Re: [Libreoffice] [partial PUSH][PATCH] build system patches

2011-09-14 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Peter Foley pefol...@verizon.net wrote:

 I'm still using my libcrmf.a patch (attached) to work around this build
 breakage.

yeah... that popped up again... pushed.

Norbert
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] [Partial PUSH] [PATCH] build system patches

2011-09-06 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Peter Foley pefol...@verizon.net wrote:
 Hi,

 Here are some patches for various problems I encountered while building
 libreoffice.


so, I've pushed 0003 and 0005 so far.  Thanks.

I'm not sure I understand the rational (what problem does it 'fixes'
what are the gains ?) for 0004 nor fully grasp the consequence... the
prefix/exec_prefix hack does nothing to re-assure me that I understand
what is going on...
maybe someone smarter than me can review and push... I try to avoid
pushing stuff I don't understand :-)

0002 we already discussed... skipped for now

0001 wating for confirmation that it is indeed a fallback from kendy's
dep-optimization wrt to moz and nss. but sound pretty harmless so I
prolly will push it

0006-0007 I'm waiting for feed back from cloph to make sure that
upping the requirement for autoconf is not going to be a problem on
PPC MacOSX 10.4 (pretty old tool-chain)

Norbert
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice