from:"Jonathan Aquilina"

Hi Amit,

Clearly this shows that English must not be your native tongue. Some word in 
english have multiple meanings such as the word barking. it is another word for 
complaining.

Is there a reason why you dont complain to them to focus on their formats only?

Regards,
Jonathan

From: A 
Sent: 23 March 2022 08:12
To: Jonathan Aquilina 
Cc: Mike Kaganski ; libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org 

Subject: Re: Hi (Formats supported by LibreOffice).



On Wednesday, 23 March 2022, Jonathan Aquilina 
mailto:jaquil...@eagleeyet.net>> wrote:
Amit,

Why then dont you go barking to microsoft and tell them that they shoudl focus 
on their formats only?

Software will never be perfect there will always be room for improvement.

What are you finding missing or that LO isnt doing well?

Regards,
Jonathan




You are again offending me by using the word "barking".

Amit

Re: Hi (Formats supported by LibreOffice).

Amit,

Why then dont you go barking to microsoft and tell them that they shoudl focus 
on their formats only?

Software will never be perfect there will always be room for improvement.

What are you finding missing or that LO isnt doing well?

Regards,
Jonathan

From: A 
Sent: 23 March 2022 08:03
To: Jonathan Aquilina 
Cc: Mike Kaganski ; libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org 

Subject: Re: Hi (Formats supported by LibreOffice).



On Wednesday, 23 March 2022, Jonathan Aquilina 
mailto:jaquil...@eagleeyet.net>> wrote:
Hi Amit,

Firstly I apologize if i offended but rubbish is another way to say incorrect 
but again apologies there.

You mention that LO is not perfect, is there any software that is perfect? 
Lastly if you feel there are lots of shortcomings in LO why not give back to 
the community and help to improve it.

Regards,
Jonathan


Hi Jonathan,

Thanks for being nice.

I will definitely contribute in LO.

But I am still of the opinion that LO should do one thing only (either MS 
Office or ODF).

Regards,
Amit

Re: Hi (Formats supported by LibreOffice).

Hi Amit,

The question I ask you is what is lacking where it should require focusing on 
one format?

Again this is an open source project if you want to improve a certain aspect 
the ODF or MS Format support then by all means contribute.

Remember this is a community of volunteers.

Regards,
Jonathan

From: LibreOffice  on behalf of A 

Sent: 23 March 2022 07:54
To: Mike Kaganski 
Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org 
Subject: Re: Hi (Formats supported by LibreOffice).


On Wednesday, 23 March 2022, Mike Kaganski 
mailto:mikekagan...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
On 23.03.2022 9:36, A wrote:
I think that you are just trying to prove your point by saying anything which 
does not make sense.

LO official web page at

https://link.edgepilot.com/s/221d3be7/aHNuYcszb0CBpxljBt-eWg?u=https://www.libreoffice.org/discover/libreoffice/#:~:text=LibreOffice%20is%20compatible%20with%20a,xls%2C%20
 
>.

says the following:

LibreOffice is compatible with a wide range of document formats such as 
Microsoft® Word (.doc, .docx), Excel (.xls, .xlsx), PowerPoint (.ppt, .pptx) 
and Publisher.

But you say that  LibreOffice is not "MS Office compatible software" 

So, who is right? - you or LO official web page?

I would argue that it was you who claimed that "You should have some respect 
for everyone" - and writing "you are just trying to prove your point by saying 
anything which does not make sense" looks funny in that context.

I have respect for you but this doesn't mean that I will not point out flaws in 
your argument.

Being respectful doesn't mean that I will accept your wrong arguments.

Also, I used decent words to point out flaws in your argument.

I didn't use offending words that "you are being stupid", etc.

By the way, my opinion is that LO should focus on only one thing because right 
now it is not very good in either MS Office compatibility nor in ODF

Why doesn't LO support ODF only? Why to touch MS Office at all?

Amit

Re: Hi (Formats supported by LibreOffice).

Hi Amit,

Firstly I apologize if i offended but rubbish is another way to say incorrect 
but again apologies there.

You mention that LO is not perfect, is there any software that is perfect? 
Lastly if you feel there are lots of shortcomings in LO why not give back to 
the community and help to improve it.

Regards,
Jonathan

From: LibreOffice  on behalf of Mike 
Kaganski 
Sent: 23 March 2022 07:45
To: A 
Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org 
Subject: Re: Hi (Formats supported by LibreOffice).

On 23.03.2022 9:36, A wrote:
> I think that you are just trying to prove your point by saying anything
> which does not make sense.
>
> LO official web page at
>
> https://link.edgepilot.com/s/52b78844/y5qi346VH0WtXkzp_18zXw?u=https://www.libreoffice.org/discover/libreoffice/%23:%7E:text=LibreOffice%2520is%2520compatible%2520with%2520a%2Cxls%252C
> .
>
> says the following:
>
> LibreOffice is compatible with a wide range of document formats such as
> Microsoft® Word (.doc, .docx), Excel (.xls, .xlsx), PowerPoint (.ppt,
> .pptx) and Publisher.
>
> But you say that  LibreOffice is not "MS Office compatible software"
> 
>
> So, who is right? - you or LO official web page?

I would argue that it was you who claimed that "You should have some
respect for everyone" - and writing "you are just trying to prove your
point by saying anything which does not make sense" looks funny in that
context.

I would also argue that someone claiming some IT background ("Masters in
Computer Networking from NCSU, NC, USA") is expected to use terms
correctly, and understand the difference between compatibility with file
formats vs being "MS Office compatible" (which is much broader thing);
and especially so since the specific topic you are answering to was
"relying on their engineers doing all the work on designing the
principles, ways of use, everything that is put into the file formats
... would be simply not ethical towards MS" - so the question was
creating a clone of MS Office, using the *principles, ways of use, etc*
that stems from having a file format as native, not being able to read
from and write to.

But anyway, you got the feedback. If you "don't understand what is the
goal of LO", you better learn that - best by trying to be part of the
community for some time - before trying to revolutionize the community
that you are not part of.

--
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski

RE: Hi (Formats supported by LibreOffice).

2022-03-22 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hi Amit,

What you are saying is totally rubbish. If you are not aware. Microsoft 365 
actually gives you the option when  you first open one of the apps to choose an 
ODF format or the proprietary microsoft ones.

Regards,
Jonathan

From: LibreOffice  On Behalf Of A
Sent: 23 March 2022 06:53
To: Michael Weghorn 
Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: Hi (Formats supported by LibreOffice).


On Wednesday, 23 March 2022, Michael Weghorn 
mailto:m.wegh...@posteo.de>> wrote:
On 23/03/2022 06.23, Amit Amit wrote:
I was thinking that why does LibreOffice support document formats other than 
that of Microsoft Office?

You might be interested in Italo's FOSDEM talk:
https://link.edgepilot.com/s/d5a6d58b/MRfW1vDLoUaJmEsNknSqpA?u=https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/event/lotech_odfbetterthanooxml/


ODF might be better but not many people are using it and I don't think this is 
going to change because Microsoft Windows is on about 90% of all personal 
computer systems.

Almost all companies and almost all governments use Microsoft Office or 
compatible software.

Most of the people use Microsoft Office and compatible software so, in my 
opinion, LibreOffice should put all its resources in developing Microsoft 
Office compatible software only.

Regards,
Amit

RE: Download speed for git clone

2021-08-21 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Good Morning,

The download speed you get would be limited by your internet connection.

Regards,
Jonathan

From: LibreOffice  On Behalf Of Yuri 
de Albuquerque
Sent: 22 August 2021 06:00
To: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Download speed for git clone

Hello! I'm trying to build LibreOffice from source in order to learn how to 
contribute. I've managed to follow the instructions up to a certain point, but 
the clone command is taking way too long! The download speed never exceeds 90 
KBps on the "Receiving objects" part. What is the download speed supposed to 
be? I'm on a Windows 10 machine and my connection supports up to 30MBps 
download.

RE: Infra call on Tue, May 18 at 16:30 UTC

2021-05-18 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hi Guilhem,

Can you provide me with an update as to the firewall side of things has 
something been started with nftables? I am asking as I will not be able attend 
to todays meeting due to some personal medical issues that I am dealing with.

Regards,
Jonathan


-Original Message-
From: LibreOffice  On Behalf Of 
Guilhem Moulin
Sent: 17 May 2021 00:59
To: webs...@global.libreoffice.org; proje...@global.libreoffice.org; 
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: hostmas...@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Infra call on Tue, May 18 at 16:30 UTC

Hi there,

The next infra call will take place at `date -d "Tue, 18 May 2021 16:30 UTC"`
(18:30 Berlin time).

We'll meet at https://jitsi.documentfoundation.org/infra and write the minutes 
to https://pad.documentfoundation.org/p/infra .  Agenda TBA.

See you there!
Cheers,
--
Guilhem.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

RE: Infra call on Tue, Jan 19 at 17:30 UTC

2021-01-18 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hi Guys,

I know after the last meeting I needed to look into nftables, Sadly I have not 
had a chance to do so as of yet. I also will not be able to attend the meeting 
tomorrow. When is the next meeting after this one please?

Regards,
Jonathan

-Original Message-
From: LibreOffice  On Behalf Of 
Guilhem Moulin
Sent: 18 January 2021 02:30
To: webs...@global.libreoffice.org; proje...@global.libreoffice.org; 
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: hostmas...@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Infra call on Tue, Jan 19 at 17:30 UTC

Hi there,

The next infra call will take place at `date -d "Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:30 UTC"`
(18:30 Berlin time).

We'll meet at https://jitsi.documentfoundation.org/infra and write the minutes 
to https://pad.documentfoundation.org/p/infra .  Agenda TBA.

See you there!
Cheers,
--
Guilhem.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

RE: [libreoffice-website] RE: Infra call on Tue, Dec 15 at 17:30 UTC

2020-12-15 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hi Brett,

Amended the agenda. See you all this evening.

Regards,
Jonathan

-Original Message-
From: Brett Cornwall  
Sent: 14 December 2020 08:19
To: webs...@global.libreoffice.org; Jonathan Aquilina 
; hostmas...@documentfoundation.org; 
webs...@global.libreoffice.org; proje...@global.libreoffice.org; 
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-website] RE: Infra call on Tue, Dec 15 at 17:30 UTC



On December 13, 2020 10:01:45 PM PST, Jonathan Aquilina 
 wrote:
>Good Morning Guilhem,
>
>What do I need to do to add a quick discussion regarding DMARC to the 
>agenda please?

You can add it to the agenda on the pad at 
https://pad.documentfoundation.org/p/infra :)
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

RE: Infra call on Tue, Dec 15 at 17:30 UTC

2020-12-14 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Good Morning Guilhem,

What do I need to do to add a quick discussion regarding DMARC to the agenda 
please?

Regards,
Jonathan

-Original Message-
From: LibreOffice  On Behalf Of 
Guilhem Moulin
Sent: 14 December 2020 01:23
To: webs...@global.libreoffice.org; proje...@global.libreoffice.org; 
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: hostmas...@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Infra call on Tue, Dec 15 at 17:30 UTC

Hi there,

The next infra call will take place at `date -d "Tue, 15 Dec 2020 17:30 UTC"`
(18:30 Berlin time).

We'll meet at https://jitsi.documentfoundation.org/infra and write the minutes 
to https://pad.documentfoundation.org/p/infra .  Agenda TBA.

(Personally I've been on AFK for over half the time since the last call and 
don't have much to report, but probably others have something to say :-)

See you there!
Cheers,
--
Guilhem.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

RE: Gmail marks it as spam

Thanks Julian,

I will reach out to the infra team on this .

Regards,
Jonathan

From: Julien Nabet 
Sent: 11 November 2020 12:50
To: Jonathan Aquilina ; Maarten Hoes 

Cc: libreoffice-dev 
Subject: Re: Gmail marks it as spam

On 11/11/2020 11:07, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:

Hi Julian,

From an infra side of things who would be an ideal person to speak to or is 
there an infra mailing list we can take this discussion to?

Hello again,

I think you can try to ping someone on dev IRC or create a new thread so it'll 
be more visible.

About a contact, I've got in mind Guilhem Moulin 
(hostmaster[@]documentfoundation.org) from 
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Infra/Services

Julien
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

RE: Gmail marks it as spam

Hi Maarten,

SPF, DKIM and DMARC are also crucial email security measures as well that 
protect against email spoofing and more

Regards,
Jonathan

From: LibreOffice  On Behalf Of 
Maarten Hoes
Sent: 11 November 2020 12:45
To: Ilmari Lauhakangas 
Cc: libreoffice-dev 
Subject: Re: Gmail marks it as spam

Hi Ilmari,

On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 8:32 AM Ilmari Lauhakangas 
mailto:ilmari.lauhakan...@libreoffice.org>> 
wrote:
Here is a bigger hammer for whitelisting addresses in gmail:
https://www.lifewire.com/how-to-whitelist-a-sender-or-domain-in-gmail-1172106

Yeah, I guess there are things an individual can do to make sure that some 
email for them specifically does not end up in their spam folder. But what I am 
wondering is if this does not just happen 'to me only', but perhaps for a 
larger group like for example 'all people with a gmail account'. Because if 
that is the case, then I do not think you can realistically expect all current 
and future mailing list subscribers to perform this trick locally/individually.


- Maarten

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

RE: Gmail marks it as spam

Hi Julian, 

>From an infra side of things who would be an ideal person to speak to or is 
>there an infra mailing list we can take this discussion to?

Regards,
Jonathan

-Original Message-
From: Julien Nabet  
Sent: 11 November 2020 09:06
To: Jonathan Aquilina ; Maarten Hoes 

Cc: libreoffice-dev 
Subject: Re: Gmail marks it as spam

Hello Jonathan,

I don't know at all.

Julien

On 11/11/2020 05:44, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> Does libreoffice on the emails take advantage of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC?
>
> Regards,
> Jonathan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: LibreOffice  On 
> Behalf Of Julien Nabet
> Sent: 10 November 2020 22:28
> To: Maarten Hoes 
> Cc: libreoffice-dev 
> Subject: Re: Gmail marks it as spam
>
> On 10/11/2020 21:21, Maarten Hoes wrote:
>> I'm not quite sure if this is anything anyone can do anything about, 
>> but I still feel like stating here:
>>
>> For quite a while now, all of the posts of you to the libreoffice dev 
>> mailing list gets put into my 'spam' folder by gmail/google. All of 
>> the posts to the same list by other people correctly go to my 'inbox'.
>> I keep marking the posts as 'not spam', but it does not seem to do 
>> any good.
>>
>> Again, I am fairly sure you cannot do anything about this, but I 
>> still feel I need to inform you that this is going on.
>>
> Hello Maarten,
>
> I suppose it's because of "yahoo.fr". Indeed, I can't do anything 
> about mail policy but don't worry I don't send regularly messages on 
> dev forum :-)
>
> When I open a thread, I check on
> http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/Dev-f1639
> 786.html
> if I got feedback.
>
> About spam, Coverity messages go to my spam even if I unmark them as spam 
> each time.
>
> Julien
>
> ___
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

RE: Gmail marks it as spam

Hi Julian,

Does libreoffice on the emails take advantage of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC?

Regards,
Jonathan

-Original Message-
From: LibreOffice  On Behalf Of 
Julien Nabet
Sent: 10 November 2020 22:28
To: Maarten Hoes 
Cc: libreoffice-dev 
Subject: Re: Gmail marks it as spam

On 10/11/2020 21:21, Maarten Hoes wrote:
>
> I'm not quite sure if this is anything anyone can do anything about, 
> but I still feel like stating here:
>
> For quite a while now, all of the posts of you to the libreoffice dev 
> mailing list gets put into my 'spam' folder by gmail/google. All of 
> the posts to the same list by other people correctly go to my 'inbox'.
> I keep marking the posts as 'not spam', but it does not seem to do any 
> good.
>
> Again, I am fairly sure you cannot do anything about this, but I still 
> feel I need to inform you that this is going on.
>
Hello Maarten,

I suppose it's because of "yahoo.fr". Indeed, I can't do anything about mail 
policy but don't worry I don't send regularly messages on dev forum :-)

When I open a thread, I check on
http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/Dev-f1639786.html
if I got feedback.

About spam, Coverity messages go to my spam even if I unmark them as spam each 
time.

Julien

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Impress Remote for IOS (conversion to 64 bits mandatory?)

2019-11-08 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hi Julian,

With what I know about ios 13 and mac osx 10.15 they are now fully 64bit. Are 
64bit versions of LO for both os's available in 64bit mode or not yet?

Regards,
Jonathan


On 08/11/2019, 11:46, "LibreOffice on behalf of julien2412" 
 
wrote:

Hello,

Following messages about Impress Remote for Android, I wanted to test
Impress Remote for IOS on a Ipad and had a message indicating that dev must
upgrade.
Searching a bit, it seems we must be convert the app to 64 bits.

Any thoughts here?

Julien



--
Sent from: 
http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/Dev-f1639786.html
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

RE: Android Beta (no Google Play)

2019-11-07 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hi Guys,

In order not to use google play you would need to download the APK from a 
reputable source, maybe something we can host on the LO website somewhere. And 
then just put it on your device memory card and navigate to the apk and install 
manually.

-Original Message-
From: LibreOffice  On Behalf Of 
Jean-Baptiste Faure
Sent: 06 November 2019 23:16
To: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: Android Beta (no Google Play)

Le 06/11/2019 à 18:25, Tim Magee a écrit :
> Is there a way to download and install the LibreOffice Android Beta 
> without Google Play?
> 
> I prefer not to use Google Play because of its proprietary nature.

For the same reason, I use apkpure.com instead Google Play.

Best regards.
JBF

--
Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Android Libreoffice

2019-10-19 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hi that is what it seems Microsoft do with office apps. they are each their own 
installs.

From: LibreOffice  on behalf of 
Dennis Thornburgh 
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2019 4:41 PM
To: Libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org 
Subject: Android Libreoffice

Just read that a Google Play Store file size limit of 50mb is delaying the 
release of your product to Android community.

Why not breakout the suite into individual components like Calc or whatever?

Most of us only use part of the suite anyway.

Regards,

Dennis Thornburgh
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Ram disk Scratch Space

2019-09-29 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Understood not sure if it’s tmpfs but I have everything on a single disk. I 
have a 4th gen i7 in this laptop but what I can’t understand is why even with 
ccache takes about 2 hrs to compile

Regards,
Jonathan Aquilina
Owner managing director

Phone (356) 20330099
Mobile (356) 79957942

Email sa...@eagleeyet.net

From: Wols Lists 
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2019 1:09:54 PM
To: Jonathan Aquilina ; 
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org 
Subject: Re: Ram disk Scratch Space

On 29/09/19 11:26, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Hi Wol,
>
> I have 16gb of ram. When I was on gentoo I was using 9gb of ram as a ramdisk 
> to help speed up compilation. You mention temp if its on the same disk aren’t 
> you going to have no gains in performance like that?
>
My reasoning was "it can't harm and might help". If /tmp is tmpfs then
it gets cleared out every boot. Saves wasting space. And
/var/tmp/portage was tmpfs for the same reason - if the system crashed
during an upgrade it would have caused a bit of a problem but otherwise
it's fine.

Where is your swap? Is that on the same disk - do you only have the one?
A tmpfs stores everything in memory - ram+virtual - so if it runs out of
ram it overflows into swap. I just wanted the space available if it was
needed.

Bear in mind also that if you make heavy use of tmpfs, then with gentoo
it probably never touches the hard drive - it's downloaded, exploded and
compiled in ram all the way. On Fedora, it'll be slower because it needs
to be pulled from disk by the compiler. And a ramdisk won't help because
you've got to copy it on to the disk ... :-)

I'd just trust linux to do the best with what's available, and don't
expect two very different distros to behave similarly.

Cheers,
Wol
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Ram disk Scratch Space

2019-09-29 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hi Wol,

I have 16gb of ram. When I was on gentoo I was using 9gb of ram as a ramdisk to 
help speed up compilation. You mention temp if its on the same disk aren’t you 
going to have no gains in performance like that?

Regards,
Jonathan

On 29/09/2019, 12:24, "LibreOffice on behalf of Wols Lists" 
 wrote:

On 27/09/19 14:28, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I’m not sure it uses as much as it needs I have seen it max out at
> around 6.1gb I know on gentoo, ok that is a source based distribution, I
> had around 9gb of ram allocated as scratch space which greatly sped up
> compile times.

And are your compile options the same? In particular concerning parallel
compilation?

No, on linux it pulls absolutely everything it needs into cache
(assuming the ram is available) and runs it from there. I notice you
haven't said how much ram your system actually has ...

If you really want to do something of the sort, I guess it might be
using /tmp - is that set up as a tmpfs? Please note that the definition
of /tmp says the contents may be lost at any time, so setting it up as
tmpfs is a *sensible* thing to do. On the other hand, the contents of
/var/tmp are defined as surviving a reboot (for things like crash
recovery) so that should *not* be tmpfs.

I run gentoo, and have a lot of tmpfs defined, but that's so that if
something overflows available ram the compile doesn't need to care about
it - it'll use all the ram available IFF it needs it.

Cheers,
Wol
> 
> Regards,
> Jonathan Aquilina
> Owner managing director
> 
> Phone (356) 20330099
> Mobile (356) 79957942
> 

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Ram disk Scratch Space

2019-09-27 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

I’m not sure it uses as much as it needs I have seen it max out at around 6.1gb 
I know on gentoo, ok that is a source based distribution, I had around 9gb of 
ram allocated as scratch space which greatly sped up compile times.

Regards,
Jonathan Aquilina
Owner managing director

Phone (356) 20330099
Mobile (356) 79957942

Email sa...@eagleeyet.net

From: LibreOffice  on behalf of 
Ilmari Lauhakangas 
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 3:08:30 PM
To: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org 
Subject: Re: Ram disk Scratch Space

I don't think you should be worried about this. The build uses as much
memory as it needs.

Ilmari

Jonathan Aquilina kirjoitti 27.9.2019 klo 14.44:
> I’m using fedora 30 with gcc 9.2.1
>
> Regards,
> Jonathan Aquilina
> Owner managing director
>
> Phone (356) 20330099
> Mobile (356) 79957942
>
> Email sa...@eagleeyet.net
> 
> *From:* LibreOffice  on
> behalf of Ilmari Lauhakangas 
> *Sent:* Friday, September 27, 2019 1:43:44 PM
> *To:* libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org 
> *Subject:* Re: Ram disk Scratch Space
> Jonathan Aquilina kirjoitti 27.9.2019 klo 8.45:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Is there a way or plans to implement a way through autogen.sh where one
>> could potentially specify use of unused ram on ones laptop. I am
>> currently running a rebuild of master and the max I see is 6.10gb out of
>> 16 and I would like to allocate ram to help to speed up the build. Is
>> this something in the works or where would be the best place for me to
>> start looking into this?
>
> Which operating system and compiler are you using?
>
> Ilmari
> ___
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>
> ___
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Ram disk Scratch Space

2019-09-27 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

I’m using fedora 30 with gcc 9.2.1

Regards,
Jonathan Aquilina
Owner managing director

Phone (356) 20330099
Mobile (356) 79957942

Email sa...@eagleeyet.net

From: LibreOffice  on behalf of 
Ilmari Lauhakangas 
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 1:43:44 PM
To: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org 
Subject: Re: Ram disk Scratch Space

Jonathan Aquilina kirjoitti 27.9.2019 klo 8.45:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Is there a way or plans to implement a way through autogen.sh where one
> could potentially specify use of unused ram on ones laptop. I am
> currently running a rebuild of master and the max I see is 6.10gb out of
> 16 and I would like to allocate ram to help to speed up the build. Is
> this something in the works or where would be the best place for me to
> start looking into this?

Which operating system and compiler are you using?

Ilmari
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Ram disk Scratch Space

2019-09-26 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hi Guys,

Is there a way or plans to implement a way through autogen.sh where one could 
potentially specify use of unused ram on ones laptop. I am currently running a 
rebuild of master and the max I see is 6.10gb out of 16 and I would like to 
allocate ram to help to speed up the build. Is this something in the works or 
where would be the best place for me to start looking into this?

Regards,
Jonathan

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

RE: Principle of least surprise

2019-02-08 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hi All,

Is it possible to hit ctrl+K to open the hyperlink window so you can clear the 
hyperlinks? If I am not mistaken that is how excel does it to allow you to add 
or remove hyperlinks.

-Original Message-
From: LibreOffice  On Behalf Of 
Kaganski Mike
Sent: 09 February 2019 08:31
To: gwid...@gmail.com; Wols Lists 
Cc: Piet van Oostrum ; libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: Principle of least surprise

Hi!

Well - I tend to agree that having the hyperlinks malfunctional is not nice. 
*Possibly* the idea behind showing "hand" cursor over such URLs even without 
holding CTRL required for their activation could be to allow user an easy way 
to identify the links... but even then, showing cursor does not necessarily 
imply that clicking should give both no following the hyperlink, and no cell 
selection.

On 09.02.2019 6:23, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> Moreover, I spent sometimes in the options dialog box (that just the 
> looks the same ms office did in 1996), searching for a way to disable 
> the "convert e-mail to hyperlink" behavior applcation wise, and could 
> not find any. (Which does not mean it is not there, just that it is 
> another broken point in the UI).

Heh, it looks like placing all controls for what changes input in one 
"AutoCorrect" dialog is indeed just another broken UI. We need better put it in 
many different places all over the application instead.

--
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Change file_path LOOL

2018-05-30 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hi renato,

Are you running this on an Apache webserver with vhosts by any chance?

Sent from my iPhone

> On 28 May 2018, at 14:03, Renato Ribeiro  wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> When I launch the LOOL server I can use the link displayed to open a document 
> in a web browser (link below)
> 
> https://localhost:9980/loleaflet/2bac/loleaflet.html?file_path=file:///home//libreoffice/online/test/data/hello_world.odt
> 
> But this link shows the path of my diretories' tree 
> (/home//libreoffice/online/test/data/hello_world.odt). I would like to 
> know how I can hide this path. Can I define a variable for this path and with 
> this show online the name fo the variable instead the path? In which diretory 
> I can change this?
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> Best regards
> ___
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Using the linux subsystem on windows for building libreoffice for windows

2017-04-09 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Good Afternoon, 

I have started and found out how to work with the linux subsystem on
windows. Has anyone tried to use it as an alternative to mingw to build
for windows? 

I have noticed and observed that its based on ubuntu but I am not sure
what version. Would this be something that is worth looking into if it
means that there is potential to use a linux system to build natively on
windows itself?

-- 
Regards, 

Jonathan Aquilina___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Fwd: [gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 201611-03 ] LibreOffice, OpenOffice: Multiple vulnerabilities

2016-11-05 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hi Guys not sure if you guys have seen these CVE's but this surfaced on
the gentoo security list.

 Original Message  

SUBJECT:
[gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 201611-03 ] LibreOffice, OpenOffice:
Multiple vulnerabilities

DATE:
2016-11-04 08:57

FROM:
Aaron Bauman 

TO:
gentoo-annou...@lists.gentoo.org

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory   GLSA 201611-03
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
   https://security.gentoo.org/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 Severity: Normal
Title: LibreOffice, OpenOffice: Multiple vulnerabilities
 Date: November 04, 2016
 Bugs: #565026, #587566
   ID: 201611-03

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Synopsis


Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in both LibreOffice and
OpenOffice, the worst of which allows for the remote execution of
arbitrary code.

Background
==

LibreOffice is a powerful office suite; its clean interface and
powerful tools let you unleash your creativity and grow your
productivity.

Apache OpenOffice is the leading open-source office software suite for
word processing, spreadsheets, presentations, graphics, databases and
more.

Affected packages
=

---
 Package  / Vulnerable /Unaffected
---
  1  app-office/libreoffice  < 5.1.4.2 >= 5.1.4.2 
  2  app-office/libreoffice-bin
 < 5.1.4.2 >= 5.1.4.2 
  3  app-office/openoffice-bin
  < 4.1.2>= 4.1.2 
---
 3 affected packages

Description
===

Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in both LibreOffice and
OpenOffice.  Please review the referenced CVE's for specific
information regarding each.

Impact
==

Remote attackers could obtain sensitive information, cause a Denial of
Service condition, or execute arbitrary code.

Workaround
==

There is no known work around at this time.

Resolution
==

All LibreOffice users should upgrade their respective packages to the
latest version:


# emerge --sync
# emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=app-office/libreoffice-5.1.4.2"
# emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose
">=app-office/libreoffice-bin-debug-5.1.4.2" 

All OpenOffice users should upgrade to the latest version:


# emerge --sync
# emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose
">=app-office/openoffice-bin-4.1.2"

References
==

[ 1 ] CVE-2015-4551
  http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-4551
[ 2 ] CVE-2015-5212
  http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5212
[ 3 ] CVE-2015-5213
  http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5213
[ 4 ] CVE-2015-5214
  http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5214
[ 5 ] CVE-2016-4324
  http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-4324

Availability


This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at
the Gentoo Security Website:

 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201611-03

Concerns?
=

Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the
confidentiality and security of our users' machines is of utmost
importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to
secur...@gentoo.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at
https://bugs.gentoo.org.

License
===

Copyright 2016 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text
belongs to its owner(s).

The contents of this document are licensed under the
Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Firebird doesn't support MSVC 2015

2016-03-03 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Instead of reinventing the wheel why not look at SQLite or there is a nosql
db couchdb as well but not sure how easy that would be to integrate with LO

This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail>
<#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

Jonathan Aquilina

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Wols Lists <antli...@youngman.org.uk> wrote:

> On 02/03/16 12:12, Noel Grandin wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2016/03/02 2:11 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
> >>
> >> personally i'd be inclined towards alternatives that are less likely to
> >> trigger toolchain problems - maybe there's a SQL database implemented
> >> in, say, Java somewhere...
> >>
> >
> > Maybe even one that shares a committer with LO ?
> >
> :-)
>
> Sounds like I ought to get my finger out :-)
>
> I want to write a NoSQL database (a Pick derivative) and the plan is to
> do it and make it part of LibreOffice. Problem is, as a carer, I find it
> very hard to get the time available to concentrate, and I also don't
> have all the skills I need.
>
> Anyways, I will try and have a crack at it - life seems to be getting a
> bit easier at the moment - and see where it takes us.
>
> For those who know me, I am very much anti relational practice - imho
> it's impossible to write an efficient truly relational database - the
> theory has technical flaws that seriously impact any FNF engine.
> Basically, that (in contravention of Einstein's dictum) the engine is
> *too* *simple*, which means that any applications *must* be *overly*
> *complex*. I'll wax lyrical if you like but you'd be wise not to get me
> started :-)
>
> My main problem is that a Pick database is actually a complete operating
> environment. Fundamental to its operation is its language, called
> DATABASIC, and while I could probably write the database engine without
> too much difficulty, writing the language compiler is a step too far at
> the moment.
>
> Anyways, here's to having a go - if anyone's mad enough to join me, great!
>
> Cheers,
> Wol
> ___
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Problem in installing powershell

2016-01-18 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Jan,

I was referring to what commands are run. It could be that there are
commands in that ps script which exist only in a particular version of
powershall rather then the one that comes installed default with windows 7
for example.

Jonathan Aquilina

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:05 AM, jan iversen <j...@documentfoundation.org>
wrote:

> Hi.
>
> Is there a minimum version of powershell which is listed?
>
>
> In short no, have a look at the ps1 script, it is very basic.
>
> As soon as I try to install powershell as instructed in lode page, it
>> gives me an installation error. can anyone help me out of this ?
>>
>
> Where do you find the instruction asking you to install powershell ??
>
> The first command is ".\install_cygwin.ps1", which is using and not
> installing powershell.
>
> Without knowing what you try to do or the error it is pretty hard to help.
>
> rgds
> jan i.
>
>
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Problem in installing powershell

2016-01-18 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Good Morning,

Powershell is already installed by default, question becomes what version
of powershell is needed as I am aware windows 7 comes with powershell
version 2 and there is an update one can download and install to get you to
powershell version 4. Windows 10 seems to come with a version 5.

Is there a minimum version of powershell which is listed?
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail>
This
email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail>
<#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

Jonathan Aquilina

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Shivang Belwariar <belwari...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> As soon as I try to install powershell as instructed in lode page, it
> gives me an installation error. can anyone help me out of this ?
>
> ___
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>
>
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Package building reduces the lifetime of the SSD drives

2015-02-23 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

In terms of a ram disk I have that done in particular when compiling from
source on gentoo. I think the biggest OS to ask how to do that on is
Windows.

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Noel Grandin noelgran...@gmail.com
wrote:



 On 2015-02-23 12:14 PM, Robert Antoni Buj i Gelonch wrote:

 There are a lot of copy operations before to package LO. I propose you
 copy the files to package into a temporary ramdisk.

 Creation of 1GB ramdisk in OS X:


 And how do you propose to that under Windows and Linux?
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

high praise for libreoffice 4.4

2015-02-22 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hi guys,

I am a long time lurker on the list and just follow the developments in the
community.

I found this link on a linkedin group I am apart of and I thought I would
share it with you.

http://netrunner-mag.com/libreoffice-4-4-review-finally-it-rocks/

There is lots of praise in this article for 4.4 and I want to thank all the
developers that pour their heart and soul to make libreoffice what it is
today. I used to use open office back in the day and that was chunky and
slow. Today I am a strong advocate for using Libreoffice, and I too use it
across all machines that i have be it Linux Mac or Windows.

Keep up the good work and hopefully I can contribute something to this
great piece of software soon.

-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: OS X build signature

2015-01-29 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

There is a way around that all one has to do to open libreoffice is go to
system preferences and go to securty and you can do one of two things

1) change gatekeeper settings
2) open libreoffice. After that it doesnt prompt you again.

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 12:38 AM, V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
wrote:

 So with release of 4.4.0 we appear to still have issues with OS X 10.9 and
 10.10 Gatekeeper fussing over the package signing.

 An easy work around to by-pass Gatekeeper, but it seems like  we have a
 correct Apple v2 signature and should not have to be asking folks to.   Is
 that not the case?

 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84352

 Unfortunately the work around now needs to be added to the release notes.




 --
 View this message in context:
 http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/OS-X-build-signature-tp4138158.html
 Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: OS X build signature

2015-01-29 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

They dont need to relax the gatekeeper settings they go in and just hit
open, but I agree it can get a bit annoying, What would i need to do to try
and help figure out why this is happening?

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:20 AM, V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
wrote:

 Jonathan Aquilina wrote
  There is a way around that all one has to do to open libreoffice is go to
  system preferences and go to securty and you can do one of two things
 
  1) change gatekeeper settings
  2) open libreoffice. After that it doesnt prompt you again.

 Of course-- there are work arounds. But, why are the Apple signatures of
 our
 builds not passing OS X Gatekeeper muster and allowing a seamless
 installation.

 Why instead must users relax Gatekeeper to globally accept untrusted
 packages--not acceptable,  or preferably must perform a one-time by-pass to
 allow LibreOffice to install/configure to completion. It should not be
 needed if we have done our signature and Apple registration correctly.

 Additionally, we now need to explain the issue, and work around(s),  to OS
 X
 users in the release notes.



 --
 View this message in context:
 http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/OS-X-build-signature-tp4138158p4138179.html
 Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: buildbot/bin/sendEmail issue

2015-01-26 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

I did it a bit differently I setup postfix to work as the relay through
gmail, and that for the most part worked out of the box for me.

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Maarten Hoes hoes.maar...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Hi,

 On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  Hi Maarten,
 
  Did you manage to get it working?
 
 Yes, after patching sendEmail.


 Thanks,


 - Maarten




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: buildbot/bin/sendEmail issue

2015-01-25 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hi Maarten,

Did you manage to get it working? as I had setup something at work to use
gmail to relay. Not sure if this will be of any use to you
https://rtcamp.com/tutorials/linux/ubuntu-postfix-gmail-smtp/

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Maarten Hoes hoes.maar...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Hi,

 On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Matúš Kukan matus.ku...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  On 24 January 2015 at 10:38, Maarten Hoes hoes.maar...@gmail.com
 wrote:
if ($conf{'tls_server'} == 1 and $conf{'tls_client'} == 1 and
   $opt{'tls'} =~ /^(yes|auto)$/) {
printmsg(DEBUG = Starting TLS, 2);
if (SMTPchat('STARTTLS')) { quit($conf{'error'}, 1); }
   -my $ssl_ver = 'SSLv3 TLSv1';
   +my $ssl_ver = 'SSLv3';
 
  That's exactly what I did after spent some time.
  And I was told it's a known issue.
  I am for pushing this or at least put some comment into the script.
  I am sorry, I forgot to do the latter.
 
  Thanks,
  Matus


 Done.

 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/14151



 - Maarten

 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Fwd: [libo-marketing-priv] Announcing Pebble Smartwatch Application for LibreOffice Impress]

2015-01-02 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

I just got a pebble device and looking forward to trying this out :)

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:

Hello,

Forwarding this to the developers' list. It has been suggested the
original developer contributes its code to our repository.

Best,

Charles.

-- Forwarded message --
From: Zeki Bildirici zeki.ozguryazi...@gmail.com
To: libreoffice-marketing-priv
libo-marketing-p...@lists.documentfoundation.org
Cc: Necdet Yücel necdetyu...@gmail.com, gulsah.1...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 23:14:35 +0200
Subject: [libo-marketing-priv] Announcing Pebble Smartwatch Application
for LibreOffice Impress
Hi,

I would like to announce the brand new LibreOffice Impress remote
control application of Pebble smartwatch.

Just a brief, Pebble is a smartwatch which is aimed to accompany with
your smartphones. A very succesfull smartwatch born from a
crowdfunding campaing. More info may be gathered from its website
https://getpebble.com

This application is developed by Gülşah Köse who is a student in
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University of Turkey. Necdet Yücel, our long
time contributor, encouraged and mentored her about this app.

You can visit this project's homepage at github
https://github.com/COMU/pebble-remote
It has a very easy installation guide.

Here is a pic -as it did happened- of Pebble app on work:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-CrK-dldEO-M/VKWIOYw0U3I/RZY/PCAVBxAY28A/s1600/pebble-impress-remote.jpg

With this Pebble app, LibreOffice Impress now has its 3rd app which is
quite different an 'cooler' than others.

It will be very nice to have this app reviewed by our devs and
announced via TDF blog.

I'm cc'ing Gülşah Köse and Necdet Yücel for your further questions
contact requests.

Best regards,
Zeki

PS: Forwarding this mail to developer list will be highly appreciated.

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

--
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Internal Updater

2014-07-21 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Khargaroth you coudl actually do one better. have it when download is
clicked have it automatically poll the nearest mirror to you and download
the installer from within LO and have it auto run and update ones system.
not sure though how much work that would be though. We would eliminate the
need to load a browser and alot of extra steps currently involved.


On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:50 PM, khagaroth khagar...@gmail.com wrote:

 I don't find this that useful. Unless the internal updater starts using
 differential updates (which would be great), I think it's better to just
 open the download site in a browser.


 On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hi All,

 I know we've discussed this already a few times - both within ESC and
 within the QA call but I wanted to get a better sense of what is needed
 to move forward with getting it fixed. FWIW I've closed 3 bugs this at
 least tangentially related to the subject.

 So - from what I understand the entire updater is just broken, when you
 get a notification that there is a new version you click it and it just
 takes you to the website where additional clicks are needed to download,
 and then more to install.

 QA has discussed this a few times and generally I think we've come up
 with a roadmap of what would be ideal but I know that it will require
 others to implement so I'm not trying to push this onto any developer
 just curious how (if at all) we can get it fixed.

 Phase I:
 Fix what is already there - currently you can go to Help - Check for
 Updates and there is a Install button that is always inactive. How
 much work would it take to at least fix that? If this will never get
 fixed (or be a long time) I think we should remove the button as it just
 reminds users about a broken feature that has been broken for a long
 time already.

 FWIW here I think we need to be clearer about what it means to check
 for update because it's based on what branch you are on


 Phase II:
 Add new options to allow a user to select the branch they want
 (fresh/stable/pre-release) and then another option to either download
 only or download and install which would automatically either
 download to a folder or download and install upon release.

 I think Phase II would be an amazing addition that would be kind of one
 of those big things we could run some PR about during a major release.


 Like I said - not pushing this on anyone, just curious where we stand as
 I see updater related bug reports and enhancement requests and QA has
 discussed it quite a few times as something that we feel need some
 love/attention.



 Best Regards,
 Joel
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice



 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Internal Updater

2014-07-21 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Khargaroth you coudl actually do one better. have it when download is
clicked have it automatically poll the nearest mirror to you and download
the installer from within LO and have it auto run and update ones system.
not sure though how much work that would be though. We would eliminate the
need to load a browser and alot of extra steps currently involved.


On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:50 PM, khagaroth khagar...@gmail.com wrote:

 I don't find this that useful. Unless the internal updater starts using
 differential updates (which would be great), I think it's better to just
 open the download site in a browser.


 On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hi All,

 I know we've discussed this already a few times - both within ESC and
 within the QA call but I wanted to get a better sense of what is needed
 to move forward with getting it fixed. FWIW I've closed 3 bugs this at
 least tangentially related to the subject.

 So - from what I understand the entire updater is just broken, when you
 get a notification that there is a new version you click it and it just
 takes you to the website where additional clicks are needed to download,
 and then more to install.

 QA has discussed this a few times and generally I think we've come up
 with a roadmap of what would be ideal but I know that it will require
 others to implement so I'm not trying to push this onto any developer
 just curious how (if at all) we can get it fixed.

 Phase I:
 Fix what is already there - currently you can go to Help - Check for
 Updates and there is a Install button that is always inactive. How
 much work would it take to at least fix that? If this will never get
 fixed (or be a long time) I think we should remove the button as it just
 reminds users about a broken feature that has been broken for a long
 time already.

 FWIW here I think we need to be clearer about what it means to check
 for update because it's based on what branch you are on


 Phase II:
 Add new options to allow a user to select the branch they want
 (fresh/stable/pre-release) and then another option to either download
 only or download and install which would automatically either
 download to a folder or download and install upon release.

 I think Phase II would be an amazing addition that would be kind of one
 of those big things we could run some PR about during a major release.


 Like I said - not pushing this on anyone, just curious where we stand as
 I see updater related bug reports and enhancement requests and QA has
 discussed it quite a few times as something that we feel need some
 love/attention.



 Best Regards,
 Joel
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice



 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: Quantifying the time overhead of Cygwin make

2014-06-12 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

I am not trying to hijack this thread, but I am part of another project
where we build for windows on linux boxes. Have you guys considered looking
into building for windows on Linux?


On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
wrote:

 On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
  Are you sure GnuWin32 actually is something even worth considering?
  Cygwin at least has a semi-decent package management even if it is a
  bit slower.
 
 If I understand correctly the exercise is about replacing gmake itself
 from a cygwin-running version to a native-running version of gmake
 the need for cygwin in general is still there...

 That being said,, reading the patch it seems there is no need for a 'flag
 day'
 most of the change in configure.ac are -u + -d = -sm and the need for
 -m or not in same case
 It should be possible to make that an autogen option, to allow a
 non-distruptive migration

 I'll test the native gmake on my windows tb, and if that works, I'll
 have a stab at the patch to make it support both mode

 Norbert
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Quantifying the time overhead of Cygwin make

2014-06-12 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

What would be interesting to see is a bench mark in terms of compilation
times and evaluate if its really worth changing the ABI and breaking
compatability.


On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com
wrote:

 On 06/12/2014 08:30 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:

 I am not trying to hijack this thread, but I am part of another project
 where we build for windows on linux boxes. Have you guys considered
 looking into building for windows on Linux?


 We have support for mingw cross-compilation in the build system, but that
 effort never really went anywhere fully fruitful AFAICT (and would imply a
 different ABI, i.e., incompatibility of---native code, at
 least---extensions).

 Stephan
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Presentation Video Bug - Need Dev/QA Feedback

2014-06-03 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

snip


 Do you know how playback is implemented on windows as i wanted to do
 testing on it. Someone mentioned that if i plays in windows media
 player, then it should play in impress, but unfortunately that is not
 the case.

 I plan to set up a wiki page with Joel's help to provide details of how
 to get audio/video playback to work correctly on different
 distros/platforms and would appreciate any contributions.



What I would be interested to know is if we could bundle codes which VLC
uses into Libreoffice that way we support formats that are not necessarily
native to windows itself as well.

-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: recovery dialogs crash reporter features and .ui conversion

2014-02-05 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hi Caolan and everyone,

This is just an idea, why not rework it that if a crash does happen it 
interfaces with the bugzilla submission assistant to help a user submit a bug 
and it will gather all the necessary dump information etc to submit with the 
bug report?

On Wednesday, February 05, 2014 12:55:55 PM Caolán McNamara wrote:
 Our default configuration for crash reporting during document Recovery
 is off (officecfg/registry/schema/org/openoffice/Office/Recovery.xcs see
 CrashReporter) and there are a bunch of dialogs and tabpages related to
 crash reporting.
 
 I don't want to convert these to the .ui format unless we are going to
 use them. We haven't enabled that crash reporting set of dialogs AFAIK
 since day 0 of LibreOffice. This would be the UI shown on document
 recovery which would allow you to send some crash report information.
 
 So anyone disagree with removing these recovery-time crash reporter
 dialogs ?
 
 I believe this stuff is somewhat orthogonal to the --enable-crashdump
 stuff (which is also disabled by default at build-time) in that the
 crashreporter applications (if they exist at run-time) would still get
 called in the event of a crash. FWIW the windows one appears to have its
 own UI and the unx not. I guess the follow up question is if anyone is
 using the --enable-crashdump stuff.
 
 C.
 
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: IRC going crazy ?

2014-02-03 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Freenode is being DoSed you are best using a european based server as US, 
australian and asian servers are being attacked.

On Monday, February 03, 2014 12:34:46 PM Adam Fyne wrote:
 Hi,
 Any idea why IRC is going nuts and shows people keep getting disconnected?
 Best,
Adam
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: IRC going crazy ?

2014-02-03 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Sophie I am on now no problem you have to keep trying until you connect to a 
server successfully.

On Monday, February 03, 2014 07:16:14 PM Sophie wrote:
 Le 03/02/2014 19:09, Jonathan Aquilina a écrit :
  Freenode is being DoSed you are best using a european based server as US,
  australian and asian servers are being attacked.
 
 It seems European too, I've been unable to connect this afternoon...
 Cheers
 Sophie
 
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Latest xcode does not have command line tools

2014-01-20 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

I had to reinstall OSX 10.9 on my imac and the latest xcode doesnt seem to 
have the command line tools available any more.

Will this start causing issues for building on mac both for releases and 
contributors alike?

Regards
Jonathan
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Is the 'libreoffice' list name confusing?

2013-12-05 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

I think for the mailing list it should be something along the lines of
d...@libreoffice.org. that is short and to the point.


On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi all,

 I wonder if the name of this list is confusing to newcomers to the
 libreoffice project.

 Consider:
 #libreoffice - channel for user questions and general visionary planning
 libreoffice@lists - mailing list for developers

 #libreoffice-dev - This is the LibreOffice DEVELOPER channel...

 Perhaps 'libreoffice-dev@lists' would be less confusing?

 Cheers,
 --R

 P.S. the current topic for the dev channel is also confusing
 (partially due to the use of commas):
 This is the LibreOffice DEVELOPER channel, user stuff, probs without
 code: #libreoffice

 I think this is clearer:
 This is the LibreOffice DEVELOPER channel. User q's  problems w/o
 code = #libreoffice
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-website] Bugzilla replacement

2013-11-28 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Redmine though reminds me a lot like launchpad in a way.


On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Florian Effenberger 
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:

 Hi Jonathan,

 Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2013-11-28 18:48:

 Hey guys I would like to propose an alternative to bugzilla.

 Redmine, It supports multiple projects as well as integration with LDAP as
 well as source control


 TDF infra is currently evaluating Redmine for internal purposes, as an
 extension or replacement for OTRS.

 However, for replacing Bugzilla it IMHO is unsuitable, as it is more a
 project management tool than a bug tracker. I really, really, would not
 replace Bugzilla.

 Florian




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla replacement

2013-11-28 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Bjoern I think that is where I think a centralized LDAP repository. if LDAP
is currently in use then the user migration shouldnt be a problem at all.


On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:34 PM, bjoern bjoern.michael...@canonical.comwrote:

 Hi,
 On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 02:19:59PM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote:
  I've only looked at Redmine very briefly, but it does seem like an
  interesting tool.

 RedMine looks very promising to me (I assume it to be at least as good as
 trac
 and I liked trac a lot) -- actually I dearly want to play with it to see
 what
 good it can do for us.

 That said, the majority of the work wouldnt be the bugs themselves (and
 that
 migrating that would already be huge), but also rewriting all the bazillion
 small things that glue stuff together like:
 - bug stats for the ESC
 - wiki integration
 - commit notification on bugs
 - email list forwarding
 - twitter feeds
 - adjusting common workflows
 - migrating over all current users
 - finding a sweet spot in the release cycle where this is least painful
 -  lots of other stuff 

 some of the above is just as much work as setting up RedMine and migrating
 the
 data, some of it is at least ten times as much work (namely pestering all
 our
 existing bugzilla users to migrate). So IMHO this isnt something to
 consider
 for LibreOffice the product in 2013 or 2014. Maybe later. ;)

 Best,

 Bjoern




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: LibreOffice Gerrit News for core on 2013-11-24

2013-11-23 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

I am just wondering shouldnt it say changes in the last 24 hours instead of
25 hours?

Regards


On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 7:00 AM, ger...@libreoffice.org wrote:

 Moin!

 * Open changes on master for project core changed in the last 25 hours:

 + winaccessibility: replace CoCreateInstance with direct instantiation
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6792 from Michael Stahl
 + Remove old outdated gallery Images
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4993 from Samuel Mehrbrodt
 + fdo#71936 Add Excel 2010 functions GAMMA.DIST, GAMMA.INV, GAMMALN.PRECISE
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6775 from Winfried Donkers
 + fdo#60924 autoinstall - gbuild/scp2: Move more libs to OOO
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6763 from Marcos Souza
 + Fix for LO crash while saving and corruption of file after roundtrip.
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6676 from Rohit Deshmukh
 + fdo#67011: Run Display::Yield through KDEXLib::Yield.
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6750 from Jan-Marek Glogowski
 + fdo#69552 make calc functions CEILING and FLOOR comply with ODF1.2
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6767 from Winfried Donkers
 + CID#1078495/1078496: Copy-paste error
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5852 from Julien Nabet


 * Merged changes on master for project core changed in the last 25 hours:

 + simplify compareTo (now correct)
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2591 from Thomas Arnhold


 * Abandoned changes on master for project core changed in the last 25
 hours:

 None

 * Open changes needing tweaks, but being untouched for more than a week:

 + fdo#69407
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6316 from matthieu gay
 + fix for exporting of text watermark to DOCX
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5568 from Adam CloudOn
 + WIP: fdo#33980 Preserve selection across all slide sorters.
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6633 from Andrzej J.R. Hunt
 + fdo#71043 -  Use STACK lint tool to clean code
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6529 from José Guilherme Vanz
 + new cell-border handling in calc
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6093 from Viktor Varga
 + Increase number of remembered recent documents from 10 to 25
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6101 from Krisztian Pinter
 + startcenter: Make SC open faster by timeouting thumbnails
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6102 from Krisztian Pinter
 + Simplify oslThreadIdentifier on Linux 32.
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5553 from Arnaud Versini
 + Dynamically align toolbars in LibreOffice
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5655 from Prashant Pandey
 + fdo#36791 : fix for import of greeting card
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4240 from Adam CloudOn
 + more debug logs, extra debug layer, file is not used in p3k
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5267 from James Michael Dupont
 + Positional Tab additions
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5387 from Adam CloudOn
 + fdo#64817 : fix for rectangle with image fill
   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4718 from Adam CloudOn


 Best,

 Your friendly LibreOffice Gerrit Digest Mailer

 Note: The bot generating this message can be found and improved here:

 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=dev-tools.git;a=blob;f=gerritbot/send-daily-digest
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-website] New requirements BSA

2013-11-07 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

I have seen this issue before server side I am not sure if this would help the 
issue or not 

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1346581

On Thursday 07 November 2013 22:38:26 Rob Snelders wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Thanks it works now. But now I have something else.
 
 When I run perl on the server I get the following error:
 perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
 perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
   LANGUAGE = en_US:en,
   LC_ALL = en_US,
   LC_PAPER = nl_NL.UTF-8,
   LC_ADDRESS = nl_NL.UTF-8,
   LC_MONETARY = nl_NL.UTF-8,
   LC_NUMERIC = nl_NL.UTF-8,
   LC_TELEPHONE = nl_NL.UTF-8,
   LC_IDENTIFICATION = nl_NL.UTF-8,
   LC_MEASUREMENT = nl_NL.UTF-8,
   LC_TIME = nl_NL.UTF-8,
   LC_NAME = nl_NL.UTF-8,
   LANG = en_US.UTF-8
  are supported and installed on your system.
 perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale (C).
 
 Also man gives a warning:
 man: can't set the locale; make sure $LC_* and $LANG are correct
 
 Can somebody tell me what the problem is? Do I somehow set settings to
 Dutch(nl_NL) that shouldn't, and how do I turn them off. The message
 from perl is annoying because it creates clutter in the logs.
 
 --
 Many thanks for any help,
 Rob Snelders
 
 On 07-11-13 10:43, Florian Effenberger wrote:
  Hi,
  
  Rob Snelders wrote on 2013-11-07 08:48:
  I installed the following patches on my Ubuntu-machine:
  - libhtml-template-perl
  - libsoap-lite-perl
  
  thanks - the former one was installed, the latter one is now. :-)
  Can you put these packages into the documentation of the BSA? Chances
  are otherwise if we move it to another server, things get lost...
  
  Florian

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: Why typing in Writer instantiates the JVM on Mac OS X

2013-10-25 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Norbert, the problem is that Ubuntu doesnt have the sun java in the repo,
it can be installed but not readily available in the default enabled repos.
The question I think becomes if its possible to include support for the
open jdk.


On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com
 wrote:
  With problems popping up for users after upgrading to Mac OS X Mavericks

 So... I installed a libreoffice 4.1 (latest stable release)
 I made sure that java was working for libreoffice.

 then I upgraded to maverick

 immediately after the install was done, I started libreoffice again...
 then selected 'Writer'... typed a charactere
 A pop up showed-up warning me that Java 1.6 is not avaialble, and
 asked me if I wanted to install it.
 I answered no to the request to install java
 at this point there is no more lo running, although there was no
 crash-report dialog.

 I started again... a lo crash recovery windows was presented for the
 writer document I was on...
 I said no to recovery and proceeded with creating a new writter document..
 same symptom... this time I replied 'yes' to the install of java
 after java has been installed, Libreoffice is restarted automatically,
 and a lo-crash-recovery windows is presented again...

 After that lo works normally


 Norbert
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: North America Pub Chat

2013-10-11 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Why not do a doodle it will make things easy for you to determine day and
time.


On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:

 hip. Really 1 hour a month is enough time to give back a bit.

 Hi,

 I dont know if I can make it this Friday, but could you also point out
 the time
 in UTC too? For a continental european guest a time like 12:00pm EST is
 ultimately confusing -- is that EST or 2400EST?


 Sure, apologies for that :)

 So for North America (or at least United States) we have:
 PST (GMT - 7)
 MDT (GMT -6)
 CST (GMT - 5)
 EST (GMT - 4)

 Once I get a head count of who theoretically would be interested if the
 time was right, we can start discussing what specific time will work and
 I'll make sure to do the conversion to GMT :) As of now it looks like 1200
 (1900 GMT) on Friday isn't going to work as there just doesn't seem to be
 availability/interest.

 All the best,
 Joel
 __**_
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.**org LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/**mailman/listinfo/libreofficehttp://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] North America Pub Chat

2013-10-11 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Why not do a doodle it will make things easy for you to determine day and
time.


On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:

 hip. Really 1 hour a month is enough time to give back a bit.

 Hi,

 I dont know if I can make it this Friday, but could you also point out
 the time
 in UTC too? For a continental european guest a time like 12:00pm EST is
 ultimately confusing -- is that EST or 2400EST?


 Sure, apologies for that :)

 So for North America (or at least United States) we have:
 PST (GMT - 7)
 MDT (GMT -6)
 CST (GMT - 5)
 EST (GMT - 4)

 Once I get a head count of who theoretically would be interested if the
 time was right, we can start discussing what specific time will work and
 I'll make sure to do the conversion to GMT :) As of now it looks like 1200
 (1900 GMT) on Friday isn't going to work as there just doesn't seem to be
 availability/interest.

 All the best,
 Joel
 __**_
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.**org libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/**mailman/listinfo/libreofficehttp://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [BUILD] Which license do I need to build a professional edition of LibreOffice (4.0.x/4.1.x) of windows ?

2013-10-09 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

I am not understanding the end goal. You are basically duplicating efforts
here and just reinventing the wheel.

What would be interesting to know is what is missing in the versions from
the LO site that you want to custom build for yourself.


On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Gay, Matthieu matthieu@capgemini.comwrote:

  Hello, I still have problem to build under windows, but I wanted to
 know, what do I need to build LibreOffice (4.0.x/4.1.x) entirely as the
 original available in the website.



 First can you confirm that I need a certificate to sign the DLL and a
 license of Visual Studio 12 (without I can't build ATL and ActiveX
 modules).



 Which version of Windows is the best? Do I need a pro version or a
 familial one?



 Thanks for your answer, if you find others license/not free component (in
 cygwin dependency or Microsoft tools by example) don't hesitate to tell me.



 Matthieu GAY.






  This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
 and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the
 person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you
 are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute,
 or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in
 error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this
 message.

 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Shortcuts not displayed in menu's

2013-10-04 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hey guys I am interested in some code pointers to get shortcuts to display
in the menus. One such example woudl be ctrl +s on windows cmd + s on mac
etc.

Is there a reason why those are not show and if there is no reason where
would one need to look to be able to add the shortcuts?

-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: LibreOffice Gerrit News 2013-09-28

2013-09-29 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

This is the developers list. Have you tried to send an email to the user
mailing list?


On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 4:12 PM, henrickth...@comcast.net wrote:

 How can I stop these E-Mails from Libre coming,since no one has been able
 to help me with my gridline printing problem.As soon as I save some of my
 information,I will delete all  ref to Libre Office on my computer. I need
 to print a document in Libre-Office with the gridlines and no one can tell
 me how to do it.Thanks,I enjoyed the time I was with Libre-Office,but help
 from the company to what I concider a small problem,could not be addressed
- Original Message -  From: ger...@libreoffice.org  To:
 libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org  Cc: q...@fr.libreoffice.org  Sent: Sat,
 28 Sep 2013 06:00:01 - (UTC)  Subject: LibreOffice Gerrit News
 2013-09-28 Moin!  * Open changes on master for project core changed in
 the last 25 hours:  + n realloc - 1 malloc + n same assignments - 1
 only   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6063 from Julien Nabet + Remove
 the Navigator button below the scrollbar in Writer   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6045 from Samuel Mehrbrodt + gbuild: use
 .xcd configuration files from instdir   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6057 from Matúš Kukan + oox: added methods
 to lock Smart-Art edition   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6059 from
 Andres Gomez + svtools: removed dead code from the export dialog   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6058 from Andres Gomez + Unit test case
 added to verify chart rendering in Writer for docx   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6056 from Tushar Bende + fdo#62082 Better
 Layout for Custom Animation Sidebar   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6055 from Samuel Mehrbrodt + General
 cleanup in sal module for all and unix.   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6016 from Arnaud Versini + Convert Draw
 char dialog to widget UI   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6054 from
 Olivier Hallot + Convert Draw page dialog to Widget UI   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6053 from Olivier Hallot   * Merged
 changes on master for project core changed in the last 25 hours:  +
 Implement hsqldb loading test.   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5934from 
 Andrzej J.R. Hunt + Improve performance of copyArea(), especially
 relevant for mobile devices   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5707 from
 Tsahi Glik @ CloudOn + unittest for fdo#67685   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6043 from Lionel Elie Mamane   * Abandoned
 changes on master for project core changed in the last 25 hours:  + Test
 Case for chart in Writer for docx(Note : work in progress DO NOT MER   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6019 from Tushar Bende   * Open changes
 needing tweaks, but being untouched for more than a week:  + fdo#69407
 Putting no fill frame color instead of transparent by default   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5996 from matthieu gay + Remove more
 unusedcode   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5937 from Marcos Souza +
 Simplify oslThreadIdentifier on Linux 32.   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5553 from Arnaud Versini + Fix for IOS
 scroll by pixels, and pinch to zoom Change-Id: Ied6087a264f1c   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5742 from Ptyl + fix polygon rendering
 with clip area of one line only   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5709from 
 Tsahi Glik @ CloudOn + fix for text watermark   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5568 from Adam CloudOn + fdo#39468:
 Translate German comments (first part) in include/svl/filerec.   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5793 from Philipp Riemer + fdo#44689: fix
 for specific case restart value 0   in 
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5681from Adam CloudOn + Dynamically align 
 toolbars in LibreOffice   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5655 from Prashant Pandey + fdo#36791 :
 fix for import of greeting card   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4240from 
 Adam CloudOn + fdo#66401: fix for combined characters   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5018 from Adam CloudOn + more debug logs,
 extra debug layer, file is not used in p3k   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5267 from James Michael Dupont +
 Positional Tab additions   in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5387 from
 Adam CloudOn + fdo#64817 : fix for rectangle with image fill   in
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4718 from Adam CloudOn   Best,  Your
 friendly LibreOffice Gerrit Digest Mailer  Note: The bot generating this
 message can be found and improved here:
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=dev-tools.git;a=blob;f=gerritbot/send-daily-digest___
  LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice

Re: 4.1.1 Binary size

2013-09-22 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Why not create a page on the site for all clipart so someone can download
the image and use it. that way the directory that has all the images can
disappear from the install.


On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.ukwrote:

 On 19/09/13 12:43, Michael Meeks wrote:
  Patches most welcome; though of course - we'd need to check that
  existing documents don't hard-code links to these paths [ it seems
  likely sadly ] into the gallery.

 Not knowing the packaging system (and of course distros do their own
 thing), but is it possible to flag certain areas - artwork being an
 obvious example - as do not remove when upgrading?

 That's annoyed me on many an occasion with some programs, where you had
 all these useful little extras like clip-art, and then an upgrade
 removed the old lot and replaced it with something new and different.

 It'd be nice to be able to include a bunch of useful bits with each
 version and change them. Then people who've got them would still have
 them but there'd be a bit of the what wonderful new things will turn up
 THIS time?. And if the location is documented then people could copy
 and share them if they so desire.

 Cheers,
 Wol
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Please regenerate api.libreoffice.org from libreoffice-4-1 branch

2013-09-08 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Andras would resubmitting a new sitemap to Google help the situation at all?


On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Alex

 On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Alexander Thurgood
 alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote:
  I've seen two user reports of similar problems (404 not found), one
  yesterday on the French list and one today on the EN user list.

 It is possible that deep links from external sites do not work any
 more. The autodoc - doxygen transition changed many links. Hopefully
 Google will reindex the site soon, so people can use Google search
 again.

 The site contains 23881 links, and there are only ~30 broken links,
 which are caused by the following line in odk/CustomTarget_javadoc.mk:
  -linkoffline ../../common/reg $(SRCDIR)/odk/pack/gendocu/uno \

 There is no common directory any more, and unfortunately
 common/reg/com/sun/star paths became part of the filename, like
 exceptioncom_1_1sun_1_1star_1_1uno_1_1RuntimeException.html. So links
 from javadocs to API docs should be fixed somehow.

 Best regards,
 Andras
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: is there a portable version of libre office for win 7 ?

2013-09-03 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

How is the portable apps one not as good as the other they should be
exactly the same.


On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:

 On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:11:29 +0200, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:

  Actually there are two portable versions.

 The one suggested by Christian and X-LibreOffice from winPenPack.

 You can get the latest version from
 http://www.winpenpack.com/en/**download.php?view.1354http://www.winpenpack.com/en/download.php?view.1354
 or choose any specific version from
 http://sourceforge.net/**projects/winpenpack/files/X-**
 LibreOffice/releases/http://sourceforge.net/projects/winpenpack/files/X-LibreOffice/releases/

 Hope this helps!


 I tried both version and I can tell that IMHO the winPenPack portable
 version is better that the one from PortableApps.

 __**_
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.**org LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/**mailman/listinfo/libreofficehttp://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Raspberry Pi for development available

2013-09-02 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

What kind of projects are we talking about. I think they would best be
served for android tin build machines. I would love to  work on setting up
android on one or both and let them run as tinderboxes.


On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Florian Effenberger 
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:

 Hello,

 earlier this year, the infrastructure team has approved budget for buying
 two Raspberry Pi with the nice LibreOffice branding. [1]

 As we have no immediate need for those devices, we'd like to offer them a
 loan to a developer who could make use out of it for LibreOffice.

 If you have a concrete project where having hands-on a Raspberry Pi 512 MB
 model would be helpful, please poke me directly (I don't follow this list
 regularly). After a few days, the best two proposals will get the
 Raspberry. :-)

 Florian


 [1] http://shop.pi3g.com/pi3g_de/**libreoffice-edition/**
 libreoffice-raspberry-**essentials-kit.htmlhttp://shop.pi3g.com/pi3g_de/libreoffice-edition/libreoffice-raspberry-essentials-kit.html
 __**_
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.**org LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/**mailman/listinfo/libreofficehttp://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Raspberry Pi for development available

2013-09-02 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

i withdraw my proposal. One can probably use the NDK using raspian (debian
derivative) on the pi itself.


On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com wrote:

 On 02/09/13 09:52, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
  What kind of projects are we talking about. I think they would best be
  served for android tin build machines. I would love to  work on setting
  up android on one or both and let them run as tinderboxes.

 uhm... according to [1] the only supported platforms to run the Android
 NDK are Windows, Mac OS X an Linux running on x86/x86_64 processors
 (which ought to be much faster than running on a puny RPi anyway); how
 exactly would your proposal work?

 [1] https://developer.android.com/tools/sdk/ndk/index.html

 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Web Administration

2013-07-29 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Alex if you want to go back to system versions you purge the nightly and
then remove the repo and reinstall the system version

I have added the developers list.

Greetings developers

I wanted to put forth a suggestion at the admin weekend this past weekend
but I have done so now. As in the previous emails the suggestion was to
create TDF hosted deb and rpm based repositories. I was talking with joel
madero earlier in the week and using dpkg basically messed up his system.
Seeing as dpkg doesnt do dependency resolution I was thinking of a
repository to prevent end users from having to use dpkg and run into
dependency problems.

Seeing as the builds are mostly automated all that would need to be done is
them put in the repo. The advantage of these repos is that those that want
to be on the bleeding edge can as well i feel it will improve overall QA as
it is easier to install the latest version. This isnt limited to Debian
based distros but can also be applied to rpm based distros as well.

Looking forward to developer feed back

Regards
Jonathan

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Waite alexq...@gmail.com wrote:

Also, I noticed that the packages for 4.1 do not replace the ones for 4.0,
so I essentially had 2 copies of LibreOffice installed to other day.

I think this is (currently) by design, so that TDF packaged don't override
the system ones.

For the majority of users, having this linked into their systems update
mechanism will help keep the majority of the userbase up to date, anyone
who doesn't want to update can always pin the older versions in apt.

No arguments here.

Sorry I'm having issues finding that specific thread in the archives, do
you have a link?

Here's the link on Nabble.

http://nabble.**documentfoundation.org/**minutes-of-ESC-call-td4066046.**
htmlhttp://nabble.documentfoundation.org/minutes-of-ESC-call-td4066046.html

With regards to time, that's the answer I was hoping for :)

Glad to hear you're interested.

---Alex

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
website+unsubscribe@global.**libreoffice.orgwebsite%2bunsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/**get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-**
unsubscribe/http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/**
Netiquette http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive:
http://listarchives.**libreoffice.org/global/**website/http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted

--
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Regd ECCN Code for LibreOffice

There are no licenses its free to download.


On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Jain, Pulkit X pulkit.j...@verizon.comwrote:

 Hi,

 ** **

 Can you let us know the ECCN Code for thisLibreOffice*. We need to
 purchase a few licenses for the same.*

 ** **

 ** **

 Thanks,

 Pulkit Jain

 vBuild || VDSI || Chennai

 NPES Mobile Dev Team

 Phone: 91-813-987-8055- Extn-109993

 *pulkit.j...@one.verizon.com*

 ** **

 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Send Feedback...and BSA ideas

I am not trying to hijack this thread. I was thinking also in conjunction
with an online version of the BSA is there something we can code into LO
which integrates with the BSA that way if people go to help and submit a
but a window pops up with version os etc and a text box to type in the
issue.

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Rob Snelders libreoff...@ertai.nl wrote:

Hi All,

My little contribution.

I think we are going the wrong way totally.

When the dev-list found gerrit it wasn't quite what they wanted. But they
took it, tweaked it and are now using it, with great success (afaik). And
here we are trying to create something new that stands between what we have
as bugzilla and the ask-site. Why are we trying to take this hughe detour
to get what we want?

I think we need _really need_ our own bugzilla so we can tweak that
install that it suits us better. Then we can make the bugs less complex and
use usefull subcomponents. But then we can also install plugins we think
are usefull. Tweaking bugzilla then so it comes really close with what we
need is better then. Yes this is a road that needs time invested. But that
is also needed for the other road.

Just my €0,02

--
Greetings,
Rob Snelders

On 16-07-13 00:33, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:

Hi,

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 05:59:37PM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:

I did that and I was told to stop.

One big problem with Ask admins reporting a bug for a user is that the
reporter isthe Ask admin. Do you run OSX 10.7? Do you run Windows
Vista? I don't, so when a dev comes back and asks me for repro steps,
I have to shrug and say Go talk to user XYZ on the Ask site and
as you said, the devs don't use the Ask site!

Yeah, its probably best to suggest users to file a bug and offer to help
them
along on #libreoffice-qa once the bug is triaged roughly. I dont think
we need
to bother with bugs as long as those are obviously not welltriaged.

Another problem is that if they haven't provided enough information,
we can't tag the question as NEEDINFO and let the Ask system pester
them for more information (although this would be a *great*
improvement that I'd like to see!)

THB, I did something similar with a question recently: Asked a long idle
incomplete question if there is an update on the missing info and then
closed
it as outdated a few days later as there was no reply.

Many/most new users on the Ask site do not read old questions. Of the
small number that do, most of them either know how to file a bug or
learn very quickly. So I don't think that me filing bugs for people
will have much value in leading by example (but I could be wrong...).

Only file bugs for others when you can reproduce the bug. Otherwise
guide them
through filing their bug themselves. This also makes the motivation for a
reproduction scenario clear to the other guy.

So: Give the people a smooth migration path towards bugzilla and allow
them to
test the waters on askbot, instead of a migration scenario that
requires a
sleep all-in learning curve, which will make a lot of them just turn
away.

It's a novel idea, having people start on Askbot and then having them
learn how to use the bugtracker later, and it's not something I'm
entirely opposed to, but it's a very drastic change to how we've been
using FDO and the Ask site up until now.

Note that experienced users will should be encouraged to stay with fdo
(and
will likely do so all by themselves). So: If you now what bugzilla is,
go with
it, otherwise better stay with askbot. If you have (experienced users:
bugzilla) behind on the feedback page, you can hopefully divide the
stream at
that point already successfull as those saying oh, I know bugzilla
will go
for it and those who do not will evade (experienced users:
UNKNOWN_THING).

Best,

Bjoern

--
--
Greetings,
Rob Snelders

__**_
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.**org LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/**mailman/listinfo/libreofficehttp://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

--
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Send Feedback...and BSA ideas

Other projects use something like that. I think it wont have any privacy
issues if all you collect is system specifications.


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:

 On 07/21/2013 11:22 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:

 I am not trying to hijack this thread. I was thinking also in conjunction
 with an online version of the BSA is there something we can code into LO
 which integrates with the BSA that way if people go to help and submit a
 but a window pops up with version os etc and a text box to type in the
 issue.


 This has been discussed a bit and from my understanding it's

 a) quite a bit of work
 b) might have some legal issues in terms of privacy if we're collecting
 data automatically.


 Best,
 Joel




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Send Feedback from LibreOffice application

That name is misleading shouldnt that be submit a bug report or something?


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Rob Snelders libreoff...@ertai.nl wrote:

 Hi All,

 There was some work in progress for that. LibreOffice gives that
 information already to the BSA. But the BSA doesn't pick it up yet. So that
 will need to be implemented. The option can be found on Help-Send
 Feedback. When you open it you can see the info of your LibreOffice in the
 URL.

 --
 Greetings,
 Rob Snelders


 On 22-07-13 16:40, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:

 Other projects use something like that. I think it wont have any privacy
 issues if all you collect is system specifications.


 On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
 mailto:jmadero@gmail.com** wrote:

 On 07/21/2013 11:22 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:

 I am not trying to hijack this thread. I was thinking also in
 conjunction with an online version of the BSA is there something
 we can code into LO which integrates with the BSA that way if
 people go to help and submit a but a window pops up with version
 os etc and a text box to type in the issue.


 This has been discussed a bit and from my understanding it's

 a) quite a bit of work
 b) might have some legal issues in terms of privacy if we're
 collecting data automatically.


 Best,
 Joel




 --
 Jonathan Aquilina




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Send Feedback from LibreOffice application

Bug might be negative but submit a bug report in a way is positive in the
sense that an issue has been found and reported.


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:

  On 07/22/2013 07:46 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:

 That name is misleading shouldnt that be submit a bug report or something?


 We are changing it so it's not misleading - it's going to get to a landing
 page - that's what this whole thread is about ;) So it will be for feedback
 (in a general sense). We want to avoid negative words like bugs in our
 main GUI.


 Best,
 Joel



 On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Rob Snelders libreoff...@ertai.nlwrote:

 Hi All,

 There was some work in progress for that. LibreOffice gives that
 information already to the BSA. But the BSA doesn't pick it up yet. So that
 will need to be implemented. The option can be found on Help-Send
 Feedback. When you open it you can see the info of your LibreOffice in the
 URL.

 --
 Greetings,
 Rob Snelders


 On 22-07-13 16:40, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:

 Other projects use something like that. I think it wont have any privacy
 issues if all you collect is system specifications.


 On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
 mailto:jmadero@gmail.com wrote:

 On 07/21/2013 11:22 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:

 I am not trying to hijack this thread. I was thinking also in
 conjunction with an online version of the BSA is there something
 we can code into LO which integrates with the BSA that way if
 people go to help and submit a but a window pops up with version
 os etc and a text box to type in the issue.


 This has been discussed a bit and from my understanding it's

 a) quite a bit of work
 b) might have some legal issues in terms of privacy if we're
 collecting data automatically.


 Best,
 Joel




 --
 Jonathan Aquilina




  --
 Jonathan Aquilina





-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Send Feedback...and BSA ideas

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Rob Snelders libreoff...@ertai.nl wrote:

Hi All,

My little contribution.

I think we are going the wrong way totally.

Just my €0,02

--
Greetings,
Rob Snelders

On 16-07-13 00:33, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:

Hi,

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 05:59:37PM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:

I did that and I was told to stop.

Only file bugs for others when you can reproduce the bug. Otherwise
guide them
through filing their bug themselves. This also makes the motivation for a
reproduction scenario clear to the other guy.

Best,

Bjoern

--
--
Greetings,
Rob Snelders

__**_
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.**org libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/**mailman/listinfo/libreofficehttp://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

--
Jonathan Aquilina
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Send Feedback from LibreOffice application

That name is misleading shouldnt that be submit a bug report or something?


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Rob Snelders libreoff...@ertai.nl wrote:

 Hi All,

 There was some work in progress for that. LibreOffice gives that
 information already to the BSA. But the BSA doesn't pick it up yet. So that
 will need to be implemented. The option can be found on Help-Send
 Feedback. When you open it you can see the info of your LibreOffice in the
 URL.

 --
 Greetings,
 Rob Snelders


 On 22-07-13 16:40, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:

 Other projects use something like that. I think it wont have any privacy
 issues if all you collect is system specifications.


 On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
 mailto:jmadero@gmail.com** wrote:

 On 07/21/2013 11:22 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:

 I am not trying to hijack this thread. I was thinking also in
 conjunction with an online version of the BSA is there something
 we can code into LO which integrates with the BSA that way if
 people go to help and submit a but a window pops up with version
 os etc and a text box to type in the issue.


 This has been discussed a bit and from my understanding it's

 a) quite a bit of work
 b) might have some legal issues in terms of privacy if we're
 collecting data automatically.


 Best,
 Joel




 --
 Jonathan Aquilina




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Send Feedback from LibreOffice application

Bug might be negative but submit a bug report in a way is positive in the
sense that an issue has been found and reported.


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:

  On 07/22/2013 07:46 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:

 That name is misleading shouldnt that be submit a bug report or something?


 We are changing it so it's not misleading - it's going to get to a landing
 page - that's what this whole thread is about ;) So it will be for feedback
 (in a general sense). We want to avoid negative words like bugs in our
 main GUI.


 Best,
 Joel



 On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Rob Snelders libreoff...@ertai.nlwrote:

 Hi All,

 There was some work in progress for that. LibreOffice gives that
 information already to the BSA. But the BSA doesn't pick it up yet. So that
 will need to be implemented. The option can be found on Help-Send
 Feedback. When you open it you can see the info of your LibreOffice in the
 URL.

 --
 Greetings,
 Rob Snelders


 On 22-07-13 16:40, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:

 Other projects use something like that. I think it wont have any privacy
 issues if all you collect is system specifications.


 On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
 mailto:jmadero@gmail.com wrote:

 On 07/21/2013 11:22 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:

 I am not trying to hijack this thread. I was thinking also in
 conjunction with an online version of the BSA is there something
 we can code into LO which integrates with the BSA that way if
 people go to help and submit a but a window pops up with version
 os etc and a text box to type in the issue.


 This has been discussed a bit and from my understanding it's

 a) quite a bit of work
 b) might have some legal issues in terms of privacy if we're
 collecting data automatically.


 Best,
 Joel




 --
 Jonathan Aquilina




  --
 Jonathan Aquilina





-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: OSX Daily Builds

2013-07-21 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Not trying to hijack this thread but what does one need to do to become a
daily build provider?


On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Thorsten Behrens 
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:

 Alexander Thurgood wrote:
  Have the OSX daily builds stopped working, or are we out of resources ?
 
 Hi Alex,

 we still have:


 http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-4-0/MacOSX-Intel@27-OSX_10.7.0-gcc_4.2.1_llvm/

 , I was moving, so had to switch off my box, hopefully back online in
 a bit. Beyond that, probably worth asking one of the several Mac bot
 admins if enabling daily build uploads would be ok with them.

 Cheers,

 -- Thorsten

 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: OSX Daily Builds

2013-07-21 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

I was but things got all hectic on the freelance front. Its still on my to
do list.


On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Thorsten Behrens 
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:

 Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
  Not trying to hijack this thread but what does one need to do to become a
  daily build provider?
 
 A tinderbox. How's the story there Jonathan, thought you were working
 on providing one? ;)

 Cheers,

 -- Thorsten




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [GSOC] iOS remote control weekly update 5 (workable milestone)

2013-07-15 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

What is the oldest version of iOS this will work with as i have an older
ipod touch with 4.1 on it.


On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Siqi Liu m...@siqi.fr wrote:

 Hello Jonathan, Tor and all LibO developers and QA testers,

 I've just integrated TestFlight into the app and now I need to register
 beta-testers' iOS devices in order to distribute this beta-testing version
 to you.

 For that I've created a gdoc to gather unique identifiers from all beta
 testers which is available here:

 https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1XXpZWnPoIZEsyVG9Q-9TuvinjvjtuzeirEFY0WwRrJA/edit?usp=sharing

 Please, feel free to register your iOS devices as testing devices so that
 I can register your devices for the ad-hoc distribution. You will then get
 a copy of the beta-testing distribution (.ipa) and try out this new app on
 your devices :-D This app gets better because of you!

 Happy testing and poke me for all questions you may have. Please also let
 me know if there is any mailing list that might be more appropriate for
 this matter.

 Thank you!
 Siqi



 2013/7/14 Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com

 For app testing there is a website that allows testing of ios apps called
 test flight.

 https://testflightapp.com/


 On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:

 The progress is really impressive!


  Also, should I publish this version on the app store so that people
 don't have to compile it? Or export it to an ipa file?

 I don't think it is a good idea to publish it before it is ready for
 real use; one is not supposed to publish beta test versions in the App
 Store.

 I would assume any hint at it being a test version in its description or
 in the app itself will automatically mean it won't get approved into the
 store.

 And on the other hand, if you publish it, knowing it has still problems,
 but without being able to tell so to customers, that will just generate bad
 press for it, LibreOffice published their Impress Remote for iOS but it
 doesn't work.

 Better to use the ad-hoc distribution mechanism, I think, where if I
 understand correctly you specifically add provisioning to the app to run on
 up to 100 named tester devices, and then distribute the app to these
 testers.

 --tml

 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




 --
 Jonathan Aquilina




 --
 

 Cordialement,
 Siqi LIU

 Étudiant Ingérieur, Université de Technologie de Compiègne
 Vice-Président de l'association robotique UTCoupe
 Responsable d'atelier de ClubChine

 --
   Tel. +33 7 61 16 95 83
   email: m...@siqi.fr
 --




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [GSOC] iOS remote control weekly update 5 (workable milestone)

2013-07-14 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

For app testing there is a website that allows testing of ios apps called
test flight.

https://testflightapp.com/


On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:

 The progress is really impressive!


  Also, should I publish this version on the app store so that people
 don't have to compile it? Or export it to an ipa file?

 I don't think it is a good idea to publish it before it is ready for real
 use; one is not supposed to publish beta test versions in the App Store.

 I would assume any hint at it being a test version in its description or
 in the app itself will automatically mean it won't get approved into the
 store.

 And on the other hand, if you publish it, knowing it has still problems,
 but without being able to tell so to customers, that will just generate bad
 press for it, LibreOffice published their Impress Remote for iOS but it
 doesn't work.

 Better to use the ad-hoc distribution mechanism, I think, where if I
 understand correctly you specifically add provisioning to the app to run on
 up to 100 named tester devices, and then distribute the app to these
 testers.

 --tml

 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: When will be relased LibreOffice for Android

2013-07-10 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

From what I have seen the android port is still in its infancy as there is
still lots that needs to be done.


2013/7/10 Abraham Macías Paredes amac...@solutia-it.es

 Hi LibreOffice people,

 I’d like to know when do you plan to release the Android version of
 LibreOffice.

 ** **

 My company is looking for a product that could add some exclusivity to
 certain Android tablets. So my boss wants to know when do you plan to
 release the Android version of LibreOffice, and what kind of donation can
 accelerate the process.

 ** **

 Thank you very much!

 ** **

 ** **

 *Abraham Macías Paredes*

 * *

 * *

 *T: **955 11 11 55*

 *F:** 954 37 11 42***

 * *

 [image: Descripción: cid:image001.jpg@01CD9B47.6F3C52A0]**

 Solutia Innovaworld Technologies S.L.

 Parque Empresarial Los Llanos

 C/ Extremadura, 108 - 41909 - Salteras (Sevilla)

 ** **

 [image: Descripción: cid:image002.jpg@01CD9B47.6F3C52A0]

 Sus datos personales contenidos en esta comunicación han sido recogidos de
 los contactos mantenidos por Vd. o por personas de su entorno, con personal
 de SOLUTIA INNOVAWORLD TECHNOLOGIES, S.L. y han sido incorporados al
 fichero de GESTIÓN COMERCIAL con la finalidad de realizar la gestión,
 seguimiento y mantenimiento de nuestra relación comercial, o a otro fichero
 correspondiente al tipo de relación que mantiene con nosotros, de lo que
 Vd. fue convenientemente informado al recibir bien el documento contractual
 entregado al inicio de los contactos bien en una comunicación
 inmediatamente posterior en que se daba cumplimiento al derecho de
 información y se le solicitaba consentimiento para tratar sus datos
 personales, tratamiento que se efectuará de acuerdo a las finalidades allí
 expresadas.

 ** **

  

  

 En el caso en que ésta sea la primera comunicación que recibe por nuestra
 parte, le solicitamos su consentimiento para proceder al tratamiento de sus
 datos de acuerdo a las condiciones detalladas al inicio. Entenderemos que
 nos presta su consentimiento si en el plazo de un mes a contar desde la
 recepción de esta comunicación no nos expresa su voluntad en contra. Le
 informamos que puede revocar en cualquier momento su consentimiento
 respondiendo a este mail indicando que no desea recibir más información
 acerca de nuestra empresa, supuesto en el que será automáticamente dado de
 baja de nuestra lista de correo.

 ** **

 Podrá ejercer sus derechos de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y
 oposición ante el Responsable del fichero, SOLUTIA INNOVAWORLD
 TECHNOLOGIES, S.L. en la dirección: Parque Empresarial Los Llanos – C/
 Extremadura, 108 – Buzón 120 – Módulo 5 – 41909 – Salteras (Sevilla),
 indicando en la comunicación la referencia LOPD.

 ** **

  

 ** **

 ** **

 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
image001.jpgimage002.jpg___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice-qa] Fwd: errors.ubuntu.com opening up ...

2013-06-01 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hey guys not sure if this would be of any use to those of you that triage
bugs.

-- Forwarded message --
From: Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com
Date: Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 1:56 AM
Subject: errors.ubuntu.com opening up ...
To: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org

Hi,

this is hopefully interesting for a wider audience of LibreOffice
developers:

https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2013-May/001039.html

the tl;dr-version is: As a non-Canonical employee you can get access to the
crashreports and statistics. This allows e.g. seeing the stack traces of the
crashers that happen most often in the wild, something that we have not a
clean
grap on otherwise upstream at TDF (and also: which was the first and last
version this stacktrace was seen on etc.). As such, this information might
be
very helpful in priotizing issues and even tracking down Heisenbugs or hard
to
reproduce bugs.

Note that the access is still granted in exchange for an NDA, which is
unavoidable as the stack traces might contain sensitive data, but still I
think
the data is well worth exploring beyond a 1-man bottleneck (me).

If there are questions wrt this, dont hesitate to ask, I will be happy help
you
get set up.

Best,

Bjoern
___
LibreOffice mailing list
libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: Gerrit submissions

2013-05-23 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

 doesnt hide the old and rusty ones (as Noel suggested), but shows _only_
 the
 old and rusty ones. Sooo, if your patch is on there, please abandon or
 update
 it. (Reducing the age to 2 weeks, with is pretty old already, is left as an
 excerise to the reader).


Is there a way if lets say a patch is older then 2 weeks it notifies the
submitter to either update or abandon the change?

-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: master start a JRE 7 even if the default JRE is 6

2013-05-08 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Is it a good idea to support java 6 both jre and jdk as those have been end
of lifed, in terms of security patches etc?


On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.comwrote:

 On 05/06/2013 07:25 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:

 What is weird, is that my default Java is Java 6 and LO is configured to
 use Java 6. I have both OpenJDK 6 and OpenJDK 7 on my PC.


 LO is configured to use Java 6:  for building (i.e., as a switch in your
 autogen.input) or at runtime (i.e., at Tools - Options... - LibreOffice -
 Advanced - Java options)?  The latter is preset via some code that tries
 to find the best JRE on your machine, so could easily pick a JRE 7 if you
 have installed both 6 and 7, even if you configured your LO build to
 compile against a JDK 6.

  It seems that official builds (LO 4.0.3.3) does not start a JVM at
 launch time.


 Can depend on what (bundled) extensions are included, for example.

 Stephan
 __**_
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.**org LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/**mailman/listinfo/libreofficehttp://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: problem in fixing a bug in calc

2013-05-04 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Hey Ram,

Have you tried one of the later released branches currently there is 4.0.3
out and it would probably be best to work of that branch.


On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:17 PM, RD Vaishnav vaishnav...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi.. I am Ram Dayal Vaishnav, a student from NIT Trichy, India. I am a
 newbie, and needs a help in creating a patch.

 I want to fix a very simple bug in the libre office Version
 4.0.0.0.alpha1. I want to enable Horizontal AutoFill in calc.

 I am made changes in libo/sc/source/ui/view/viewfun2.cxx (in funciton
 replace ScViewFunc::FillCrossDblClick())

 Now when I run /libo/install/program/.scalc it doesn't show any change. I
 think I am missing something (may be I need to compile/build this code so
 that it can reflect changes to ./soffice or ./calc file)

 kindly help me out, thanks in advance

 --
 : Ram Dayal Vaishnav Gurumukhi
   NIT Trichy


 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Killing the gerrit to dev-list spam ...

2013-05-03 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Thorsten I think as well you forgot a useful feature being able to reply to
the patch sets through an email as I had previously mentioned.


On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Thorsten Behrens 
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:

 Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
  On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 12:16:51AM +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
   And then people will cross-post,
 
  Why? I dont see anyone posting to the gerrit list directly at
  all. If you want you comment on that do it in a comment on gerrit
  (send via email or whatever).  This is what people are doing right
  now -- I rarely see someone to reply on a a gerrit mail on the
  dev-list (and that is a Good Thing as replying on the dev-list keeps
  the stuff invisible on gerrit).
 
 Ok - but then I see even less reason for another list, if it is
 read-only. Gerrit already lets me get email for any number of events,
 with filters  all. So if additional action is necessary anyway -
 which subscribing to a 2nd list is - why not suggest to everyone
 interested to customize his or her own private gerrit firehose?

  The folks on the dev-list are already missing more than half of the
  discussion as as Lionel notes the mailing list does not get the
  comments -- which it where almost ~all the interesting stuff
  happens. So the firehose we have right now is sprinkling you enough
  to get wet, but not enough to get clean.
 
 Sure. But it seems people appreciate the occasional email poke about
 new patches - why else was there the suggestion to have a daily digest
 from the gerrit list?

  Subscribing a second list is not a lot of effort -- probably a lot
  less effort than the custom filtering ~everyone is doing right now,
  while still having to poll gerrit to see the comments (which are the
  relevant bits).
 
 I'm with you that the current situation leaves something to be
 desired. I just disagree with the proposed solution, which in my mind
 does not help anyone with deeper interest in LibreOffice hacking -
 they'd have to subscribe to two lists, get even more email, and need
 even more filtering to stay afloat.

 To keep this constructive, my alternative proposal would be:

  - cut down current gerrit email somewhat, to an acceptable level
* it seems there is ~consensus that at least new patches should be
  notified to the list
  - educate folks on how to make use of gerrit's Watch / Notification
feature - it should be possible to get the equivalent of the
proposed new list setup individually, no?
  - encourage to have larger discussions on the dev list - hackers
watching such a discussion on gerrit could simply fwd the
notification email to the dev-list. That hopefully prevents the
'oh, decision $foo happened on that other list' argument, and
ghettoization into pro-hackers and volunteer hackers lists.

 Cheers,

 -- Thorsten

 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Killing the gerrit to dev-list spam ...

2013-05-02 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

Don't u consider sending nothing to report spam in a way?
On May 2, 2013 9:42 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org
wrote:

 Le 02/05/2013 07:49, Jonathan Aquilina a écrit :
  If there is nothing to report is it necessary to send anything out at
 all?

 Perhaps: if you do not receive anything, you do not know if there
 nothing to receive or if there is a problem on the sender side or on the
 receiver side or if the link between them is broken.

 JBF

 
 
  On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi
  mailto:t...@iki.fi wrote:
 
   Next question to ask though with daily digests how many times a
  day will they be sent out?
 
  Every few hours definitely, except on Mondays of odd-numbered weeks
  when the daily digest should be sent just twice. And if there is
  nothing to digest, they should say so, Nothing to report.
 
  --tml
 
 
 
 
  --
  Jonathan Aquilina
 
 
  ___
  LibreOffice mailing list
  LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
  http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
 


 --
 Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents.
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Killing the gerrit to dev-list spam ...

2013-05-02 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

What would be nice i think is being able to respond to the patch set which
is on gerrit via email, like you can do with bugzilla no?


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Thomas Arnhold thomas-l...@arnhold.orgwrote:

 On 02.05.2013 17:39, Thorsten Behrens wrote:

 If we remove all the [PATCH] from the ML, what is left ? a
 dev-discuss list ?

  It is already now the case that there is a disconnect between
 discussing code, or a concrete problem, and the subsequent gerrit
 patch submission (case in point: 
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.**org/3699https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3699
 ,
 https://gerrit.libreoffice.**org/3698https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3698and
  Noel Grandin's conversion
 operators for UNO thread), I'm very hesitant to widen that gap.

 Devil's advocate question: with that two-list proposal, where to
 discuss a given patch? ;)


 Hm right. Given the current state that gerrit patches are only dumped on
 the ML a second list seems reasonable. But Norberts and Lionels arguments
 are right, there is a need for discussion of that patches which is not
 possible at the moment.

 Thomas

 __**_
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.**org LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/**mailman/listinfo/libreofficehttp://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Killing the gerrit to dev-list spam ...

+1 to JBF's suggestion usualy when i get these emails I instantly delete
them.


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org
 wrote:

 Hi,

 Le 01/05/2013 21:33, Bjoern Michaelsen a écrit :
 [...]
 
  So, is there anyone who is _not_ a sponsored developer opposing to kill
 the mail
  spammage? If so:
 
 [...]
 
  Opinions?

 Even if I am able to filter gerrit mails, I agree that a separate
 gerrit-patches mailing list would be better.

 Best regards.
 JBF

 --
 Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents.
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Killing the gerrit to dev-list spam ...

Next question to ask though with daily digests how many times a day will
they be sent out? would they be sent out every hour every few hours once to
twice a day?


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Winfried Donkers 
w.donk...@dci-electronics.nl wrote:

  So, is there anyone who is _not_ a sponsored developer opposing to kill
 the
  mail spammage? If so:
 
  - could this be mitigated by a separate gerrit-patches mailing list?
  - could this be mitigated by a daily digest of gerrit news?
  - could this be mitigated by other means?

 I would be happy with a daily digest.

 Winfried
 ___
 LibreOffice mailing list
 LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Killing the gerrit to dev-list spam ...

If there is nothing to report is it necessary to send anything out at all?


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:

  Next question to ask though with daily digests how many times a day will
 they be sent out?

 Every few hours definitely, except on Mondays of odd-numbered weeks when
 the daily digest should be sent just twice. And if there is nothing to
 digest, they should say so, Nothing to report.

 --tml




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Killing the gerrit to dev-list spam ...