On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 14:33 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
I think the biggest issue is the offline editing; and I think here we
can use the Wiki Publisher
(http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/project/wikipublisher) to
edit the pages in LibreOffice.
Ooh - that is an interesting
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 10:47 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
How about the following attached hack in build.pl so that if a normal
dmake fails when launched from build.pl, then do a dmake depend=t and
retry.
Looks great to me :-)
Thanks !
Michael.
--
Hi there,
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 16:28 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
I'd like to port a patch to the libreoffice-3-3 branch to ignore
preceding and trailing spaces in cells during csv import.
I just wrote a set of unit tests for this; in sc/qa/unit/ something
like:
struct {
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 12:20 -0800, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
Please stop setting up autoreplies that reply to mailing lists... Dr.
Frank Peters. :)
Ah - you should only get one each, and its nice to know that Frank is
listening (when he is not on vacation) - personally I'm happy
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 20:58 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Michael Meeks wrote:
Riight; interesting. Ultimately XSLT requires a DOM to operate on, so I
suppose if we get SAX events from OO.o, we will need to map these to
libxml's nodes.
..
Hm, just getting a DOM tree is even easier
Hi Rene,
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 00:27 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:13:28PM +, Wols Lists wrote:
Version 2.0 has been out there for quite some time, 2.0.1 is well on the
way and as the website
states, the new version is much improved on various ends.
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 10:04 +, Noel Power wrote:
did you look at the changes I committed to the branch ? ( of course
there are some more changes to look at now :-) ) I'd be interested in
your thoughts as I would like to get this stuff into master asap
With this rather more
Hi Wols,
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 01:18 +, Wols Lists wrote:
I'm hoping to get time to plough on, but family and christmas are
getting in the way. Chat off-list if you like and we'll see how far we
get :-)
Perhaps the best thing to do is to create a feature branch, and push it
there:
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 02:09 +0800, imacat wrote:
surensp...@gmail.com said:
I'm pretty sure Michael has already fixed this yesterday. So, please
update your build tree and see if you can go past that.
I think the above has fixed my issue, though I still failed to build
LO. I shall
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 14:51 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
could anyone review that attached diff, so we could add it for
libreoffice-3-3?
Looks fine to me; and v. low risk.
Both changes were requested, discussed, and approved in the thread
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 12:57 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
The build on NetBSD currently fails with:
Entering /disk/2/archive/libreoffice/sc/qa/unit
This is where we run our unit testing framework, which involves the
first real(ish) run of great chunks of the code.
Hi Martin,
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 17:40 +0100, Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
I think online help must be available in all languages - it is a
stopper, if it isn't.
I agree. On the other hand - if there are bugs in the web help we can
improve the conversion continually to fix them without
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 01:56 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
and to be extra-safe: do the above in a fresh shell. (I have had issue
with environment variables getting fked-up)
Right - the clean shell is quite important here. Arguably we should
detect and fail in configure.in if you have
Hi there,
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 08:52 -0800, sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote:
Hi. I am usually immune to conspiracy theories, but have we thought
about becoming an OIN Licensee ?
In a word; yes - watch this space ...
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com ,
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 10:23 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Please someone review and sign-off for libreoffice-3-3 (probably we should
check for the function and not for the version, but anyways ;)):
And PKG_CONFIG is supposed to be broken compared to this ? ;-) I just
read the 100 lines
Hi Rene,
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 02:51 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
I wonder what the rationale for the intrusive help packages
change between rc1 and rc2 is.
Weeell - it was promised for RC2; and as such, I feel we ought to
deliver - although it is delaying RC2, which has some nice wins
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 11:16 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Either way, the check looks fine to me; I notice it is pushed to
libreoffice-3-3, but (apparently) not to master, is that intentional ?
Well, as we agreed that libreoffice-3-3 gets git merge'd to master, I
don't think one needs
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 00:01 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Andras Timar wrote:
You (or I) need to patch files in po/ folder, too.
Whoops, good catch. Indeed, there's no translation necessary. Please
find a patch for the build repo attached.
Looks fine to go in to me.
Hi Berhard,
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 11:05 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
The links here looks a bit strange with 'Beta' while we have been in
RC phase for some while:
...
The only thing I had to do was to export the download buttons to .png
and upload them to the issue.
Brilliant
Hi David,
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 00:56 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
The content on those pages is out of date. We're nearly finished
preparing the new LibreOffice site now. You can view it at
http://test.libreoffice.org, and the downloads page there is up to
date. The documentfoundation page
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 17:55 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
i need the following commits to build nss and moz on a linux 3.1 kernel:
..
please somebody tell me that's ok for 3.4.
Both look fine to me; ideally I'd have time to sign them off and commit
them myself for you :-) [
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 08:43 -0700, night striker wrote:
Ok, I removed all mentions of adabasui from dbaccess/Module_dbaccess.mk and
from scp2 and I am no longer getting the first error, but I still get
Hokay :-) sounds good, I suppose we should remove the code they mention
as well,
Hi Nicholas,
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 22:57 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote:
Nicholas wrote:
I have experience in Java, PHP and C. Please advice how I can
get started to create LibreOffice extensions and if there are
any mentors available.
I suspect this very much depends on what you
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 16:34 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
(the number is not always 72) that is repeated more or less identically
some 12,000 times in the 7 minute run. Since each set appears to take
around .02 seconds that alone would account for some 4 minutes of the run.
7321 times
Hi Dag,
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 16:19 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
(Maybe this was already discussed before.)
Let me take it to ux-advise :-)
It would be nice if the default template that ships with LibreOffice would
ship with visually attractive styles, and paragraph styles for commonly
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 17:32 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
What the LibO hsqldb code does a lot is call JNI's
Attach/DetachCurrentThread. Googling around,
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6929067 Stack
guard pages should be removed when thread is detached suggests that
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 01:35 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
Is it possible to get subproject build progress information dynamically
from make ? Among other things, moving all projects to tail_build
currently reduces the usefulness of the Zenity SVG clock build progress
meter. I'm
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 02:00 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
I'm hesitant to ask this because I cannot personally promise time toward
LO (only on an as-can basis, which is dismally small ATM), but hey, you
can easily so no. :-) You mention really need[ing] a whiteboard to
elaborate
Hi Peter,
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 22:37 +0200, Peter Jentsch wrote:
I just pushed 2 commits to LO master that fix the problem you
encountered.
Awesome :-) thanks for that Peter !
The first patch supports importing (but not exporting) the 2nd
userdata parameter, so you can use the
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 19:46 +0200, Italo Vignoli wrote:
http://www.antelink.com/blog/libreoffice-vs-openoffice-anatomical-study-fork.html
Indeed ! it seems reasonable; their initial graph falls foul of the
emacs / vi header / footer addition / removals which skew the commit
statistics
Hi Regina,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 19:32 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
I have build with 'make build' (form
5ad4d151dac1eb887d92200330e31af269d8d1fd) on WinXP with MSVC 2008 Express.
Great - I'll add a note for that revision in a bit.
It finished and I could install and start it :)
Present:
+ Stephan, Petr, Michael, Andras, Mitch, Thorster, Rainer,
Michael Stahl, Caolan, Tor, Kendy, Eike, Bjoern, Norbert
* Completed Action Items
+ publicise our list of ODF proposals / extensions (Thorsten)
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 23:21 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
I must confess ...
Heh :-) seems reasonable enough.
Anyway, if anybody less Windows-phobic than me would like to check out
whether pyuno still works on Windows, that would be great:
In the past I've had similar
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 20:06 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
From the wiki page, one of the concerns is binary incompatibility. I
assume this is in reference to extensions?
Sure; of course we only export a reasonably small ABI, the 'ure' (big
chunks of which are in-lined C++
Hi August,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 15:01 -0400, August Sodora wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:01 PM, August Sodora aug...@gmail.com wrote:
I've attached a new patch that includes some tests for the BASIC
scanner. Most of the test cases are just to get an idea of how the
scanner handles
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 14:20 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
That said, I anecdotally note on my limited-in-hardware machine, that a
consecutive run of make is almost instantaneous. Would a make -pn
really be that expensive?
Try running a no-op incremental make in tail_build :-) it's
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 14:51 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
That would of course mean shipping some
duplicate legacy MSVC++ compiled libraries, but ... surely do-able.
It would not suffice to ship them, one would also need to build them.
Kind of back to square one.
For windows -
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 08:45 -0400, August Sodora wrote:
Interesting, I'll take a look at those documents. I had actually
initially thought that adding something to the BASIC language would be
more controversial than adding a calc cell function :)
Heh :-) well, the direction we're
Hi Michael,
Good catch with this :-)
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 12:28 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
is there any authoritative documentation on when exactly the SolarMutex
should be locked when coming from the UI?
So - with the gtk+ backend, it should mirror the GDK_THREADS lock
Hi August,
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 08:50 -0400, August Sodora wrote:
Thanks to all for being so patient with me! Would it be worthwhile to
continue working on the mess that is scanner/tokenizer/parser (why do
they inherit from eachother?!) in basic? I'm also curious about VBA
support and
Hi Rob,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 20:37 +0200, Rob Snelders wrote:
Here are 3 patches that together make the code for adding the
scan-button to the sanedlg.
Great to see that :-) Any chance you could drop a nice screenshot /
feature note and your name at:
Hi Laurent,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 17:19 +0200, Laurent Godard wrote:
before diving in calc large file in november, i have to deal at the
moment with XToolPanel
Sounds exciting :-)
the purpose is to be able to have things in task pane and manipulate
them using scripting (macro or
Hi Olivier,
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 17:15 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote:
The following patch fixes bug fdo41997.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41997
Wow - no sooner than I filed it, it got closed :-) great work. I pushed
the patch, it looks like you caught all the cases in
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 21:02 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
have replaced this implementation with a new, faster one:
Nice work :-)
but perhaps that just means my new machine is too fast; perhaps somebody
wants to benchmark it on their netbook/Alpha box/ARM wristwatch
You know
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 18:16 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Unfortunately, this breaks the build, as basic now has a (missing)
dependency on sfx2, which already depends on basic.
Fair enough, my mistake. I dropped sfx from the link line, it's not
actually required, leaving the link
Someone pointed out that we don't have one of these for SUSE employee's
contributions which is a fair point :-) so here it is:
In line with our general corporate policy, code contributed to open
source projects will be made available under the terms of that project's
license.
Hi there,
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 14:00 +0200, Andor E wrote:
I have done a build debug=t on a module. Now every time I build this
module, debug symbols are build - no matter, if I have the debug
parameter or not. Is there a trick to turn a debug build off?
That is odd :-) quite
Hi Noel co.
I'll CC the public dev list on this since it may be of wider interest.
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 11:24 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
something like this should work ( although doesn't on master or 3.4
but... does appear to work on 3.3 :-/ ) seems like this really is a
regression
Hi Maxime,
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 14:52 +0200, Christophe Strobbe wrote:
At 06:50 22-10-2011, Maxim Iorsh wrote:
When the user selects Pages radio button in the Range section, it is very
reasonable to expect that she would now want to specify the range. Thus
moving
the focus automatically to
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 14:27 +0200, Andor E wrote:
I did remove unxlngi6.pro. The configure.log shows that debug is
turned off. I might have to add, that I'm building OOo.
Well - I'd grab someone on IRC (#libreoffice-dev on irc.freenode.net)
to ask, we need a lot more information about
Hi Olivier,
On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 08:08 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote:
Here is the patch to clean further, as requested.
Wonderful ... thanks for that :-)
I'll push it to the feature/gtk3 branch which I hope to merge tomorrow.
Thanks,
Michael.
--
Hi guys,
I just pushed feature/gtk3 to master. What does that mean ?
well, a few things. While there are no known major bugs, and a fair
bit of testing has been done - there are a large number of backends
that this affects. This mainly affects unix where it touches the gtk,
gtk3, gen,
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 20:38 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
However, the naming question remains for future functions not (yet)
defined by ODF.
Quite.
Certainly it should not be ORG.OPENOFFICE.FOO, IMHO it should be
ORG.LIBREOFFICE.FOO instead of ORG.DOCUMENTFOUNDATION.FOO, i.e.
specify
Hi Carlos,
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 11:32 -0600, Carlos Trewartha wrote:
I was able to hide / unhide toolbar by following your steps.
Great.
I've included an snapshot how the embedded editor look right now,
while was composing this emai. I'm having refresh issue while
switching to text
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 13:54 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
There is one minor annoyance I discovered of a warning under gtk2:
g_main_context_prepare(): main loop already active in another thread
I pushed a fix for this by implementing a custom timer GSource that we
can query
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 08:39 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Just a blunt question: Why not keep it as an extension, if that already
works fine? Could be a pre-installed one (in an extra package with a
Java dependency, for those package distributions that choose to do so).
We are
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 22:50 +0200, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote:
We (my friend Tibusz and me) are thinking about to integrate SmART into
LibreOffice suite. I hope you saw the ligtning talk about SmART. What
you think about this extension ?
It captures a really valuable missing piece of
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 11:29 +0100, Paul Scarbro wrote:
Hello, please could you direct me to the relevant patch.
Checkout the code cf.
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers
git log sc/
search for Dargaud
HTH,
Hi Kami,
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 10:02 +0200, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote:
EuroOffice Extension Creator is a LGPLv3 licensed Python language
framework for easy extension development. Our Barcode extension also
uses it. What about to integrate EOEC to LibreOffice SDK? It would be
useful for
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 19:49 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 26/10/11 18:55, Noel Power wrote:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=3fcb94311fd7dd40c05ca132e3a30a888316cbbe
..
have no clue when it comes to OLE automation, but after reading the bug
your patch looks like it
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 01:24 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
After a long build, I'm there. As I'm not mired in that part of LibO
internals, for what visible changes should I be looking?
Cool :-) glad you've got a build. Just a tip: stick with that build for
a while, and/or have two build
Hi there,
Bjoern - quick request for help below ;-)
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 22:05 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
I have build it (about 2011-10-19) with commit ID
5ad4d151dac1eb887d92200330e31af269d8d1fd
Ah ! this is where I needed to put my magic note; I've just pushed
that. I
Present:
+ Eike, Michael, Thorsten, Stephan, Andras, Fridrich, Kendy,
Tor, David, Norbert, Rainer, Michael S, Bjoern, Caolan,
Petr
* Completed Action Items
+ adding l10n code is currently done by pair of VB Scripts
need to grok port these to a better
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 01:55 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
So I suspect the --set-last-working shall be limited to the
tinderboxes that build regularly with a non-changing setup, i.e.
without having random other stuff that might affect the build-result?
Well - I suggest we do it
Hi Timothy,
On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 21:54 -0500, Timothy Pearson wrote:
I have created a patch that enables Trinity Desktop Environment (TDE, the
successor to KDE3.5.10) desktop integration for LibreOffice. The patch is
based against a copy of the LibreOffice GIT pulled on 10/28/2011 and has
Hi Alex,
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 18:57 +0200, alexander.wi...@zoho.com wrote:
My name is Alex and I am a member of the design team. I've collected
several ideas regarding the look of LO. I'd like to hear your
opinions:
Great ! :-) the best list for this is
Hi Christina,
Great to see you here again :-)
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 22:18 +0200, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
the deprecated string classes have a Fill(n,c) method which fills a
string with a single character c repeated n times. I found ~50
occurrences of Fill() using git grep, so it might
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 17:38 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
I don't specifically, but my hunch is that it's some interaction with
the newly merged GTK code.
Almost certainly it's my fault ;-) I'll dig into it later today -
thanks for the testing feedback.
ATB,
Hi Alex,
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 16:33 +0100, Alex Thurgood wrote:
With a build from master today on 32bit Linux, I keep getting :
Ah - what fun, no doubt another of my problems:
GLib-CRITICAL **: g_ascii_strncasecmp: assertion `s1 != NULL' failed
So - to find this; run under
On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 20:33 +0800, LOH KOK HOE wrote:
The export to GNUMAKE is not working.
You can of course add the path to this to the beginning of your path -
which might do it better.
Personally, I'd love a --with-internal-gnumake configure option that
would download,
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 14:54 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Hope this helps.
Hah - not so much, since vcl/ is not built with debuginfo; however - it
turns out there is only one use of that method in vcl/ - it seems gtk+
can't determine the name of your monitors, so we hit this NULL
Hi Christian,
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 15:43 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Git log on the notes object is not the same as git notes list.
Ah ! this was my missing piece :-) so your approach sounds much better
indeed.
the log is sequential/chronological as is any other commit.
..
See
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 11:01 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Generally IIRC StringBuffers were the way to go. You can find
padToLength in comphelper/inc/string.hxx which expands a buffer to the
desired length and pads it with the requested character, which is pretty
much an equivalent to the
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 07:12 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
In Writer: open a new text document and do nothing else = CPU ~100% of
one core
Should be fixed in master :-) more testing of course much appreciated.
Thanks !
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 12:30 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
So, that's finally an end to SvUShorts, gone, dead as a parrot, pretty
cool.
Nice work indeed ! :-)
How far are we from killing all of these macro driven nightmares ? :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
Hi Emile,
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 08:41 -0700, Emile Kempees wrote:
To whom it may concern.
This is a developers list. It is not a suitable forum for end-user
questions. Please re-send your mail to the discuss list:
disc...@documentfoundation.org
Out of interest, where (on the
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 05:55 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Build in progress. :-)
With the fix by Bjoern, smoketest does not block anymore my tests. And I
confirm that your fix solves the CPU problem for me.
Wonderful :-) good to know.
Thank you very much
Thanks for
Hi Lior,
On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 21:26 +0100, Lior Kaplan wrote:
In my RTL bugs talk during the conference, I showed a weird option in
the tables options - text flow tab which refers to RTL text as
vertical (guessing a feature for Japanese). See attached screen shot.
Looks lovely;
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 15:47 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 11/01/2011 07:50 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Wouldn't they benefit/suffer from the stable ABI requirement then,
whereas in comphelper they don't? Or am I mislead?
Yup, that was the original rationale for introducing
Hi Matt,
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 22:58 -0600, Matt Pratt wrote:
this post struck a chord with me:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201110.mbox/%3C1319628345.22078.111.camel%40linux-yjtf.site%3E
So here I am with me first contribution.
Awesome ! :-) thanks so
Hi Alex,
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 10:40 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
After pulling from master today the commit 72682b9...ca7e6f5, I get the
following when trying to build on Mac OSX :
You need to follow the advice we used to give to remove the output
directory in sal/
internal
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 10:11 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Simplify addition of optional components to URE_MORE_{SERVICES,TYPES}.
brings the following change:
Ooh ! :-) nice.
That way, it is simpler for optionally installed modules to get their
services and types registered---just
Hi there,
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 19:08 +0100, Emanuele Fia wrote:
This is my first patch.
So - welcome ! :-) really great to have you involved. As you can see
there is a lot of unused code to remove, and it's great to have more
hands on it.
I'm trying to remove unusedcode.easy but i
Hi Alex,
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 12:38 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
That would indeed be helpful. I've noticed in the past that this is
sometimes done, and sometimes not.
:-)
For those who don't live and breathe the build process and know the code
intimately, is there a known list
* Present:
+ Stephan, David, Eike, Andras, Norbert, Rainer, Caolan,
Cedric, Petr, Fridrich, Kohei, Kendy, Michael
* Completed Action Items
+ review Noel's OLE automation fix for 3.4.4 (Petr)
+ package Liberation fonts on Win32 (Fridrich)
* Pending Action Items
Hi Luc,
On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 09:01 +0100, Luc Castermans wrote:
Just wanted to let this list know I started working on translation
various strings in the code from German to English.
Wonderful - there is (unfortunately) so much work to do in this area
that the changes of conflict are
Hi Cor,
On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 16:50 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Just tried to install the daily build from 2011-11-02 on my Ubuntu:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/Linux_x86_Release_Configuration/master/2011-11-05_01.05.12/
As this keeps coming back, I was amazed to read:
I
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 11:57 +0100, Luc Castermans wrote:
Does this script exist: bin/find-german-comments ?
Where is it.
In the bin/ directory :-) if you git clone the core/ repository as per:
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/developers/
And run
Hi Cor,
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 14:01 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Thanks for looking at this.
Not too much time ATM, so just two short notes:
:-)
I have about 20+ versions - time to delete some, but then still, I have
many versions in parallel. Just to be able to check in various
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 16:17 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Heh - so, I'd be inclined to recommend installing the packages, and
then moving the results away to somewhere else - that may turn out to be
rather more reliable [but will break system integration no doubt].
Isn't that what happens
Hi there,
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 16:37 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
Attached patch change ANKER found in sw/ to ANCHOR.
Pushed - thanks ! :-) People will need to 'make clean' inside sw/ to
avoid build failure like this:
Hi Noel,
This does look interesting :-) thanks for the trace.
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 09:26 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
Test name: ScFiltersTest::testCVEs
setUp() failed
- An uncaught exception of type
com.sun.star.registry.InvalidRegistryException
-
Hi Clemens,
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 15:55 +0100, webmas...@csz-online.de wrote:
I'm currently working on some data format exportation tests with the
LibreOffice SDK and Java. I want to develop an addon, which can export
the current opened file in another dataformat.
Sounds fun :-)
Hi Fridrich,
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 09:42 +0100, Fridrich Strba wrote:
So the Windows (MSVC) tinderbox produced a build second time in a row. I
know that you were annoyed by its message every day or so during the
~two months. Just to avoid that anew, please, start to pay attention to
it again,
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 19:20 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
they are not pre-processed in any usual way it seems, so i hacked svidl
to write out GNU make dependencies, which turned out to be surprisingly
simple.
Awesome - you rock ;-) thanks for that, gnumake makes the
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 14:04 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Currently, LO seems to call the API for every word (or even letter) typed,
which is incredibly wasteful as grammar checking only makes sense at
sentence level.
Heh :-) sounds like a beast. Also it's (no doubt) rather annoying
Hi Noel,
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 18:28 +, Noel Power wrote:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=991aa4fff785612bad7281f4948f5771bf8d215a
It'd be great to reference the public bug in the commit msg ;-) Anyhow
- I've pushed it to 3.4
Thanks,
Hi Regina,
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 11:18 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote:
I do not understand, why SolidMarkHandles should be removed. It works as
it should.
Heh :-)
If it is set to TRUE, you get the 3D-Handles, and if it is
set to FALSE, you get the flat handles. It is the same
Hi Tim,
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 19:06 +0100, Tim Hardeck wrote:
I have created a patch to remove the leftovers mentioned here and some
additional I have found.
This builds and runs for me; the subsequent tests still fail - but
since I've spent a while playing with them, and totally
Hi Regina,
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 15:27 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote:
Your explanations convinced me.
Good :-)
That would mean, that the UI in the
other modules is changed too ? If yes, it needs a description in
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.5 that highlight
201 - 300 of 7443 matches
Mail list logo
