[Bug 87003] Kill BOOST_FOREACH on master and use C++11s range-based for() loops instead

2015-01-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87003 --- Comment #8 from Commit Notification --- Pieter Adriaensen committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=f29bf4635958f7d4b8a22c0825cbcca4858ba037 Resolves: f

[Bug 87003] Kill BOOST_FOREACH on master and use C++11s range-based for() loops instead

2015-01-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87003 Caolán McNamara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 87003] Kill BOOST_FOREACH on master and use C++11s range-based for() loops instead

2015-01-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87003 --- Comment #7 from Commit Notification --- Nathan Yee committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=a509a8d9951a0c31bea0f4ff8942720cad8b6e7f Resolves: fdo#8700

[Bug 87003] Kill BOOST_FOREACH on master and use C++11s range-based for() loops instead

2015-01-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87003 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|EasyHack DifficultyBeginner |EasyHack DifficultyBeginner

[Bug 87003] Kill BOOST_FOREACH on master and use C++11s range-based for() loops instead

2015-01-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87003 Nathan Yee changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|pieter...@gmail.com |ny.nathan@gmail.com -- You are receivi

[Bug 87003] Kill BOOST_FOREACH on master and use C++11s range-based for() loops instead

2015-01-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87003 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Yee --- Sent a patch for this bug over gerrit at https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/13714. I'm going to assign this bug to myself for the time being. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 87003] Kill BOOST_FOREACH on master and use C++11s range-based for() loops instead

2014-12-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87003 David Tardon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dtar...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Da

[Bug 87003] Kill BOOST_FOREACH on master and use C++11s range-based for() loops instead

2014-12-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87003 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Yee --- I've been working on this bug since there seems to not have been activity on this bug for more than a week. It seems like converting to range-based for loops is fairly trivial except in this specific case shown

[Bug 87003] Kill BOOST_FOREACH on master and use C++11s range-based for() loops instead

2014-12-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87003 Pieter Adriaensen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug 87003] Kill BOOST_FOREACH on master and use C++11s range-based for() loops instead

2014-12-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87003 Stephan Bergmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sberg...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug 87003] Kill BOOST_FOREACH on master and use C++11s range-based for() loops instead

2014-12-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87003 Björn Michaelsen changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||EasyHack DifficultyBeginner

[Bug 87003] Kill BOOST_FOREACH on master and use C++11s range-based for() loops instead

2014-12-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87003 Björn Michaelsen changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low CC|