See fdo#36950 for discussion. It doesn't seem to make sense to push a
backport of the commit to the 3-4 branch, as we don't know if it
actually helps the problem.
OK, now some more people have verified that the fix helps for them in
the situation it actually was supposed to help. So, I guess,
On 25/10/11 09:37, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
See fdo#36950 for discussion. It doesn't seem to make sense to push a
backport of the commit to the 3-4 branch, as we don't know if it
actually helps the problem.
OK, now some more people have verified that the fix helps for them in
the situation it
Hi Tor,
Tor Lillqvist píše v St 19. 10. 2011 v 10:42 +0300:
OK, so technically not possible as cherry-pick because of the git repo
combination, I guess, but anyway, should this fix be cherry-picked to
the 3.4 branch? It is supposed to fix the Windows build so that a
64-bit Explorer extension
See fdo#36950 for discussion. It doesn't seem to make sense to push a
backport of the commit to the 3-4 branch, as we don't know if it
actually helps the problem.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
OK, so technically not possible as cherry-pick because of the git repo
combination, I guess, but anyway, should this fix be cherry-picked to
the 3.4 branch? It is supposed to fix the Windows build so that a
64-bit Explorer extension is also built, to get the Explorer extension
also on a 64-bit OS.
