Re: [Libreoffice] Java baseline is 1.5, right?

2011-09-19 Thread Marc-André Laverdière
Can we keep it in with a 'use at your own risk and peril'? I don't think that spending energy on 1.4 bugs is wise, but if someone finds them, let 'em fix. -- Marc-André Laverdière Software Security Scientist Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services Hyderabad, India On Thu 15 Sep 2011 07:15:06

Re: [Libreoffice] Java baseline is 1.5, right?

2011-09-15 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:38:04 +0200 Fridrich Strba wrote: > Hello, Michael, > > On 15/09/11 15:06, Michael Stahl wrote: > > just noticed David's commit to move around the fix for a broken IBM > > LinuxPPC JRE: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ab5ce3f70a5635c3ca141b5c892

Re: [Libreoffice] Java baseline is 1.5, right?

2011-09-15 Thread Fridrich Strba
Hello, Michael, On 15/09/11 15:06, Michael Stahl wrote: > just noticed David's commit to move around the fix for a broken IBM > LinuxPPC JRE: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ab5ce3f70a5635c3ca141b5c8928a104b522e1bb > AFAIK the OOo JRE baseline was raised to 1.5 some years

[Libreoffice] Java baseline is 1.5, right?

2011-09-15 Thread Michael Stahl
just noticed David's commit to move around the fix for a broken IBM LinuxPPC JRE: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ab5ce3f70a5635c3ca141b5c8928a104b522e1bb AFAIK the OOo JRE baseline was raised to 1.5 some years ago, right? so 1.4 seems obsolete and we can get rid of it no