Thanks Caolan, I have not used a development environment and I have not noticed
the lapse. I'm usually spoiled by working with Eclipse and automatically notify
me of these errors. Did I correct it and send it back to?
Yeah right, I will confirm the terms of license LGPLv3 + / MPL + combination.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:28:09PM +0200, Arnaud Versini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the trace with --enable-dbgutil of this crash, no more
>
> warn:desktop:12777:1:/media/Medias/core/desktop/source/app/app.cxx:702: UNO
> Exception: InvalidRegistryException:
> file:///media/Medias/core/solver/unxlng
On 04/23/2012 06:07 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hi Daniel,
First of all, welcome aboard for GSoC 2012! We are very excited to
have you work on Calc's performance improvement this summer.
According to the official GSoC timeline, we should spend the first
couple of weeks getting to know your mentor
Hi Daniel,
First of all, welcome aboard for GSoC 2012! We are very excited to
have you work on Calc's performance improvement this summer.
According to the official GSoC timeline, we should spend the first
couple of weeks getting to know your mentors (which is, me and
Markus), read documentation
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 17:13 +0100, Vicente Rafael Estévez Vacas wrote:
> Asunto: PATCH: Remove unused code from editing
Basically good. Though you need to build after your make your changes to
pick up that there's a small mixup between the unused
sdr::contact::ViewObjectContactOfUnoControl::isCon
Unfortunately, at least the Apple Clang doesn't generate any
compilation error or *proper* warning for command-line options it
doesn't understand, like -fno-enforce-eh-specs.
It just prints out clang: warning: argument unused during compilation:
'-fno-enforce-eh-specs' to stderr... Even with -Werr
Hi all,
my GSoC proposal has been accepted!
I'm really happy that also this GSoC I'll contribute to
the LibreOffice project.
I want to thanks Thorsten and Fridrich for having placed their
trust in me again for this GSoC.
My proposal is about improving the project I started the last GSoC.
The pro
On Monday 23 of April 2012, Catalin Iacob wrote:
> The plan is also to report the Clang crash that I encountered, I can
> report your test too while I'm at it if I can reproduce it (didn't try
> yet) and then keep going, as time allows, with Clang + werror and see
> what else turns out.
Note that
Something like OLE, cf the module embedserv, which iw as questioning about
in the other thread :)
huh oh
Mat
Le Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:41:04 +0200, Michael Meeks
a écrit:
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 22:48 +0200, Mat M wrote:
>> Is it intentional we do not provide it by default or not ?
>
> Yes,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> Pushed most of these now:
> 0001-WaE-Clang-empty-forloop-body.patch: trivially fixed tabs to spaces
Sorry for that, the file doesn't have mode declarations for Emacs like
they usually do, probably because it's a ll file.
> 0005-WaE-Clang
Hi,
This is the trace with --enable-dbgutil of this crash, no more
warn:desktop:12777:1:/media/Medias/core/desktop/source/app/app.cxx:702: UNO
Exception: InvalidRegistryException:
file:///media/Medias/core/solver/unxlngx6/installation/opt/program/../share/extensions/presenter-screen/components.rd
To whom it may concern,
Collabora has a general policy of contributing code to open source
projects under the that project's existing licensing terms.
All contributions past, present, and future (while this choice of
project license is in place) made to LibreOffice from Collabora are
available un
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Korrawit Pruegsanusak
wrote:
> Hello Norbert, all,
>
> In commit [1], is it intended to have a trailing question marks like this:
> +export ENABLE_CORETEXT?=@ENABLE_CORETEXT@
> and
> -export GMAKE_PARALLELISM=@GMAKE_PARALLELISM@
> +export GMAKE_PARALLELISM
Given a certain cursor (or PaM) position on Writer, how can I get the
current font height? Or check if two PaM have the same height/style?
I can't understand the pool model...
Thank you in advance,
Rodolfo
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.
Hi Rob,
pushed (with some corrections)
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=9c99dac0968c405537cd6094a46c7f6de01ccc4e
On 19.04.2012 01:35, Rob Snelders wrote:
I have tested with removing the PAPER_SCREEN*.
It seems to work. The size indeed dissapears where the page-size of the
Hello Norbert, all,
In commit [1], is it intended to have a trailing question marks like this:
+export ENABLE_CORETEXT?=@ENABLE_CORETEXT@
and
-export GMAKE_PARALLELISM=@GMAKE_PARALLELISM@
+export GMAKE_PARALLELISM?=@GMAKE_PARALLELISM@
And I think the message in AC_MSG_CHECKING is inco
Hi,
I observe the same error but moving ~/.config/libreoffice to
libreoffice.old does not help. More ideas?
Christina
Am 23.04.2012 15:17, schrieb Miklos Vajna:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 03:12:01PM +0200, Tomáš
Chvátal wrote:
after finally making my tinderbox build and install lo I get this
This patch removes unused code as listed in unusedcode.easy
0001-Remove-unused-code-in-sc.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
Bug 37361 depends on bug 48778, which changed state.
Bug 48778 Summary: FILEOPEN arbitrary.pptx will CRASH
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48778
What|Old Value |New Value
This patch removes unused code as listed in unusedcode.easy
0001-Remove-unused-code-in-dpitemdata.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Friday 20 of April 2012, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Monday 16 of April 2012, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 01:50:00PM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > > Is it possible to do the build also the other way around, i.e. e.g.
> > > "all but sc"?
> >
> > Not yet, feel free to add it
"All my contributions, past and future, to LibreOffice are licensed
under the terms of the MPL / LGPLv3+. "
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42982
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOf
Regina Henschel wrote:
> Perhaps more a topic for documentat...@global.libreoffice.org than for
> libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
No, I do not want to write documentation, I am trying to figure out how
to hack the help to improve it, because most users still refer to the
help when they do not k
Hi. i send a patch for libreoffice (fich dociter.cxx)
thanks
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Italo,
On 23/04/2012 16:55, Italo Vignoli wrote:
I have tried to figure out the thinking behind the Calc Functions Help,
but after a couple of days I have given up because it looks impossible
to understand.
Basically, the problems are the following:
1. Functions are not listed alphabetically
Hi Italo,
please have a look at
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/How_Tos/Calc:_Functions_listed_by_category
and
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/How_Tos/Calc:_Functions_listed_alphabetically
Those indexes are needed in the help.
Italo Vignoli schrieb:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
utter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||4
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freede
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
--- Comment #295 from utter 2012-04-23 09:50:10 PDT ---
Propose Bug 4
Can cause serious annoyance to people distributing pdf docs created from LibO
Writer. See example inside bug report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/us
Lubos Lunak píše v Po 23. 04. 2012 v 13:37 +0200:
> On Monday 23 of April 2012, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > Hmm, we might want to keep the strip stuff and the -dontstrip options in
> > the in the perl installer. It is handy when you have debug build and you
> > need to send someone the small stripped bu
- Mensaje reenviado -
De: Vicente Rafael Estévez Vacas
Para: ""libreoffice-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org""
CC: Estévez Vacas Vicente
Enviado: Lunes 23 de abril de 2012 13:39
Asunto: PATCH: Remove unused code from editing
Thanks
0001-PATCH-Remove-unused-code-from-editing.patch
D
On 04/20/2012 01:03 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 00:01 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Pushed to -3-5, still needs two signoffs for 3-5-3.
+1, looks safe.
Another +1 and pushed to -3-5-3 now.
Stephan
___
LibreOffice mailing lis
Hi,
please note that the commit deadline for 3.5.3-rc2 is today, April 23,
2012. It will be used as LO-3.5.3 final if no blocker is reported.
See also
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.5_release
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/
On 04/08/2012 11:38 AM, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote:
Finally I get managed to release a new bugfix/feature version. Now it is
working under LibO 3.4 and 3.5. Can you test it then cherry-pick it to
3.4 and3.5 branches?
Version 1.3.5 of the Barcode extension (as now included in LO -3-5 and
master
I have tried to figure out the thinking behind the Calc Functions Help,
but after a couple of days I have given up because it looks impossible
to understand.
Basically, the problems are the following:
1. Functions are not listed alphabetically. Does it make sense? Does it
make sense to swap them
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 03:12:01PM +0200, Tomáš Chvátal
wrote:
> after finally making my tinderbox build and install lo I get this
> error when I try to launch any of the apps.
>
> scarabeus@arcarius: ~ $ lowriter
> terminate called after throwing an instance of
> 'com::sun::star::uno::Deploymen
Hi all,
after finally making my tinderbox build and install lo I get this
error when I try to launch any of the apps.
scarabeus@arcarius: ~ $ lowriter
terminate called after throwing an instance of
'com::sun::star::uno::DeploymentException'
The problem here is that the install ended without any
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 02:50:52PM +0200, Michael Stahl
wrote:
> would it be possible to just hide them in the web interface, so the old
> URLs still work, but the obsolete stuff doesn't clutter up the overview?
AFAIK cgit has its static list of repos, which is updated by a nightly
cronjob, so p
On 23/04/12 14:43, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> just a short note (maybe to be discussed in the ESC call):
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/
>
> is overloaded with obsolete repositories, making it hard for a curious
> newcomer
> to find his way around and be dragged i
Hi there,
just a short note (maybe to be discussed in the ESC call):
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/
is overloaded with obsolete repositories, making it hard for a curious newcomer
to find his way around and be dragged in. If it is not too much work, could we
possibly move all the obs
Just for the refference, fixed in the git now by
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=071d6daf5c798e89887a84a17fb3b64824fdbc6f
Tom
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/lis
On 04/23/2012 01:24 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
diff --git a/cppu/source/uno/lbenv.cxx b/cppu/source/uno/lbenv.cxx
index 47ca98f..23d4871 100644
--- a/cppu/source/uno/lbenv.cxx
+++ b/cppu/source/uno/lbenv.cxx
@@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ inline void EnvironmentsData::registerEnvironment(
uno_Environment *
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 01:37:29PM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Monday 23 of April 2012, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > Hmm, we might want to keep the strip stuff and the -dontstrip options in
> > the in the perl installer. It is handy when you have debug build and you
> > need to send someone the small
On Monday 23 of April 2012, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Hmm, we might want to keep the strip stuff and the -dontstrip options in
> the in the perl installer. It is handy when you have debug build and you
> need to send someone the small stripped build. It is a big difference in
> the size. I am not sure i
> I will provide the complete details on what I am trying to do.
> I don't want to install LibreOffice on my machine but still want to
> use the utility of LibreOffice to convert the doc to ps(print-script)
> format.I know this is quite tough and there is a lot of
> interdependency but still can s
Hi David,
thanks a lot for looking at it. Your patch is almost perfect. Well,
there are still some open questions, see below. :-)
David Ostrovsky píše v So 21. 04. 2012 v 14:23 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> here is the patch to remove strip solver configure option.
> Some places still has a strip code, for e
[accidentally had dropped libreoffice@ from my original response]
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Some fixes for Clang warnings
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:36:46 +0200
From: Stephan Bergmann
To: Catalin Iacob
On 04/22/2012 09:57 PM, Catalin Iacob wrote:
I tried to build
Basically, don't bother to try to do it "without installing LibreOffice".
LibreOffice does not have some magic simple "convert-doc-to-postscript"
library that you could use.
Sure, you could try to come up with a customized installation of
LibreOffice that includes only those bits that are needed
On 23/04/12 09:49, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 04/22/2012 10:51 PM, David Ostrovsky wrote:
>> your patch was still not pushed.
>>
>> So we have two options here:
>> 1. push your patch (I attached it with description ;-)
>> 2. use make interactive variable LDFLAGS, a lá make
>> LDFLAGS='-Wl,--no-as
On 23/04/12 12:30, Ankit Jain wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I basically want to convert the doc files into ps(print script) format
> using the document conversion utility of LibreOffice but without
> installing LibreOffice on my machine. I want to write my own code for
> this.I know its quite tough but sti
So you want to use LibreOffice without installing LibreOffice? Sound like
you need a quantum computer.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi All,
I basically want to convert the doc files into ps(print script) format using
the document conversion utility of LibreOffice but without installing
LibreOffice on my machine. I want to write my own code for this.I know its
quite tough but still if someone can provide any reference on how
On 23/04/12 09:41, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> See
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=5187174
>
> Regression from 3.4; testcase in sw/qa/extras/rtftok/data/fdo39053.rtf;
> backported patch attached.
pushed to libreoffice-3-5
_
On 04/23/2012 11:33 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 21:06 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Pushed to master and 3-5. Need more reviewers to get it into 3-5-3
Looks like a no-brainer to me too; +1, one more needed for 3-3-5.
By my counting, the two Michaels' sign-offs woul
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 22:48 +0200, Mat M wrote:
> >> Is it intentional we do not provide it by default or not ?
> >
> > Yes, it is. We disable it in distro-configs/LibreOfficeWin32.conf
> > (--disable-activex-component). You can enable it in your own build and
> > play with it. As Tor mentined in
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>
> This is solvable with updating the VM's git repos "in the background," just
> taking the latest image when starting a VM.
>
> Before we abandoned work on OOo at Oracle last year, we were busy setting up
> a cool VM cluster for such build
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 21:06 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Pushed to master and 3-5. Need more reviewers to get it into 3-5-3
Looks like a no-brainer to me too; +1, one more needed for 3-3-5.
Thanks Korrawit :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo
On 21/04/12 22:06, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 10:09 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Please find the attached patch to fix fdo#45848.
>> I've tested the patch at libreoffice-3.5.2.2 tag on Windows XP, but
>> not tested on master yet.
>>
>> Of course, pleas
On 04/23/2012 11:15 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 04/23/2012 10:55 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
So - one advantage of a VM here, is that -if- we have a 'standard'
virtual-machine for this, and do the tinderbox-ness in some snapshot
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 04/23/2012 10:55 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>>
>> So - one advantage of a VM here, is that -if- we have a 'standard'
>> virtual-machine for this, and do the tinderbox-ness in some snapshot or
>> somesuch; then in the event of probl
On 04/23/2012 10:55 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
So - one advantage of a VM here, is that -if- we have a 'standard'
virtual-machine for this, and do the tinderbox-ness in some snapshot or
somesuch; then in the event of problems, QA or Developers could re-use
the same VM for doing their own te
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 17:54 +0200, Tommy wrote:
> > + LibO 4.0
> > + planned to be incrementally developed / migrated anyway
> > + postpone until license change done (Bjoern)
> > + concerns about breaking all extensions at once (Norbert)
> > + be
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 09:09 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> >> + bytemark machine #2
> >> + working on *BSD in virtualbox with little
> >> joy help appreciated (Norbert)
> >> + need 3x BSD virtual-boxes (ideally)
> >
> > I'd like to know a bit mor
Hello,
These is the patch that I've created. Is my first patch, so I hope this will be
correct. If you detect any problem, please let me know.Thanks!Licence: made
available under the MPL/LGPLv3+
Ferran Vidal From 553d11cbb902cf30f499c27e834d0f5c26c4f134 Mon S
El dl 23 de 04 de 2012 a les 11:36 +0530, en/na Muthu Subramanian K va
escriure:
> Thank you for the patch!
It's a pleasure!
> I believe this is your first patch?
> Can you confirm that this (and possibly your future contributions) is
> licensed under the MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license, please?
Yes,
On 04/22/2012 10:51 PM, David Ostrovsky wrote:
your patch was still not pushed.
So we have two options here:
1. push your patch (I attached it with description ;-)
2. use make interactive variable LDFLAGS, a lá make
LDFLAGS='-Wl,--no-as-needed' check
Any ideas on this?
I still do not see why
Hi,
See
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=5187174
Regression from 3.4; testcase in sw/qa/extras/rtftok/data/fdo39053.rtf;
backported patch attached.
Thanks,
Miklos
>From 0e53b7a1eda752017a620c7b6f07bcba342e1490 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miklos Vajna
Date: Sun, 15 Apr
66 matches
Mail list logo
