Hi,
Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide? Could one be created cmake
style perhaps?
Josh
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop
>On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 22:10 +0100, walter wrote:
>> Compiling: np_sdk/mozsrc/npwin.cpp
>>
>> C:/LO35/np_sdk/mozsrc/npwin.cpp(171) : error C2440: 'return' : cannot
>> convert from 'const char *' to 'char *'
> I just pushed an explicit cast to master that (I hope) 'fixes'
this, at
Makes sense. Pushed.
Thanks a lot for this patch.
2012/2/19 Santiago Martinez :
> This patch removes unused code as listed in unusedcode.easy
> ___
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/lis
Makes sense. Pushed.
Thanks a lot for the patch.
2012/2/19 Santiago Martinez :
> This patch removes unused code as listed in unusedcode.easy
>
>
> ___
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/
Hi,
I decided to begin some work looking through the cppcheck [1] errors.
I found a nullPointer in
svx/source/svdraw/svdotextpathdecomposition.cxx.
Thought I would give the heads up first before commit + push, as
Michael said so.
Cheers,
Josh
[1] http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/
nullPoi
Hi there,
another bit of unused core removed.
Petr
>From deda0e8f7bfa57ff8b1568fd71466a8084c98efd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Vorel
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:25:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unused code
---
basic/source/comp/symtbl.cxx |5
basic/sourc
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:15:58AM -0800, julien2412 wrote:
> Just to be sure I didn't misunderstand.
> About http://bugs.debian.org/652784, this one is no more a problem since
> Boost would be used for master.
Yes.
> About http://bugs.debian.org/652681, it means that it's possible only fro
Hi Michael, Tor
On 17 February 2012 18:36, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Well, I'm building and running with it myself on Linux; so far it seems
> that libmergedlo.so is only 5.1Mb - which surprises me, since my libsvx*
> are both rather huge.
It has ~28 MB for me now.
> As/when we have
Khoo Wei Ming wrote
>
> ...
> Future plans
> I plan to try out the clang static analyzer, and if I survive that
> maybe I'll give KLEE a go.
>
I began to run static analyzer and posted some output on the easyhack here :
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39596
Julien.
--
View this me
>> remangle32to64.pl # Committed in Jan 2011, seems relevant to w64 porting.
> That one should be ketp, unless Tor says otherwise...
The dev-tools repo might be a better place for it. Feel free to remove/add it.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreO
On 15 February 2012 02:00, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> Is it ok to push these patches?
Hmm, it was probably not necessary to review these, I have pushed them as:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=a391a096bd3e0f96ba21cc42ee7dd46c7faeb2b2
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
Divakar Ramachandran changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||q...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #190
This patch removes unused code as listed in unusedcode.easy
From ea73cbfbb2b67f47fabdcde224720a49ada4e47b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Santiago Martinez
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:20:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unused code in XclExpName
---
sc/source/filter/excel/xename.cxx |7 ---
Rene Engelhard wrote
>
> - 3.4.5 had a build fix for boost 1.48, before it didn't build anymore
> (see http://bugs.debian.org/652784 and the mentioned fdo bug)
> - you missed http://bugs.debian.org/652681 because you tried it after
> the fixed version entered testing :-)
>
> But it's normal
This patch removes unused code as listed in unusedcode.easy
From 9db43697d0b1946ce9817914b78f98d94b9b6ae1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Santiago Martinez
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:01:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unused code in XMLTextListAutoStylePool.
---
unusedcode.easy
A big kudos to Kristian Rietveld for his hard work described here
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Building_LibreOffice_with_Clang
So for what it's worth, here's the route I took (by no means ideal). I
built LibO 3.6.0alpha using clang 3.1 on Ubuntu 11.04 Natty 32 bits
and
./autogen
Performance improvement unlikely yet readability/intent clearer + cppcheck
satisfied.
--
Regards,
Mariusz Dykerek
>From 3fa7c19cfa1a844a926221d2d0235e4c9737c86c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mariusz Dykierek
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:21:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Using empty() instead of s
This patch removes unused code as listed in unusedcode.easy
From 17ff6fa0f72dfb7088e24b331ff7dd65e951fb5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Santiago Martinez
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:26:38 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unused code in XclRoot.
---
sc/source/filter/excel/xlroot.cxx | 15 --
Hi,
This patch removes 14 unused methods from basegfx.
Best Regards,
Elton
--
Elton Chung
Administrator, Sponsor of mirror.layerjet.com
Language Maintainer, Tester of ReactOS Project | http://reactos.org
Email: el...@layerjet.com
On 19/02/2012 10:14, Winfried Donkers wrote:
Markus Mohrhard wrote (15 februari 2012 19:05)
I don't like this solution but well the other option is to debug ucalc
and find why it fails ( it does not for me ). Since you now disabled
the test can you at least check after a full build that if you s
Hi Walter,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 03:12:30PM +0100, walter wrote:
> If you think that these simple scripts are useful feel free to post them in
> the wiki.
We have the dev-tools repository for such things:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/dev-tools/tree/
Please find a place for
These three patches remove some home-grown path manipulation from
solenv, and replace it with functions shipped with the Perl core.
Kind regards,
--
Tim Retout
From 65e81a1935604058082929e772e2f789533eb610 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Retout
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:45:56 +
Subject:
The learning curve for developers to become valid for a large open source
project is particularly steep (git, java,perl, python, c ++, c #, project
architecture, project philosophy, . many, too many technologies, to learn
in a short time).
Who, like me, every day develops Windows desktop applicati
On 19 February 2012 12:19, Riccardo Magliocchetti
wrote:
>> configure: error: Package requirements (gnome-vfs-2.0>= 2.6.0 ) were not
>>>
>>> met:
>>>
>
> Please take a look at this document that should help you resolve this and
> future build issues:
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Developmen
Hi Riccardo,
Thank you so much of your reply. The wiki really helpful.
The command
> sudo apt-get install libgnomevfs2-dev
>
> is for Ubuntu, may I know how can I do it in Fedora?
THanks @!
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Riccardo Magliocchetti <
riccardo.magliocche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> He
Hi,
I let a comment about this bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46180#c3.
I'm stucked because I don't know what's the use of the boolean variables
quoted in the comment.
Any idea ?
Julien.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/About-fdo-46180-LO-
On 19.02.2012 16:01, Elton Chung wrote:
This patch converts some size() == 0 usage to empty() for performance reasons.
Pushed partially...
I dropped changes in sc/qa/unit/ucalc.cxx - there are no appropriate
empty() function; and in soltools/giparser/st_gilrw.cxx - but luckily
this stuff was
> But If i want to build libreoffice-3.5-0, what I have to do ?
./g checkout libreoffice-3-5-0
--
Jesús Corrius
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
But If i want to build libreoffice-3.5-0, what I have to do ?
Regards walter
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
You probably have different repo branches mixed.
if you are building the 3.5 branch, type:
./g checkout libreoffice-3-5
--
Jesús Corrius
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libr
Hi *
The build fails in module 125.
After re-run inside the module:
=
(1/1) Building module translations
=
Entering /cygdrive/c/LO350/translations
dmake: Error: -- `/cygdrive/c/LO350/solver/wntmsci12.pro/bin/localize' not
found, and can't be made
Retrying
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 01:41:59PM -0800, julien2412 wrote:
> I saw that boost package used by LO sources by default was the 1.44 version.
> On debian testing pc x86-64 (with Boost 1.48) and by using
> --with-system-boost in the autogen options, it compiled ok. I thought there
> would be some thin
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:14:28AM -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > If at all possible, rather run Ubuntu (or some other Linux distro)
> > inside a VMWare virtual machine on your Windows desktop.
>
> Don't forget openSUSE and Fedora. We have quite a number of core
> developers from both of th
On 19.02.2012 03:13, Petr Vorel wrote:
I removed a little bit of unused code (unusedcode.easy).
Thank you!
Ivan
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
just a heads up: they still miss.
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hello,
Il 19/02/2012 08:35, LOH KOK HOE ha scritto:
configure: error: Package requirements (gnome-vfs-2.0>= 2.6.0 ) were not
met:
Please take a look at this document that should help you resolve this
and future build issues:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build
hth
On 19.02.2012 12:28, Elton Chung wrote:
This patch removes 4 unused methods from basegfx.
Pushed, thanks.
Ivan
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On 19.02.2012 12:25, Elton Chung wrote:
This patch removes 5 unused methods.
Pushed, thank you!
Ivan
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Eike
Am Freitag, den 17.02.2012, 15:20 +0100 schrieb Eike Rathke:
> Hi Dietmar, ...
>
> There were many quirks, and many fixed in 3.5, please give it a try and
> report success (and failure if necessary ;)
>
My tests show that Tabelborder works fine in Writer in Calc, _as long as
single lines
Markus Mohrhard wrote (15 februari 2012 19:05)
>I don't like this solution but well the other option is to debug ucalc
>and find why it fails ( it does not for me ). Since you now disabled
>the test can you at least check after a full build that if you start
>calc insert a note in B2 and then inse
Hi,
This patch removes 4 unused methods from basegfx.
Best Regards,
Elton
--
Elton Chung
Administrator, Sponsor of mirror.layerjet.com
Language Maintainer, Tester of ReactOS Project | http://reactos.org
Email/ IM : el...@layerjet.com
Hi,
This patch removes 5 unused methods.
Best Regards,
Elton
--
Elton Chung
Administrator, Sponsor of mirror.layerjet.com
Language Maintainer, Tester of ReactOS Project | http://reactos.org
Email: el...@layerjet.com
--
42 matches
Mail list logo
