[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144530] Redo of the insertion of a textbox doesn't activate selected highlighting (which appears as redo isn't working)

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144530

--- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(Tested with Writer and I understand selection in terms of the text box not the
toolbar icon.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 144530] Redo of the insertion of a textbox doesn't activate selected highlighting (which appears as redo isn't working)

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144530

--- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(Tested with Writer and I understand selection in terms of the text box not the
toolbar icon.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144793] EDITING: LO Base Absence of scrollbar in the SQL query modification window

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144793

Robert Großkopf  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|7.1.6.2 release |7.1.0.3 release
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Keywords||regression
 CC||rob...@familiegrosskopf.de
 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 OS|Windows (All)   |All

--- Comment #1 from Robert Großkopf  ---
Could confirm there is no scrollbar available for the query editor in LO
7.1.0.3 and newer versions with OpenSUSE 15.2 64bit rpm Linux.

Scrollbar does exist in LO 7.0.5.2 on the same system. So a regression.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144530] Redo of the insertion of a textbox doesn't activate selected highlighting (which appears as redo isn't working)

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144530

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #0)
> CTRL+Y does re-insert the textbox, but well hard to tell
I don't see an issue.

> Expected Results:
> Maybe activate the textbox (mark it selected)
It is selected for me (7.2 and 7.3 VCL=kf5)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 144530] Redo of the insertion of a textbox doesn't activate selected highlighting (which appears as redo isn't working)

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144530

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #0)
> CTRL+Y does re-insert the textbox, but well hard to tell
I don't see an issue.

> Expected Results:
> Maybe activate the textbox (mark it selected)
It is selected for me (7.2 and 7.3 VCL=kf5)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 144851] Title Case Applied Outside of Selection

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144851

--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze  ---
What use case would a user try to solve? So I'd prefer forgiveness of unprecise
selections and apply _sentence_ to word boundary.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: include/tools tools/source

2021-10-13 Thread Mike Kaganski (via logerrit)
 include/tools/json_writer.hxx |   15 ---
 tools/source/misc/json_writer.cxx |   29 -
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 02d225f2a46b3d531e187976d8f2c39ed390899c
Author: Mike Kaganski 
AuthorDate: Thu Oct 14 00:15:11 2021 +0300
Commit: Mike Kaganski 
CommitDate: Thu Oct 14 07:40:52 2021 +0200

Simplify JsonWriter a bit

Move ensureSpace code to json_writer.cxx, and merge with reallocBuffer.
The methods are private, and are only used in methods in the same .CXX,
so the code will get inlined as compiler decides anyway, but becomes
simpler.

Make extractDataAs* to consider the known size of the data, to avoid
calculating null-terminated size. To do that, the code is moved from
extractData to private extractDataImpl, which returns both pointer
and size.

Change-Id: I7c0e425b5c584089c6e866c31d4cfdb5e242d66b
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/123568
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Mike Kaganski 

diff --git a/include/tools/json_writer.hxx b/include/tools/json_writer.hxx
index 45df53c61c5f..72ed59edadc5 100644
--- a/include/tools/json_writer.hxx
+++ b/include/tools/json_writer.hxx
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 
 /** Simple JSON encoder designed specifically for LibreOfficeKit purposes.
  *
@@ -73,7 +74,7 @@ public:
 
 /** Hands ownership of the underlying storage buffer to the caller,
  * after this no more document modifications may be written. */
-char* extractData();
+char* extractData() { return extractDataImpl().first; }
 OString extractAsOString();
 std::string extractAsStdString();
 
@@ -85,17 +86,9 @@ private:
 void endArray();
 void endStruct();
 void addCommaBeforeField();
-void reallocBuffer(int noMoreBytesRequired);
 void writeEscapedOUString(const OUString& rPropVal);
-
-// this part inline to speed up the fast path
-inline void ensureSpace(int noMoreBytesRequired)
-{
-assert(mpBuffer && "already extracted data");
-int currentUsed = mPos - mpBuffer;
-if (currentUsed + noMoreBytesRequired >= mSpaceAllocated)
-reallocBuffer(noMoreBytesRequired);
-}
+std::pair extractDataImpl();
+void ensureSpace(int noMoreBytesRequired);
 };
 
 /**
diff --git a/tools/source/misc/json_writer.cxx 
b/tools/source/misc/json_writer.cxx
index 7024b580c7fd..d6e34179f930 100644
--- a/tools/source/misc/json_writer.cxx
+++ b/tools/source/misc/json_writer.cxx
@@ -388,18 +388,22 @@ void JsonWriter::addCommaBeforeField()
 }
 }
 
-void JsonWriter::reallocBuffer(int noMoreBytesRequired)
+void JsonWriter::ensureSpace(int noMoreBytesRequired)
 {
+assert(mpBuffer && "already extracted data");
 int currentUsed = mPos - mpBuffer;
-auto newSize = std::max(mSpaceAllocated * 2, (currentUsed + 
noMoreBytesRequired) * 2);
-mpBuffer = static_cast(realloc(mpBuffer, newSize));
-mPos = mpBuffer + currentUsed;
-mSpaceAllocated = newSize;
+if (currentUsed + noMoreBytesRequired >= mSpaceAllocated)
+{
+auto newSize = (currentUsed + noMoreBytesRequired) * 2;
+mpBuffer = static_cast(realloc(mpBuffer, newSize));
+mPos = mpBuffer + currentUsed;
+mSpaceAllocated = newSize;
+}
 }
 
 /** Hands ownership of the underlying storage buffer to the caller,
   * after this no more document modifications may be written. */
-char* JsonWriter::extractData()
+std::pair JsonWriter::extractDataImpl()
 {
 assert(mStartNodeCount == 0 && "did not close all nodes");
 assert(mpBuffer && "data already extracted");
@@ -409,24 +413,23 @@ char* JsonWriter::extractData()
 ++mPos;
 // null-terminate
 *mPos = 0;
+const int sz = mPos - mpBuffer;
 mPos = nullptr;
-char* pRet = nullptr;
-std::swap(pRet, mpBuffer);
-return pRet;
+return { std::exchange(mpBuffer, nullptr), sz };
 }
 
 OString JsonWriter::extractAsOString()
 {
-char* pChar = extractData();
-OString ret(pChar);
+auto[pChar, sz] = extractDataImpl();
+OString ret(pChar, sz);
 free(pChar);
 return ret;
 }
 
 std::string JsonWriter::extractAsStdString()
 {
-char* pChar = extractData();
-std::string ret(pChar);
+auto[pChar, sz] = extractDataImpl();
+std::string ret(pChar, sz);
 free(pChar);
 return ret;
 }


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103030] [META] Navigator sidebar deck and floating window

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103030
Bug 103030 depends on bug 141477, which changed state.

Bug 141477 Summary: make "master view" a sub-topic in navigator
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141477

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141477] make "master view" a sub-topic in navigator

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141477

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

--- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze  ---
So let's abstain from this enhancement.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 141477] make "master view" a sub-topic in navigator

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141477

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

--- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze  ---
So let's abstain from this enhancement.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145118] direct formatting of "character locale" cannot be cleared

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145118

--- Comment #2 from Mike Kaganski  ---
Yes, there are some explicit exceptions for Clear DF operation, this one being
one of them. I assume this is perceived to be more user-friendly ...

I suppose that having a configuration (some options page, with checkboxes
"clear this, that, and that" - like "Paste Special in Calc", only in options)
would make sense. Personally I would definitely use that to maximize what Clear
DF does.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145061] Font::identifyFont should also detect Type1C font

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145061

Kevin Suo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |enhancement

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145061] Font::identifyFont should also detect Type1C font

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145061

Kevin Suo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Font::identifyFont should   |Font::identifyFont should
   |also detect Type 1C ( Type  |also detect Type1C font
   |1 Compacted, CCF) font  |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145061] Font::identifyFont should also detect Type 1C ( Type 1 Compacted, CCF) font

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145061

--- Comment #2 from Kevin Suo  ---
Created attachment 175727
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=175727=edit
CairoFont-3-0-bold-italic.data

The CairoFont-3-0 (bold italic) font extracted from the pdf file in attachment
98668.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145061] Font::identifyFont should also detect Type 1C ( Type 1 Compacted, CCF) font

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145061

--- Comment #1 from Kevin Suo  ---
Created attachment 175726
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=175726=edit
CairoFont-1-0-italic.data

The CairoFont-1-0 (italic) font extracted from the pdf file in attachment
98668.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135659] Images positioned wrongly after paste RFT undo regular paste

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135659

Aron Budea  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ba...@caesar.elte.hu
   Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected

--- Comment #6 from Aron Budea  ---
Note that the problem isn't with the placement of the image, but the wrapping
becomes different. Not the setting, that stays the same, just whether the row
is resized to accomodate the image or not.

The steps started crashing at the RTF paste step at the beginning of the
following range, and when the crash was gone at the end of the range, the
result was already bad.

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range=7b4bdab8252200e89a05294bdcdebef2ab9feb81..1a89eaeabd31dddfbad037e8109431a924632543

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145117] XML Source not imported if tags is non-ASCII symbols

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145117

--- Comment #3 from Anton Shevtsov  ---
Tried 7.0.6.2 from my distro repo  and 7.2.1.2 from official site
Problem still exists. XML not imported (button Import is disable)

Version: 7.2.1.2 / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 87b77fad49947c1441b67c559c339af8f3517e22
CPU threads: 12; OS: Linux 5.10; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: ru-RU (ru_RU.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

Version: 7.0.6.2
Build ID: 00(Build:2)
CPU threads: 12; OS: Linux 5.10; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: ru-RU (ru_RU.UTF-8); ИП: ru-RU
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: basctl/source chart2/qa chart2/source comphelper/qa comphelper/source connectivity/source cppuhelper/source dbaccess/source desktop/source extensions/source forms/sourc

2021-10-13 Thread Mike Kaganski (via logerrit)
 basctl/source/basicide/scriptdocument.cxx  |5 -
 chart2/qa/extras/chart2import.cxx  |2 
 chart2/qa/extras/charttest.hxx |4 
 chart2/source/controller/dialogs/DialogModel.cxx   |2 
 chart2/source/controller/main/ObjectHierarchy.cxx  |2 
 chart2/source/model/template/ColumnLineChartTypeTemplate.cxx   |2 
 chart2/source/tools/DataSeriesHelper.cxx   |2 
 chart2/source/tools/DataSourceHelper.cxx   |4 
 chart2/source/tools/DiagramHelper.cxx  |4 
 chart2/source/tools/InternalDataProvider.cxx   |   10 --
 chart2/source/tools/UncachedDataSequence.cxx   |4 
 comphelper/qa/unit/base64_test.cxx |   12 +-
 comphelper/source/property/opropertybag.cxx|   21 ++--
 comphelper/source/property/propertycontainerhelper.cxx |   10 +-
 connectivity/source/commontools/ConnectionWrapper.cxx  |3 
 connectivity/source/commontools/dbtools2.cxx   |6 -
 connectivity/source/drivers/jdbc/JStatement.cxx|5 -
 connectivity/source/drivers/odbc/OStatement.cxx|5 -
 connectivity/source/sdbcx/VDescriptor.cxx  |5 -
 cppuhelper/source/factory.cxx  |2 
 dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/ModelImpl.cxx  |2 
 dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/connection.cxx |2 
 dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/databasedocument.cxx   |5 -
 dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/datasource.cxx |   10 +-
 dbaccess/source/ui/browser/unodatbr.cxx|5 -
 dbaccess/source/ui/misc/UITools.cxx|8 -
 dbaccess/source/ui/misc/dbsubcomponentcontroller.cxx   |5 -
 dbaccess/source/ui/querydesign/querycontroller.cxx |5 -
 desktop/source/lib/init.cxx|4 
 desktop/source/lib/lokclipboard.cxx|4 
 extensions/source/bibliography/formcontrolcontainer.cxx|   17 ++-
 extensions/source/propctrlr/cellbindinghelper.cxx  |   15 +--
 extensions/source/propctrlr/eformshelper.cxx   |6 -
 extensions/source/propctrlr/eventhandler.cxx   |4 
 extensions/source/propctrlr/formcomponenthandler.cxx   |2 
 extensions/source/propctrlr/genericpropertyhandler.cxx |4 
 extensions/source/propctrlr/stringrepresentation.cxx   |3 
 extensions/source/propctrlr/xsdvalidationhelper.cxx|9 +-
 forms/source/component/ListBox.cxx |   14 +--
 forms/source/component/propertybaghelper.cxx   |2 
 forms/source/misc/InterfaceContainer.cxx   |3 
 framework/qa/cppunit/dispatchtest.cxx  |4 
 framework/source/services/autorecovery.cxx |2 
 i18npool/qa/cppunit/test_ordinalsuffix.cxx |   38 
++--
 i18npool/source/transliteration/ignoreIandEfollowedByYa_ja_JP.cxx  |3 
 i18npool/source/transliteration/ignoreIterationMark_ja_JP.cxx  |3 
 i18npool/source/transliteration/ignoreKiKuFollowedBySa_ja_JP.cxx   |3 
 i18npool/source/transliteration/ignoreProlongedSoundMark_ja_JP.cxx |3 
 i18npool/source/transliteration/transliterationImpl.cxx|   34 
++-
 i18npool/source/transliteration/transliteration_OneToOne.cxx   |3 
 i18npool/source/transliteration/transliteration_body.cxx   |5 -
 include/com/sun/star/uno/Sequence.h|   10 ++
 include/com/sun/star/uno/Sequence.hxx  |   24 +
 include/vcl/FilterConfigItem.hxx   |4 
 include/xmloff/XMLEventExport.hxx  |2 
 oox/source/crypto/AgileEngine.cxx  |2 
 oox/source/export/chartexport.cxx  |4 
 oox/source/helper/zipstorage.cxx   |3 
 oox/source/ole/olestorage.cxx  |3 
 reportdesign/source/core/api/ReportDefinition.cxx  |2 
 sc/source/core/data/dptabsrc.cxx   |2 
 sc/source/core/tool/addincol.cxx   |4 
 sc/source/core/tool/rangeseq.cxx   |2 
 sc/source/filter/xml/xmlcvali.cxx  |4 
 sc/source/ui/Accessibility/AccessibleCell.cxx  |5 

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145084] Linux/KDE: Mail Merge cursor disappears after 1st or 2nd field is entered

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145084

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||bibisectRequest

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144778] Exported epub file will not pass validation.

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144778

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144816] Collabora Office: on Android some menus in Czech environment are in English

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144816

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144815] Collabora Office on Android does not prevent from entering invalid filename

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144815

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144794] FILEOPEN XLSX Chart axis labels are rotated in multiple categories and partial secondary data series

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144794

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144793] EDITING: LO Base Absence of scrollbar in the SQL query modification window

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144793

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144785] Export presentation with appear animations

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144785

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144780] Anti-aliasing ON + No Transparency + Custom page size + no margins = line right and bottom of PNG draw exports

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144780

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144717] Issues related converting endnotes to footnotes

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144717

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144645] UI: Tooltip is squished/stretched and truncated on change

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144645

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145095] PPT to PDF: Text with shadow effect is duplicated.

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145095

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|1   |0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145095] PPT to PDF: Text with shadow effect is duplicated.

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145095

--- Comment #6 from QA Administrators  ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141038] Comments in Libre Writer are unusable because of their sheer size

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141038

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA
 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141038] Comments in Libre Writer are unusable because of their sheer size

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141038

--- Comment #7 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear dgubbins,

Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.

Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately
reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest
your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still
present in the latest stable release, we need the following
information (please ignore any that you've already provided):

a) Provide details of your system including your operating
   system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have
   confirmed the bug to be present

b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better

c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem

d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help

e) Read all comments and provide any requested information

Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED
and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not:

a) respond via email 

b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details
   on the top section of our bug tracker

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140991] Crash on open openoffice file, maybe some day will compatible with openoffice?

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140991

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA
 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140991] Crash on open openoffice file, maybe some day will compatible with openoffice?

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140991

--- Comment #6 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear zlotowinfo,

Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.

Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately
reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest
your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still
present in the latest stable release, we need the following
information (please ignore any that you've already provided):

a) Provide details of your system including your operating
   system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have
   confirmed the bug to be present

b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better

c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem

d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help

e) Read all comments and provide any requested information

Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED
and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not:

a) respond via email 

b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details
   on the top section of our bug tracker

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140976] Crash at every opening of a ods, xls, xlsx file

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140976

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA
 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140976] Crash at every opening of a ods, xls, xlsx file

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140976

--- Comment #7 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear rol2,

Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.

Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately
reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest
your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still
present in the latest stable release, we need the following
information (please ignore any that you've already provided):

a) Provide details of your system including your operating
   system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have
   confirmed the bug to be present

b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better

c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem

d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help

e) Read all comments and provide any requested information

Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED
and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not:

a) respond via email 

b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details
   on the top section of our bug tracker

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 78703] SLIDESHOW: fading slide transitions start with a white 'flash'

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78703

--- Comment #36 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Rene Sedmik,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141716] Crash in: mergedlo.dll

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141716

--- Comment #3 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear giova_kde,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141690] slow input in Calc since latest upgrade ~4/12/21

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141690

--- Comment #2 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear wohlf-waldo,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124377] Make better bitmap export quality to PDF for Redaction

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124377

--- Comment #15 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Roman Kuznetsov,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 53614] FILEOPEN: Document In Use Dialog appearing after cancelling Text Import dialog

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53614

--- Comment #12 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Erik,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 119985] EDITING The Graphics alignment property of the check box, option button and push button form controls can’t be modified

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119985

--- Comment #5 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Gabor Kelemen,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 118658] Fill handle should be visible at the beginning of the row, when whole rows are selected

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118658

--- Comment #9 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Tyr Antilles,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 118142] FILESAVE DOCX The width of Combobox/drop-down list Form control element increase

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118142

--- Comment #6 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Gabor Kelemen,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 114047] Keyboard shortcut Option + Left/Right Arrow Key Should Scroll to the Previous/Next Word not Reduce/Increase the Column Width

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114047

--- Comment #14 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear gurol,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144899] Table Shadows' "Position" property is not saved in Impress

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144899

Deep17  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||deepoose2...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Deep17  ---
This issue is reproducible only if the distance value is set to zero. For every
other value set in the distance it is working as expected.


Version: 7.2.1.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 87b77fad49947c1441b67c559c339af8f3517e22
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19042; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US
Calc: CL

Version: 7.3.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 56883788d0090383dad58552f5a11044ffe64a44
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19042; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US
Calc: CL

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145121] New: Undesired operation of the shift+F3 feature

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145121

Bug ID: 145121
   Summary: Undesired operation of the shift+F3 feature
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 6.4.7.2 release
  Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Linux (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: LibreOffice
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: matos...@gmail.com

Description:
When using the shift+F3 feature we can select several words and switch between
all uppercase, all lowercase or initial capitals and it works correctly, ok.
However, when we select or position the course in just ONE WORD, the resource
presents a bug. Instead of just formatting the selected word, it modifies words
before or after the selected one, usually by capitalizing that other word in an
undesirable way.

Actual Results:
.

Expected Results:
.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145120] New: Will only start in safe mode

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145120

Bug ID: 145120
   Summary: Will only start in safe mode
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+
  Hardware: All
OS: Windows (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Documentation
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: andy.g@live.com
CC: olivier.hal...@libreoffice.org

Description:
Will not start when I click on icon. Will only start in safe mode. I've tried
deleting folder '4' user profile, according to a thread on this issue.

Actual Results:
?

Expected Results:
?


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: Yes



Additional Info:
[Information automatically included from LibreOffice]
Locale: en-US
Module: safemode
[Information guessed from browser]
OS: Windows (All)
OS is 64bit: no

Version: 7.1.6.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 0e133318fcee89abacd6a7d077e292f1145735c3
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19043; UI render: default; VCL: win
Locale: en-AU (en_AU); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141477] make "master view" a sub-topic in navigator

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141477

--- Comment #10 from Jim Raykowski  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #8)
> Jim, what do you think about consolidation the Navigator in master view
> mode? Does it save hassles or introduce new. From UX POV consistency in the
> UI is desirable.

Looks like a project. It would involve adding another another line of tool
buttons to the toolbox. Tool buttons could be hid and shown depending on the
selected tree entry but I think we don't like doing that sort of thing.

I lean towards Roman's comment on this.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 141477] make "master view" a sub-topic in navigator

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141477

--- Comment #10 from Jim Raykowski  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #8)
> Jim, what do you think about consolidation the Navigator in master view
> mode? Does it save hassles or introduce new. From UX POV consistency in the
> UI is desirable.

Looks like a project. It would involve adding another another line of tool
buttons to the toolbox. Tool buttons could be hid and shown depending on the
selected tree entry but I think we don't like doing that sort of thing.

I lean towards Roman's comment on this.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 144851] Title Case Applied Outside of Selection

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144851

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org

--- Comment #3 from V Stuart Foote  ---
Michael,

Wearing my UX hat, I'm torn. Without selection I think we need to work at ICP
word bounds at the edit cursor.

With a selection, for consistency honor the selection--same as sentence case.

Thoug trying to split a word by selection and then apply cycle case is a fools
effort, wrong tool. Especially as double click is an easy full word selection
(triple for sentence, quad for para).

But with selection made (whole word or not) the transliterations should honor
the selection made--weird though it may be to be title case in the middle of a
word.

Stuart

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144463] "Showing a Slide Show" help doesn't match Impress UI

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144463

Rafael Lima  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |rafael.palma.l...@gmail.com
   |desktop.org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'distro/mimo/mimo-6-4' - 2 commits - xmlsecurity/qa

2021-10-13 Thread Michael Stahl (via logerrit)
 
xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_macros_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt
 |binary
 xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt 
   |binary
 xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated2.odt
   |binary
 
xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated_triple.odt
 |binary
 
xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_trusted_person_manipulated.odt
  |binary
 xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/signed_with_x509certificate_chain.odt 
   |binary
 xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing.cxx
   |  122 ++
 7 files changed, 122 insertions(+)

New commits:
commit 94f9c42a39d511504ddc65839eb5442e19706ed0
Author: Michael Stahl 
AuthorDate: Fri Feb 26 17:29:37 2021 +0100
Commit: Andras Timar 
CommitDate: Wed Oct 13 23:33:30 2021 +0200

xmlsecurity: add tests for multiple X509Data/X509Certificate

Change-Id: If50ae8156f81c1053aa8fbfc3148da64bb8e1442

diff --git 
a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_macros_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt
 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_macros_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt
new file mode 100644
index ..d63e4b6b7b72
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_macros_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt
 differ
diff --git 
a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt
new file mode 100644
index ..0190abb00f23
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt 
differ
diff --git 
a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated2.odt 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated2.odt
new file mode 100644
index ..f4b4198f94a6
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated2.odt 
differ
diff --git 
a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated_triple.odt
 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated_triple.odt
new file mode 100644
index ..558bdee47e59
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated_triple.odt
 differ
diff --git 
a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/signed_with_x509certificate_chain.odt 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/signed_with_x509certificate_chain.odt
new file mode 100644
index ..5e519dd8b7e7
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/signed_with_x509certificate_chain.odt differ
diff --git a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing.cxx 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing.cxx
index 7d9d75a32150..e960a21d2bce 100644
--- a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing.cxx
+++ b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing.cxx
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
@@ -580,6 +581,105 @@ CPPUNIT_TEST_FIXTURE(SigningTest, 
testODFUnsignedTimestamp)
 CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(sal_Int32(18183742), infos[0].SignatureTime);
 }
 
+CPPUNIT_TEST_FIXTURE(SigningTest, testODFX509CertificateChain)
+{
+createDoc(m_directories.getURLFromSrc(DATA_DIRECTORY)
+  + "signed_with_x509certificate_chain.odt");
+SfxBaseModel* pBaseModel = dynamic_cast(mxComponent.get());
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT(pBaseModel);
+SfxObjectShell* pObjectShell = pBaseModel->GetObjectShell();
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT(pObjectShell);
+SignatureState nActual = pObjectShell->GetDocumentSignatureState();
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_MESSAGE(
+(OString::number(o3tl::underlyingEnumValue(nActual)).getStr()),
+(nActual == SignatureState::NOTVALIDATED || nActual == 
SignatureState::OK));
+uno::Sequence const infos(
+pObjectShell->GetDocumentSignatureInformation(false));
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(sal_Int32(1), infos.getLength());
+// check that the signing certificate was picked, not one of the 2 CA ones
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(security::CertificateValidity::VALID, 
infos[0].CertificateStatus);
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT(infos[0].Signer.is());
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(
+OUString("CN=Xmlsecurity RSA Test example Alice,O=Xmlsecurity RSA 
Test,ST=England,C=UK"),
+infos[0].Signer->getSubjectName());
+}
+
+CPPUNIT_TEST_FIXTURE(SigningTest, testODFDoubleX509Data)
+{
+createDoc(m_directories.getURLFromSrc(DATA_DIRECTORY)
+  + "02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt");
+SfxBaseModel* pBaseModel = dynamic_cast(mxComponent.get());
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT(pBaseModel);
+SfxObjectShell* pObjectShell = pBaseModel->GetObjectShell();
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT(pObjectShell);
+SignatureState nActual = pObjectShell->GetDocumentSignatureState();
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_MESSAGE(
+(OString::number(o3tl::underlyingEnumValue(nActual)).getStr()),
+(nActual == 

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 113512] 1.15 Line spacing is missing in Format Spacing menu

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113512

--- Comment #10 from Jim Raykowski  ---
Here is a patch that adds 1.15 line spacing UNO for use in Writer text,
comments, and drawing shells: 

https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/123569

It needs an image.

I think patches for a 1.15 line spacing UNO for Draw/Impress and Calc and 2.5,
3 line spacing UNO commands can be a good way for a beginning LO hacker to
learn how UNO commands are implemented.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145117] XML Source not imported if tags is non-ASCII symbols

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145117

--- Comment #2 from Michael Warner  ---
I recall another bug about this being written about 5 months back. I can't
remember enough details at the moment to find it, but it was traced to a
dependent library and was fixed. 

You don't say what 7.x version you tried, but please try downloading the latest
version from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/ and see if
the problem is still there.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 142443] Libre Office Writer breaks the text adding unwanted tags in the content.xml file

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142443

Michael Warner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
   ||2447

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132447] Words break according to elements in exported PDF

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132447

Michael Warner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
   ||2443

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145119] Style of chapter formatted as inline (ver. 6 and 7) in WRITE (NOT WEB)- in HTML exported is

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145119

Michael Warner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
   ||2443

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 142443] Libre Office Writer breaks the text adding unwanted tags in the content.xml file

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142443

Michael Warner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
   ||5119

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'distro/mimo/mimo-6-2' - 2 commits - xmlsecurity/qa

2021-10-13 Thread Michael Stahl (via logerrit)
 
xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_macros_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt
 |binary
 xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt 
   |binary
 xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated2.odt
   |binary
 
xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated_triple.odt
 |binary
 
xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_trusted_person_manipulated.odt
  |binary
 xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/signed_with_x509certificate_chain.odt 
   |binary
 xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing.cxx
   |  135 ++
 7 files changed, 135 insertions(+)

New commits:
commit b955c289b6eb4bbaaa3d3b5516720eec27825bde
Author: Michael Stahl 
AuthorDate: Fri Feb 26 17:29:37 2021 +0100
Commit: Andras Timar 
CommitDate: Wed Oct 13 23:21:37 2021 +0200

xmlsecurity: add tests for multiple X509Data/X509Certificate

Change-Id: If50ae8156f81c1053aa8fbfc3148da64bb8e1442

diff --git 
a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_macros_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt
 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_macros_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt
new file mode 100644
index ..d63e4b6b7b72
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_macros_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt
 differ
diff --git 
a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt
new file mode 100644
index ..0190abb00f23
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated.odt 
differ
diff --git 
a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated2.odt 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated2.odt
new file mode 100644
index ..f4b4198f94a6
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated2.odt 
differ
diff --git 
a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated_triple.odt
 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated_triple.odt
new file mode 100644
index ..558bdee47e59
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/02_doc_signed_by_attacker_manipulated_triple.odt
 differ
diff --git 
a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/signed_with_x509certificate_chain.odt 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/signed_with_x509certificate_chain.odt
new file mode 100644
index ..5e519dd8b7e7
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/signed_with_x509certificate_chain.odt differ
diff --git a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing.cxx 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing.cxx
index 03aa3c81ca44..36034ee41d6f 100644
--- a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing.cxx
+++ b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing.cxx
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 
@@ -81,6 +82,11 @@ public:
 /// Document has a signature stream, but no actual signatures.
 void testODFNo();
 void testODFUnsignedTimestamp();
+void testODFX509CertificateChain();
+void testODFDoubleX509Data();
+void testODFTripleX509Data();
+void testODFMacroDoubleX509Data();
+void testODFDoubleX509Certificate();
 /// Test a typical OOXML where a number of (but not all) streams are 
signed.
 void testOOXMLPartial();
 /// Test a typical broken OOXML signature where one stream is corrupted.
@@ -134,6 +140,11 @@ public:
 CPPUNIT_TEST(testODFNo);
 CPPUNIT_TEST(testODFBroken);
 CPPUNIT_TEST(testODFUnsignedTimestamp);
+CPPUNIT_TEST(testODFX509CertificateChain);
+CPPUNIT_TEST(testODFDoubleX509Data);
+CPPUNIT_TEST(testODFTripleX509Data);
+CPPUNIT_TEST(testODFMacroDoubleX509Data);
+CPPUNIT_TEST(testODFDoubleX509Certificate);
 CPPUNIT_TEST(testOOXMLPartial);
 CPPUNIT_TEST(testOOXMLBroken);
 CPPUNIT_TEST(testOOXMLDescription);
@@ -657,6 +668,106 @@ void SigningTest::testODFUnsignedTimestamp()
 CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(sal_Int32(18183742), infos[0].SignatureTime);
 }
 
+void SigningTest::testODFX509CertificateChain()
+{
+createDoc(m_directories.getURLFromSrc(DATA_DIRECTORY)
+  + "signed_with_x509certificate_chain.odt");
+SfxBaseModel* pBaseModel = dynamic_cast(mxComponent.get());
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT(pBaseModel);
+SfxObjectShell* pObjectShell = pBaseModel->GetObjectShell();
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT(pObjectShell);
+SignatureState nActual = pObjectShell->GetDocumentSignatureState();
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_MESSAGE(
+(OString::number(/*o3tl::underlyingEnumValue(*/ (int)nActual 
/*)*/).getStr()),
+(nActual == SignatureState::NOTVALIDATED || nActual == 
SignatureState::OK));
+uno::Sequence const infos(
+pObjectShell->GetDocumentSignatureInformation(false));
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(sal_Int32(1), 

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 117840] Layer properties visible/printable/locked are wrong in watch window

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117840

--- Comment #6 from Regina Henschel  ---
Created attachment 175725
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=175725=edit
Screenshot layer properties

I see the error still in Version: 7.3.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: a3416ed058884a1fcaae0659ff6e71f5a7dff8d0
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19043; UI render: default; VCL: win
Locale: de-DE (en_US); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

Compare the screenshot of the Basic IDE with the screenshot of the layer
properties.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 117840] Layer properties visible/printable/locked are wrong in watch window

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117840

--- Comment #5 from Regina Henschel  ---
Created attachment 175724
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=175724=edit
Screenshot Basic IDE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145103] "Invalid Value." window pops up by cells with Validity check

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145103

m.a.riosv  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG

--- Comment #3 from m.a.riosv  ---
Sheet it's protected.

Let's close for now as notabug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144840] Special Paste RTF: Table with merged cells messed up

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144840

Aron Budea  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||bisected

--- Comment #4 from Aron Budea  ---
Actually, that was a red herring. The regression was introduced in the range,
but it's from the following commit, confirmed by reverting.

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=e3ea0e32657a41b48d9d9d28f6ad15af4c2a7abc
author  Noel Grandin  2021-08-28 17:28:34 +0200
committer   Noel Grandin  2021-08-29
09:33:52 +0200

tdf#135683 speed up large writer table load

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 139469] [LOCALHELP] fontwork help page needs review

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139469

Regina Henschel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de

--- Comment #7 from Regina Henschel  ---
Created attachment 175723
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=175723=edit
Screenshot slant shadow

Slant shadow works for me. Only the tooltip is not adapted when slant shadow is
on.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sw/qa

2021-10-13 Thread Xisco Fauli (via logerrit)
 dev/null |binary
 1 file changed

New commits:
commit 17d3cacfb9675268e709cfc95771ad4ce8bde75a
Author: Xisco Fauli 
AuthorDate: Wed Oct 13 18:17:49 2021 +0200
Commit: Xisco Fauli 
CommitDate: Wed Oct 13 22:29:31 2021 +0200

sw: remove unused document

it was added in 2211a67cc5e577f8abdcc96c9c63865be5fb988d
< Rewrite import and export of custom dashes in ooxml filter (fix) >
The test was later removed in f3d6c44c9cb533fe4f1cd28fc95adc36cac4bfd5
< tdf#108064 OOXML export: keep preset dashes with any line width >
and it fails if it's reintroduced. No explanation why it was removed
though, sigh.

Change-Id: Ie7409f64d4f8912634d3871c75d16448de0f5211
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/123561
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Xisco Fauli 

diff --git a/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/data/dashed_line_preset.docx 
b/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/data/dashed_line_preset.docx
deleted file mode 100644
index 923360b496c8..
Binary files a/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/data/dashed_line_preset.docx and 
/dev/null differ


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 117840] Layer properties visible/printable/locked are wrong in watch window

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117840

--- Comment #4 from Andreas Heinisch  ---
I cannot reproduce the error in:
Version: 7.3.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 8fb366c13ac1b23c455c32afc085bca2edff03bb
CPU threads: 6; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19042; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: en-US (de_DE); UI: en-US
Calc: CL

The properties are the same as shown in the message box.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 121032] Fontwork is insert behind shape instead of on top

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121032

--- Comment #5 from Regina Henschel  ---
Still a problem in Version: 7.3.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: a3416ed058884a1fcaae0659ff6e71f5a7dff8d0
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19043; UI render: default; VCL: win
Locale: de-DE (en_US); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 118336] Wrong statement about Fontwork

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118336

--- Comment #3 from Regina Henschel  ---
Created attachment 175722
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=175722=edit
Dialog for legacy "Fontwork"

(In reply to Olivier Hallot from comment #1)
> Created attachment 143060 [details]
> Dialog for old fontwork

Your screenshot shows the wrong object. The legacy Fontwork, which this issue
is about, is applicable to Polygons and BezierCurves.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144691] Applying complext text layout resets selected language

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144691

psidiumcode  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 OS|Linux (All) |All
Version|7.2.1.2 release |7.1.0.0.alpha0+
   Keywords||bibisected, bisected,
   ||regression

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144691] Applying complext text layout resets selected language

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144691

--- Comment #4 from psidiumcode  ---
git bisect log:

# bad: [116e9431a240e3a7c7161b9d7112c4a93c0363b3] source
sha:d5e786d78d2f72a39f02746d6e0faa04da72c60a
# good: [75306c92d72b1fb500c114873493cf9d3c824e76] source
sha:574c57090642347980d2395e1e183cc7b5c171ad
git bisect start 'master' 'oldest'
# good: [062dcd9049c6a969aee24685350fac959be03ee9] source
sha:a0f282f57213c4318c1de10d74ee43b850886147
git bisect good 062dcd9049c6a969aee24685350fac959be03ee9
# good: [8b798baaca3703ad21dda65e0f8935fb31b34a78] source
sha:5744ed4ff9f2fab5073c5f8b3153b18109cb5594
git bisect good 8b798baaca3703ad21dda65e0f8935fb31b34a78
# bad: [a40c46d071a412578c027c370ebef0181d18d910] source
sha:874af0da643e48fb2a2825be48261819ff53962d
git bisect bad a40c46d071a412578c027c370ebef0181d18d910
# good: [5c668106d4bb25924c6cc84e9af7bd25ec0d0c15] source
sha:c7caec046f8bfff8c46fc930738f29631cf16df9
git bisect good 5c668106d4bb25924c6cc84e9af7bd25ec0d0c15
# good: [8f20b2031cc48a5ef0c3fae0e1323d5c88a92aa3] source
sha:8977fd400ced120a710cb7c683d89583c44d5733
git bisect good 8f20b2031cc48a5ef0c3fae0e1323d5c88a92aa3
# bad: [36e00ebc550910c5fd9f3051db6dfea8372afefd] source
sha:9aa8552bf9168836662b45798e06de4b972550ed
git bisect bad 36e00ebc550910c5fd9f3051db6dfea8372afefd
# bad: [252bc4dee8d54b041e0135e4a02fd64288c2] source
sha:60dbe21f59a45889c433727d0862c9a4274d94d2
git bisect bad 252bc4dee8d54b041e0135e4a02fd64288c2
# bad: [db48c02a99c693cd0ae475d6e166c061a6b3228d] source
sha:9f6fbe36da3d53df0b64c41e9ea51cc20d442a30
git bisect bad db48c02a99c693cd0ae475d6e166c061a6b3228d
# good: [a40cc63139826813c068cc25ee3241c6d94cb98d] source
sha:a096575b8a26e80f7da13ca559bcbe33564c2498
git bisect good a40cc63139826813c068cc25ee3241c6d94cb98d
# good: [00864410f966b77949cdb8ba929015caa68c9440] source
sha:2ae0d2a21778634f085e5bccd73e88e8b96fc69a
git bisect good 00864410f966b77949cdb8ba929015caa68c9440
# good: [3f5e2f3f8a028ed75a6aad1ae754d01966070788] source
sha:1ec39615b91b299c48be90f134840d89517ab4c3
git bisect good 3f5e2f3f8a028ed75a6aad1ae754d01966070788
# good: [3d676b87b9d18dcd4704003a04e726699420a2b6] source
sha:806c696ccdac69e274cbfeac0cb45ea59555c01d
git bisect good 3d676b87b9d18dcd4704003a04e726699420a2b6
# bad: [652728030440accee88baabf8ed6031b72e568b9] source
sha:78c6e88e163f50eccc1cebdb2defe9ec4af248ce
git bisect bad 652728030440accee88baabf8ed6031b72e568b9
# first bad commit: [652728030440accee88baabf8ed6031b72e568b9] source
sha:78c6e88e163f50eccc1cebdb2defe9ec4af248ce

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144691] Applying complext text layout resets selected language

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144691

--- Comment #3 from psidiumcode  ---
I could reproduce it in ver:

Version: 7.3.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 56883788d0090383dad58552f5a11044ffe64a44
CPU threads: 12; OS: Mac OS X 10.15.7; UI render: default; VCL: osx
Locale: en-GB (en_GB.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded


Bisected from bibisect-mac64-7.1.

652728030440accee88baabf8ed6031b72e568b9 is the first bad commit
commit 652728030440accee88baabf8ed6031b72e568b9
Author: libreoffice 
Date:   Wed Nov 11 14:28:58 2020 +0100

source sha:78c6e88e163f50eccc1cebdb2defe9ec4af248ce

source sha:78c6e88e163f50eccc1cebdb2defe9ec4af248ce

 LibreOffice.app/Contents/Frameworks/libcuilo.dylib | Bin 3811876 -> 3811780
bytes
 LibreOffice.app/Contents/Resources/setuprc |   2 +-
 LibreOffice.app/Contents/Resources/versionrc   |   2 +-
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140045] Windows Draw - memory leak with png files

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140045

Julien Nabet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|serval2...@yahoo.fr |

--- Comment #20 from Julien Nabet  ---
(In reply to xordevoreaux from comment #19)
> ...
> May not be a linux problem.

Perhaps.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107634] [META] Fontwork / WordArt bugs and enhancements

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107634

Regina Henschel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||104911


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104911
[Bug 104911] Changing fontwork's character spacing to a custom % makes text
unreadable
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 104911] Changing fontwork's character spacing to a custom % makes text unreadable

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104911

Regina Henschel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||107634
 CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de

--- Comment #7 from Regina Henschel  ---
The current "spacing" keeps the total length and makes each character wider or
smaller. if the character becomes wider it will overlap with the neighbor
character otherwise the total length would change. And for the overlapping
areas the even-odd fill rule is used.

Changing this behavior to keeping the character size and increase/decrease the
space between the characters would result in different total length. But a
different length is only possible with draw:text-path-scale="shape". It would
not be possible with draw:text-path-scale="path", which is used for most
predefined Fontwork shapes and most of the Fontwork preset forms. On the other
hand this kind of "spacing" is that one known from the character properties
dialog.

Perhaps both kind of "spacing" are needed.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107634
[Bug 107634] [META] Fontwork / WordArt bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140045] Windows Draw - memory leak with png files

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140045

--- Comment #19 from xordevore...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #18)
> On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I tried to get a
> Valgrind trace with --leak-check=full but I don't see anything wrong. Now
> I'm not a Valgrind expert. I suppose there are other tools on Linux but
> don't have the patience to test them. I think there should be a standard
> tool with a quick and simple tuto, after all it's just C++, not an exotic
> language.
> Anyway, I can't help here=>uncc myself.

May not be a linux problem.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145103] "Invalid Value." window pops up by cells with Validity check

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145103

--- Comment #2 from omui+libreoff...@pm.me ---
(In reply to m.a.riosv from comment #1)
> A1 it's empty so
> "1:"(A1) gives 1:0 what it's not a correct address
> 
> with D25 instead A1
> ISNUMBER(SUMPRODUCT(SEARCH(MID(D25;ROW(INDIRECT("1:"(D25)));1);
> "0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ")))
> 
> I think it works.

I confirm changing that did work, as no "invalid values." will pop up. So it
appears that this is a wrong formula provided by the sheet maker (Amazon), I'll
give this feedback to Amazon.

However, the "Re-type Password" window still pops up, though.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145090] LO Calc Crash with drop-down-menu

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145090

Julien Nabet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #6 from Julien Nabet  ---
How did you install LO? From official TDF website, from distrib repo, other?
What's your distribution and which version do you use?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145099] Recovery of MS OFFICE documents fails after crash

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145099

Julien Nabet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|https://banfftheatrecollect |
   |ive.weebly.com  |
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Julien Nabet  ---
Spam I suppose

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140045] Windows Draw - memory leak with png files

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140045

--- Comment #18 from Julien Nabet  ---
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I tried to get a
Valgrind trace with --leak-check=full but I don't see anything wrong. Now I'm
not a Valgrind expert. I suppose there are other tools on Linux but don't have
the patience to test them. I think there should be a standard tool with a quick
and simple tuto, after all it's just C++, not an exotic language.
Anyway, I can't help here=>uncc myself.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 61576] fontwork trailing space

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61576

Regina Henschel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
 CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED

--- Comment #9 from Regina Henschel  ---
I cannot reproduce it. Tested with Version: 7.1.5.2 (x64) / LibreOffice
Community
Build ID: 85f04e9f809797b8199d13c421bd8a2b025d52b5
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19043; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: en-GB (en_US); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

Beside that, the new shapes in the Fontwork Gallery do not have a trailing
space in the text.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107634] [META] Fontwork / WordArt bugs and enhancements

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107634
Bug 107634 depends on bug 61576, which changed state.

Bug 61576 Summary: fontwork trailing space
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61576

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143756] Basic: Round VBA compatibility function needs documenting its rounding mode

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143756

Rafael Lima  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |rafael.palma.l...@gmail.com
   |desktop.org |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 118320] Add support for Windows 10 dark mode

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118320

--- Comment #54 from V Stuart Foote  ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #53)
> 
> "Either of two ways to address. One would be to implement support for UWP
> theming mechanism--a lot of native Windows code." 
> 
> Only that would "solve" the incorrectly read UWP system colors, though we'll
> need to keep track of HC mode behavior as well.
> 

Though another approach, as in comment 40, avoids the unsupportable UWP
framework and uses winrt.UI.ViewManagement UIsettings for win32 calls to pickup
the os/DE (XAML) theme support. Seems like this provides a functional
alternative API providing full os/DE theme. But just of use for Windows 10
onward. [1]

I think we can agree there will never be a win32 API for passing Windows WPF
color theming.

=-ref-=
[1]
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/desktop/modernize/using-the-xaml-hosting-api

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145115] Laggy selection rectangle

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145115

--- Comment #2 from Jim Svensson  ---
Yes I have tried safe mode, it does not help. The laggy selection rectangle has
been like that since version 6.1 or something.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134426] Changing Paragraph format, editing Text and changing back leaves edited text's format unchanged

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134426

--- Comment #20 from Justin L  ---
revert proposed at http://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/123566

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 141986] Improve current LO Application Colors theme handling to support a LibreOffice "dark" color scheme mode

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141986

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11
   ||8320

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 118320] Add support for Windows 10 dark mode

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118320

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
   ||1986

--- Comment #53 from V Stuart Foote  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #52)
> I started with a patch that exposes the systems colors under Tools > Options
> > Application Colors. It's kind of a workaround to the incorrectly read
> system colors. The idea is to be able to configure manually a dark mode -
> and eventually to make it customizable per extension.
> 
> Now the discussion comes up whether this will be assumed as a solution given
> that users might expect an automatic switch from day to night, which wont be
> done with the patch. It does nothing but to list the system colors like menu
> color, dialog background etc. with the default values taken from whatever
> source (so the actual issue can be fixed by real developers).
> 
> What do you think?

actually you did more with your work of defining a default "LibreOffice Dark"
Application colors --> Color Scheme for bug 141986

And as noted there:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141986#c14

"Either of two ways to address. One would be to implement support for UWP
theming mechanism--a lot of native Windows code." 

Only that would "solve" the incorrectly read UWP system colors, though we'll
need to keep track of HC mode behavior as well.

"The other is to provide a full set of application colors touching all widgets
of the UI."

The problem remains (even with your
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/123548 patch) that too much of the UI
is not exposed in the Application Colors color scheme to set our own
LibreOffice managed defaults, and to block os/DE provided theme that overlays
the "automatic" values.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145116] assert fails in debug build when touch a style dialog second time

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145116

--- Comment #4 from Julien Nabet  ---
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I don't reproduce this
with gtk3 or gen renderings.
As soon as my local Windows build has finished, I'll give it a try.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144530] Redo of the insertion of a textbox doesn't activate selected highlighting (which appears as redo isn't working)

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144530

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff
   ||ice.org

--- Comment #3 from Buovjaga  ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #1)
> Also in
> Versie: 4.4.7.2 
> Build ID: f3153a8b245191196a4b6b9abd1d0da16eead600
> Locale: nl_NL
> 
> and in
> Versie: 4.2.0.4 
> Build ID: 05dceb5d363845f2cf968344d7adab8dcfb2ba71
> 
> no undo of frame in
> Versie: 4.1.0.4 
> Build ID: 89ea49ddacd9aa532507cbf852f2bb22b1ace28
> 
> Adding bibisectRequest to see who did implement the feature.. need to be
> done once to get also an answer for bug 144531

Undo started removing the frame in
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/12a4200e8ff7f045efcc7e9d15a24b15b248c437
Related: #i120498# Enhanced Undo/Redo and user experience...

Bibisected with Linux 42max.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 144530] Redo of the insertion of a textbox doesn't activate selected highlighting (which appears as redo isn't working)

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144530

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff
   ||ice.org

--- Comment #3 from Buovjaga  ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #1)
> Also in
> Versie: 4.4.7.2 
> Build ID: f3153a8b245191196a4b6b9abd1d0da16eead600
> Locale: nl_NL
> 
> and in
> Versie: 4.2.0.4 
> Build ID: 05dceb5d363845f2cf968344d7adab8dcfb2ba71
> 
> no undo of frame in
> Versie: 4.1.0.4 
> Build ID: 89ea49ddacd9aa532507cbf852f2bb22b1ace28
> 
> Adding bibisectRequest to see who did implement the feature.. need to be
> done once to get also an answer for bug 144531

Undo started removing the frame in
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/12a4200e8ff7f045efcc7e9d15a24b15b248c437
Related: #i120498# Enhanced Undo/Redo and user experience...

Bibisected with Linux 42max.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 144531] Undo of textbox keeps the textbox insert button activated

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144531

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff
   ||ice.org
   Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected

--- Comment #4 from Buovjaga  ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #1)
> Also in
> Versie: 4.4.7.2 
> Build ID: f3153a8b245191196a4b6b9abd1d0da16eead600
> Locale: nl_NL
> 
> and in
> Versie: 4.2.0.4 
> Build ID: 05dceb5d363845f2cf968344d7adab8dcfb2ba71
> 
> no undo of frame in
> Versie: 4.1.0.4 
> Build ID: 89ea49ddacd9aa532507cbf852f2bb22b1ace28
> 
> Adding bibisectRequest to see who did implement the feature..

Undo started removing the frame in
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/12a4200e8ff7f045efcc7e9d15a24b15b248c437
Related: #i120498# Enhanced Undo/Redo and user experience...

Bibisected with Linux 42max. Was an excruciating experience as the repo tends
to be very crashy. This made it less annoying:

while (git clean -f -X && git bisect skip && ! (SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=gen
opt/program/soffice --impress --norestore)); do : ; done

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144531] Undo of textbox keeps the textbox insert button activated

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144531

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff
   ||ice.org
   Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected

--- Comment #4 from Buovjaga  ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #1)
> Also in
> Versie: 4.4.7.2 
> Build ID: f3153a8b245191196a4b6b9abd1d0da16eead600
> Locale: nl_NL
> 
> and in
> Versie: 4.2.0.4 
> Build ID: 05dceb5d363845f2cf968344d7adab8dcfb2ba71
> 
> no undo of frame in
> Versie: 4.1.0.4 
> Build ID: 89ea49ddacd9aa532507cbf852f2bb22b1ace28
> 
> Adding bibisectRequest to see who did implement the feature..

Undo started removing the frame in
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/12a4200e8ff7f045efcc7e9d15a24b15b248c437
Related: #i120498# Enhanced Undo/Redo and user experience...

Bibisected with Linux 42max. Was an excruciating experience as the repo tends
to be very crashy. This made it less annoying:

while (git clean -f -X && git bisect skip && ! (SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=gen
opt/program/soffice --impress --norestore)); do : ; done

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sw/qa

2021-10-13 Thread Xisco Fauli (via logerrit)
 dev/null |binary
 1 file changed

New commits:
commit ba68eccbf1524f3d956e777d9e8988ca8514b6a8
Author: Xisco Fauli 
AuthorDate: Wed Oct 13 18:25:45 2021 +0200
Commit: Stephan Bergmann 
CommitDate: Wed Oct 13 20:31:32 2021 +0200

sw: remove another unused document

it was added in 598d8194b0ea1a64e0ebba28a86c128bafa57c7c
< Visible function type RTTI for Clang -fsanitize=function >
which doesn't seem to be related at all

Change-Id: Id74affa131f871b047b7ac4e99964c993908c0b6
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/123562
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann 

diff --git a/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/data/fdo79822-SPECIAL.docx 
b/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/data/fdo79822-SPECIAL.docx
deleted file mode 100644
index 48fde879344f..
Binary files a/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/data/fdo79822-SPECIAL.docx and 
/dev/null differ


[Libreoffice-qa] Minutes from the UX/design meeting 2021-Oct-13

2021-10-13 Thread Heiko Tietze

Present: Heiko
Comments: Stuart, AndreasH

Tickets/Topics

 * Special characters: A favorite character is only added to recent,
   if you insert it from the special characters dialog
   + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113310
   + always add to recently used (and accept this list to become busy)
 or keep the current behavior?
   + no duplicating (Stuart)
   => resolve NAB

 * UI: Animation not arrange alphabetically
   + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145034
   + most often used "Appear" comes first, we should sort by
 last use, if at all (Heiko)
   + Sorting alphabetically makes no sense but; pseudo-sorting
 the most common on top (as today) is better; could also
 imagine a treeview (AndreasH)
   => resolve NAB; sorting is not an issue

 * UI: Add icons to the effect list (instead of text only)
   + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145039
   + barely possible on small icons and don't we have the preview anyway
   => no further input, resolving WF to keep the list items small

 * UI: Animation list, show all entry's by default. Add search &
   drop down to filter
   + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145037
   + adding an input field to search shrinks the screen real estate further
   => resolve WF but add splitter to shrink/grow the applied/available
   list (AI: Heiko)

 * UI: Sidebar Animation isn't that 'self-explaining' for adding a new animation
   + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145028
   + Problem a): NAB/WF b/c): larger buttons with labels?
   + no further input, agree on labelled buttons (Heiko)
   => keep and make easyhackable


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Minutes from the UX/design meeting 2021-Oct-13

2021-10-13 Thread Heiko Tietze

Present: Heiko
Comments: Stuart, AndreasH

Tickets/Topics

 * Special characters: A favorite character is only added to recent,
   if you insert it from the special characters dialog
   + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113310
   + always add to recently used (and accept this list to become busy)
 or keep the current behavior?
   + no duplicating (Stuart)
   => resolve NAB

 * UI: Animation not arrange alphabetically
   + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145034
   + most often used "Appear" comes first, we should sort by
 last use, if at all (Heiko)
   + Sorting alphabetically makes no sense but; pseudo-sorting
 the most common on top (as today) is better; could also
 imagine a treeview (AndreasH)
   => resolve NAB; sorting is not an issue

 * UI: Add icons to the effect list (instead of text only)
   + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145039
   + barely possible on small icons and don't we have the preview anyway
   => no further input, resolving WF to keep the list items small

 * UI: Animation list, show all entry's by default. Add search &
   drop down to filter
   + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145037
   + adding an input field to search shrinks the screen real estate further
   => resolve WF but add splitter to shrink/grow the applied/available
   list (AI: Heiko)

 * UI: Sidebar Animation isn't that 'self-explaining' for adding a new animation
   + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145028
   + Problem a): NAB/WF b/c): larger buttons with labels?
   + no further input, agree on labelled buttons (Heiko)
   => keep and make easyhackable


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 118320] Add support for Windows 10 dark mode

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118320

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||caol...@redhat.com

--- Comment #52 from Heiko Tietze  ---
I started with a patch that exposes the systems colors under Tools > Options >
Application Colors. It's kind of a workaround to the incorrectly read system
colors. The idea is to be able to configure manually a dark mode - and
eventually to make it customizable per extension.

Now the discussion comes up whether this will be assumed as a solution given
that users might expect an automatic switch from day to night, which wont be
done with the patch. It does nothing but to list the system colors like menu
color, dialog background etc. with the default values taken from whatever
source (so the actual issue can be fixed by real developers).

What do you think?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144840] Special Paste RTF: Table with merged cells messed up

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144840

Aron Budea  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ba...@caesar.elte.hu,
   ||noelgran...@gmail.com
   Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected

--- Comment #3 from Aron Budea  ---
This started crashing at the paste special step with the first commit below.
The crashing ended at the second commit, but the result was already bad. I'm
fairly sure the regression started with the first commit (but haven't confirmed
it). Adding CC: to Noel Grandin.

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=426930d0c4bd6f782a04a92e8a36e92cd65e186f
author  Noel Grandin 2021-08-28 08:35:29
+0200
committer   Noel Grandin  2021-08-28
15:13:20 +0200

"speedup dynamic_cast to SwTextFrame"

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=aac3ef9df34b38d8fc786f13b0336c7cbe68ee51
author  Noel Grandin  2021-08-31
12:07:56 +0200
committer   Noel Grandin  2021-08-31
22:13:15 +0200

"fix crash in select-all"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145116] assert fails in debug build when touch a style dialog second time

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145116

Telesto  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr

--- Comment #3 from Telesto  ---
@Julien,
A debug build is needed for testing ..

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145115] Laggy selection rectangle

2021-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145115

Telesto  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tele...@surfxs.nl

--- Comment #1 from Telesto  ---
1. Start LibreOffice 
2 select Help ▸ Restart in Safe Mode
3. In the Enter Safe Mode dialog select Restart. LibreOffice will restart and
display the Safe Mode dialog
4. Select Continue in Safe Mode
5. Test and see if the problem is gone.

If the problem persists, you can exit the safe mode because the user profile
was not the cause of the problem.

If the problem is solved, something is wrong with your configuration. Start
LibreOffice in safe mode again to see the safe mode dialog. You can now try to
disable Hardware acceleration or to restore/reset your user profile.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

  1   2   3   >