On 25/07/2011 03:24, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi Norbert, *,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Norbert Thiebaudnthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
because you can build with a sdk 10.6 and a
Hi Norbert, *,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Norbert, *,
[..]
If matching SDK is available, use that, otherwise use whatever
oldest SDK is
Hi Tor, * (now all, wrong button the first time...),
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@novell.com wrote:
Having lion doesn't force you to install the latest version of XCode, or
does it?
Well, if you want to use Xcode 4.x, it must be Xcode 4.1 (the latest). An
Xcode
Hi Norbert, *,
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
Like for example?
Mac OSX was the first platform to be WaE free, despite some
over-pickyness of the compiler. What pain did gcc 4.0 bring?
actually I'm compiling with SDK 10.5 and gcc 4.2.1 right now and
Hi Norbert,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok it is easier to discuss based on actual code... so:
the attaches patch, allow for --with-mac-sdk=10.x to be specified
the default is the lowest SDK available in /Developer/SDKs
regarding the default
The more I look at the aqua code (to get inspiration / hints for iOS
CocoaTouch), and read the various notes from the MacOSX porters in the OOo
Wiki, and read Apple documentation, the more I suspect / realize that the
aqua MacOSX port is mostly using obsolete APIs. ATSUI , HITheme*, etc.
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Norbert,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok it is easier to discuss based on actual code... so:
the attaches patch, allow for --with-mac-sdk=10.x to
Hi Norbert, *,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
regarding the default see the other posts.
just regarding
-MACDEVSDK*=/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Norbert, *,
because you can build with a sdk 10.6 and a deployment-target of 10.4
(at least that is how I understood the AvailabilityMacros.h )
Yes, in theory, but see my other post, or look at
Hi Norbert, *,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
because you can build with a sdk 10.6 and a deployment-target of 10.4
(at least that is how I understood
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Norbert, *,
[..]
If matching SDK is available, use that, otherwise use whatever
oldest SDK is available and hope for the availability-macro stuff
(and more importantly the linking) doesn't fail.
Having lion doesn't force you to install the latest version of XCode, or does
it?
Well, if you want to use Xcode 4.x, it must be Xcode 4.1 (the latest). An Xcode
4(.0) you had in 10.6 tells you to upgrade when you try to use it on 10.7.
I haven't tried if one can run the IDE of Xcode 3.2.6
I believe it's about time to drop 10.4 support in LibreOffice. [in master]
I agree, but please ignore my opinion, as I am not really in the Mac part of
this community... I just happen to have also a MacBookPro, I love it, and build
LO on it (natively, and cross-compiling for iOS).
Most of
Hi Joe,
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 20:21 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote:
Just doing a little research and wanted to report my findings:
Wow - what a nice write-up; we have similar problems on Linux deciding
what versions of what underlying infrastructure to support and/or when
to axe it.
+1
Support doesn't come free. If there is a real need for it, then we can
reverse decision any time... Git is there for such things :)
Marc-André Laverdière
Software Security Scientist
Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services
Hyderabad, India
On 07/22/2011 03:42 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi
Hi *,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Michael Meeks
michael.me...@novell.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 20:21 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote:
Just doing a little research and wanted to report my findings:
[...]
I'd love an ack from Norbert / Christian - to make a final decision, or
if
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote:
Hi Joe,
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 20:21 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote:
Just doing a little research and wanted to report my findings:
Wow - what a nice write-up; we have similar problems on Linux deciding
what
Hi Norbert, *,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Caveat: Like tml_ I don't consider myself a 'Mac' developer... just a
Dev that happen to own a Mac.
That being said, Christian is the person that need convincing.
Oh, I don't consider myself
I just find that drop it because it is old is not enough reason to
drop 10.4 support.
Yeah, I see your point.
I guess a good enough reason to drop it would be this hypothetical (but, I
guess, quite possible) situation, or something similar: Some volunteer wants to
contribute code that makes
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Norbert, *,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Caveat: Like tml_ I don't consider myself a 'Mac' developer... just a
Dev that happen to own a Mac.
Ok it is easier to discuss based on actual code... so:
the attaches patch, allow for --with-mac-sdk=10.x to be specified
the default is the lowest SDK available in /Developer/SDKs
The patch does not check that your CC anc CCX make sens based on the
SDK selected (ToDO list)
I have only tested it
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@novell.com wrote:
I just find that drop it because it is old is not enough reason to
drop 10.4 support.
Yeah, I see your point.
I guess a good enough reason to drop it would be this hypothetical (but, I
guess, quite possible)
Hi Tor, *,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@novell.com wrote:
I just find that drop it because it is old is not enough reason to
drop 10.4 support.
Yeah, I see your point.
I guess a good enough reason to drop it would be this hypothetical (but, I
guess, quite
Hi Norbert, *,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
The benefit is that a new developer can still build the product, even
if he has _only_ a brand new lion.
Having lion doesn't force you to install the latest version of XCode,
or does it?
As you
Hi Norbert, *,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
the attaches patch, allow for --with-mac-sdk=10.x to be specified
the default is the lowest SDK available in /Developer/SDKs
This is pointless, it is the same as dropping 10.4 support.
Note: the
Like for example?
Mac OSX was the first platform to be WaE free, despite some
over-pickyness of the compiler. What pain did gcc 4.0 bring?
actually I'm compiling with SDK 10.5 and gcc 4.2.1 right now and it is
picking up quite few more WaE.
so gcc-4.0 is not over-picky, quite the contrary... and
Just doing a little research and wanted to report my findings:
1. The last G3 Mac was sold in January 1999 - 12 years ago
2. The last G5 mac was sold in August 2006 - 5 years ago
2. Mac OS 10.5 was released in October 2007 - 4 years ago
3. The last security update for Mac OS 10.4 was September
27 matches
Mail list logo