivier, > > [taking this rather to the dev ML :-)] > > On 2012-01-03 at 07:06 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote: > (snip) >> Also, as far as I remember, OpenOffice had a download interface fo

[Libreoffice] libvisio: how can I help?

Hi all, I discovered the existence of libvisio [1] while building LibO this morning. So first I'd like to thank Fridrich and Eilidh for the code and then I'd like to know: how can I help? I'm happy to work on code or test cases: I use Visio all the time at work so I often have weird and wonde

[Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.4.5.2 tag created (3.4.5-rc2)

Hi, there have been created the libreoffice-3.4.5.2 tag for 3.4.5-rc2 release. The corresponding official builds will be available by the end of the week. It will be used as final if no blocker is found. See the attached list of changes against 3.4.5-rc2. Now, you might switch your current 3-4

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Remove unused tools function.

On Tuesday 03 of January 2012, Marcel Metz wrote: > Hello lo-devs, > > this patch removes the unused (according to OpenGrok) GetIsoFallback > function from the tools module. Looks ok, pushed. -- Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz ___ LibreOffice mailing li

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Online update service up & running

Hi Olivier, [taking this rather to the dev ML :-)] On 2012-01-03 at 07:06 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote: > I guess LibreOffice will send a ping to a given URL and get a response > that a new version is available. Yes. > I affirmative, can this URL be placed > in a configuration (XML) file (so t

Re: [Libreoffice] Tinderbox failure, last success: 2011-12-05 19:05:50

On 01/03/2012 01:49 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: On 3 January 2012 03:37, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: I believe that one is linked to the gbuild conversion of cppuhelper... Hm, me too, but I have no idea how cppu::WeakImplHelper1::~WeakImplHelper1(void) could be defined in comphelpMSC.dll. This is ap

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 41089, which changed state. Bug 41089 Summary: FILESAVE: Impossible with password protection https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41089 What|Old Value |New Value -

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fixing some errors when building with clang on linux

On Monday 02 of January 2012, August Sodora wrote: > The fourth and final patch is the most troubling one because there is > no way it can be correct. Clang really doesn't like stlport trying to > use placement new to call a "helper" constructor and according to [1] > it might not do what was inten

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 2/2] Added missing includes.

--- binfilter/bf_xmloff/source/core/xmloff_xmlexp.cxx |1 + .../bf_xmloff/source/meta/xmloff_xmlmetae.cxx |1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/binfilter/bf_xmloff/source/core/xmloff_xmlexp.cxx b/binfilter/bf_xmloff/source/core/xmloff_xmlexp.cxx index

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 1/2] Added missing includes.

--- binfilter/inc/bf_starmath/smmod.hxx |2 ++ binfilter/inc/bf_sw/shellres.hxx|2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/binfilter/inc/bf_starmath/smmod.hxx b/binfilter/inc/bf_starmath/smmod.hxx index f3f4ec4..1ec73db 100644 --- a/binfilter/inc/bf_starmath/

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 1/2] Added missing includes.

--- binfilter/inc/bf_starmath/smmod.hxx |2 ++ binfilter/inc/bf_sw/shellres.hxx|2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/binfilter/inc/bf_starmath/smmod.hxx b/binfilter/inc/bf_starmath/smmod.hxx index f3f4ec4..1ec73db 100644 --- a/binfilter/inc/bf_starmath/s

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 5/5] Removed unnecessary tools includes.

--- sd/source/filter/eppt/pptx-epptbase.cxx |1 - sfx2/source/doc/docfile.cxx |1 - sfx2/source/doc/objstor.cxx |1 - vcl/unx/generic/app/salinst.cxx |1 - 4 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/sd/source/filter/eppt/pptx-epp

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 4/5] Removed unnecessary tools includes.

--- avmedia/source/gstreamer/gstcommon.hxx |1 - avmedia/source/quicktime/quicktimecommon.hxx |1 - avmedia/source/win/wincommon.hxx |1 - basic/source/sbx/sbxres.cxx|2 ++ basic/source/sbx/sbxres.hxx

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 3/5] Removed unnecessary tools includes.

--- cui/source/factory/cuiresmgr.cxx |1 - cui/source/factory/dlgfact.cxx |1 - cui/source/inc/about.hxx |1 - dbaccess/source/core/api/viewcontainer.cxx |1 - dbaccess/source/ui/inc/charsets.hxx

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 1/5] Removed unnecessary tools includes.

Hello lo-devs, this patch series removes a lot of unnecessary includes for the various tools header. The patches without suffix should be applied to the core repository, the .binfilter.patch suffix should be applied to the binfilter repository. I've tested the build with the configuration --enable

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for bug fdo#44110, New Math symbols issues in Windows

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Kendy Em 30-12-2011 06:36, Jan Holesovsky escreveu: > Hi Olivier, > > On 2011-12-24 at 00:13 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote: > >> Please find the patch attached in bug 44110, together with the >> description of the issue and fix. >> >> https://bugs.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] Correct ARCCOSH's parameter description

Hi Korrawit, 31.12.2011 14:46, Korrawit Pruegsanusak пишет: I found this while translating. Could someone please review it? Looks great! Nice catch, thanks! :) Also, if this patch could be pushed in -3-5 branch as well? I've found the wiki page [1] says hard string freeze is next week. So, i

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove unused tools function.

Hello lo-devs, this patch removes the unused (according to OpenGrok) GetIsoFallback function from the tools module. regards Marcel --- rsc/source/parser/rscdb.cxx |1 - tools/Library_tl.mk |1 - tools/Package_inc.mk|1 - tools/inc/tools/isofallback.hxx |

Re: [Libreoffice] make dev-install error, dict-xx.oxt files not found

Hi Winfried, I think running "git pull -r" in core/dictionaries should fix this. Tim On 01/03/2012 12:10 PM, Winfried Donkers wrote: > > I often get a failed make dev_install when building following a git > pull --rebase. > > The error is that dict-xx.oxt (today they were dict-an.oxt, > dict-be.

Re: [Libreoffice] bug 36874 (label printing) further improvement?

Hi Ivan, >> Ivan, what do you think? Are you interested? >Interested, but extremely busy the whole January through... :-( >I'm sorry. But an UI is an easy piece of programming; Winfried, may be >you need a few little tips to start, and then there will be no >questions? If so, please ask on usin

Re: [Libreoffice] bug 36874 (label printing) further improvement?

Hi Rainer, hi Winfried, 03.01.2012 11:41, Rainer Bielefeld пишет: Winfried Donkers schrieb: (See bug 36874 (and this list) for history) I am quite willing to further improve the labelprinting functionality by adding the page size to the label definitions and label-creation code, but I need s

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW:3-4-5][PUSHED:3-4-5] crash in LO 3.4.5 rc1 : fdo40253

Le 03/01/2012 11:20, Petr Mladek a écrit : > Lubos Lunak píše v Po 02. 01. 2012 v 18:39 +0100: >> On Monday 02 of January 2012, Petr Mladek wrote: >>> Petr Mladek píše v Po 02. 01. 2012 v 11:31 +0100: Jean-Baptiste Faure píše v Po 26. 12. 2011 v 10:51 +0100: > Hi, > > Bug fdo40253

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 37390, which changed state. Bug 37390 Summary: LibreOffice writes invalid ODF (please don't re-open, file new bugs instead) https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37390 What|Old Value

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fixing some errors when building with clang on linux

On 01/02/2012 08:11 PM, August Sodora wrote: For the past couple of weeks I've been trying to build LO with clang on linux and have hit a couple of obstacles. I can't get the internal nss to build and I didn't even try to enable mozilla because it fails to build on ubuntu anyway. The -Qunused-arg

[Libreoffice] make dev-install error, dict-xx.oxt files not found

I often get a failed make dev_install when building following a git pull --rebase. The error is that dict-xx.oxt (today they were dict-an.oxt, dict-be.oxt, dict-el.oxt, dict-gd.oxt, dict-si.oxt and dict-te.oxt) files cannot be found. This occurred also after a clean git clone on a new machine. M

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW:3-4, 3-4-5] crash in LO 3.4.5 rc1 : fdo40253

On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 11:31 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > Jean-Baptiste Faure píše v Po 26. 12. 2011 v 10:51 +0100: > > Hi, > > > > Bug fdo40253 seems to be fixed in LO 3.5.0 beta2+ but still crashes LO > > 3.4.5 rc1. I don't know which commit solved this but is it possible to > > backport the fix t

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW:3-4-5][PUSHED:3-4-5] crash in LO 3.4.5 rc1 : fdo40253

Lubos Lunak píše v Po 02. 01. 2012 v 18:39 +0100: > On Monday 02 of January 2012, Petr Mladek wrote: > > Petr Mladek píše v Po 02. 01. 2012 v 11:31 +0100: > > > Jean-Baptiste Faure píše v Po 26. 12. 2011 v 10:51 +0100: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Bug fdo40253 seems to be fixed in LO 3.5.0 beta2+ bu

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW 3-4-5][PUSHED:3-4-5] Related: fdo#33463 (writerfilter)

Lubos Lunak píše v Po 02. 01. 2012 v 18:29 +0100: > On Monday 02 of January 2012, Petr Mladek wrote: > > Miklos Vajna píše v So 31. 12. 2011 v 14:51 +0100: > > > I don't have a -3-4 checkout around - could someone check if commit > > > 52f51f57287fc955fd83b521c80519beb5c923bf in master is what fixe

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW-3-4-5][PUSHED:3-4-5] bug#36874 to be patched in 3.4.5 as well?

and correct subject Petr Mladek píše v Út 03. 01. 2012 v 10:15 +0100: > Korrawit Pruegsanusak píše v Út 03. 01. 2012 v 10:38 +0700: > > >> I see the point and agree with your assumption. Your patch makes sense > > >> and I have pushed it to the 3-4 branch, see > > >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/li

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW-3-4-5] bug#36874 to be patched in 3.4.5 as well?

Korrawit Pruegsanusak píše v Út 03. 01. 2012 v 10:38 +0700: > >> I see the point and agree with your assumption. Your patch makes sense > >> and I have pushed it to the 3-4 branch, see > >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4&id > >>=502ef71db74c3cdb1433c3402a0d

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Correct ARCCOSH's parameter description

Hello all, I found this while translating. Could someone please review it? Also, if this patch could be pushed in -3-5 branch as well? I've found the wiki page [1] says hard string freeze is next week. So, it would be good if it could be pushed. [1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW-3-4-5] bug#36874 to be patched in 3.4.5 as well?

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 04:38:05 +0100, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: Just a reminder. As you are the third reviewer, could you please cherry-pick it to 3-4-5? Thanks! Best Regards, a last minute 3.4.5 cherry-pick would be a bless!!! ___ LibreOffic