Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Andreas, On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 13:51 +0200, Andreas Radke wrote: DESTDIR seem to be not properly applied to ooinstall. Has anybody tested this? It doens't work for me. In theory ooinstall's output is fully re-locatable :-) so you should do: ooinstall $DESTDIR/usr/bin or whatever I

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-21 Thread Hanno Meyer-Thurow
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:58:29 +0200 Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: One of the arguments seems to point outside my chroot or wherever to a bad path. How can I check the args? First of all, just to verify, your PKGBUILD looks just fine. So, how to check the args, see

[Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, I wanted to prepare the freebsd port for libreoffice 3.4 beta1, but I can find the distfile for libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 on the mirrors, it is missing or I missed something and it is not needed anymore? regards, Bapt ___ LibreOffice mailing

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Wed, 20 Apr 2011 06:10:25 + schrieb Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org: Hi, I wanted to prepare the freebsd port for libreoffice 3.4 beta1, but I can find the distfile for libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 on the mirrors, it is missing or I missed something and it is not needed

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Hanno Meyer-Thurow
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:42:31 +0200 Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: ... (make DESTDIR=... install is broken for me). Hi all, I would recommend my patch attached. For that one would need to pass '--libdir=/usr/LIBDIR' to configure to behave. Otherwise it installs to /LIBDIR. Improvements to

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Petr Mladek
Hanno Meyer-Thurow píše v St 20. 04. 2011 v 11:25 +0200: On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:42:31 +0200 Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: ... (make DESTDIR=... install is broken for me). Hi all, I would recommend my patch attached. For that one would need to pass '--libdir=/usr/LIBDIR' to

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Hanno Meyer-Thurow
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:43:07 +0200 Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote: I did some changes. I made the libreoffice dirname configurable by --with-install-dirname option. Also I defined prefix, exec_prefix, libdir values in Makefile.in. The result is that the installation path is

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Petr Mladek
Hanno Meyer-Thurow píše v St 20. 04. 2011 v 16:08 +0200: On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:43:07 +0200 Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote: I did some changes. I made the libreoffice dirname configurable by --with-install-dirname option. Also I defined prefix, exec_prefix, libdir values in

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Andreas Radke
Thanks for your work but I'm running into a permission issue: == Entering fakeroot environment... == Starting package_libreoffice()... Installing in /usr/lib/libreoffice... mkdir /usr/lib/libreoffice: Permission denied at /build/src/build/solenv/bin/ooinstall line 32 make: *** [install] Error

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Hanno Meyer-Thurow
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:35:47 +0200 Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: This has not happened when using plain beta1 source and using make OODESTDIR=foo install. The only thing changed there was OODESTDIR to DESTDIR. So it should stay in the sandbox. Would you mind to pastebin the log of the