and if it does something useful, that something
should be rewritten to not depend on network resources.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
(FREEBSD) section
After some more digging I found out FREEBSD is defined in the system version
of nspr/prcpucfg.h
I'll try to disable the use of system nspr headers as a workaround.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice
),
Microsoft Word had a mode where the style name for each paragraph was shown
on the left of the document beeing edited.
I always found that handy.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org
The attached patch removes the use of *PDP_ENDIAN* defines; besides the
two .h files in the patch, nothing uses them.
Please test it on your platform of choice, I'll commit it when I'll be sure
it doesn't break anything.
--
Francois Tigeot
From 804a0660bb66f8453f71768e4407671b2b3b1b6d Mon Sep
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:59:53AM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
The attached patch removes the use of *PDP_ENDIAN* defines; besides the
two .h files in the patch, nothing uses them.
Pushed.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
to Bjoern for having re-established the verbose output behavior.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
it be possible to add links
to the source code tarballs for people wanting to build LO themselves ?
As far as I know, the tree has not been tagged so the only way to get the
exact same sources used to create theses binaries is to download a complete
archive.
--
Francois Tigeot
Thanks for your answers Miklos and Christian,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 02:02:09PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:49:50PM +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
[...]
http
here. :)
Ok, thanks all for your answers.
I'll create an alias for git and forget about it :)
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
me if this list is not the place to ask this sort of questions,
but the only installation instructions available on the web site are for
the binary packages and the user list wasn't too helpful either.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Hi,
Thanks everyone for your answers.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:03:42AM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:27 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
Well, I may become a package maintainer in the future but for that I need
to be able to build LO from the released sources first
This patch adds support for DragonFly to bootstrap/configure.in
DragonFly is a BSD-derived operating system:
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/
--
Francois Tigeot
diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index be8aa6c..e5b94fe 100755
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -1530,6 +1530,15 @@ case
#platforms
IMHO, there's no reason to include old versions of third-party packages in
LibreOffice proper.
In addition to all the included junk, I remember OpenOffice needing a
special-purpose version of gcc to be compiled.
Should we go the same path again ?
--
Francois Tigeot
generic builds - particularly since we have
a QA team that is dispersed across many Linux's.
I never said it was; I merely objected to the inclusion of out-of-date and
unmaintained software in LO.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 01:19:13PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 22:09 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
It would seem that Open/LibreOffice has not been able to be built on OSF1
systems for more than 2 years, and no one has noticed so far.
Hmm, I don't think
=true in your shell to get some details about the
failing command.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
of libtextcat
I should be aware of ?
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 07:49:26AM +0100, David Tardon wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 09:03:55PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
LibreOffice does not build with a stock libtextcat.
[...]
Are these patches only maintained in LO ?
libtextcat package in Fedora contains them.
I've also
/types.rdb
Exception on createRegistryServiceFactory
dmake: Error code 1, while making
'../../../unxdflyx3.pro/misc/localedata_en_AU.cxx'
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 04:00:39PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 08:43 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
I can't get the build to stop failing in i18npool. The only error message is
Exception on createRegistryServiceFactory and I can't get any more
details.
Try
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 08:52:19PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 04:00:39PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 08:43 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
I can't get the build to stop failing in i18npool. The only error message
is
Exception
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:52:33PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 08:52:19PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 04:00:39PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 08:43 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
I can't get the build to stop
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:05:43PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:52:33PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 08:52:19PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 04:00:39PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 08:43
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 02:32:32PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 15:10 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
The attached patch prints the exception message in saxparser.cxx.
It would be useful to have it in tree.
Looks reasonable to me, pushed, thanks for this.
Great
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:47:07PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 02:32:32PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 15:10 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
The attached patch prints the exception message in saxparser.cxx.
It would be useful to have
no error and the target
libpyuno.so is correctly created.
I can't figure out why the build keeps stopping with these Shared object not
found errors.
Is there any way to have dmake print the commands it is trying to run or give
more information on what it is actually doing ?
--
Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:47:17PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 15:47 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
Oh, and by the way, createRegistryServiceFactory() used in saxparser.cxx
is deprecated in OpenOffice:
A lot of things that are deprecated remain in there, not enough
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:30:56PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 19:35 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
My builds are now crashing in the same way in a few modules; pyuno is one of
them.
--enable-new-dtags ...
The library is present in /usr/pkg/lib/libpython2.6.so
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 08:47:46AM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
I don't think --enable-new-dtags was the culprit. I have updated the sources
with g pull since my last mail and I only get these errors now:
/usr/libexec/binutils217/elf/ld: cannot find -luno_sal
/usr/libexec/binutils217/elf
tangible to search for !
so check if /path/to/solver is correct, perhaps the source/buildtree got
moved or moved around. Is this head or 3.3.X branch ?
This is -head (master).
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice
= *Env.Set.sh
You're right, I'm the culprit for this one.
I somehow missed one
if ($platform = ~m/.../)
line in set_soenv.inc
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo
a build, but I hope to reduce the
differences with -head with this batch.
License is LGPLv3/MPL.
--
Francois Tigeot
diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index f210dd4..0425d35 100755
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -3805,7 +3805,7 @@ if test $enable_epm = yes; then
AIX
of
'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'
[1]15465 abort (core dumped) LD_LIBRARY_PATH=
../../unxdflyx3.pro/lib/libswdoctest.so -headless -invisibl
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 09:30:17PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 20:34 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
LibreOffice builds now run for almost 3 hours before failing on DragonFly.
The errors are always of the same sort: some kind of segmentation fault
with an unit test
plan to remove all traces of
OSF1 / DECUNIX and 386BSD (which has been dead since 1993 or so)
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
LibreOffice was forked...
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/diff/solenv/inc/unxobsd.mk?id=773db1a598d5800ca5e37258d3fbf397d8ffc4f2
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:05:15PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 18:34 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
- i386 / amd64
- power / powerppc
- sparc / sparc64
- arm
- mips
- alpha
http://porting.openoffice.org/ might help btw. FWIW We (Red Hat, Inc.)
build/ship
Well, it's not really a patch but a new file.
This is the last missing piece to complete a build on DragonFly.
It should be put into bootstrap/solenv/inc/
--
Francois Tigeot
# Version: MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+
#
# The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public License Version
LibreOffice has ever run on HP/UX.
What about SCO ?
Maybe we should put an announcement on the web site or something. It would
be a shame to remove support for a platform still in use by someone.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice
.
Are the UUID_SYSTEM_TIME_RESOLUTION_100NS_TICKS defines in
sal/inc/rtl/uuid.h a part of that ?
It looked completely bogus to me.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:06:47PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 13:03 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:55:12AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Are the UUID_SYSTEM_TIME_RESOLUTION_100NS_TICKS defines in
sal/inc/rtl/uuid.h a part
-mingw.patch
but since they are patches, I didn't dare modify them.
I have also let dmake/ untouched.
--
Francois Tigeot
diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index 45a22cd..ddf1614 100755
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -1470,12 +1470,6 @@ case $host_os in
AC_MSG_RESULT
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:15:37PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
in the meantime I removed HPUX and SCO support. Found out, that
osarch.pm is pretty unused ;)
Seems like good ideas are common these days :-)
--
Francois Tigeot
have thought there was Windows 3.x code in there !!
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:08:58AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
CSET is probably also complete foo IIRC. Though I don't know to what it
referred.
I don't know if these cleanups are the reason, but my builds are now faster
by a few minutes.
I'm down to 2:38 on a 3GHz Core 2.
--
Francois
One small patch needed at runtime
--
Francois Tigeot
diff --git a/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh b/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh
index e485b11..caa975c 100644
--- a/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh
+++ b/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh
@@ -70,7 +70,8 @@ fi
sd_binary=`basename $0 | sed 's/libreoffice/soffice/g
the check ;-)
I kinda understand that. Java can be such a pain...
The good news is that in 3.4 we will have a totally different component
registration mechanism, so - we can kill that check on master
pre-emptively (perhaps).
How about that ? :-)
I'm in full agreement :-)
--
Francois
Following the removal of files in testing/testautomation/framework/optional
I had a look in test/testautomation/ and the files there seemed largely
unused.
I have removed this directory from my local git tree; I had no trouble
building and installing LibreOffice afterwards.
--
Francois Tigeot
Hi Jan,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:30:06AM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Francois Tigeot píše v Čt 17. 02. 2011 v 18:29 +0100:
One small patch needed at runtime
Thank you, pushed! :-)
Thanks :-)
If you can send the further patches as the output of
git format-patch HEAD~
(you have
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:38:59AM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Francois,
Francois Tigeot píše v Čt 17. 02. 2011 v 23:32 +0100:
Following the removal of files in testing/testautomation/framework/optional
I had a look in test/testautomation/ and the files there seemed largely
unused
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 06:40:11PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 05:25:06PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
Well; javaldx sets up the LD_LIBRARY_PATH for java to 'actually
work' It also used to be the case that without /proc mounted it would crash
and burn[1
OSL_ENSURE(it != aControlList.begin() it != aControlList.rbegin(),
Button at first or last position?);
I believe there should be a cast to const somewhere for aControlList.rbegin()
but I am no C++ programmer and cannot write a fix for this expression.
--
Francois Tigeot
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:28:19AM -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 10:28 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
There's some value in that. I've attached a small patch instead ;)
Looks like someone has already applied this patch (?)
It would be helpful if whoever applies
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:49:47PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
The attached patches remove OSF/1 support from the build system and some
application code.
Pushed.
For the record, these patches and subsequent ones can be considered to be
LGPLv3+/MPL unless stated otherwise
--
Francois Tigeot
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 04:25:37PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 17:19 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
The attached patch a 386BSD #defined test (the only one ?)
Go for it,
Pushed.
that mkdepend is derived from some imake mkdepend or
something, hence the old platforms
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 08:43:20PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 11:37 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
This patch gets rid of some remaining SCO tests.
Go ahead and push this yourself now.
Done.
What's strange is that there were references in sal/osl/os2/
It seems
it.
I have attached two files:
- build.log, the output of dmake in sc/qa/unit
- gdbtrace.log
I may have missed something stupid, like a path element but for now I'm stuck.
Any help would be much appreciated !
--
Francois Tigeot
build -- version: 275224
=
Building module sc
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:36:14PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 09:46 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
For now, I'm focussing on sc/qa/unit.
Because your log shows OK (10) before it falls over and dies, I
believe that the tests themselves are passing, and you are dying
Failures: 1 Errors: 0
dmake: Error code 1, while making 'test2'
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:13:34PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:36:14PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Another possibility is some nasty atexit/__cxa_atexit problem. A hack to
experiment for that possibility can be found at
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives
.
I had to comment some code for an unrelated failure; I'll send a separate
mail for that one.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
this commit is to blame:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/base/commit/?id=a66fec7123aa82cf441066cf91e0e287450f0784
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:56:56AM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:11:46AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 09:30 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
With STAR_RESOURCEPATH set, gdb ends up in an eternal wait state, exactly
like when I ran it from
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:26:46PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 20:07 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000801535510 in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x000801535510 in ?? ()
#1 0x0008010b7db9 in __cxa_finalize
3.x developpement:
http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 12:07:22AM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:26:46PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
This confirms the theory anyway. Doesn't help exactly pin down the
problem, but it does point to some global dtor, or explicit
atexit/cxa_finalize handler, so
files works fine.
How can I know what exactly is going wrong ?
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
.
The only issue I've found at runtime so far is I'm unable to save normal
.odt or .ods files but this may not be related.
I've not yet encountered a single LibreOffice crash.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the help.
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 07:02:30AM -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote:
At 3:11am -0500 Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Francois Tigeot wrote:
The dialog box just closes itself and reopens half a second later.
No file is written to disk.
Saving .fods and .fodt files works fine
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 12:38:28PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 09:11 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
The dialog box just closes itself and reopens half a second later. No file
is
written to disk.
What fun :-)
Yeah :-/
you mentioned that your
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:35:15AM -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote:
At 10:51am -0500 Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Francois Tigeot wrote:
Well, I was also thinking about a printf-like solution. I just hoped
to not have to rebuild a binary, it takes almost two hours and a
half...
That's just it: you don't
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:43:27PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 15:34 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
The output is almost unreadable: it seems LO constantly runs poll() and
gettimeofday().
That would be interacting with the X server ;-) try not to use the
mouse
a jdk on our users.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
the last code drop introduced a new dependency to GNU cp:
$ ./autogen.sh [blah]
[...]
checking for cp... /bin/cp
checking whether /bin/cp is GNU cp from coreutils with preserve= support...
configure: error: no, GNU cp needed. install or specify with
--with-gnu-cp=/path/to/it
--
Francois Tigeot
Hi Bjoern,
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 05:36:02AM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:17:34 +0100
Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote:
configure: error: no, GNU cp needed. install or specify
with --with-gnu-cp=/path/to/it
As the guy who changed that (back when I
Hey Bjoern,
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 01:05:07AM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 06:09:10 +0100
Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote:
Well, all my builds of the last few month were run without it.
That is luck and you dont want to count on that. Anyone using
Boost::Date_time is in fact perfectly functional and the
configure script reports a non-existing error.
Removing the check is enough to make LibreOffice-3.6 build again (see
attached patch).
--
Francois Tigeot
From 080bbbc053c415d07c4d4ae74e68effb6898024e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q
of
testtools/CustomTarget_bridgetest.mk and ensures CustomTarget_uno_test.mk
succeeds in all cases.
It should be committed to -master and the -3.6 branch if possible.
--
Francois Tigeot
From a2fee1ba5cc96bdf4a493b16897504e0e789aa07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Fran=C3=A7ois=20Tigeot
. Since
it is potentially intrusive, I prefer to show it here for review instead of
committing it directly.
--
Francois Tigeot
From d726ef2fca9430395010f0e6d34469f34583c78a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Fran=C3=A7ois=20Tigeot?= ftig...@wolfpond.org
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 12:48:42 +0200
Hey Michael,
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:15:51PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 12:59 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
The attached patch reduces OUTPATH to two possible values: unx and wnt.
Since
it is potentially intrusive, I prefer to show it here for review instead
Hi,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:07:06PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
On Saturday, 2012-05-26 12:59:32 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
The attached patch reduces OUTPATH to two possible values: unx and wnt.
In addition to what others already said regarding cross-platform builds
like to know a bit more about this item; Norbert, would you prefer real
boxes if possible ?
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 09:09:34AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 04:11:18PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
* tinderboxen / status (Norbert)
+ bytemark machine #2
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 03:02:45PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote:
If boxes are finally set up, they will be DragonFly + pkgsrc packages only,
special software will have to be maintained by the developers themselves
All of my past contributions to LibreOffice are licensed under the
MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license; subsequent ones may also be licensed as
MPL/LGPLv3+ unless stated otherwise.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
versions
gives perfectly fine binaries.
The platform used was DragonFly/x86_64 but I have no reason to believe
other *nix systems would fare differently.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:16:06AM -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On 08/15/2012 11:08 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
The error I got is:
libsclo.so: Undefined symbol _ZN5boost6system16generic_categoryEv
I think David Tardon has already fixed this.
Ah, it seems this was not directly a libreoffice
.
Looks good to me.
Howewer, I'd prefer to have only one dragonfly.mk file. No need to have
two files with tens of identical lines and only one or two different ones.
You can just delete the -INTEL file and rename the other one, I'm not
trying to build on i386 for now.
--
Francois Tigeot
module shed some light on
this ? I'm pretty sure this hard-coded call to a 'java' executable is a bug
but I don't know enough about the implications to disable it yet.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 05:41:20PM +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
2011/3/26 Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org:
Shouldn't l10ntools/java/jpropex be removed then ?
Or the whole l10ntoos/java directory while we're at it ?
Good question.
java/l10nconv and java/receditor are not even build
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:27:16AM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 07:50:06AM +0200, Francois Tigeot
ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote:
curl is required at the autogen.sh stage: if I try to run ./autogen.sh
without any curl package installed, I get this error:
configure
generates both old and new-style sections,
keeping all binutils happy.
The attached patch does just that.
--
Francois Tigeot
diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index 50ea5e1..4882e09 100755
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ WITH_SYSTEM_MOZILLA=no)
AC_ARG_WITH(linker
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:53:55AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 22:51 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
During the last few days, my builds have been broken with this error
message:
makedepend: Shared object has no run-time symbol table
Oh
.gnu.hash
section; it is of no use when you want to check if a particular system can
_run_ them.
Kind Regards,
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:02:48PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:28:40PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:53:55AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
I guess it might be a good idea to default to 'auto' for
hash-style,
and compile
option depending if the machine can run such binaries or
not.
--
Francois Tigeot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:45:39PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
Francois Tigeot píše v St 06. 04. 2011 v 17:04 +0200:
the test you have reused and the one I just wrote are for two different
things.
We have two things here:
- the first check tested for --hash-style=gnu option support
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 06:28:47PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
Francois Tigeot píše v St 06. 04. 2011 v 18:01 +0200:
I admit I only have taken a cursory look to the patch itself. Howewer, I've
also updated my git repository and tried to build LibreOffice.
The build failed exactly as I
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
