Re: LibreOffice LTO

2013-03-27 Thread Martin Liška
that I've only done it once or twice. The multiple definition errors should all be fixed now. Thanks, Peter On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote: Hi Martin Martin Liška píše v Ne 24. 03. 2013 v 20:26 +0100: Looks like there's a big issue that must be done

Re: Libreoffice - tests

2013-06-03 Thread Martin Liška
at 00:41 +0200, Martin Liška wrote: I send you in attachment build log and install log file. Do you have any ideas why calc build failed? For anyone looking at this, please bear in mind that Martin is attempting to use LTO. Martin can you verify that a parallel build with --enable

[PATCH] LTO parallelism

2014-03-26 Thread Martin Liška
Hello, following patch increases parallelism for LTO. I tried to add -flto=+jobserver, but didn't help. Tested on trunk for x86_64 GNU/Linux. Thank you, Martin diff --git a/solenv/gbuild/platform/com_GCC_defs.mk b/solenv/gbuild/platform/com_GCC_defs.mk index a4b18a3..93d3fe7 100644 ---

Re: [PATCH] LTO parallelism

2014-03-26 Thread Martin Liška
Sure, there's correct patch. Martin On 03/26/2014 12:59 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote: Hi Margin, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:43:24AM +0100, Martin Liška mli...@suse.cz wrote: diff --git a/solenv/gbuild/platform/com_GCC_defs.mk b/solenv/gbuild/platform/com_GCC_defs.mk index a4b18a3..93d3fe7

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: solenv/gbuild

2014-04-03 Thread Martin Liška
solenv/gbuild/platform/com_GCC_defs.mk |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit d7cb910ad888401335552835314d689a49351924 Author: Martin Liška mli...@suse.cz Date: Wed Mar 26 13:22:05 2014 +0100 gbuild: enable LTO parallelism for GCC Change-Id:

Segfaulting test-case with -flto

2018-04-10 Thread Martin Liška
Following test-case is failing with --enable-lto: [ 7806s] /bin/sh: line 1: 1652 Segmentation fault (core dumped) ( LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:}"$I/program:$I/pro gram":$W/UnpackedTarball/cppunit/src/cppunit/.libs MALLOC_CHECK_=2 MALLOC_PERTURB_=153

Re: Segfaulting test-case with -flto

2018-04-19 Thread Martin Liška
On 04/19/2018 02:56 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Not sure how -Wclass-memaccess is relevant for LTO? It's much easier to end up with an UBSAN that eventually causes a SEGFAULT. That's my experience learned from Firefox. Anyway, had cleaned up LO master the other day to compile with upcoming

Re: Segfaulting test-case with -flto

2018-04-19 Thread Martin Liška
On 04/10/2018 09:32 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > The help message for the --enable-lto option says: "This is experimental work  > in progress that shouldn't be used unless you are working on it." > > Thus you have two choices: 1) Don't do that then, or 2) Debug and fix the > problem. > > --tml