On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:53:25 +0200
Petr Mladek wrote:
> libreoffice-3.3.* are missing in the "translation" repo because we
> used "l10n repo for LO-3.3. Is this the problem? Or are the tags
> missing in more repositories?
They are missing in core for all repos but bootstrap mostly. The cause
is
Bjoern Michaelsen píše v Ne 21. 08. 2011 v 02:35 +0200:
> It could do even more, but it seems the following tags:
> DEV300_m32-64
> libreoffice-3.3.0.4
> libreoffice-3.3.1.1
> libreoffice-3.3.1.2
> libreoffice-3.3.3.1
> libreoffice-3.3.4.1
> OOO310_m2-19
>
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 20:24:29 -0500
Norbert Thiebaud
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just pushed:
> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/dev-tools/commit/?id=7616113f5e211dcd7cc3f3f432ffd08e1c43d48e
> > it merges the old tags fro
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 20:57:11 -0500
Norbert Thiebaud
wrote:
> A shell script that generate an awk script that generate a shell
> script that is sourced in the original script... really ? :-) , you're
> sure you can't add a lex/yacc, and a couple of lisp emacs macro in the
> mix ? :-D
Well, given
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just pushed:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/dev-tools/commit/?id=7616113f5e211dcd7cc3f3f432ffd08e1c43d48e
A shell script that generate an awk script that generate a shell
script that is sourced in the origina
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just pushed:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/dev-tools/commit/?id=7616113f5e211dcd7cc3f3f432ffd08e1c43d48e
> it merges the old tags from all the core split repo and makes branches
> that contain at least the st
Hi,
I just pushed:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/dev-tools/commit/?id=7616113f5e211dcd7cc3f3f432ffd08e1c43d48e
it merges the old tags from all the core split repo and makes branches
that contain at least the state of the joined repo at the tagpoints, so
that even old releases cou
