[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 76595] Microsoft Offfice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76595 --- Comment #35 from luna beth --- Brother printer is the globally used machine in industries, and home printing works. Millions of happy customers get satisfactory results with its outstanding print quality features. https://istartsetup.com/fixed-brother-printer-in-error-state/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149249] Ship LibreOfficeKit headers and library files with the LibreOffice community packages
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149249 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145844] Multiple crashes with text document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145844 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear gomurchu, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145627] Cross reference error if merging two numbered paragraphs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145627 --- Comment #10 from QA Administrators --- Dear Orwel, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 119520] The table borders/content shifting when saving with selected content (and afterwards when deselecting)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119520 --- Comment #9 from QA Administrators --- Dear Telesto, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149473] New: Find and Replace dialog remembers most options, but not all
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149473 Bug ID: 149473 Summary: Find and Replace dialog remembers most options, but not all Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.1.8.1 release Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Windows (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: Calc Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: v+li...@nevcal.com Description: The options for Match case, formatted display, entire cells, and all sheets are not remembered across exiting and restarting LibreOffice (Calc, at least). I think they should be. All the "other options" seem to be remembered. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open a spreadsheet, Ctrl-H, tick "All sheets" 2. Close LibreOffice 3. Open a spreadsheet, Ctrl-H Actual Results: note that "All sheets" is no longer ticked. Expected Results: "All sheets" should remain ticked Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: I know I'm a few versions behind, but am coordinating versions with other people on a project. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 104597] RTL script text runs are reversed on PDF import, PDFIProcessor::mirrorString misbehaving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104597 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kni...@gmail.com --- Comment #74 from V Stuart Foote --- *** Bug 149457 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149457] Arabic Text Scrambled and Unreadable in PDF Files Opened by LibreOffice Draw
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149457 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu --- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote --- Thanks for filing, but a known and long running PDF import filter issue for RTL text runs. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 104597 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149469] Install Windows 10 64 bit fails with version 7.3.3.2 with MSI error 1324 "The path Program Files contains an invalid character"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149469 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO Summary|It fails to install Windows |Install Windows 10 64 bit |10 64 bit version. (I need |fails with version 7.3.3.2 |to send a "screenshot" of |with MSI error 1324 "The |the problem.) |path Program Files contains ||an invalid character" Ever confirmed|0 |1 Version|3.3.3 release |7.3.3.2 release Component|LibreOffice |Installation CC||mikekagan...@hotmail.com, ||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu --- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote --- We'll assume you validated the HASH value for the installer. So, any chance you can try another installation, but this time from the command line and capture an installation log? Command line would be: "msiexec.exe /i LibreOffice_7.3.3.2_Win_x64.msi /L*V lo7332instLog.txt" It will be a large file, ZIP it and attach (assuming it still errors). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149472] New: Freezes on selection Writer
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149472 Bug ID: 149472 Summary: Freezes on selection Writer Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.2.7.2 release Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: macOS (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: LibreOffice Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: bnewber...@alumni.princeton.edu Created attachment 180610 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180610=edit See above See attachment which describes my actions and has report. Running macos 10.15.7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 105433] UI - Tooltip flickers annoyingly in dialogs when overlaid over another hierarchically superior dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105433 --- Comment #36 from Aron Budea --- If someone has a fix to this, and any of the duplicates remain after retesting, do reopen those bug reports. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 105433] UI - Tooltip flickers annoyingly in dialogs when overlaid over another hierarchically superior dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105433 --- Comment #35 from Aron Budea --- *** Bug 144120 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144120] Flickering extended tooltip text on “Select X.509 Certificate” dialogue box and unable to sign the document on mac version LibreOffice 7.2
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144120 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aron.bu...@gmail.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Aron Budea --- Let's mark this as duplicate of bug 105433. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 105433 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 105433] UI - Tooltip flickers annoyingly in dialogs when overlaid over another hierarchically superior dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105433 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mateusz.la...@gmail.com --- Comment #34 from Aron Budea --- *** Bug 146563 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 146563] Flickering text hint in color picker
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146563 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC||aron.bu...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Aron Budea --- Duplicate of bug 105433. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 105433 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 105433] UI - Tooltip flickers annoyingly in dialogs when overlaid over another hierarchically superior dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105433 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avd.sha...@gmail.com --- Comment #33 from Aron Budea --- *** Bug 144123 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144123] Flickering text on Security Options and Warning dialog box on macOS
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144123 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||aron.bu...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Aron Budea --- Looks like a duplicate of bug 105433. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 105433 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 112889] [META] Screen flickering when hovering on items or selecting text with default rendering
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112889 Bug 112889 depends on bug 139245, which changed state. Bug 139245 Summary: Calc: Tooltip for color selection in Format Cells… > Border flickering https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139245 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 139245] Calc: Tooltip for color selection in Format Cells… > Border flickering
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139245 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC||aron.bu...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Aron Budea --- Looks like duplicate of bug 105433. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 105433 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 105433] UI - Tooltip flickers annoyingly in dialogs when overlaid over another hierarchically superior dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105433 --- Comment #32 from Aron Budea --- *** Bug 139245 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 105433] UI - Tooltip flickers annoyingly in dialogs when overlaid over another hierarchically superior dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105433 --- Comment #31 from Aron Budea --- *** Bug 148572 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148572] UI: Color picker tooltip flickering (macOS) Skia Raster and without Skia (not seen with Vulkan)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148572 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Aron Budea --- Actually, this is duplicate of bug 105433. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 105433 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149471] DOCX: Word header content with convert-to PDF on Linux has fidelity issues
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149471 --- Comment #2 from viewer --- Created attachment 180609 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180609=edit Comparison screenshot showing the problem -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149471] DOCX: Word header content with convert-to PDF on Linux has fidelity issues
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149471 --- Comment #1 from viewer --- Created attachment 180608 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180608=edit Source document that is converted to PDF -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149471] New: DOCX: Word header content with convert-to PDF on Linux has fidelity issues
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149471 Bug ID: 149471 Summary: DOCX: Word header content with convert-to PDF on Linux has fidelity issues Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.2.1.2 release Hardware: All OS: Linux (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: view...@opentext.com Description: When the attached Word document is converted to PDF on Linux, the header content in the PDF file has the following issues (See attached comparison screenshot: WordHeaderIssues.jpg) 1. The text WEO9 wraps when it should not 2. The Date value 24-02-2022 wraps when it should not. 3. The page number is not resolved as it is in MS Word. The first two items are not a problem for conversion on Windows, the third one is a problem on Windows as well. Not related to header content, for the Table of Contents on page 2 of the document, the page number 3 is missing for 1. Major Title 1. 2. Major Title 2. This is a problem on Linux only. Steps to Reproduce: 1.On Linux, use convert-to to export the docx file provided to PDF 2.View the PDF created in Adobe Reader 3.Navigate to page 2 4.Compare the header field values in the top right area, with the file opened in LibreOffice Writer or MS Word. 5.Compare the first two lines of the Table of Contents for the page number at the right end. Actual Results: In the header, text is wrapped and page numbers are not resolved (Page 2 of 8) In the Table of Contents, page number 3 is missing on two lines. See attached WordHeaderIssues.jpg Expected Results: In the header, the document title and date field should fit in one line each and page number should be resolved (2 of 8) In the Table of Contents, page number 3 should be shown at the end of the first two lines. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: LibreOffice is run headless in the Linux environment and there isn't an About dialog. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149470] Firebird: CLOB Field Types only save 20480 bit
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149470 bugreport...@protonmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #180606|test odb files |CLOB_FB.odb description|| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149470] Firebird: CLOB Field Types only save 20480 bit
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149470 --- Comment #2 from bugreport...@protonmail.com --- Created attachment 180607 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180607=edit mem_testHSQLDB.odb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149470] Firebird: CLOB Field Types only save 20480 bit
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149470 --- Comment #1 from bugreport...@protonmail.com --- Created attachment 180606 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180606=edit test odb files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149470] New: Firebird: CLOB Field Types only save 20480 bit
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149470 Bug ID: 149470 Summary: Firebird: CLOB Field Types only save 20480 bit Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.3.3.2 release Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Windows (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Base Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: bugreport...@protonmail.com Description: When inserting large texts in a CLOB field, only part of the text is saved. I tested this with inserting the whole German base handbook text into a CLOB field. Only 20480 bit are saved; query: BIT_LENGTH. CLOB_FB.odb The same test in HSQLDB results in no data loss; query BIT_LENGTH 19696736 mem_testHSQLDB.odb Version: 7.3.3.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: d1d0ea68f081ee2800a922cac8f79445e4603348 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22000; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: de-DE Calc: CL Steps to Reproduce: 1.inserting large texts in a CLOB field 2. 3. Actual Results: only part of the text is saved Expected Results: full text is saved Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: Yes Additional Info: no other information -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149469] It fails to install Windows 10 64 bit version. (I need to send a "screenshot" of the problem.)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149469 Jim Willis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||willis0...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jim Willis --- Created attachment 180605 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180605=edit It is a screenshot of the message I get/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149469] New: It fails to install Windows 10 64 bit version. (I need to send a "screenshot" of the problem.)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149469 Bug ID: 149469 Summary: It fails to install Windows 10 64 bit version. (I need to send a "screenshot" of the problem.) Product: LibreOffice Version: 3.3.3 release Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Windows (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: LibreOffice Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: willis0...@gmail.com Description: The installation program "LibreOffice_7.3.3_Win_x64.msi" crashes shortly (within seconds...) after starting - & YES, I have tried the 32 bit version also - but I have Windows 10 - 64 bit version/// Actual Results: It failed to install. Expected Results: I "expected" it to install properly! Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: It should have installed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149468] Scaling for draw:path-stretchpoint-x is wrongly triggered
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149468 --- Comment #1 from Regina Henschel --- There are more things wrong than the faulty condition, therefore it might be an easyHack, but not with difficultyBeginner. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149468] New: Scaling for draw:path-stretchpoint-x is wrongly triggered
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149468 Bug ID: 149468 Summary: Scaling for draw:path-stretchpoint-x is wrongly triggered Product: LibreOffice Version: Inherited From OOo Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) URL: https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.3/o s/part3-schema/OpenDocument-v1.3-os-part3-schema.html# attribute-draw_path-stretchpoint-x OS: Windows (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: LibreOffice Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: rb.hensc...@t-online.de Blocks: 108198 Created attachment 180604 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180604=edit The left, yellow shape is faulty The behavior for draw:path-stretchpoint-x is specified in 19.204 ODF 1.3 (see URL) as "If specified, and if the x/y aspect ratio of the svg:viewBox 19.574 is lower than the x/y aspect ratio of the shape size then the whole path is stretched horizontally at draw:path-stretchpoint-x." The attached document contains a yellow, a blue, a green and a red custom shape. The yellow and green shapes have an attribute draw:path-stretchpoint-x set. The blue and red shape have the same coordinates, but they have no draw:path-stretchpoint-x attribute. The yellow shape has the attributes svg:width="6cm", svg:height="3cm" and svg:viewBox="0 0 21600 10800". So its x/y aspect ratio of the svg:viewBox is 21600/10800=2 and the x/y aspect ratio of its size is 6cm/3cm=2. So the values are equal and therefore there should be no stretching. That means it should look the same as the blue shape. The green shape has the attributes svg:width="6cm", svg:height="6cm" and svg:viewBox="0 0 21600 21600". So its x/y aspect ratio of the svg:viewBox is 21600/21600=1 and the x/y aspect ratio of its size is 6cm/6cm=1. Here it works. The error is in method EnhancedCustomShape2d::SetPathSize() 689 fXRatio = static_cast(aLogicRect.GetWidth()) / static_cast(aLogicRect.GetHeight()); 690 if ( fXRatio > 1 ) 691 fXScale /= fXRatio; 692 else 693 fXRatio = 1.0; Here it tests whether the shape width of the shape is larger than the shape height. But being ODF conform the ratio viewBoxWidht/viewBoxHeight has to be compared to ratio shapeWidth/shapeHeight. Variable aLogicRect has the size of the shape and variables nCoordWidth and nCoordHeight have the size of viewBox. https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/svx/source/customshapes/EnhancedCustomShape2d.cxx?r=0a1bfe1e#690 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108198 [Bug 108198] [META] ODF export is unsuitable or invalid XML -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108198] [META] ODF export is unsuitable or invalid XML
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108198 Regina Henschel changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||149468 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149468 [Bug 149468] Scaling for draw:path-stretchpoint-x is wrongly triggered -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 128773] Images not shown and new cannot be pasted in frame before caption if anchor type is changed
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128773 --- Comment #10 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Timur from comment #5) > Although strange. > Happens only when image is pasted before caption: I believe I can explain the observed behavior, but I will it to others to decide whether there is a valid "problem" here, and how to describe it. Tests conducted with 7.4.0.0.alpha1+: 1. Open test file. (notice, in Navigator, that in addition to the schematic (Name: Image1) two images are hidden "Image2" and "test") 2. In the frame, where the image is supposed to be copied, place cursor in front of the first character (i.e., "F"). (notice that it is not possible to add any spaces before that "F" character) 3. Press Ctrl+M (or Clear Direct Formatting icon). (The two hidden images become visible (both anchors as character). 4. Delete both images, place cursor before "F" again. (notice that again it is not possible to add spaces before "F") 5. Press Ctrl+M 6. Now possible to add the image before "F" and change anchor to "as character", without the image disappearing. No explanation for how the file got into that state, but STR should give enough information to understand likely cause of "observed/reproduced" behavior. Additional information 1. Starting with "fresh" test file, "cut" schematic image (Image1 not shown now in Navigator), paste before "F" (Image1 appears again in Navigator). Cursor goes to EOD, but image is not visible. (Using Navigator, with Image1, "Go to" does not change cursor position, regardless of what cursor is placed, and not image frame is highlighted. "Edit" does not open the properties dialog.) 2. Do not think bug 149458 (comment 9) is a DUP of this ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149436] FORMATTING FILESAVE EDITING Microsoft Excel to LibreOffice Calc to Microsoft Excel, formating lost on round trip
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149436 --- Comment #6 from Timur --- I added what I considered as needed. I don't know what to add more. LO simply doesn't understand Table Style on open and any further saving is expectedly wrong. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149467] New: Follow URL link in Writer text: Crash in: _chkstk
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149467 Bug ID: 149467 Summary: Follow URL link in Writer text: Crash in: _chkstk Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.3.3.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: as-sf...@online.de Created attachment 180603 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180603=edit Document with one line of text. A URL without whitespace appended only. This bug was filed from the crash reporting server and is br-5d2316f1-16a8-434d-85d4-076ff3072c48. = 1. I have created a Writer document with one line of text. The text is a https URL. I did not append a white space. Thus writer did not create a hyperlink from the text. 2. I saved the document. 3. I opened the document and appended a white space to the URL. Writer makes it a hyperlink. 4. I control-select the link to open it. 5. Writer crashes. It happens with 7.3.3.2 and 7.3.2.2. See the attachement for a document to reproduce the problem. Kind regards, Olav -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149466] New: LibreOffice Draw opens the OpenSSH public key
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149466 Bug ID: 149466 Summary: LibreOffice Draw opens the OpenSSH public key Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.0 all versions Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Draw Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: sal...@smoha.org Description: I created an SSH key pair using the following command on Debian: $ ssh-keygen which subsequently created two files: id_rsa id_rsa.pub the public key has a .pub extension but has the following type: $ file id_rsa.pub id_rsa.pub: OpenSSH RSA public key But LibreOffice assumes that every .pub file is a Microsoft Publisher file and LibreOffice Draw becomes automatically the default software to open it. I think this is a bug and it needs to be changed. Actual Results: LibreOffice Draw opens the ssh public key Expected Results: LibreOffice Draw should not open ssh public key file. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 7.0.4.2 Build ID: 00(Build:2) CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.16; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US Debian package version: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u1 Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148991] Chinese characters break when other chinese characters are inserted ahead
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148991 Ayush Jain changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #4 from Ayush Jain --- Thank you for reporting the bug. I can confirm that the bug is present in 7.3.3.2 (x64) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149436] FORMATTING FILESAVE EDITING Microsoft Excel to LibreOffice Calc to Microsoft Excel, formating lost on round trip
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149436 --- Comment #5 from junk_2...@live.co.uk --- Timur, >From an end user point of view I believe this issue is different to the bug 66377 you have marked this a duplicate of. I was reporting formatting that is lost on a round trip to Microsoft Excel and back again, which is a compatibility issue. To me as an end user that is different to a request for a new feature that is in the description for bug 66377, whch you marked this as a duplicate of. I understand from a developer point of view you may class them as the same. I did run a search and not find anything matching the "end user" issue. Perhaps you would consider updating the description in bug 66377 to avoid anyone else raising the issue? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: dictionaries
dictionaries |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit f572585756494c59fb81f5d93c51cc2d35421f0e Author: Eike Rathke AuthorDate: Mon Jun 6 20:36:50 2022 +0200 Commit: Gerrit Code Review CommitDate: Mon Jun 6 20:36:50 2022 +0200 Update git submodules * Update dictionaries from branch 'master' to 15c340d66842e3f99729e20686ffec28d36c2784 - Related: tdf#147390 Add oc-FR-lengadoc to oc_FR/dictionaries.xcu And remove trailing whitespace and convert to unix line ends.. Change-Id: I1fba3ef0c1b7e279f299a4adfd3fdffb7a9a60d4 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/dictionaries/+/135459 Reviewed-by: Eike Rathke Tested-by: Eike Rathke diff --git a/dictionaries b/dictionaries index 3cfa1a08999c..15c340d66842 16 --- a/dictionaries +++ b/dictionaries @@ -1 +1 @@ -Subproject commit 3cfa1a08999c0bfa7ef8f79db324b565fd87e8c6 +Subproject commit 15c340d66842e3f99729e20686ffec28d36c2784
[Libreoffice-commits] dictionaries.git: oc_FR/dictionaries.xcu
oc_FR/dictionaries.xcu | 38 ++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) New commits: commit 15c340d66842e3f99729e20686ffec28d36c2784 Author: Eike Rathke AuthorDate: Mon Jun 6 19:29:14 2022 +0200 Commit: Eike Rathke CommitDate: Mon Jun 6 20:36:49 2022 +0200 Related: tdf#147390 Add oc-FR-lengadoc to oc_FR/dictionaries.xcu And remove trailing whitespace and convert to unix line ends.. Change-Id: I1fba3ef0c1b7e279f299a4adfd3fdffb7a9a60d4 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/dictionaries/+/135459 Reviewed-by: Eike Rathke Tested-by: Eike Rathke diff --git a/oc_FR/dictionaries.xcu b/oc_FR/dictionaries.xcu index 84ff991..0a8cba4 100644 --- a/oc_FR/dictionaries.xcu +++ b/oc_FR/dictionaries.xcu @@ -1,20 +1,18 @@ - -http://openoffice.org/2001/registry; xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema; oor:name="Linguistic" oor:package="org.openoffice.Office"> - - - - -%origin%/oc_FR.aff %origin%/oc_FR.dic - - -DICT_SPELL - - -oc-FR - - - - - - - + +http://openoffice.org/2001/registry; xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema; oor:name="Linguistic" oor:package="org.openoffice.Office"> + + + + +%origin%/oc_FR.aff %origin%/oc_FR.dic + + +DICT_SPELL + + +oc-FR-lengadoc oc-FR + + + + +
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149463] Calc/Graph/trend curve format, if type moving average, type is not saved with document, always after reopening is set to preceeding
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149463 m.a.riosv changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o ||rg --- Comment #1 from m.a.riosv --- Please attach a sample file, with the file format you used to save it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: i18nlangtag/qa i18nlangtag/source i18npool/Library_localedata_es.mk i18npool/Library_localedata_euro.mk i18npool/source
i18nlangtag/qa/cppunit/test_languagetag.cxx|2 ++
i18nlangtag/source/isolang/isolang.cxx |8 +---
i18npool/Library_localedata_es.mk |2 +-
i18npool/Library_localedata_euro.mk|2 +-
i18npool/source/localedata/data/oc_ES_aranes.xml |5 +++--
i18npool/source/localedata/data/oc_FR_lengadoc.xml |5 +++--
i18npool/source/localedata/localedata.cxx |4 ++--
7 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 196f2b6f8e61cd8e78f6f8dfda6b55c4fbaec0c8
Author: Eike Rathke
AuthorDate: Mon Jun 6 19:08:56 2022 +0200
Commit: Eike Rathke
CommitDate: Mon Jun 6 20:35:27 2022 +0200
Resolves: tdf#147390 tag oc-FR to oc-FR-lengadoc, oc-ES to oc-ES-aranes
Change-Id: I849e8e2c6cf2a61b81b25c96b79478bc04907b5c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135458
Reviewed-by: Eike Rathke
Tested-by: Jenkins
diff --git a/i18nlangtag/qa/cppunit/test_languagetag.cxx
b/i18nlangtag/qa/cppunit/test_languagetag.cxx
index 16a2ee20d37f..5b73b3cbf714 100644
--- a/i18nlangtag/qa/cppunit/test_languagetag.cxx
+++ b/i18nlangtag/qa/cppunit/test_languagetag.cxx
@@ -751,6 +751,8 @@ bool checkMapping( std::u16string_view rStr1,
std::u16string_view rStr2 )
if (rStr1 == u"cmn-CN" ) return rStr2 == u"zh-CN";
if (rStr1 == u"cmn-TW" ) return rStr2 == u"zh-TW";
if (rStr1 == u"kw-UK" ) return rStr2 == u"kw-GB";
+if (rStr1 == u"oc-FR" ) return rStr2 == u"oc-FR-lengadoc";
+if (rStr1 == u"oc-ES" ) return rStr2 == u"oc-ES-aranes";
return rStr1 == rStr2;
}
diff --git a/i18nlangtag/source/isolang/isolang.cxx
b/i18nlangtag/source/isolang/isolang.cxx
index 1e967015b285..d20014e67f4b 100644
--- a/i18nlangtag/source/isolang/isolang.cxx
+++ b/i18nlangtag/source/isolang/isolang.cxx
@@ -489,8 +489,8 @@ IsoLanguageCountryEntry const aImplIsoLangEntries[] =
{ LANGUAGE_LOWER_SORBIAN_GERMANY, "dsb", "DE", k0},// MS maps
this to 'wee-DE', which is nonsense. 'WEE' is a SIL code, see
http://www.ethnologue.com/14/show_language.asp?code=WEE
{ LANGUAGE_LOWER_SORBIAN_LSO, "dsb", "" , k0},
{ LANGUAGE_OBSOLETE_USER_LOWER_SORBIAN,"dsb", "DE", k0},
-{ LANGUAGE_OCCITAN_FRANCE, "oc", "FR", k0},
-{ LANGUAGE_OBSOLETE_USER_OCCITAN, "oc", "FR", k0},
+{ LANGUAGE_OCCITAN_FRANCE, "oc", "FR", kSAME },
+{ LANGUAGE_OBSOLETE_USER_OCCITAN, "oc", "FR",
LANGUAGE_OCCITAN_FRANCE },
{ LANGUAGE_USER_KURDISH_TURKEY,"kmr", "TR", kSAME },
{ LANGUAGE_USER_KURDISH_TURKEY, "ku", "TR", kSAME },
{ LANGUAGE_USER_KURDISH_SYRIA, "kmr", "SY", kSAME },
@@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ IsoLanguageCountryEntry const aImplIsoLangEntries[] =
{ LANGUAGE_USER_CHURCH_SLAVIC, "cu", "RU", k0},
{ LANGUAGE_USER_VENETIAN, "vec", "IT", k0},
{ LANGUAGE_USER_ENGLISH_GAMBIA, "en", "GM", k0},
-{ LANGUAGE_USER_OCCITAN_ARANESE,"oc", "ES", k0},
+{ LANGUAGE_USER_OCCITAN_ARANESE,"oc", "ES", kSAME },
{ LANGUAGE_USER_ARPITAN_FRANCE,"frp", "FR", k0},
{ LANGUAGE_USER_ARPITAN_ITALY, "frp", "IT", k0},
{ LANGUAGE_USER_ARPITAN_SWITZERLAND, "frp", "CH", k0},
@@ -779,6 +779,8 @@ Bcp47CountryEntry const aImplBcp47CountryEntries[] =
{ LANGUAGE_USER_ENGLISH_UK_OED, "en-GB-oed", "GB", "",
LANGUAGE_USER_ENGLISH_UK_OXENDICT }, // grandfathered, deprecated, prefer
en-GB-oxendict
{ LANGUAGE_SPANISH_DATED, "es-ES-u-co-trad", "ES",
"es-u-co-trad", k0 }, // RFC6067/CLDR
{ LANGUAGE_SPANISH_DATED, "es-ES_tradnl", "ES", "", kSAME },
// MS malformed
+{ LANGUAGE_OCCITAN_FRANCE, "oc-FR-lengadoc", "FR",
"oc-lengadoc", k0 },
+{ LANGUAGE_USER_OCCITAN_ARANESE, "oc-ES-aranes", "ES", "oc-aranes",
k0 },
// { LANGUAGE_YUE_CHINESE_HONGKONG, "zh-yue-HK", "HK", "", 0 }, //
MS reserved, prefer yue-HK; do not add unless LanguageTag::simpleExtract() can
handle it to not call liblangtag for rsc!
{ LANGUAGE_YIDDISH, "yi-001", "", "", k0 }, //
MS since rev.15, was "yi-Hebr" reserved, "001"="World"
{ LANGUAGE_FRENCH_WEST_INDIES, "fr-029", "", "", k0 }, //
MS since rev.15, was "Neither defined nor reserved", "029"="Caribbean"
diff --git a/i18npool/Library_localedata_es.mk
b/i18npool/Library_localedata_es.mk
index 5b6cdd3bcc29..46f8c387848b 100644
--- a/i18npool/Library_localedata_es.mk
+++ b/i18npool/Library_localedata_es.mk
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ $(eval $(call
gb_Library_add_generated_exception_objects,localedata_es,\
CustomTarget/i18npool/localedata/localedata_es_UY \
CustomTarget/i18npool/localedata/localedata_es_VE \
CustomTarget/i18npool/localedata/localedata_gl_ES \
-
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 112182] [META] Text and object selection issues
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112182 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||149308 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149308 [Bug 149308] CTRL + SHIFT + right-arrow should not select whitespace after word -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149308] CTRL + SHIFT + right-arrow should not select whitespace after word
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149308 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Version|6.0.0.3 release |Inherited From OOo CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org OS|Windows (All) |All Summary|Problem with text selection |CTRL + SHIFT + right-arrow |using CTRL + SHIFT +|should not select |right-arrow |whitespace after word Blocks||112182 --- Comment #2 from Buovjaga --- Already in version 3.3.0. I guess it would be better to change the behaviour. I tested with some applications and it varies. In Firefox, it only selects the word. In KDE, Dolphin and Kate behave like LibreOffice. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112182 [Bug 112182] [META] Text and object selection issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149298] LibreOffice Writer has messed up text using TrueType fonts after changes in the sentence.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149298 Joseph Barrow changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #4 from Joseph Barrow --- I have tried that now (deactivate Skia) and wrote a few paragraphs of text. Yes, it does help and I didn't realize that it was there - I poke around in the settings for other things. It seems to me that this is the cause of the problem, although why, I couldn't say. I am not familiar with Skia's purpose and would hesitate to comment further, other than to confirm that it helps to deactivate this. Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138126] Anchor image as character when inserting it into an caption frame
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138126 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||114426 CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de --- Comment #6 from Dieter --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2) > Don't see advantage from To Paragraph when the image is placed within a > frame. So I agree with keeping the value. What do you think, Regina? I'm not an expert at all, but since anchor of image is now at beginning of the caption frame, it might be the expected result: Image is "connected" with caption frame - sounds logic to me. Regina? Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114426 [Bug 114426] [META] Caption bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 114426] [META] Caption bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114426 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||138126 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138126 [Bug 138126] Anchor image as character when inserting it into an caption frame -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138126] Anchor image as character when inserting it into an caption frame
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138126 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olivier.hallot@libreoffice. ||org --- Comment #5 from Dieter --- *** Bug 149458 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149458] Adding Caption to image change image anchoring
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149458 --- Comment #2 from Dieter --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 138126 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 128773] Images not shown and new cannot be pasted in frame before caption if anchor type is changed
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128773 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olivier.hallot@libreoffice. ||org --- Comment #9 from Dieter --- *** Bug 149458 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149458] Adding Caption to image change image anchoring
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149458 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Dieter --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 128773 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149298] LibreOffice Writer has messed up text using TrueType fonts after changes in the sentence.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149298 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org --- Comment #3 from Buovjaga --- Does it make a difference, if you deactivate Tools - Options - LibreOffice - View - Use Skia for all rendering ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148884] LibreOffice Draw dark color scheme background color leaks to the exported PDF
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148884 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.3.2.2 release |7.2.0.0.alpha0+ Keywords||implementationError CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org Severity|enhancement |normal --- Comment #3 from Buovjaga --- I guess it's an implementation error from bug 141986 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 98367] Draw/Impress Small capitals preview correct but result as Capitals, including with Text box in Writer
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98367 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||milbr...@smileconsult.de --- Comment #25 from Buovjaga --- *** Bug 147732 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 147732] font effect "small caps" does not work in Impress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147732 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #11 from Buovjaga --- I repro and it seems to be a dupe indeed *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 98367 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sc/inc sc/source
sc/inc/refdata.hxx |2 +-
sc/source/core/tool/refdata.cxx |6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 1e022eb12e1222d6d9c6d127a18b0ed8fd49b6c0
Author: Eike Rathke
AuthorDate: Mon Jun 6 17:00:31 2022 +0200
Commit: Eike Rathke
CommitDate: Mon Jun 6 17:55:58 2022 +0200
ScSingleRefData::TabValid: for absolute reference take sheets into account
Change-Id: I56e7e34f127345e2633b5bef07c2783ed8ffbbfe
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135456
Reviewed-by: Eike Rathke
Tested-by: Jenkins
diff --git a/sc/inc/refdata.hxx b/sc/inc/refdata.hxx
index 4cc296a0a394..d893248ba0bc 100644
--- a/sc/inc/refdata.hxx
+++ b/sc/inc/refdata.hxx
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ public:
bool Valid(const ScDocument& rDoc) const;
bool ColValid(const ScDocument& rDoc) const;
bool RowValid(const ScDocument& rDoc) const;
-bool TabValid() const;
+bool TabValid(const ScDocument& rDoc) const;
/** In external references nTab is -1 if the external document was not
loaded but the sheet was cached, or >=0 if the external document was
loaded. */
diff --git a/sc/source/core/tool/refdata.cxx b/sc/source/core/tool/refdata.cxx
index 8bd55dfc92ec..3e1b9b1af8be 100644
--- a/sc/source/core/tool/refdata.cxx
+++ b/sc/source/core/tool/refdata.cxx
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ bool ScSingleRefData::IsDeleted() const
bool ScSingleRefData::Valid(const ScDocument& rDoc) const
{
-return !IsDeleted() && ColValid(rDoc) && RowValid(rDoc) && TabValid();
+return !IsDeleted() && ColValid(rDoc) && RowValid(rDoc) && TabValid(rDoc);
}
bool ScSingleRefData::ColValid(const ScDocument& rDoc) const
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ bool ScSingleRefData::RowValid(const ScDocument& rDoc) const
return true;
}
-bool ScSingleRefData::TabValid() const
+bool ScSingleRefData::TabValid(const ScDocument& rDoc) const
{
if (Flags.bTabRel)
{
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ bool ScSingleRefData::TabValid() const
}
else
{
-if (mnTab < 0 || MAXTAB < mnTab)
+if (mnTab < 0 || rDoc.GetTableCount() <= mnTab)
return false;
}
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149450] Unable to change font type, style and size of an already typed para after long session of usage
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149450 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Julien Nabet --- Could you give an upgrade to 7.3.3 + take a look at https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FirstSteps#Corrupted_user_profile and indicate if you still reproduce this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149454] Log-scale scatter plot dissappears leaving only a black diagonal line when error bars larger than the graphs value are added
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149454 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Julien Nabet --- 6.4 LO version is quite old, please give a try to a newer LO version like 7.2.7 or brand new 7.3.3. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149464] Calc is very slow to load
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149464 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #1 from Julien Nabet --- Could you give a try at https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FirstSteps ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-7-3' - basic/qa basic/source
basic/qa/cppunit/test_compiler_checks.cxx | 41 ++
basic/source/comp/scanner.cxx |7 -
basic/source/inc/scanner.hxx |1
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit ed3d572b730d1873dd66fa2a31695248d506a335
Author: Andreas Heinisch
AuthorDate: Fri Jun 3 09:41:05 2022 +0200
Commit: Xisco Fauli
CommitDate: Mon Jun 6 17:08:15 2022 +0200
tdf#149402 - BASIC: Don't extend comment if line ends in a whitespace
Change-Id: I8adf530e77a0e65329fa59ac2873b99f48befac4
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135336
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Andreas Heinisch
(cherry picked from commit fbce18558a58cddf910b788a67c2f2d4d25d68e9)
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135378
Reviewed-by: Xisco Fauli
diff --git a/basic/qa/cppunit/test_compiler_checks.cxx
b/basic/qa/cppunit/test_compiler_checks.cxx
index e2882f3f694c..044977670e62 100644
--- a/basic/qa/cppunit/test_compiler_checks.cxx
+++ b/basic/qa/cppunit/test_compiler_checks.cxx
@@ -73,4 +73,45 @@ CPPUNIT_TEST_FIXTURE(CppUnit::TestFixture, testTdf149157_vba)
CPPUNIT_ASSERT(!aMacro.HasError());
}
+CPPUNIT_TEST_FIXTURE(CppUnit::TestFixture, testTdf149402)
+{
+MacroSnippet aMacro("Function extentComment() As Integer\n"
+" ' _ \n"
+" If Not extentComment Then\n"
+" extentComment = 1\n"
+" Else\n"
+" End If\n"
+"End Function\n");
+aMacro.Compile();
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT(!aMacro.HasError());
+}
+
+CPPUNIT_TEST_FIXTURE(CppUnit::TestFixture, testTdf149402_compatible)
+{
+MacroSnippet aMacro("Option Compatible\n"
+"Function extentComment() As Integer\n"
+" ' _ \n"
+" If Not extentComment Then\n"
+" extentComment = 1\n"
+" Else\n"
+" End If\n"
+"End Function\n");
+aMacro.Compile();
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT(!aMacro.HasError());
+}
+
+CPPUNIT_TEST_FIXTURE(CppUnit::TestFixture, testTdf149402_vba)
+{
+MacroSnippet aMacro("Option VBASupport 1\n"
+"Function extentComment() As Integer\n"
+" ' _ \n"
+" If Not extentComment Then\n"
+" extentComment = 1\n"
+" Else\n"
+" End If\n"
+"End Function\n");
+aMacro.Compile();
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT(!aMacro.HasError());
+}
+
/* vim:set shiftwidth=4 softtabstop=4 expandtab cinoptions=b1,g0,N-s
cinkeys+=0=break: */
diff --git a/basic/source/comp/scanner.cxx b/basic/source/comp/scanner.cxx
index d391e7b6dff2..8c63dcd6643c 100644
--- a/basic/source/comp/scanner.cxx
+++ b/basic/source/comp/scanner.cxx
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ SbiScanner::SbiScanner(const OUString& rBuf, StarBASIC* p)
, bVBASupportOn(false)
, bPrevLineExtentsComment(false)
, bClosingUnderscore(false)
+, bLineEndsWithWhitespace(false)
, bInStatement(false)
{
}
@@ -186,6 +187,8 @@ bool SbiScanner::readLine()
while(nBufPos < nEnd && BasicCharClass::isWhitespace(aBuf[nEnd - 1]))
--nEnd;
+// tdf#149402 - check if line ends with a whitespace
+bLineEndsWithWhitespace = (n > nEnd);
aLine = aBuf.copy(nBufPos, nEnd - nBufPos);
// Fast-forward past the line ending
@@ -663,7 +666,9 @@ PrevLineCommentLbl:
bPrevLineExtentsComment = false;
aSym = "REM";
sal_Int32 nLen = aLine.getLength() - nLineIdx;
-if( bCompatible && aLine[nLineIdx + nLen - 1] == '_' && aLine[nLineIdx
+ nLen - 2] == ' ' )
+// tdf#149402 - don't extend comment if line ends in a whitespace
(asicCharClass::isWhitespace)
+if (bCompatible && !bLineEndsWithWhitespace && aLine[nLineIdx + nLen -
1] == '_'
+&& aLine[nLineIdx + nLen - 2] == ' ')
bPrevLineExtentsComment = true;
nCol2 = nCol2 + nLen;
nLineIdx = -1;
diff --git a/basic/source/inc/scanner.hxx b/basic/source/inc/scanner.hxx
index 39dda9fa391c..cc3cbb5d7b41 100644
--- a/basic/source/inc/scanner.hxx
+++ b/basic/source/inc/scanner.hxx
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ protected:
bool bVBASupportOn; // true: OPTION VBASupport 1 otherwise
default False
bool bPrevLineExtentsComment; // true: Previous line is comment and
ends on "... _"
bool bClosingUnderscore; // true: Closing underscore followed
by end of line
+bool bLineEndsWithWhitespace; // true: Line ends with whitespace
(BasicCharClass::isWhitespace)
bool bInStatement;
void GenError( ErrCode );
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 116278] MAILMERGE (Labels): Unused labels at end of last page should be completely blank
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116278 Timur changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #11 from Timur --- I couldn't reproduce this. So either it works or there is some detail missing. Sample attachment 140454 is not proper, it's a result, not source. I set Needinfo for sample source with fields that come from in-built Bibliography database. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149248] Feature request: Option to not hyphenate last word in a paragraph
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149248 --- Comment #24 from László Németh --- (In reply to rferraro from comment #22) > Also, if you want to be strictly typographically correct you should also > disallow hyphenation across columns (Indesign has that feature) and even > more important would be to disallow hyphenation across pages. It makes for > nicer typography. @Rferraro: you are right! Moreover, it seems, it needs for for interoperability, too, because from Word 2013, this is the default behavior there: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/office_standards/ms-docx/e0c0663e-a5e7-4a44-8360-b0b5df1f43e6 See tdf#132599 for that bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 149248] Feature request: Option to not hyphenate last word in a paragraph
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149248 --- Comment #24 from László Németh --- (In reply to rferraro from comment #22) > Also, if you want to be strictly typographically correct you should also > disallow hyphenation across columns (Indesign has that feature) and even > more important would be to disallow hyphenation across pages. It makes for > nicer typography. @Rferraro: you are right! Moreover, it seems, it needs for for interoperability, too, because from Word 2013, this is the default behavior there: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/office_standards/ms-docx/e0c0663e-a5e7-4a44-8360-b0b5df1f43e6 See tdf#132599 for that bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132599] Option to stop words hyphenating across pages
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132599 László Németh changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |nem...@numbertext.org |desktop.org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149248] Feature request: Option to not hyphenate last word in a paragraph
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149248 --- Comment #23 from László Németh --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #21) > (In reply to László Németh from comment #20) > > My next plan to implement hyphenation zone, which is a Word/OOXML feature. > > :thumbs-up: > > The on/off solution for the last word seems a bit unflexible to me, I'd have > appreciated something like n words/lines. But thanks for the patch, fixes > the issue efficiently! Hope you enabled the option by default. @Heiko: Thanks for your feedback! For interoperability, it's better to avoid of to use this, as a default option, because OOXML doesn't contain such a thing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 149248] Feature request: Option to not hyphenate last word in a paragraph
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149248 --- Comment #23 from László Németh --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #21) > (In reply to László Németh from comment #20) > > My next plan to implement hyphenation zone, which is a Word/OOXML feature. > > :thumbs-up: > > The on/off solution for the last word seems a bit unflexible to me, I'd have > appreciated something like n words/lines. But thanks for the patch, fixes > the issue efficiently! Hope you enabled the option by default. @Heiko: Thanks for your feedback! For interoperability, it's better to avoid of to use this, as a default option, because OOXML doesn't contain such a thing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sc/qa sc/source
sc/qa/unit/ucalc_formula.cxx|4 ++--
sc/source/core/tool/refdata.cxx |2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 104596d005b32bd2bba15554e8c9ae740327aa46
Author: Eike Rathke
AuthorDate: Mon Jun 6 14:34:34 2022 +0200
Commit: Eike Rathke
CommitDate: Mon Jun 6 16:55:21 2022 +0200
Resolves: tdf#148163 Preserve names of bad cell reference input again
A regression of
commit e247262327d04ad9933f4af354050f4420c6e303
CommitDate: Tue Jul 30 23:49:55 2013 -0400
More on avoiding direct access to data members.
that changed, for example, invalid sheet references
-aRef.nTab = MAXTAB+3;
+aRef.SetTabDeleted(true);
The then following
commit 8a19af57bbcc57a02a7d87c6408d1e3212a6deba
CommitDate: Tue Jul 30 23:50:03 2013 -0400
Now nobody accesses reference members directly. Make them private.
changed ScSingleRefData::Valid()
-return nCol >= 0 && nCol <= MAXCOL &&
-nRow >= 0 && nRow <= MAXROW &&
-nTab >= 0 && nTab <= MAXTAB;
+return ColValid() && RowValid() && TabValid();
without taking the deleted flags into account, where previous to
commit e247262327d04ad9933f4af354050f4420c6e303 nTab > MAXTAB
fulfilled the condition of not valid.
This makes it necessary to adjust the
TestFormula::testFuncRangeOp() test case that relied on the broken
behaviour.
Change-Id: I42e769ca0d56a2eb786bb6f65917f0c15d082763
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135453
Reviewed-by: Eike Rathke
Tested-by: Jenkins
diff --git a/sc/qa/unit/ucalc_formula.cxx b/sc/qa/unit/ucalc_formula.cxx
index 6bad4a40127c..e1df10374d43 100644
--- a/sc/qa/unit/ucalc_formula.cxx
+++ b/sc/qa/unit/ucalc_formula.cxx
@@ -7415,8 +7415,8 @@ void TestFormula::testFuncRangeOp()
// have to be adapted.
aPos.IncRow();
m_pDoc->SetString( aPos, "=SUM(B1:Sheet2.B2:Sheet3.B3)");
-ASSERT_FORMULA_EQUAL(*m_pDoc, aPos, "SUM(#REF!.B2:#REF!.B3)", "Wrong
formula.");
-CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL( OUString("#REF!"), m_pDoc->GetString(aPos));
+ASSERT_FORMULA_EQUAL(*m_pDoc, aPos, "SUM(b1:sheet2.b2:Sheet3.B3)", "Wrong
formula.");
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL( OUString("#NAME?"), m_pDoc->GetString(aPos));
aPos.IncRow();
m_pDoc->SetString( aPos, "=SUM(Sheet1.B1:Sheet3.B2:Sheet2.B3)");
diff --git a/sc/source/core/tool/refdata.cxx b/sc/source/core/tool/refdata.cxx
index ec18dc06f598..8bd55dfc92ec 100644
--- a/sc/source/core/tool/refdata.cxx
+++ b/sc/source/core/tool/refdata.cxx
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ bool ScSingleRefData::IsDeleted() const
bool ScSingleRefData::Valid(const ScDocument& rDoc) const
{
-return ColValid(rDoc) && RowValid(rDoc) && TabValid();
+return !IsDeleted() && ColValid(rDoc) && RowValid(rDoc) && TabValid();
}
bool ScSingleRefData::ColValid(const ScDocument& rDoc) const
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 137848] Inserted image slow (15 seconds, expected 3)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137848 Claudio Bogado changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ||8295 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148295] Inserting rotated JPEG image takes several seconds
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148295 Claudio Bogado changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 ||7848 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149465] Wrong link URL in "Extension" button in start center
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149465 --- Comment #3 from himajin100...@gmail.com --- https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/svtools/source/misc/langhelp.cxx?r=e4913a56=localizeWebserviceURI#29 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149465] Wrong link URL in "Extension" button in start center
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149465 --- Comment #2 from himajin100...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Franklin Weng from comment #0) > Description: > When clicking the "Extension" button in start center (bottom-left corner) it > would go to https://extensions.libreoffice.org/zh-tw which would give a 404 > error. The string is at > https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/master/sfx2/uiconfig/ui/startcenter. > ui#473 but no idea where the URL is generated. > > https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/postprocess/CustomTarget_registry.mk?r=3829c0c7#576 https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Common.xcu?r=96607133#36 https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sfx2/source/dialog/backingwindow.cxx?r=ed45b67d#514 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149465] Wrong link URL in "Extension" button in start center
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149465 Mike Kaganski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cl...@documentfoundation.or ||g --- Comment #1 from Mike Kaganski --- Maybe a topic for redmine, and something to fix at server side redirection? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #31 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180602 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180602=edit CCB - User Manual DEU -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #31 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180602 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180602=edit CCB - User Manual DEU -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #30 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180601 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180601=edit CCB - User Manual ENG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #30 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180601 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180601=edit CCB - User Manual ENG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #29 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180600 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180600=edit CCB -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #29 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180600 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180600=edit CCB -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Keywords||needsUXEval Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED --- Comment #28 from Buovjaga --- (In reply to Hans-Werner from comment #15) > C o r e f e a t u r e ? > > [1] The Basic IDE is part of the core and therefore the Basic IDE printing > feature [File]>[Print] is part of the core too. Isn't it ? > > [2] The Basic IDE printing feature seems to be a little bit old-fashioned, > only black-and-white printing is possible contrary to the colorized basic > macro code displayed by the Basic IDE. There's no "What You See Is What You > Get" ... > > [3] Why not to replace the printing feature by an export-to-writer feature ? > Colorizing basic macro code outside LO in the same way as is displayed by > the Basic IDE is complex, difficult and error-prone. What's about to use > directly or indirectly the already existing code colorizer of the Basic-IDE. > For example, could it be possible to code some software that exports the > displayed basic macro code in a writer document and replaces the > SCREEN-color-tags by WRITER-color tags ? > > [4] The language of the descriptions of the (most) extensions is English. > What's about LO users, that don't speak English ? If [3] could be realized, > the language would be automatically the language of the LO version the user > is using. Let's ask UX team -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Keywords||needsUXEval Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED --- Comment #28 from Buovjaga --- (In reply to Hans-Werner from comment #15) > C o r e f e a t u r e ? > > [1] The Basic IDE is part of the core and therefore the Basic IDE printing > feature [File]>[Print] is part of the core too. Isn't it ? > > [2] The Basic IDE printing feature seems to be a little bit old-fashioned, > only black-and-white printing is possible contrary to the colorized basic > macro code displayed by the Basic IDE. There's no "What You See Is What You > Get" ... > > [3] Why not to replace the printing feature by an export-to-writer feature ? > Colorizing basic macro code outside LO in the same way as is displayed by > the Basic IDE is complex, difficult and error-prone. What's about to use > directly or indirectly the already existing code colorizer of the Basic-IDE. > For example, could it be possible to code some software that exports the > displayed basic macro code in a writer document and replaces the > SCREEN-color-tags by WRITER-color tags ? > > [4] The language of the descriptions of the (most) extensions is English. > What's about LO users, that don't speak English ? If [3] could be realized, > the language would be automatically the language of the LO version the user > is using. Let's ask UX team -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149465] New: Wrong link URL in "Extension" button in start center
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149465 Bug ID: 149465 Summary: Wrong link URL in "Extension" button in start center Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.3.2.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: LibreOffice Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: frank...@goodhorse.idv.tw Description: When clicking the "Extension" button in start center (bottom-left corner) it would go to https://extensions.libreoffice.org/zh-tw which would give a 404 error. The string is at https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/master/sfx2/uiconfig/ui/startcenter.ui#473 but no idea where the URL is generated. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open Start Center 2. Click the "Extension" button in the bottom-left corner 3. Browser opened a page with 404 error Actual Results: Got a 404 error Expected Results: Should open the extension site Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 7.3.2.2 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 49f2b1bff42cfccbd8f788c8dc32c1c309559be0 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.17; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: zh-TW (zh_TW.UTF-8); UI: zh-TW Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #27 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180599 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180599=edit TestData - CodeColorizerBasic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #26 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180598 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180598=edit TestData - Code Colorizer Formatter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #25 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180597 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180597=edit TestData - coooder - vbnet -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #24 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180596 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180596=edit TestData - coooder - vb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #23 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180595 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180595=edit TestData - coooder - qbasic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #22 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180594 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180594=edit TestData - coooder - freebasic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #21 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180593 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180593=edit TestData - coooder - blitzbasic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: include/svx svx/source
include/svx/fontworkgallery.hxx |4 ++--
svx/source/tbxctrls/fontworkgallery.cxx |4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit d987918e811d71357a934684cb481ca06466f06e
Author: Noel Grandin
AuthorDate: Mon Jun 6 13:36:50 2022 +0200
Commit: Noel Grandin
CommitDate: Mon Jun 6 15:51:11 2022 +0200
improve field name
Change-Id: I78c1670589c21c047ba7a2eede86e46643e88f69
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135451
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin
diff --git a/include/svx/fontworkgallery.hxx b/include/svx/fontworkgallery.hxx
index 7d9dd4ef9338..78e0370dbac5 100644
--- a/include/svx/fontworkgallery.hxx
+++ b/include/svx/fontworkgallery.hxx
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ class SAL_WARN_UNUSED SVXCORE_DLLPUBLIC FontWorkGalleryDialog
final : public wel
SdrView&mrSdrView;
boolmbInsertIntoPage;
-SdrObject* mppSdrObject;
+SdrObject* mpSdrObject;
SdrModel* mpDestModel;
std::vector> maFavoritesHorizontal;
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ public:
// SJ: if the SdrObject** is set, the SdrObject is not inserted into the
page when executing the dialog
void SetSdrObjectRef( SdrModel* pModel );
-SdrObject* GetSdrObjectRef() { return mppSdrObject; }
+SdrObject* GetSdrObjectRef() { return mpSdrObject; }
};
}
diff --git a/svx/source/tbxctrls/fontworkgallery.cxx
b/svx/source/tbxctrls/fontworkgallery.cxx
index cc9c4631361d..802cc1f4fcb8 100644
--- a/svx/source/tbxctrls/fontworkgallery.cxx
+++ b/svx/source/tbxctrls/fontworkgallery.cxx
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ FontWorkGalleryDialog::FontWorkGalleryDialog(weld::Window*
pParent, SdrView& rSd
, mnThemeId(0x)
, mrSdrView(rSdrView)
, mbInsertIntoPage(true)
-, mppSdrObject(nullptr)
+, mpSdrObject(nullptr)
, mpDestModel(nullptr)
, maCtlFavorites(m_xBuilder->weld_icon_view("ctlFavoriteswin"))
, mxOKButton(m_xBuilder->weld_button("ok"))
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ void FontWorkGalleryDialog::insertSelectedFontwork()
if (bUseSpecialCalcMode)
{
-mppSdrObject = pNewObject;
+mpSdrObject = pNewObject;
}
else
{
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #20 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180592 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180592=edit TestData - coooder - basic4gl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #19 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180591 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180591=edit TestData - LO Basic IDE - ScreenPrint Part 3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #18 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180590 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180590=edit TestData - LO Basic IDE - ScreenPrint Part 2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #17 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180589 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180589=edit TestData - LO Basic IDE - ScreenPrint Part 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 Hans-Werner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #168747|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #168748|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #168751|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #168754|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #16 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180588 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180588=edit TestData -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380
--- Comment #15 from Hans-Werner ---
OS: Windows 10 Home (21H2 - 19044.1741)
LO: 7.2.7.2 (x64) + 7.3.3.2 (x64) (LibreOffice Community)
T e s t D a t a
Used for testing the macro basic code colorizing extensions:
Attachment: "TestData.txt"
TestData as to be seen in the LO Basic IDE:
Attachment: "TestData - LO Basic IDE - ScreenPrint Part 1.png"
Attachment: "TestData - LO Basic IDE - ScreenPrint Part 2.png"
Attachment: "TestData - LO Basic IDE - ScreenPrint Part 3.png"
Colors: Blue, Green, Red, Grey (only for comments) and Black (only for # @).
E x t e n s i o n s
[1] Code Highlighter
https://extensions.libreoffice.org/en/extensions/show/code-highlighter
Not working, only error message:
Ein Scripting Framework Fehler trat während der Ausführung vom Python Skript
vnd.sun.star.script:codehighlighter.oxt|python|highlight.py$highlight_qbasic_default?language=Python=user:uno_packages
auf.
Meldung: : 'codehighlighter.oxt'
File "C:\Program Files\LibreOffice\program\pythonscript.py", line 1046, in
getScript
storageUri = self.provCtx.getStorageUrlFromPersistentUrl(
File "C:\Program Files\LibreOffice\program\pythonscript.py", line 417, in
getStorageUrlFromPersistentUrl
package = self.mapPackageName2Path[ packageName ]"
[2] coooder
https://extensions.libreoffice.org/en/extensions/show/coooder
No basic dialect found were basic macro code is colorized similar to the
colorizing of the LO Basic IDE:
Attachment: "TestData - coooder - basic4gl.odt"
Attachment: "TestData - coooder - blitzbasic.odt"
Attachment: "TestData - coooder - freebasic.odt"
Attachment: "TestData - coooder - qbasic.odt"
Attachment: "TestData - coooder - vb.odt"
Attachment: "TestData - coooder - vbnet.odt"
[3] Code Colorizer Formatter (Pitonyak)
https://extensions.libreoffice.org/en/extensions/show/71
Very good colorizing, but not exactly like "LO Basic IDE" colorizing:
+ All special characters (outside strings) "( ) [ ] % ! $ : = - + &" are
colorized "black", but should be colorized "dark blue". Only "@ #" should be
colorized "black".
+ Variable names enclosed by square brackets are mixed colorized ("dark green"
and "dark blue"), but should be colorized "dark green".
+ "Chr()", "InStr()" and "MsgBox()" are colorized "dark blue", but should be
colorized "dark green".
+ "HEX" and "OCT" numbers are mixed colorized ("black" and "dark green") but
should be colorized "red".
+ "REM", "REm", "Rem" and "rem" are colorized "dark blue", but should be
colorized "grey".
Attachment: "TestData - Code Colorizer Formatter.odt"
[4] CodeColorizerBasic (no extension, basic macro)
Uses for colorizing only regular expressions. No errors to be found. But this
does not mean, that errors could never be found ...
Attachment: "TestData - CodeColorizerBasic.odt"
C o r e f e a t u r e ?
[1] The Basic IDE is part of the core and therefore the Basic IDE printing
feature [File]>[Print] is part of the core too. Isn't it ?
[2] The Basic IDE printing feature seems to be a little bit old-fashioned, only
black-and-white printing is possible contrary to the colorized basic macro code
displayed by the Basic IDE. There's no "What You See Is What You Get" ...
[3] Why not to replace the printing feature by an export-to-writer feature ?
Colorizing basic macro code outside LO in the same way as is displayed by the
Basic IDE is complex, difficult and error-prone. What's about to use directly
or indirectly the already existing code colorizer of the Basic-IDE. For
example, could it be possible to code some software that exports the displayed
basic macro code in a writer document and replaces the SCREEN-color-tags by
WRITER-color tags ?
[4] The language of the descriptions of the (most) extensions is English.
What's about LO users, that don't speak English ? If [3] could be realized, the
language would be automatically the language of the LO version the user is
using.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149425] EDITING: Business Cards
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149425 --- Comment #9 from Timur --- I only reproduce this problem: Alt+Arrow move image up and down but not left and right. Arrow or Shift+Arrow move it in all directions. Please see if we can focus bug on that, or propose else. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149437] "Distribute Rows Equally" -> "Distribute Rows Evenly" in Draw/Impress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149437 --- Comment #3 from Commit Notification --- Adolfo Jayme Barrientos committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/help/commit/7b96772378358eba9af18e8bf3dd99c5d8042eba tdf#149437 Help: Update “Equally” to “Evenly” -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: helpcontent2
helpcontent2 |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit e4035407c048e61c62ea237581bf6d11374d66b6 Author: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos AuthorDate: Mon Jun 6 08:14:53 2022 -0500 Commit: Gerrit Code Review CommitDate: Mon Jun 6 15:14:53 2022 +0200 Update git submodules * Update helpcontent2 from branch 'master' to 7b96772378358eba9af18e8bf3dd99c5d8042eba - tdf#149437 Help: Update “Equally” to “Evenly” See core commit 73dde4733fdf66408d9ed6b048dfab4f77f088d8 Change-Id: I4fab0377f68fc48dcc5958fd3369637353f8bc97 diff --git a/helpcontent2 b/helpcontent2 index 396d82a4d705..7b9677237835 16 --- a/helpcontent2 +++ b/helpcontent2 @@ -1 +1 @@ -Subproject commit 396d82a4d705d7b473f767816f970bffec74d33e +Subproject commit 7b96772378358eba9af18e8bf3dd99c5d8042eba
