On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 18:09 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> This is about direct use of JNI, not via UNO.
Ah - I wonder ... ;-) if it is the transition that is the problem;
could we have a Java thread polling a loopback socket and sucking simple
commands & parsing & executing them, then
On 2012-07-19 14:38, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
For example, to minimise the number of Java calls from C++ , maybe we
could, when we retrieve a whole row through JDBC, doing this from Java
code instead of from C++ code:
for (i=0; i < row->getNumberOfColumns; ++i)
cacheEntry[i]=row->getColumn
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:03:32PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 15:47 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> I'm fond of my trampoline idea, but 't would have to be done in a
>> clean way; not sure yet how.
> Heh ;-) I'm still holding my breath for the end-of-problem Fir
On 07/19/2012 06:03 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 15:47 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I'm fond of my trampoline idea, but 't would have to be done in a
clean way; not sure yet how.
Heh ;-) I'm still holding my breath for the end-of-problem Firebird
solution myself .
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 15:47 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> I'm fond of my trampoline idea, but 't would have to be done in a
> clean way; not sure yet how.
Heh ;-) I'm still holding my breath for the end-of-problem Firebird
solution myself ...
I wonder if there are some silli
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 02:53:35PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 07/19/2012 02:38 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 02:12:30PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>>> On 07/18/2012 10:06 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> I noticed that there are truckloads of calls to
>>> m
On 07/19/2012 02:38 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 02:12:30PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 07/18/2012 10:06 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
The issue *originally* reported in fdo#51239, which has been bumped to
fdo#52170: in LibreOffice 3.5.2, much slower than "before"
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 02:12:30PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 07/18/2012 10:06 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> The issue *originally* reported in fdo#51239, which has been bumped to
>> fdo#52170: in LibreOffice 3.5.2, much slower than "before", on
>> GNU/Linux, but NOT on Windows. Unknow
On 07/18/2012 10:06 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
The issue *originally* reported in fdo#51239, which has been bumped to
fdo#52170: in LibreOffice 3.5.2, much slower than "before", on
GNU/Linux, but NOT on Windows. Unknown on Mac. Not entirely clear what
"before" it is. *This* issue *could* be JV
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:10:09PM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 of July 2012, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> I'd appreciate some help on fdo#51239 which is of the form "doing this
>> is horribly slow"; how can I profile LibO, i.e. find out where it
>> spends all its time; if it spends
try googling for "profiling C++" or "profiling on system here>"
On 2012-07-11 11:48, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I'd appreciate some help on fdo#51239 which is of the form "doing this
is horribly slow"; how can I profile LibO, i.e. find out where it
spends all its time; if it spends a lot of time
On Wednesday 11 of July 2012, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> I'd appreciate some help on fdo#51239 which is of the form "doing this
> is horribly slow"; how can I profile LibO, i.e. find out where it
> spends all its time; if it spends a lot of time in function FOO, can I
> also get information on wha
I'd appreciate some help on fdo#51239 which is of the form "doing this
is horribly slow"; how can I profile LibO, i.e. find out where it
spends all its time; if it spends a lot of time in function FOO, can I
also get information on what the call stack looks like "most of the
time"?
Either someone
13 matches
Mail list logo
