Re: [Libreoffice] First attempt to build LO3.4

2011-05-08 Thread KAMI911 KAMI911
Hi Michael,

        But yes - the --enable-extra-gallery stuff all sounds great to have in
 the stock build, rather than in patches - so more people can use and get
 familiar with your great work. [ We should really have a talk from you
 at the conference about why it is that we havn't shipped that stuff in
 the past - I forget the details ;-].

Of course we can chat about, I am interested :oD.


KAMI
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] First attempt to build LO3.4

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there,

On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 17:06 +0200, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote:
 So I should create option like --enable-oxygenoffice, and add my
 stuffs here ? All things depending in the code directly ?

I couldn't see my reply elsewhere. But I would add an OxygenOffice
distro config in distro-config/ and then add individual configuration
options for each feature you want to add.

  How should I make the download conditional? I really don't want to
 enforce anybody to download our extra stuffs, extensions, etc without
 using   --enable-extra-gallery, --enable-extra-template,
   --enable-extra-sample, --enable-extra-font and all --with-ext-*
 (extension) switches.

Sure :-) if we don't make that conditional already, then we should. I
guess it is a matter of moving ooo.lst to ooo.lst.in  and having some
@FOO_EXTRA_DOWNLOAD@ macros in ooo.lst.in and processing it in configure
(?).

But yes - the --enable-extra-gallery stuff all sounds great to have in
the stock build, rather than in patches - so more people can use and get
familiar with your great work. [ We should really have a talk from you
at the conference about why it is that we havn't shipped that stuff in
the past - I forget the details ;-].

ATB,

Michael.

-- 
 michael.me...@novell.com  , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] First attempt to build LO3.4

2011-04-19 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Kami,

On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:33 +0200, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote:
 I recently build a new version from libreoffice-3-4. I found that it
 does not not support:

 * patches/dev300 infrastructure to patch the source

Right :-)

 * download infrastructure for additional stuffs

Oh ? surely we have that with ooo.lst ?

 Are we planning this features for bootstrap repo? Or this only for
 build repo?

I think the idea is to try to get all of these patches turned into
build conditionals - so we have a single build that auto-adapts to the
underlying system, and has features that can be enabled as required.

Of course, the flip side of that is - we need things flattening and
conditionalizing, and fixing in the bootstrap (and other) repos - rather
than continuing to pile them up inside 'build'.

I guess for 3.4 'build' may still be workable, but I'd like to
completely kill it on master (personally).

Does that make sense ?

ATB,

Michael.

-- 
 michael.me...@novell.com  , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[Libreoffice] First attempt to build LO3.4

2011-04-18 Thread KAMI911 KAMI911
Hi,

I recently build a new version from libreoffice-3-4. I found that it does
not not support:

* patches/dev300 infrastructure to patch the source
* download infrastructure for additional stuffs

Are we planning this features for bootstrap repo? Or this only for build
repo?

Regards,
KAMI
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice