[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #29 from Chris Sherlock --- Sorry, I'm literally still learning how to develop on OS X :( I'm happy to look into it, but not sure how long it will take me to work this out... I've been a bit ill

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #29 from Chris Sherlock --- Sorry, I'm literally still learning how to develop on OS X :( I'm happy to look into it, but not sure how long it will take me to work this out... I've been a bit ill

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 jan iversen changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 jan iversen changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #26 from Sierk Bornemann --- (In reply to barefootguru from comment #7) > 3. Have one download which includes all languages, like every other Mac app +1 (!) (In reply to steve -_- from comment #16) > Raising

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #26 from Sierk Bornemann --- (In reply to barefootguru from comment #7) > 3. Have one download which includes all languages, like every other Mac app +1 (!) (In reply to steve -_- from comment #16) > Raising

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Sierk Bornemann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||42082 -- You

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Sierk Bornemann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||42082 -- You

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #28 from barefootguru --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #27) > @Chris, want to be a hero to your fellow OS X users? ;-) > > See Thorsten's code tip in comment 8 Unless the AppleScript

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #28 from barefootguru --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #27) > @Chris, want to be a hero to your fellow OS X users? ;-) > > See Thorsten's code tip in comment 8 Unless the AppleScript

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #25 from barefootguru --- Thanks Frank, had forgotten you needed to right-click when installing language pack. Note you *can* run LO if you immediately install a language pack, but it requires

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #25 from barefootguru --- Thanks Frank, had forgotten you needed to right-click when installing language pack. Note you *can* run LO if you immediately install a language pack, but it requires

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Christian Lohmaier changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Christian Lohmaier changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|high|medium

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|high|medium

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #18 from barefootguru --- While I don't have any stats on the number of people affected by this, I think the current system is unacceptable and user hostile: - you shouldn't have to download 2 things

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #18 from barefootguru --- While I don't have any stats on the number of people affected by this, I think the current system is unacceptable and user hostile: - you shouldn't have to download 2 things

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #20 from Frank Fuchs --- Stuart: I beg to differ as a really long time StarOffice/OOo/LO user - and MAC user since 3 years: The problem is even worse than barefootguru described: Because the language

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #20 from Frank Fuchs --- Stuart: I beg to differ as a really long time StarOffice/OOo/LO user - and MAC user since 3 years: The problem is even worse than barefootguru described: Because the language

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #22 from Frank Fuchs --- Tor: that can't be bypassed. Mac OSX simply reports this app as "broken". You do not get a prompt where you could choose to accept running an unsigned app. -- You are

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #22 from Frank Fuchs --- Tor: that can't be bypassed. Mac OSX simply reports this app as "broken". You do not get a prompt where you could choose to accept running an unsigned app. -- You are

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #23 from Tor Lillqvist --- Not even right-click and "Open"? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ LibreOffice mailing list

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #21 from Tor Lillqvist --- But if the user has to know how to bypass Gatekeeper when running a langpack installer, can't she then also bypass Gatekeeper when running LibreOffice that has been "broken" by the

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #21 from Tor Lillqvist --- But if the user has to know how to bypass Gatekeeper when running a langpack installer, can't she then also bypass Gatekeeper when running LibreOffice that has been "broken" by the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #24 from Frank Fuchs --- Nope. If you install a language pack before running a freshly installed LO at least once, all you can do is move the installed LO app to the trash. Afterwards, a new install is

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #24 from Frank Fuchs --- Nope. If you install a language pack before running a freshly installed LO at least once, all you can do is move the installed LO app to the trash. Afterwards, a new install is

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #23 from Tor Lillqvist --- Not even right-click and "Open"? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #19 from V Stuart Foote --- (In reply to barefootguru from comment #18) > LO needs a single installer or drag-and-drop install, like almost every > other Mac app. > Hence this Installation/UX issue

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #19 from V Stuart Foote --- (In reply to barefootguru from comment #18) > LO needs a single installer or drag-and-drop install, like almost every > other Mac app. > Hence this Installation/UX issue

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #13 from Piet van Oostrum --- Approach 2 is the standard way these things are done on OS X: install additions in /Library/Application Support/LibreOffice. If they are version dependent, add a version

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #13 from Piet van Oostrum --- Approach 2 is the standard way these things are done on OS X: install additions in /Library/Application Support/LibreOffice. If they are version dependent, add a version

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #14 from Tor Lillqvist --- LibreOffice as distributed in the Mac App Store comes with a set of user interface languages already. No separate lang-packs necessary. Just saying. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #14 from Tor Lillqvist --- LibreOffice as distributed in the Mac App Store comes with a set of user interface languages already. No separate lang-packs necessary. Just saying. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #12 from catacom...@gmail.com --- [OS X developer and long time LibreOffice user, first time LibreOffice Bugzilla commenter...] I would prefer approach 3 as suggested by barefootguru, but if that would grow the size of the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #12 from catacom...@gmail.com --- [OS X developer and long time LibreOffice user, first time LibreOffice Bugzilla commenter...] I would prefer approach 3 as suggested by barefootguru, but if that would grow the size of the

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #9 from Tor Lillqvist --- Also see https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62442#c33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #9 from Tor Lillqvist --- Also see https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62442#c33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 jan iversen changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|difficultyEasy

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 jan iversen changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|difficultyEasy

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 jan iversen changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Thorsten Behrens changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #7 from Tom Robinson --- 3. Have one download which includes all languages, like every other Mac app :] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #6 from Uwe Altmann --- Besides fixing I see two possible workarounds: 1. when installing a langpack, the installer checks if a first run of LO has taken place (is that possible?). If LO wasn't started yet,

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #4 from Frank Fuchs --- Could you please also add this to the installation Release Notes (e.g. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/5.0.3/RC1) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #1 from mi...@filmsi.net --- I first reported this under https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84352 (See comment 22), but only now we seem to know how to reproduce/why it happens. -- You are receiving this mail

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED