Re: [Libreoffice] Some more features
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 12:42:01PM +0100, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote: Oooh ! :-) do we have old, obsolete, and non-compiled code in git master ? Does that make sense ? can we remove the old RTF cruft that we no longer use ? That's right - when the RTF rework was a patch I just removed old files from the makfiles, then they didn't get removed when the patch was moved to the repos. I think Cedric will fix this - though if I should do it, please let me know. Thanks. pgptp40B2DRj0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Some more features
Hi Miklos, Michael, On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 16:10 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: I think Cedric will fix this - though if I should do it, please let me know. I just removed those files in sw/source/filter/rtf/. Regards, -- Cédric Bosdonnat LibreOffice hacker http://documentfoundation.org OOo Eclipse Integration developer http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Some more features...
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 10:28 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: Having said that, once we remove this, it won't be easy to add it back. So I'd personally like to be a bit careful on making decision here. For example, can anybody provide any arguments for keeping the current behavior? No, +1 for removal Noel ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Some more features...
- Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com a écrit : [...] No disagreement there. I would be among the first ones to support removal of this cruft. Great :-) Having said that, once we remove this, it won't be easy to add it back. So I'd personally like to be a bit careful on making decision here. I completely agree with you here. That's why I was happy but when Caolán McNamara implemented yesterday a change I had been wainting for (no auto conversion of numbers in Writer's tables by default) but also worried that it hadn't been validated at UX level. I think it would be good for everyone if we can reach a broad consensus on this, including from OOo's UX team. I have started formalizing my arguments in favour of this change there : http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/User:Camillem/aboutFramework#Read_Only_files_should_be_open_in_R.2FW_mode For example, can anybody provide any arguments for keeping the current behavior? That's also what I'd like to know. I'll post on OOoUX list about that tonight. Cheers, Camille ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
