Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-11-04 Thread HelRw
What's up! wow i just found this.. i just won my iPad2 for nothing, thats 
right nothing.. you need to hurry up and get yours before it to late heres 
the website.. http://so.ee/K50  code 39588976/HTML
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-11-01 Thread AmandaAES
How are you. I was messing around on the net and found this!! want a NFL 
Jersey you can pick any team there only giving out!! 84 NFL Jerseys! hurry up 
and get yours!! heres the link my friend.. http://sayabit.com/dbayoh/HTML
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-10-31 Thread thomas
 

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-09-12 Thread MAILER-DAEMON
The original message was received at Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:32:29 +0700 from 
35.150.96.253

- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org

- Transcript of session follows -
... while talking to 139.165.184.241:
554 libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org... Message is too large
554 libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org... Service unavailable

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-09-09 Thread Stephen Braithwaite


Hi everybody.im sorry to bother to you, but i wasnt sure where to go, im a very 
low level editor on wikipedia and i had created the libreoffice writer and 
libreoffice calc articles, they are quite small articles and were copied from 
the oo.o articles and then heavily modified,  but im sure given a chance they 
will improve.
there is a user 'fitoschido' who continues to try and delete these articles and 
argued that they are not notable. I stated my positions and i'm quite sure that 
this user is just sabre rattling and that an admin would overturn any deletion 
that he would attempt but i thought i'd come to you guys just in case.
this user attempted to delete the libreoffice writer article as well, but the 
article remains up due to strong support from the community, but he's trying to 
delete calc this time.
libreoffice needs a presence on wikipedia and overzealous users shouldnt be 
allowed to muscle us out.

please if u have any spare time write a word of support for libreoffice calc 
article and libreoffice at this 
webpagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/LibreOffice_Calc



  ___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-09-04 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Thorsten,

On Saturday, 2011-09-03 18:31:57 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:

  Can we do something against letting all those .exe .scr .zip etc.
  attachments pass through?
  
 Yep, just adapted the setup accordingly. Note that the surrounding
 messages will still be delivered (that might annoy people who've
 previously had downstream filters for exactly those attachments).

As me..

 Oh, .zip is still permitted - no strong opinion on that one, though.

Do we need really .zip? Btw, that seems to be a negative list,
disallowing specified extensions, there are umpteen extensions Windows
regards as executable.. wouldn't it be better to have a positive list
instead?

  Eike

-- 
 PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
 Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3  9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-09-03 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Eike Rathke wrote:
 Can we do something against letting all those .exe .scr .zip etc.
 attachments pass through?
 
Yep, just adapted the setup accordingly. Note that the surrounding
messages will still be delivered (that might annoy people who've
previously had downstream filters for exactly those attachments).

Oh, .zip is still permitted - no strong opinion on that one, though.

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


pgp2HaJHOhd5i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-09-01 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi,

On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 01:02:51 -0500, chars...@apple.com wrote:

 [... bla making it look like coming from a mailer-daemon ...]
and
[-- Attachment #2: document.exe --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Encoding: base64, Size: 29K --]

Can we do something against letting all those .exe .scr .zip etc.
attachments pass through?

  Eike

-- 
 PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
 Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3  9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-09-01 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Eike,

On 2011-09-01 at 12:18 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:

 Can we do something against letting all those .exe .scr .zip etc.
 attachments pass through?

I'd say bug against the fd.o infa...

Regards,
Kendy

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-08-23 Thread Alexander Thurgood


Hi all,


After a fresh clone, I'm still seeing the following build breakage in
globlmn.hrc on Mac OSX :

svx 0 #define ITEM_FORM_CONTROL_PROPERTIES !defined _GLOBLMN_HRC 3 all
Con~trol... 20110821 20:34:29
   ^
f640:
/Users/alex/DevHack/git/libo/workdir/unxmacxi.pro/inc/svx/globlmn.hrc,
line 1: Error: syntax error
f256: Error: !! 1 Error found!!

I seemed to recall that Caolàn indicated this had been fixed, but either
it has crept back in, or it was incomplete.

My autogen options :

./autogen.sh 'CC=ccache gcc-4.0' 'CXX=ccache g++-4.0'
--with-max-jobs=4
--with-num-cpus=2
--with-lang=en-US
--with-distro=LibreOfficeMacOSX
--enable-python=auto
--enable-ext-mysql-connector
--with-libmysql-path=/Users/alex/DevHack/mysql-connector-c-6.0.2-osx10.5-x86-32bit
--disable-systray
--with-sun-templates
--enable-extra-gallery
--enable-extra-template
--enable-extra-sample
--enable-extra-font
--enable-ext-numbertext
--enable-ext-oooblogger
--enable-ext-google-docs
--enable-ext-diagram
--enable-ext-barcode

Alex


___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-08-23 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 22/08/11 12:44, Alexander Thurgood a écrit :

Please ignore this particular message, which has appeared elsewhere
already, just Gmane and/or Thunderbird doing some strange things to my
reply to list button.


Caolan has already suggested something on this elsewhere.

Alex


___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-08-07 Thread Tommaso Bartalena




This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-05-25 Thread douglas vitor
 

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-03-29 Thread Brian Carter
Very impressed with the programme (or should I say 'program' ), but, as 
a newcomer to Linux, I found the installation procedure a pain in the butt.


Brian
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-02-17 Thread nerea lopez castro

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-01-31 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hello Antoine,

Thanks for your patch. I just pushed it. Feel free to provide other
patches like this one.

BTW, you didn't mention anything, I supposed you were agreeing to
provide the patch under LGPLv3+ / MPL... is that OK?

Regards,
-- 
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-01-29 Thread Jean-Francois Willem

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[Libreoffice] (no subject)

2010-12-04 Thread Gert Faller
Hi,

@Wol
thanks for your answer.

I've already configured with '--enable-binfilter'.
binfilter builds except some sub-dirs 'bf_sd', 'bf_svx' and
'bf_xmloff' (and some others) and I have changes ready in there
but not tested.

For 'extension', make simply answers 'Presenter Screen build disabled'
and things like that.

For 'ure' I have a 400k+ patch which concerns many sub-dirs and make
does not see any change in those...

Regards.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[Libreoffice] (no subject)

2010-11-20 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
Hi all, here some nice stats. Summary, is that we lost 34,000 lines of
code since we started to code on LO...

I used SLOCCount by David A. Wheeler to
check our project size. At the time of the fork ie the
LIBREOFFICE_CREATE tag our clone directory was this big:

Total Physical Source Lines of Code (SLOC) = 5,671,599
Totals grouped by language:
cpp:4731322 (83.42%)
java:401786 (7.08%)
xml: 185842 (3.28%)
ansic:   133211 (2.35%)
pascal:  103341 (1.82%)
perl: 70676 (1.25%)
sh:   15889 (0.28%)

Current Master is this big:
==
Total Physical Source Lines of Code (SLOC) = 5,638,347
Totals grouped by language:
cpp:4714769 (83.62%)
java:401831 (7.13%)
xml: 186150 (3.30%)
ansic:   119903 (2.13%)
pascal:  103360 (1.83%)
perl: 66601 (1.18%)
sh:   15797 (0.28%)
[snip]

Hope you like it
Sebastian


pgp09iLjPbnuh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)

2010-11-16 Thread Drew Jensen
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:51 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
 Summary, is that we lost 34,000 lines of
 code since we started to code on LO... 

Howdy Sebastian,

Outstanding - this is a figure we are confident enough in to publish?

Sounds like it, but just to be sure..so, this is how I put it out via
twitter.

==

#libreoffice developers put the #openoffice code on a diet / work-out
regiment. After 6 weeks how did they do? 34,000 Lines of code lighter.

Best wishes,

Drew


___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)

2010-11-16 Thread Tor Lillqvist
 #libreoffice developers put the #openoffice code on a diet / work-out
 regiment. After 6 weeks how did they do? 34,000 Lines of code lighter.

But isn't a lot of this lines of code that were commented out, or inside #if 0?

And how much of the change is due to changes in the OOo milestones that have 
been merged in?

I would be very careful in using that number in any kind of bragging fashion, 
without very explicitly indicating what it measures, exactly. Of course, hard 
to do that in a short tweet, and it is bound to be misinterpreted.

--tml


___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)

2010-11-16 Thread Drew Jensen
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 09:04 -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
 I would be very careful in using that number in any kind of bragging
 fashion, without very explicitly indicating what it measures, exactly.
 Of course, hard to do that in a short tweet, and it is bound to be
 misinterpreted.

Right - I understand your concern. Laugh if you like but what I did was
a quick read over the docs for the tool Sebastian used and felt pretty
comfortable afterwards. Granted there are variables not mentioned,
options, et al.

But, did send that tweet out. IMO it wasn't a bragging tone, just
promoting. If there is are questions folks will refer to the ML, already
public anyway. At least that was my thought process.

Best wishes,

Drew

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)

2010-11-16 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:28:46 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
   Fun - so, of course, statistics without a robust interpretation can be
 rather dangerous :-)

Right, and netto LOC is a pretty bad measure of productivity and
effectiveness, even if things like COCOMO (?) models andwhatnot suggest
otherwise. Most of the code loss is probably removing code that has been
#ifdef 0 out, or similar.

Still a fun trivia that one can ask the audience at a conference :).

Sebastian


pgpi4TtynrQ1E.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[Libreoffice] (no subject)

2010-11-08 Thread AAMIR KHAN

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[Libreoffice] (no subject)

2010-11-02 Thread Gert Faller
Hi,

a little bit more...

regards.




createFromAscii_8.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[Libreoffice] (no subject)

2010-10-31 Thread Niko Rönkkö
 From 09a62885c6c5aea12412d9bcb37a997bce87fa2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Niko=20R=C3=B6nkk=C3=B6?= ron...@iki.fi
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 00:36:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Wrong option name in help
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=kaben8Ohv4ahdainoh7Ohche4iequoodah1thahph0aiyefaingeeshohzaihaes

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--kaben8Ohv4ahdainoh7Ohche4iequoodah1thahph0aiyefaingeeshohzaihaes
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


Option --with-servlet-api-jar was named wrong in --help.
---
 configure.in |7 ---
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


--kaben8Ohv4ahdainoh7Ohche4iequoodah1thahph0aiyefaingeeshohzaihaes
Content-Type: text/x-patch; name=0001-Wrong-option-name-in-help-bootstrap.patch
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-Wrong-option-name-in-help-bootstrap.patch

diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index 6f0539a..af00634 100644
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -641,9 +641,10 @@ AC_ARG_WITH(commons-logging-jar,
 ])
 
 AC_ARG_WITH(servlet-api-jar,
-[  --servlet-api-jar=JARFILE   Specify path to jarfile manually ],
-[ SERVLETAPI_JAR=$withval
-])
+AS_HELP_STRING([--with-servlet-api-jar=JARFILE],
+[Specify path to jarfile manually.]),
+[SERVLETAPI_JAR=$withval],
+)
 
 AC_ARG_WITH(system-jfreereport,
 [  --with-system-jfreereport  Use JFreeReport already on system

--kaben8Ohv4ahdainoh7Ohche4iequoodah1thahph0aiyefaingeeshohzaihaes--


___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice