Re: [Libreoffice] boost exceptions

2010-10-18 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 23:36 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: As you can see, I already added -fexceptions to the g++ arguments. Why did you add -fexceptions to the arguments ?, I ask because there are places in LibreOffice where its explicitly enabled, and others where its explicitly disabled, so

Re: [Libreoffice] boost exceptions

2010-10-18 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:14:25AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: Why did you add -fexceptions to the arguments ?, I ask because there are places in LibreOffice where its explicitly enabled, and others where its explicitly disabled, so globally enabling it wouldn't be something typically tested

Re: [Libreoffice] boost exceptions

2010-10-18 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 12:54 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:14:25AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: Why did you add -fexceptions to the arguments ?, I ask because there are places in LibreOffice where its explicitly enabled, and others where its explicitly disabled,

Re: [Libreoffice] boost exceptions

2010-10-18 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 13:15 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:01:15PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: Did you configure with --with-system-boost ? There's a test in configure.in for a broken boost header. Yes, I'm using system boost. I know you're using system boost,