Re: Android UI branch

For just basic UI experimentation / "active mockups" without any actual document handling code behind you don't need any LibreOffice code. That said, there is already a feature/android branch. I don't know if we intend to merge it to master soon, perhaps? --tml ___

Re: OK to merge the fw? libraries in framework?

On 02/09/2012 12:09 AM, Lubos Lunak wrote: [*] Seriously, I can't find a thing. Is there actually something using the library? Many libraries that export UNO services are never linked against directly. Stephan ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice

Android UI branch

Good morning Michael Would it be possible to get a branch specifically for android work where i can push any of my work or for now just work on a local clone for the time being? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://li

[PATCH]bug 44516 improved label and business card document creation

The patch itself is not attached to this mail (size 1.2MB), but attached to the bug itself. The patch file is so large because the file labels.xcu has almost all lines changed. This patch addresses problems that were not solved with patch 36874. Changes made in the patch: -added page width and p

Re: [PATCH] [PUSHED] Module READMEs for libs-extern modules

Setting it PUSHED. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [PATCH] Module READMEs for libs-extern modules

Hi Josh, On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 13:48 +1030, Josh Heidenreich wrote: > Hi, > > Here is another patch containing READMEs for modules. > This one contains all the modules from libs-extern. Thanks a lot. Pushed to master. BTW, this is not a big issue, but I got several trailing whitespace warnings

Re: [REVIEWED][PUSHED 3-5] fix for fdo#45768, copying a RTL sheet results in a LTR sheet

On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 02:54 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > Hey, > > Please cherrypick > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=b1c9d167ef96df5c3a781ed825d789505a325324 > to 3-5. > > It fixes the problem that copying RTL sheets are inserted as LTR > sheets. We need to adjust the

Re: [REVIEWED][PUSHED 3-5] fix for fdo#45481, undo does not work with text pasted from external tool to calc

On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 02:51 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > Hey, > > please cherrypick > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=73088aaaed3ad16f80405a3d87cea437d350b893 > to 3-5. > > It solves the problem that undo in calc can not remove pasted content > from an external program.

[PATCH] Module READMEs for libs-extern modules

Hi, Here is another patch containing READMEs for modules. This one contains all the modules from libs-extern. Cheers, Josh 0001-Added-and-improved-READMEs-for-modules-whihc-used-to.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffic

fix for fdo#45768, copying a RTL sheet results in a LTR sheet

Hey, Please cherrypick http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=b1c9d167ef96df5c3a781ed825d789505a325324 to 3-5. It fixes the problem that copying RTL sheets are inserted as LTR sheets. We need to adjust the settings directly because ScTable is not copyable and therefore we need to

[REVIEW] fix for fdo#45481, undo does not work with text pasted from external tool to calc

Hey, please cherrypick http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=73088aaaed3ad16f80405a3d87cea437d350b893 to 3-5. It solves the problem that undo in calc can not remove pasted content from an external program. The patch just correctly sets the paste area to the ScMarkData used in t

Need code pointer for bug 43895

Hi, I'm looking at working on bug 43895 ( https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43895) But there is not code pointer provided so that I know where to start looking. Does anyone have an idea of where I could start with this? Thanks ~Nathan P. (ntpeters) _

Re: Tinderbox failure, Linux-RHEL6-x86_64@14-with-check, MASTER, last success: 2012-02-08 09:52:51

On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:56:09PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Lionel, can you please have a look whether > > "Tentative fix for invalid iterator range regression" is actually > good? On Wed,

Re: Android design?

Hello all, why not gather best of both worlds. Warmful users are used to the icons B U I, so let them have it. Underneath, use fuzzy logic and apply styles: If selection is empty or the selection looks like a paragraph, use a block style, else a char style. My 2 cents. Mat M -- _If there

[ANN] LibreOffice Hamburg Hackfest, April 14/15

Hi there, after closing down the poll, counting carefully and checking back with our kind venue sponsor, the next LibreOffice HackFest is now scheduled for the weekend April 14-15 in Hamburg, Germany. Please find more (but still incomplete) information in our wiki: https://wiki.documentfoundati

Re: [REVIEW 3-4] Couple of wiki-help related patches

Hello Kendy How NL translators are warned about changes in WikiHelp system ? Is there an automatic process, or just a mail is pushed to L10n list ? Regards Mat M Le Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:36:27 +0100, Jan Holesovsky a écrit: Hi, I'm about to upload the new version of the 3.4 wikihelp. Thes

Re: OK to merge the fw? libraries in framework?

On Wednesday 08 of February 2012, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 08/02/12 18:10, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > Is there any fundamental problem in just shoving all the objects in > > framework into one library (for instance the "fwk" one, or one renamed > > to the perhaps more logical name "framework")? No

Re: OK to merge the fw? libraries in framework?

Am 08.02.2012 18:39, schrieb Michael Stahl: > On 08/02/12 18:10, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> While trying to find easy ways to lower the number of (shared) >> libraries, which is more or less on the critical path for the Android >> work (the stupid run-time linker on Android has a low (from our >> per

Re: Tinderbox failure, Linux-RHEL6-x86_64@14-with-check, MASTER, last success: 2012-02-08 09:52:51

On 02/08/2012 06:27 PM, stephan.bergmann.tinder...@googlemail.com wrote: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.4.6/bits/stl_algo.h:1678: error: function requires a valid iterator range [__middle, __last). Objects involved in the operation: iterator "__middle" @ 0x

Re: basegfx::fround and friends seems needed in windows build

On 02/08/2012 09:30 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: So there are some alternatives options to hide something from callcatcher. [...] write unit tests that call it [...] I somehow like that solution best. :) Stephan ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffi

Re: [PUSHED][REVIEW 3-5] fdo#40957 and an internal bug

Hi Noel, On Wednesday, 2012-02-08 18:08:59 +, Noel Power wrote: > fdo#40957 > 09d7b5e6039827d0f02f424370f929caff179ac9 > > this fixes a problem with the new calc inputline/bar thingy where > cntrl-shift-F2 should focus on the inputbar but doesn't ( and > instead starts editing in the cell )

Re: basegfx::fround and friends seems needed in windows build

On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 20:33 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > I guess one can argue both ways here. A feature-complete basegfx > library where some features happen to only be used in certain scenarios, > but the library itself clean of scenario-differentiating ifdef hacks vs. > "micro-level conf

Windows / Cygwin - installer name contains 'rc0'

After a good build (not using lang=it), I have the following installer: LibO-Dev_3.5.1rc0_Win_x86_helppack_en-US.msi Is the name correct ? Why rc0 ? Saluti.

Re: [PATCH 0/8][PUSHED (partial)] Remove some more unused methods

On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:24:01AM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > Here are 8 patches removing some more unused methods in the tree. > > > > Hopefully I didn't mess up and delete somethings that were being used by > > Windows or oth

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED-partially][PATCH]a better about dialog

On 02/08/2012 07:13 PM, Ivan Timofeev wrote: I didn't try German, but see how it looks in Russian in the attached screenshot. The problem is that the new links start with '=' and are quoted. Looks like a bug somewhere. That looks suspiciously like a bug I introduced recently on master when fid

[Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 39006, which changed state. Bug 39006 Summary: FILEOPEN: LibreOffice hangs with 100% CPU usage on specific .doc file https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39006 What|Old Value |Ne

Re: Typo: com.sum.star...

On 02/08/2012 08:10 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/search?q=com.sum&project=core&defs=&refs=&path=&hist= Can this be fixed, or is it stable API? Implementation names should not be considered stable API, so changing this should be pretty safe. (And it looks dubious a

[REVIEW 3-5] fdo#39006 Layout loop fixed

Hi all, I just fixed a nasty layout loop. Could someone review and cherry-pick this commit to 3-5 branch? http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=2a22e664811e10ca58ec66ba8fd10b1a6185c178 FYI, I tested the change also with the bug report mentioned in the removed comment... I reall

Re: Typo: com.sum.star...

Hi Tor, On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 21:10 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/search?q=com.sum&project=core&defs=&refs=&path=&hist= > > Can this be fixed, or is it stable API? You can fix it, this is not even API: the query shows only implementation names. You only need to ma

Re: basegfx::fround and friends seems needed in windows build

On 02/08/2012 06:31 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: And of course, it'd be good to add some #ifndef UNX stuff around that I suppose, so it is not compiled and doesn't re-appear on the unusedcode.easy list in future :-) I guess one can argue both ways here. A feature-complete basegfx library

Typo: com.sum.star...

http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/search?q=com.sum&project=core&defs=&refs=&path=&hist= Can this be fixed, or is it stable API? --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[PATCH] Remove unused code (4)

Hi, This contribution is licensed under MPL 1.1 / GPL v3+ / LGPL v3+. Best Regards, Elton -- Elton Chung Administrator, Sponsor of mirror.layerjet.com Language Maintainer, Tester of ReactOS Project | http://reactos.org Email : el...@layerjet.com -

[REVIEW 3-5] fdo#40957 and an internal bug

fdo#40957 09d7b5e6039827d0f02f424370f929caff179ac9 this fixes a problem with the new calc inputline/bar thingy where cntrl-shift-F2 should focus on the inputbar but doesn't ( and instead starts editing in the cell ) also, b0602d2f179182de42bffb739252cc3f3705d18f fixes an internal bug where v

[PUSHED] [PATCH] [REVIEWED:3-5] postgresql compatibility with 8.4

On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 06:19:25PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 08/02/12 13:51, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> Attached patch restores compatibility of PostgreSQL-SDBC with >> PostgreSQL server version 8.4. LibO 3.5.0 accidentally works only with >> 9.0 and later. (9.0 came after 8.4, there is n

Re: OK to merge the fw? libraries in framework?

On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 06:39:05PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 08/02/12 18:10, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > While trying to find easy ways to lower the number of (shared) > > libraries, which is more or less on the critical path for the Android > > work (the stupid run-time linker on Android has a

Re: [PUSHED 4/4] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Remove some unused methods

On 08/02/12 17:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:26:18AM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: >> patches to remove the tools/fsys trainwreck completely and adapt callers >> to use osl/file.hxx would be appreciated of course :) > > I've started to look into this. great :) > It is

[REVIEW][3-4] fdo#36109 in INDIRECT() make a non-existing sheet produce an error again

Hi, please review and cherry-pick to 3-4 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=0240cbf5bad319f82afe8fda9fb9f897e5e33e3d Fixes https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36109 Thanks Eike -- LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. GnuP

[PATCH] [REVIEW:3-4] crash on query with outer join

fdo#44813 is a crasher on 3.4.x, and has been filed as such separately in fdo#44823. Since it is a crasher, let's fix it in 3.4.x, too. Attached is a port to libreoffice-3-4 of the corresponding commits in libreoffice-3-5, with the later fixup: commit acc36a60de35cdc07e41d1838738b7603e87cf4d Aut

Re: OK to merge the fw? libraries in framework?

On 08/02/12 18:10, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > While trying to find easy ways to lower the number of (shared) > libraries, which is more or less on the critical path for the Android > work (the stupid run-time linker on Android has a low (from our > perverse perspective) limit on the number of shared li

Re: Android design?

On 08/02/2012 18:35, Michael Meeks wrote: On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 18:18 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Otherwise, some good ideas there. Do we have excitable people wanting to do UI work in Java - that we can plug together with the core in due course ? it'd be great to parallelise that wo

Re: Android design?

On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 18:18 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > Otherwise, some good ideas there. Do we have excitable people wanting > > to do UI work in Java - that we can plug together with the core in due > > course ? it'd be great to parallelise that work. > > Hey Michael I would love to

Re: basegfx::fround and friends seems needed in windows build

On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 21:22 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 17:11, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > Yes, please just revert what is used by Windows-only canvas/source/directx > > but got erroneously removed. > > Thanks! Done at > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/co

Re: How to compile Calc

On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 22:15 +0800, LOH KOK HOE wrote: > In order to compile Calc, any other dependencies "project" I should > checkout as well? This should mostly get done for you automagically :-) After a git clone of the core repository: cd core ./configure

[Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Bug 37361 depends on bug 45254, which changed state. Bug 45254 Summary: EDITING PostgreSQL-SDBC can not edit data with PostgreSQL server 8.4 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45254 What|Old Value |New

Re: [PATCH 0/8][PUSHED (partial)] Remove some more unused methods

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Here are 8 patches removing some more unused methods in the tree. > > Hopefully I didn't mess up and delete somethings that were being used by > Windows or other architectures, I think my searching was sufficient, but > I might have miss

Re: [PATCH] [REVIEW:3-5] postgresql compatibility with 8.4

On 08/02/12 13:51, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > Attached patch restores compatibility of PostgreSQL-SDBC with > PostgreSQL server version 8.4. LibO 3.5.0 accidentally works only with > 9.0 and later. (9.0 came after 8.4, there is no 8.5.) > > Basically, it replaces "try to be extra-smart and look d

Re: Android design?

On 08/02/2012 15:55, Michael Meeks wrote: On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 13:43 +0100, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote: Hehe. Take a look at the amazing mock-up and ideas that Mirek has been working on for a while now: http://clickortap.wordpress.com/frivl/ They look nice :-) (No, none of this is p

OK to merge the fw? libraries in framework?

While trying to find easy ways to lower the number of (shared) libraries, which is more or less on the critical path for the Android work (the stupid run-time linker on Android has a low (from our perverse perspective) limit on the number of shared libraries that can be used at a time in a process)

Re: [PUSHED 4/4] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Remove some unused methods

On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:26:18AM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > patches to remove the tools/fsys trainwreck completely and adapt callers > to use osl/file.hxx would be appreciated of course :) I've started to look into this. It is safe to say that I should only be cleaning up the usages outside

[PATCH 0/8] Remove some more unused methods

Here are 8 patches removing some more unused methods in the tree. Hopefully I didn't mess up and delete somethings that were being used by Windows or other architectures, I think my searching was sufficient, but I might have missed something. All of these patches are contributed under the LGPLv3+

[PATCH 8/8] vcl: I18nHelper: delete unused GetDate() method

--- vcl/inc/vcl/i18nhelp.hxx|1 - vcl/source/app/i18nhelp.cxx |7 --- 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/vcl/inc/vcl/i18nhelp.hxx b/vcl/inc/vcl/i18nhelp.hxx index faafdfe..610f5cf 100644 --- a/vcl/inc/vcl/i18nhelp.hxx +++ b/vcl/inc/vcl/i18nhelp.hxx @@ -8

[PATCH 7/8] vcl: I18nHelper: delete unused getLocal() method

--- unusedcode.easy |1 - vcl/inc/vcl/i18nhelp.hxx|2 -- vcl/source/app/i18nhelp.cxx |5 - 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/unusedcode.easy b/unusedcode.easy index 53c1aea..f4115ce 100644 --- a/unusedcode.easy +++ b/unusedcode.easy @@ -

[PATCH 6/8] utl: delete unused NodeValueAccessor::bind() method

--- unotools/source/config/configvaluecontainer.cxx | 10 -- unusedcode.easy |1 - 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/unotools/source/config/configvaluecontainer.cxx b/unotools/source/config/configvaluecontainer.cxx index

[PATCH 5/8] unographic: delete unused GraphicDescriptor::isValid() method

--- svtools/source/graphic/descriptor.cxx |7 --- svtools/source/graphic/descriptor.hxx |2 -- unusedcode.easy |1 - 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/svtools/source/graphic/descriptor.cxx b/svtools/source/graphic/descriptor.cxx

[PATCH 4/8] unicode: delete unused unicode:getCharType() method

--- i18nutil/inc/i18nutil/unicode.hxx |1 - i18nutil/source/utility/unicode.cxx | 64 --- unusedcode.easy |1 - 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) diff --git a/i18nutil/inc/i18nutil/unicode.hxx b/i18nutil/inc/i18nutil

[PATCH 3/8] unicode: delete unused unicode:isTitle() method

--- i18nutil/inc/i18nutil/unicode.hxx |1 - i18nutil/source/utility/unicode.cxx |1 - unusedcode.easy |1 - 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/i18nutil/inc/i18nutil/unicode.hxx b/i18nutil/inc/i18nutil/unicode.hxx index 75b5730..7fce041

[PATCH 2/8] unicode: delete unused unicode:isPunctuation() method

--- i18nutil/inc/i18nutil/unicode.hxx |1 - i18nutil/source/utility/unicode.cxx |1 - unusedcode.easy |1 - 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/i18nutil/inc/i18nutil/unicode.hxx b/i18nutil/inc/i18nutil/unicode.hxx index 23ed754..75b5730

[PATCH 1/8] unicode: delete unused unicode:isBase() method

--- i18nutil/inc/i18nutil/unicode.hxx |1 - i18nutil/source/utility/unicode.cxx |1 - unusedcode.easy |1 - 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/i18nutil/inc/i18nutil/unicode.hxx b/i18nutil/inc/i18nutil/unicode.hxx index 24e9c63..23ed754

[Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Bug 37361 depends on bug 40768, which changed state. Bug 40768 Summary: LibreOffice Writer doesn't get the right border style of an image or object in .doc files. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40768 What|Old Value

[REVIEW 3-4] Couple of wiki-help related patches

Hi, I'm about to upload the new version of the 3.4 wikihelp. These are the patches I am using to generate that, would be great to get them in the repository :-) - can anybody sign-off & push them for me? They are all against the help repository. Thank you, Kendy >From 1a2123c6b92692f14734c4cb95

Re: PATCH build errors on Ubuntu 10.04

On 08/02/12 16:58, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:44:00PM +0100, Alexander Bergmann wrote: >>which are enabled by default, but can be disabled pretty safely. Some of >>them --disable-epm, --without-junit and --without-java were documented in >>the wiki: [1]h

Re: PATCH build errors on Ubuntu 10.04

Hi, On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:44:00PM +0100, Alexander Bergmann wrote: >which are enabled by default, but can be disabled pretty safely. Some of >them --disable-epm, --without-junit and --without-java were documented in >the wiki: [1]http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_

Re: PATCH build errors on Ubuntu 10.04

Hi Michael, from what I read here makes me feel like there are couple of switches, which are enabled by default, but can be disabled pretty safely. Some of them --disable-epm, --without-junit and --without-java were documented in the wiki: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_

Re: [RFC] x11 / cairo-less build try #2

Hi Riccardo, On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 18:19 +0100, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote: > I've progressed a bit with X11 / cairo less build. Now everything builds > but somethings chokes in make dev-install: As Matus says, you'll need to add some conditionals to the scp2 stuff - both in the makefi

Re: Android design?

Hi, At 15:55 8-2-2012, Michael Meeks wrote: On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 13:43 +0100, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote: > Hehe. Take a look at the amazing mock-up and ideas that Mirek has been > working on for a while now: > http://clickortap.wordpress.com/frivl/ They look nice :-) > (No, none of

R: Errror building LO lang=it - windows / cygwin

Now I get the same error but with a different behavior. After 3 hours cl.exe,sh.exe, perl.exe ' freeze', 0,00 % cpu -- cl had only 17KB of memory working set !! you can see the logs and other information at http://pastebin.com/u/walterLO. Regards walter ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED-partially][PATCH]a better about dialog

On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 12:48 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > Also I am not sure whether the following change is desired: > > --- cut --- > - Text[ en-US ] = "This product was supplied by %OOOVENDOR."; > + Text[ en-US ] = "%PRODUCTNAME is a free and open source office suite > developed by %OOOVENDOR. "

Re: PATCH build errors on Ubuntu 10.04

Hi, On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 02:47:21PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 15:11 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: > > On 2012-02-08 14:54, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > Seriously, if someone can't install doxygen when configure errors out > > > because doxygen is not there... > > > > The

Re: Android design?

On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 13:43 +0100, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote: > Hehe. Take a look at the amazing mock-up and ideas that Mirek has been > working on for a while now: > http://clickortap.wordpress.com/frivl/ They look nice :-) > (No, none of this is perfectly specced out yet, but there's

Re: [PATCH] convert detdata.cxx in SC module to std::vector

will do. On 2012-02-08 16:44, Eike Rathke wrote: Hi Noel, On Wednesday, 2012-02-08 13:05:42 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: Attached path converts usage of SV_DECL_PTRARR_DEL in sc/inc/detdata.hxx and associated code to std::vector. SV_DECL_PTRARR_DEL is one of those containers that take ownershi

[RESOLVED][PATCH] proposed fix for fdo#43479

Just marking this thread as resolved, i.e. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43479 final fix pushed to 3-5 and 3-4 C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: PATCH build errors on Ubuntu 10.04

On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 15:11 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: > On 2012-02-08 14:54, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Seriously, if someone can't install doxygen when configure errors out > > because doxygen is not there... > > The list of things to do for building LO is pretty steep for a first > timer. Ind

Re: [PATCH] convert detdata.cxx in SC module to std::vector

Hi Noel, On Wednesday, 2012-02-08 13:05:42 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: > Attached path converts usage of SV_DECL_PTRARR_DEL in > sc/inc/detdata.hxx and associated code to std::vector. SV_DECL_PTRARR_DEL is one of those containers that take ownership of the objects pointed to, as you noticed and i

Re: How to compile Calc

It's best to avoid the word "project" completely as it has so many different meanings. For instance, many people accustomed to using IDEs for all aspects of software development would say a "project" is something you open in an IDE (like Visual Studio or Xcode) and design, edit, build and debug the

[Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Bug 37361 depends on bug 45117, which changed state. Bug 45117 Summary: Input window to ask if save in docx or odf format looks unequilibrated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45117 What|Old Value |N

Re: [PUSHED][MASTER][3-5] fdo#45117 - Input window to ask if save in docx or odf format looks unequilibrated

Josh Heidenreich píše v St 08. 02. 2012 v 18:51 +1030: > Hi, > > This patch fixes the problem listed in the bug. > It adjusts the width of the dialog to be wider, if required. > > This is one of the bugs listed in LibO most annoying bugs 3.5 > (fdo#37361), so I guess this patch should go into 3.5

Re: [REVIEW]Fix for annoying bug fdo#35669

On 08/02/12 15:05, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > Hi Kendy, all, > > On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 15:50 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: >>> Looked fine. Worked reasonable => pushed into 3-5-0, see >>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-5-0&id=4632a18dae5e1770aa1da4ac55719a09c1ae

[PUSHED] Re: [REVIEW][3-5][3-4]Fix for fdo#35669

On 08/02/12 14:30, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > Hi all, > > Could someone review, cherry-pick -s the following commit in 3-5 and > 3-4? > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=44f971506c0ed37928c48e55d8007f24b0c43a5f makes sense; pushed to libreoffice-3-5: http://cgit.freedeskto

Re: basegfx::fround and friends seems needed in windows build

Hello Stephan, On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 17:11, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Yes, please just revert what is used by Windows-only canvas/source/directx > but got erroneously removed. Thanks! Done at http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=a330f38093e2643a26239557050561afae9ff23d Anywa

Re: PATCH build errors on Ubuntu 10.04

Hi. On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 02:58:36PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > Now multiply this by a dozen other settings, and you begin to see the > > problem. > > I don't know the debian dependencies, but as most of the download in > your case is TeX, just leave that out. It only creates html, no

Re: How to compile Calc

Thank you so much on the clarification. I was trying to get myself involve in the project development. At the very beginning step is to get myself familiar with the code base by working on the bug fixes, but the project is too huge and kind of lose where should I start. Since I have been using a l

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW]Fix for annoying bug fdo#35669

Hi Kendy, all, On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 15:50 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > Looked fine. Worked reasonable => pushed into 3-5-0, see > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-5-0&id=4632a18dae5e1770aa1da4ac55719a09c1ae461b > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/

Re: PATCH build errors on Ubuntu 10.04

Hi Noel, *, On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Noel Grandin wrote: > On 2012-02-08 15:15, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> >> Nonssense. What is hard on "No doxygen ther". to "apt-get install >> doxygen"? Right, nothing. > > This is what I get - it needs to do 400M of downloads - please tell me which > piec

Re: PATCH build errors on Ubuntu 10.04

Hi Noel, apparently the package doxygen recommends to install texlive as well. Try this: $ sudo apt-get install --no-install-recommends doxygen Best regards, Alexander ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freede

Re: PATCH build errors on Ubuntu 10.04

On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:26:55PM +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: > On 2012-02-08 15:15, Rene Engelhard wrote: > >Nonssense. What is hard on "No doxygen ther". to "apt-get install > >doxygen"? Right, nothing. > > This is what I get - it needs to do 400M of downloads - please tell > me which pieces it

[REVIEW][3-5][3-4]Fix for fdo#35669

Hi all, Could someone review, cherry-pick -s the following commit in 3-5 and 3-4? http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=44f971506c0ed37928c48e55d8007f24b0c43a5f Thanks, -- Cedric ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freede

Re: PATCH build errors on Ubuntu 10.04

On 2012-02-08 15:15, Rene Engelhard wrote: Nonssense. What is hard on "No doxygen ther". to "apt-get install doxygen"? Right, nothing. This is what I get - it needs to do 400M of downloads - please tell me which pieces it needs and does not need. Now multiply this by a dozen other settings,

Re: PATCH build errors on Ubuntu 10.04

Hi, On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:11:18PM +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: > On 2012-02-08 14:54, Rene Engelhard wrote: > >Seriously, if someone can't install doxygen when configure errors > >out because doxygen is not there... > > The list of things to do for building LO is pretty steep for a first > tim

Re: Lots of module READMEs; libs-core, libs-gui, components, filter, base, calc

Michael Meeks wrote: > As another wish - I wonder if we can link modules into the > http://docs.libreoffice.org/ doxygen documentation (that is if they have > any) - and assuming that is even the up-to-date place to find things :-) > The script that generates that load is solenv/bin/mkdocs.s

Re: Please remove obsolete files (?) in dev-www/bundles

Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: > In http://dev-www.libreoffice.org/bundles/ IMHO there are 2 obsoleted files: > [ ] libreoffice-git.tar.bz2 14-Aug-2011 03:00 642M > [ ] libreoffice-extra-git.tar.bz214-Aug-2011 03:07 291M > > If they are really obsoleted, they should be removed. >

[Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Bug 37361 depends on bug 35669, which changed state. Bug 35669 Summary: Incorrect cross-references to illustrations and equations in master documents https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35669 What|Old Value

Re: PATCH build errors on Ubuntu 10.04

On 2012-02-08 14:54, Rene Engelhard wrote: Seriously, if someone can't install doxygen when configure errors out because doxygen is not there... The list of things to do for building LO is pretty steep for a first timer. Individually it may not seem like much, but when you've gone back to

[PATCH] fdo#37775 - EasyHack: Recent Documents not updated by Save & Save As...

Hello, Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37775 Patch link: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=56740 Patch Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=37775&attachment=56740 Changes (copied from patch): This patch changes LO behavior so that we

Re: PATCH build errors on Ubuntu 10.04

On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 03:18:13PM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Gert van Valkenhoef > wrote: > > Dear LibreOffice developers, > > 2) There is no build-dep on doxygen (ppa libreoffice), but LibreOffice won't > > build without it > > it will if you specify --wit

[PATCH] [REVIEW:3-5] postgresql compatibility with 8.4

Attached patch restores compatibility of PostgreSQL-SDBC with PostgreSQL server version 8.4. LibO 3.5.0 accidentally works only with 9.0 and later. (9.0 came after 8.4, there is no 8.5.) Basically, it replaces "try to be extra-smart and look directly into the PostgreSQL internals" by "get informat

Moderator / maintainer for FDO Bugzilla ?

Hi all, I've been trying to change my options in the FDO bugzilla, so that : (1) I don't get an e-mail every time someone creates a new bug report (2) any e-mail I do get, is sent to a new e-mail address In order to change (1), I have logged in on several occasions, navigated to the options page

[Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Bug 37361 depends on bug 43644, which changed state. Bug 43644 Summary: Document Converter doesn't work without 'Legacy Filters' https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43644 What|Old Value |New Value --

Re: Android design?

Hi Mirek, Michael, >        Anyhow - thanks for getting involved ! I look forward to what you come > up with. Hehe. Take a look at the amazing mock-up and ideas that Mirek has been working on for a while now: http://clickortap.wordpress.com/frivl/ (No, none of this is perfectly specced out yet,

Re: [PUSHED][patch] tools/table.hxx to std::map conversion in SV, SVL and SVX modules

Hi Noel, On Monday, 2012-02-06 14:50:59 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: > This patch converts one use of tools/table.hxx in > svl/inc/svl/zforlist.hxx, whose use in turn spans 3 modules. Pushed to master http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=0979307bbf769399f97da10a29f04936a6cf117c

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED-partially][PATCH]a better about dialog

Noel Power píše v Čt 02. 02. 2012 v 16:33 +: > Hi Barış > > On 02/02/12 12:22, Noel Power wrote: > > Hi Barış > > looks really nice, I will push it ( or maybe someone else will before > So I am partially pushing the content of the patch, mostly it is > the same except for the width change,

  1   2   >