On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 15:13 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
+ Adabas DB - disable / removal for 4.0 (Francois)
..
+ decision:
+ kill it completely dead (Caolan, Michael, Norbert,
Bjoern, Cedric)
My heading was, in retrospect not helpful; the
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:13:45 +0100
Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com
wrote:
+ please do not touch the following modules, they are
already gbuildized in gnumake4:
basebmp basegfx canvas cppcanvas dbaccess idl
linguistic oox
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 19:05 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
... and vcl, which I forgot in the original list.
vcl is already converted in master :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Present:
+ Rene, Kohei, David, Andras, Cedric, Bjoern,
Caolan, Kendy, Petr, JoeP, Mitch
* AA done:
+ get post-3.4 schedule into the wiki pwrt. 3.5 (Petr)
+ look into notifing of package updates (Kendy)
+ URL is already setup in openoffice.lst
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 11:47 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
AA: + provide current versions to Caolan (Fridrch)
glib2 2.16.0 was the first release to integrated the gio stuff
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2008-March/msg00022.html
as a data point RHEL-5 is glib2-2.12.3 while
On 20/05/11 12:53, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
I do agree. but then it should be possible to use a nice review-tools
and still have the generated review comment posted in the the ML
I mean, when someone add a patch to be review in the tool that can
generate a post to the ML with the patch (either
Hi all,
Sorry, I couldn't join yesterday. I'm just wondering where the
reviewboard action item went? is that a dropped idea or does it still
deserves some action?
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 18:13 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
Attending:
Thorsten, Andras, Kendy, Norbert, Christian, Petr,
On Fri, 20 May 2011 09:27:21 +0200
Cedric Bosdonnat cedric.bosdonnat@free.fr
wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry, I couldn't join yesterday. I'm just wondering where the
reviewboard action item went? is that a dropped idea or does it still
deserves some action?
Still to be done, but wont be done next
On 20/05/11 08:27, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry, I couldn't join yesterday. I'm just wondering where the
reviewboard action item went? is that a dropped idea or does it still
deserves some action?
I meant to say something when this was originally floated but got
distracted. I think
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Noel Power nopo...@novell.com wrote:
I really wish to stress the 'learn' aspect because I think reviews are a key
way for people to learn about the code ( no joke I think I learn something
new every day on this list from the reviews that I read ) imho we should
Attending:
Thorsten, Andras, Kendy, Norbert, Christian, Petr,
Rainer, David, Bjoern, Kohei
* AA's done
+ announce new 4.0 wiki page (blog going live today) (Bjoern)
+ write list of things that suck for newcomers with taste (Mitch /
Christian)
+ write up a
Hi *,
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote:
Attending:
Thorsten, Andras, Kendy, Norbert, Christian, Petr,
Rainer, David, Bjoern, Kohei
/me was also listening, but apparently my microphone didn't work...
But as I didn't have anything to
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 23:02 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Oh - and please write this in big letters :-)
Yes :-)
And also make sure when you remove it completely: Don't remove the
filter-detection part of it. I.e. when a user then opens a
binfilter-covered format, don't present
Hi,
* announcing binfilter as deprecated in 3.4
+ want to warn people in plenty of time
+ officially deprecate it, we drop save support in 3.4
The code cleaning is not yet finished, I still have commits (and done
commits) that missed the 3.4 freeze (argh, missing free time)
Hi *,
2011/5/6 Pierre-André Jacquod pjacq...@alumni.ethz.ch:
[...]
+ be warned - it will die in a new major release soon.
Will be this 3.5 ? Or do you want to wait for the next version? If post 3.5,
then I will continue the cleaning. If no, I may change my work and try to
perform
Hi Pierre,
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 18:15 +0200, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote:
+ be warned - it will die in a new major release soon.
Will be this 3.5 ? Or do you want to wait for the next version ?
Probably post 3.5 :-) and of course, Caolan is on FTO and would want
some input
Present:
+ Michael, Norbert, Kendy, Andras, Bjoern, Thorsten,
Petr, Fridrich, Cedric, Kohei, Rene, Mitch
* AA done:
+ encourage(d) QA guys to quietly dig at snapshots
+ master now parallel installable (thanks Andras)
+ to get a release
Hi *,
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote:
* announcing binfilter as deprecated in 3.4
+ want to warn people in plenty of time
+ officially deprecate it, we drop save support in 3.4
+ be warned - it will die in a new major release
I omitted to remind people of this one, so poor attendance; but:
Present:
Kendy, Andras, Bjoern, Petr, Christian, Koehi
* AA completed
+ discuss Debian adding a second apply file support to
apply.pl or using patches/hotfixes/ directory (done)
+ will do
Hi *,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote:
[...]
* Patches from new contributors
+ master regularly not building [urk! needs more reliable tinderboxes]
Well, the existing tinderboxes do spot the errors, the problem is that
it takes rather long
Present:
Thorten, Norbert, Kendy, Bjoern, Petr,
Michael, Andras, Kohei, Mitch
* AA completed:
+ Thorsten to fix last vmethod warnings (done)
+ update release plan page based on minutes
+ get some graphite2 screenshot / feature foo (done)
+ add Unity
* Present:
+ Michael, Nobert, Kendy, Andras, Thorsten,
Caolan, Petr, Bjoern, Kohei, Fridrich
* Previous Action Items:
(done) new Evo addresbook bug (Michael)
(done) re-title to most annoying bugs not blockers (Petr)
(done) potentially a 10day gap between RC1 and release
* Present:
+ Michael, Thorsten, Kendy, Caolan,
+ Norbert, Petr, David, Kohei, Andras
* Previous Action Items:
AA: new Evo addresbook bug - not done (Michael)
download javascript test site setup: Christian did it
post a dependency graph of split modules: Petr
Attending:
+ Norbert, Andras, Thorsten, Caolan,
Kendy, Bjoern, Petr, Rene
* Previous Action items:
+ writer useless in Japan bug(s)
+ fixed as well as possible for now
+ magic fallback / Windows font needs some
love
* Attending:
+ Norbert, Bjoern, Kendy, Caolan, Petr,
Rene, Michael, Andras, David, Fridrich
* Action item review:
AA: + writer useless in Japan bug - in progress (Caolan)
* daily snapshot downloads
+ tinderbuild script consolidation underway (Kendy)
Attending: Andras, Thorsten, Norbert, Kendy, Caolan, Kohei, Petr, Bjorn
+ Bjorn introduction welcome
+ 3.3.0 round-up / post-mortem
+ overall release went very well
+ positive surprise by lack of issues
+ no overly
Hi Caolan,
On 2010-12-15 at 20:20 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Actually, I still might have the cvs - git import I did 2-3 years back
The source cvs repos are still around and online, right ?,
i.e. :pserver:anon...@anoncvs.services.openoffice.org:2401/cvs
Yes, but for the import I need a
Hi Thorsten,
On 2010-12-15 at 20:51 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Actually, I still might have the cvs - git import I did 2-3 years back
that tracked all the branches, and also marked the integration commits
as merges; if there'd be more demand for that, I could try to resurrect
that
Hi Caolan,
On 2010-12-09 at 20:08 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
AA: + write tooling to retain history across repo moves (Kendy)
I suppose its silly to look into rewriting our existing history by
tracking back through the various old svn and cvs workspace branch
systems to
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Actually, I still might have the cvs - git import I did 2-3 years back
that tracked all the branches, and also marked the integration commits
as merges; if there'd be more demand for that, I could try to resurrect
that for the history digging purposes ;-)
If you have it
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 18:27 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Actually, I still might have the cvs - git import I did 2-3 years back
The source cvs repos are still around and online, right ?,
i.e. :pserver:anon...@anoncvs.services.openoffice.org:2401/cvs
C.
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 18:18 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
AA: + write tooling to retain history across repo moves (Kendy)
I suppose its silly to look into rewriting our existing history by
tracking back through the various old svn and cvs workspace branch
systems to determine who
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 14:07 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 11:14 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
+ crashes on exit
+ vile threading issue in destructors
+ a choice of memory corruption / crashes either way
AA: + correct fixes
101 - 133 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
