Hi all,
All of my past & future contributions to LibreOffice may be
licensed under the MPLv2/LGPLv3+ dual license.
Sincerely,
NienTsu
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Tommy wrote:
Michael Meeks wrote:
.
+ 5.4.4 RC2 status
.
no bugfix list has been published yet about RC1 and RC2 in the wiki
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.4#5.4.4_release
nevermoind. it's fixed now
---
Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus
Michael Meeks wrote:
.
+ 5.4.4 RC2 status
.
no bugfix list has been published yet about RC1 and RC2 in the wiki
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.4#5.4.4_release
---
Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus da AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Xisco Fauli wrote:
Hello,
We're still getting spam:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/buglist.cgi?component=deletionrequest
I see... awful amount of rubbish...
---
Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus da AVG.
http://www.avg.com
different numbers?
Tommy
---
Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus da AVG.
http://www.avg.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org
Xisco Fauli wrote:
Hello,
Right now we're at 39990 ( 37033 + 1458 + 1499 ), so we should reach the
milestone pretty soon :D
milestone has been broker sooner than expected...
total count right now is 40035 (37078 resolved + 1458 verified + 1499
closed).
good job!!!
Tommy
---
Questa
Tommy wrote:
Tommy wrote:
both tinderbox are not "baking" any fresh build to test...
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-5-4/Win-x86@62-TDF/
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-5-4/Win-x86_64@62-TDF/
please, take a look at it.
still no 5.4.x da
please read this:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109280#c10
what an idiot...
cheers, Tommy
---
Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus da AVG.
http://www.avg.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
that the bughunt for n° 40K could be a funny
summer contest.
cheers, Tommy
---
Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus da AVG.
http://www.avg.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change
Tommy wrote:
both tinderbox are not "baking" any fresh build to test...
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-5-4/Win-x86@62-TDF/
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-5-4/Win-x86_64@62-TDF/
please, take a look at it.
still no 5.4.x daily builds
both tinderbox are not "baking" any fresh build to test...
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-5-4/Win-x86@62-TDF/
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-5-4/Win-x86_64@62-TDF/
please, take a look at it.
---
Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus da
Michael Meeks wrote:
* Release Engineering update (Christian)
+ 5.2.7 RC2
+ on the mirrors as a final version, but no official announce yet.
+ the last of the 5.2.x line planned.
5.2.7 RC1 changelog still missing here:
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 5.3.2, the builds for rc2 are now
available on pre-releases.
It is release configuration, meaning it will update an existing
version of LibreOffice on Windows (linux and Mac users can install
alongside 5.2.x, but not run
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 5.3.1, the builds for rc2 are now
available on pre-releases.
...
Bugzilla "5.3.1.2 rc" version item just added
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Michael Meeks wrote:
>
* Release Engineering update (Christian)
+ 5.2.5 release status
+ announced today
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/5.2.5/RC1
this page is still empty.
the list of fixed bugs has not been published yet.
To
have been yet published on the wiki...
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.3#5.3.0_release
both betas and rc links are still empty
Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 5.2.5, the builds for RC1 are now
available on pre-releases.
...
the buglist is not yet published on the wiki
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/5.2.5/RC1
___
List Name:
hi Xisco,
just to make you aware that in the latest NEW mass ping the text message
says:
--- snip ---
Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version
of LibreOffice (5.1.6 or 5.2.3 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/
--- snip ---
the latest available release is
Hi Xisco,
what about editing the script in order to show links with "bit.ly" URLs
or other shortlink web services?
some huge URLs like:
hi there.
the 5.2.4.1 RC bugfix list is not yet published here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.2#5.2.4_release
don't know who has to take care about it.
bye, Tommy
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Tommy wrote:
let's try to put it down to 500 by the end of the weekend!!!
Tommy
from 513 to 502 right now. good job guys.
a little small additional effort is needed to break the 500 wall.
Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
let's try to put it down to 500 by the end of the weekend!!!
Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems
Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I would like to advise to create a group to make easier our
communication, something like slack or a telegram group.
Facebook?
Oh, I forgot, nobody has ever heard of that.
--tml
@Tor
somebody should collect these pearls and make an e-book out of them...
:-)
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 5.2.3, the builds for RC3 are now
available on pre-releases.
5.2.3 rc3 is in release-build configuration, meaning it will update a
previous version of LibreOffice
5.2.3 will be the third bugfix release for the fresh 5.2 codeline
Xisco Fauli wrote:
Hello,
In order to give more visibility to the work QA is doing, I've just
created a new section in the QA wiki (
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Stats ) where I'll add some QA
stats based on Bugzilla.
nice initiative. thumbs up!!!
Tommy
Jay Philips wrote:
Hi All,
So i encourage all users to associate meta bugs to bug reports they
submit and triage and create a new meta bug if a suitable one isnt
available and they have seen enough similar bugs of a similar topic.
>
I've created many meta bugs over the last few
and the prerequisites
needed to start contributing.
Looking forward to your cooperation,
With regards,
Akshay.
best thing would be to start with an "easy hack".
you can find more infos here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/EasyHacks#Progress
Jan Iversen wrote:
The list of fixed bugs relative to 5.1.5 final (rc2) is here:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/bugs-libreoffice-5-1-6-release-5.1.6.1.log
Object not found in my web browser.
___
List Name:
Tommy wrote:
take a look here: http://tinyurl.com/ze4qyhj
the count is now 29970
I know we already passed the 30K FIXED milestone if we count the CLOSED
and VERIFIED bugs as well...
anyway it's getting time to celebrate this new achievement soon...
cheers, Tommy
I wonder if we can
take a look here: http://tinyurl.com/ze4qyhj
the count is now 29970
I know we already passed the 30K FIXED milestone if we count the CLOSED
and VERIFIED bugs as well...
anyway it's getting time to celebrate this new achievement soon...
cheers, Tommy
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Hi,
In the dropdown list of version, 5.1.3.2 rc is missing.
Could somebody with the ad-hoc permissions fix that?
Best regards.
JBF
somebody fixed it meanwhile. I see the 5.1.3.2 rc item now.
___
List Name:
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second release
candidate of LibreOffice 5.1.3.
>
5.1.3.2 rc bugzilla version item created
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Markus Mohrhard wrote:
Hey,
can we add a new keyword needUITest to bugs that are purely in the UI?
It would help me track bugs that can not be tested right now and would
need a test later.
Regards,
Markus
no objections from my side.
would you please dgive a couple of bugs that would
the latest ping I did few minutes ago, 3595 bugs were pinged, of
those 803 turned from NEW to a RESOLVED status after being retested by
LibO users.
this means that after 1 year, 22,34% of reported bugs where somehow
fixed during continuous code development.
cheers, Tommy
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the third release
candidate of LibreOffice 5.1.0.
> ...
Bugzilla 5.1.0.3 rc item created
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the first release
candidate of LibreOffice 5.0.5. The upcoming 5.0.5 will be the fourth
bugfix release of our fresh 5.0 line. Please be aware that LibreOffice
5.0.5 RC1 has not been flagged as ready for
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second release
candidate of LibreOffice 5.1.0.
...
bugzilla 5.1.0.2 rc item created
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Sophie wrote:
Hi all,
Is anybody interested on having access to a VNC server with daily builds
on Windows for testing or bibisecting?
Cheers
Sophie
Windows? i thought bibisect was only available on Linux.
Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hello all,
For the upcoming version 5.0.4 the builds for RC2 are now available on
pre-releases.
...
bugzilla 5.0.4.2 rc item created too
Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa
Robinson Tryon wrote:
Hi all,
The migration of several tags from the Whiteboard -> Keywords is now
largely complete for Open bugs.
> ...
you really did a good job.
Tommy
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.or
positives. One participant posted a trivial patch on
his own earlier this week. So we ended up with two new contributors :)
please tell the bug numbers you fixed and write the achievements in the
Terni hackfest wikipage.
thumbs up!!!
Tommy
Joel Madero wrote:
Hi All,
As long as the comment moving all to the maj.min version includes the
original version (or even adds it as a whiteboard item, I don't see
need for having the versions available.
Well the comment doesn't always have the version - more often than not
it doesn't. I'm
Pedro wrote:
Hi Tommy, all
Tommy wrote
1- I still think that the 6 months EOL embargo before cleanup is too
much... It would be better to do the cleanup earlier, let's say 4 or 3
months after the EOL
so leaving all those RCs in the list for such a long time still seems to
me just a waste
entify regression points.
Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lis
Joel Madero wrote:
Hi Tommy,
1- I still think that the 6 months EOL embargo before cleanup is too
much... It would be better to do the cleanup earlier, let's say 4 or 3
months after the EOL
I still disagree :) I don't see that many benefits and I see potential
issues that cause headaches
tems from the
version admin page. doing this we would get rid of 8 items from our long
version list.
feel free to discuss this in the QA mailing list or in the next QA
meeting... unfortunately I cannot be present in QA meetings because of
work and family issue, but I'm interested to know what othe
Joel Madero wrote:
Hi All,
QA is going to have a meeting second week of December about regressions
and what we (QA) can realistically do to help move things forward.
> ...
4) In the past we tried a hardHack list that we ultimately retired.
Would it be possible to have a weekly 1-2 fully
Tor Lillqvist wrote:
While at it, we should also start working on extending LO into the field
of real-time process control, including defence and aerospace applications.
--tml
you forgot mind control and telepathy.
think about a LibreOffice extension allowing to use the software without
a
would deserve a PEBKAC status :-)
This will mostly be used by the automatic
pings and most QA people probably won't have to do much to maintain this
new status.
Best,
Joel
bye, Tommy
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Robinson Tryon wrote:
Hi all,
As mentioned in the ESC call, it could be helpful to add a new
Bugzilla Status that encompasses bugs that have been abandoned/don't
have enough data.
=> What type of bugs would this cover?
* User isn't willing to share private document with anyone, and we
can't
Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Tommy,
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 06:07 +0100, Tommy wrote:
I want to inform the developer community that an user offered 250
dollars to fix:
Bug 33082 - Multiple operations are not tracked as change in change control
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33082
I want to inform the developer community that an user offered 250
dollars to fix:
Bug 33082 - Multiple operations are not tracked as change in change control
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33082
here's the FreedomSponsors link:
http://bit.ly/1QeQR1i
*bump*
Tommy wrote:
who's the correct person to ping looking at the following bibisect log?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94955#c2
Bibisection result:
===
b827dce34450091ab3fd608fcb1774899cb2f865 is the first bad
Michael Meeks wrote:
* Raw data for new metrics:
+ issues marked as 'highest' priority.
+ considered equivalent to MAB.
http://tdf.io/mab
I like the new table but I think it would be better to put the "total"
column just after the release column, and then the
Tommy wrote:
bfoman wrote:
Tommy wrote
I think knowing the list of the most duplicated bug reports would help
QA members to identify more duplicates once they are reported.
is this achievable?
Hi!
Yes, you can play with this site:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/duplicates.cgi
Best
bfoman wrote:
Tommy wrote
I think knowing the list of the most duplicated bug reports would help
QA members to identify more duplicates once they are reported.
is this achievable?
Hi!
Yes, you can play with this site:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/duplicates.cgi
Best regards
Robinson Tryon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The MAB docs on the wiki have been updated to reflect the new
> Priority-based system for categorizing bugs:
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Most_Annoying_Bugs
I like very much the new scheme
I wonder if it's possible to have numbers close to the
who's the correct person to ping looking at the following bibisect log?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94955#c2
Bibisection result:
===
b827dce34450091ab3fd608fcb1774899cb2f865 is the first bad commit
commit
Joel Madero wrote:
Hi All,
I wanted to know people's thoughts about dealing with bugs that we know
are caused by corrupt profiles. My suggestion:
NEW
with "corruptProfile" in the whiteboard. This is different from how it's
currently done as we close these as WFM. I'm happy to continue but if
Hi there,
is there any way we can obtain a Bugzilla query showing a list with the
bugs with the highest duplicates number?
an example is:
Bug 40534 - slide tearing in LARGE screens with hardware acceleration
enabled (11 dupes)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40534
I
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 4.4.6 the builds for RC1 are now
available on pre-releases.
4.4.6.1 rc version field added to bugzilla
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Test to see if the bug is still present in the latest supported
branch of LibreOffice (preferably 5.0.0.5 or later)
I'd like this one better
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Joel Madero wrote:
Hi All,
...
2) Ask the user to test their own bug - link to the page with old
releases
(http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/) - say
it helps a lot and it _could_ potentially help get the bug fixed faster;
...
Windows users can also use portable
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 20:21:45 +0200, Jan Holesovsky ke...@collabora.com
wrote:
* 4.3 MABs - what's the plan with them? (Kendy)
+ Re-check and prioritize - anything more? (Robinson)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=mab4.3
+ will they became 5.0 MAB's or
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 01:23:05 +0200, Christian Lohmaier
lohma...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the first release
candidate of LibreOffice 5.0.1
5.0.1.1 rc version added to Bugzilla
___
On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 02:43:41 +0200, Jan Holesovsky ke...@collabora.com
wrote:
* Release Engineering update (Christian)
+ 4.4.5 - RC2 status
+ released as final earlier today, done
+ will update the online update soon
would you please take a look at this:
bye, Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how
in the last few weeks I was given Bugzilla admin power by Joel and I'm
adding new version once they come out and rename RCs to release once they
are promoted.
I think I could do some cleanups but I need your opinion first...
-
1 - remove the all versions
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 18:49:43 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
On 07/26/2015 07:02 AM, Tommy wrote:
...
-
1 - remove the all versions items
-
actually we have 7 of those items for 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 4.0
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 19:59:04 +0200, Christian Lohmaier
lohma...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 4.4.5 the builds for RC2 are now
available on pre-releases.
bugzilla 4.4.5.2 rc version item created
___
List Name:
RESOLVED bugs over 25K
check latest stats here: http://snipurl.com/2a3ne8c
the total FIXED count is almost 27000 if we include the CLOSED and
VERIFIED bugs as well.
so looking forward to break the 3 milestones.
congrats to all developers and triagers that made this possible,
bye,
please test this one.
very easy and quick to triage.
Bug 92861 - AutoCorrect Options checkboxes do not work
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92861
IMHO is an important regression and breaks the autocorrect options
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client:
please test this one under Linux and Mac using LibO 5.x
Bug 92774 - Can't add word to dictionary or use other options when list of
choices is very long and have to scroll
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92774
if the bug affects Linux as well it has to be bibisected
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:56:50 +0200, Italo Vignoli it...@libreoffice.org
wrote:
On 02/07/15 06:23, Tommy wrote:
I need additional Linux and Mac testers with dual monitor setup for this
one:
Bug 91574 - SLIDESHOW: presenter console not shown and focus remains on
the secondary monitor
https
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 11:38:02 +0200, Naruhiko Ogasawara naru...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Tommy, *
Just a quick look, what should be checked is playing slideshow
under the multi-window environment, as described in comment #3?
the current bug situation in Windows is described here:
https
an eye out for people doing it the old way out of habit for
at
least half a year
Im not saying its not possible, just that it is much more work and
hidden costs
that it might initially appear.
Best,
Bjoern
gardening is a much tougher work than it seems at first glance :-)
Tommy
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 18:26:26 +0200, Christian Lohmaier
lohma...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 4.4.5 the builds for RC1 are now
available on pre-releases.
...
4.4.5.1 rc version added to Bugzilla.
___
List Name:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 07:13:04 +0200, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
o...@sophia-louise.de wrote:
Hi Joel, Pedro,
Am 25.06.2015 um 01:32 schrieb Joel Madero:
Yeah the instructions weren't entirely helpful beyond the superfluous
devs don't care at all! type stuff. I'm tempted to throw it back to
On Sun, 31 May 2015 22:14:54 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All!
So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking
out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*.
I will miss MABs... expecially the fact there were different
it always rises (and it alway will do that)but I've noticed that lately
it's not as steady as before.
see chart:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/reports.cgi?product=LibreOfficedatasets=NEW
many thanks to developers fixing bugs and triagers closing duplicates and
retesting WFM issues.
we already have a Weekly summary here:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/page.cgi?id=weekly-bug-summary.html
It's possible to have a similar bugzilla page with a Daily summary?
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
please add it to the version dropdown menu
Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http
should spend my free time in a better way.
Regards,
Markus
sorry to hear that. you've been a great contributor to LibO so far.
we will miss you.
Tommy
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman
please check this one:
Bug 89873 - UI: dialog windows broken
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89873
in confirmed it has to be added to mab4.5 list
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:29:18 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey Tommy,
On 02/16/2015 10:28 PM, Tommy wrote:
hi guys, sorry of not being much active in the last month but work
issues brought me away from bugzilla (temporarily)
I wonder if Joel is planning to do another run
into fixed (most of them
WFM)
with a 16.35% ratio which is almost 1 out of 6.
I wonder if another run would give the same good results.
bye, Tommy
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:52:25 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:30:35 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 05:07:24AM +0100, Tommy wrote:
hi there, I'm curious to know the name of that walrus mascot we have
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:30:35 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 05:07:24AM +0100, Tommy wrote:
hi there, I'm curious to know the name of that walrus mascot we have
in our own bugzilla.
so here are a few proposals:
...
my
hi there, I'm curious to know the name of that walrus mascot we have in
our own bugzilla.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:24:44 +0100, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
Quick reminder:
The next time we (read: probably Joel) do some bulk updates of bug
reports, we shoudl leverage that opportunity to insert a small
reminder about the migration of Bugzilla, password reset, etc.
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:12:34 +0100, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
+1. we really need to remove a lot of those useless keywords
Here's the current list of keywords:
ALL: What should go?
these are the one
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:25:38 +0100, bfoman bfo.bugm...@spamgourmet.com
wrote:
Time to clean the database from FDO leftovers (keywords, unrelated
series,
etc.).
+1. we really need to remove a lot of those useless keywords and add some
that are nore useful.
morevoer I'd like to
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 08:30:00 +0100, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
let's keep the pace!!!
One of the best ways for us to keep up with the 23+ bugs that are
filed each day is for us to grow the QA Team. Whenever you meet
someone in IRC, or have a good experience with
On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 11:24:55 +0100, Christian Lohmaier
lohma...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 4.4.0 the builds for RC2 are now
available on pre-releases.
.
See
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/4.4#4.4.0_release
for the complete schedule
of these at
once as there are already nearly 1600. So I think slowly going from 22,
20, 18...etc... until we're down to 12 months and then run both this
ping as well as the NEEDINFO ping every month on the 1st. Let me know
how this sounds.
Best,
Joel
sounds good planning
Tommy
On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 00:06:02 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the start of a spreadsheet that can track stats for QA pings.
...
nice job Joel.
very nice.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 21:57:24 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Can you capture and publish a list of the bugs you ping this way?
Then we can:
So FDO sucks for this kind of task BUT we can just search for bugs
touched by qa-admin account on the day that I run itnot
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 17:54:32 +0100, Thomas Hackert thack...@nexgo.de
wrote:
Hello all,
after I stalled
LO Version: 4.4.0.1
Build-ID: 1ba9640ddd424f1f535c75bf2b86703770b8cf6f
Gebietsschema: de_DE
on Debian Testing i686 (following the instructions from
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 18:04:29 +0100, Alexander Thurgood
alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 16/12/2014 13:40, Tommy a écrit :
of the original 83 mab4.2 that were open at the time of 4.2.x EOL, 12
turned to be RESOLVED WORKSFORME in the 4.3.x or 4.4.x branch.
More of interest to me would
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:52:59 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:45:59 +0100, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
hi guys,
I've retested and migrated most of the mab4.2 to the mab4.3 list.
of the original 83 mab4.2 issue that were still open on the 4.2.x END OF
LIFE (november
1 - 100 of 372 matches
Mail list logo
