Re: [Libreoffice] postgresql bits in minutes of tech. steering call

2012-02-03 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:37:38PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:14:42PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: a more accurate statement would be, we only use libraries that are in a sufficiently recent version in our baseline system, and which are available in ~all

Re: [Libreoffice] postgresql bits in minutes of tech. steering call

2012-02-02 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:14:42PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: On 15/12/11 19:46, Michael Meeks wrote: On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 19:11 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On this, someone said on the talk we use only libc (and I implicitly understood: in the binaries we distribute). You have

Re: [Libreoffice] postgresql bits in minutes of tech. steering call

2011-12-16 Thread Michael Stahl
On 15/12/11 19:46, Michael Meeks wrote: On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 19:11 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On this, someone said on the talk we use only libc (and I implicitly understood: in the binaries we distribute). You have to be quite careful with claims from Fridrich, they are often

[Libreoffice] postgresql bits in minutes of tech. steering call

2011-12-15 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:40:27PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: * postgresql bits AA: + checking pg baseline on windows (Fridrich) I had understood this as: Check Kerberos/GSSAPI on our GNU/Linux baseline, to see if we can use it as a system library. So nothing on Windows. On this, someone

Re: [Libreoffice] postgresql bits in minutes of tech. steering call

2011-12-15 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 19:11 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On this, someone said on the talk we use only libc (and I implicitly understood: in the binaries we distribute). You have to be quite careful with claims from Fridrich, they are often exaggerated for comic effect :-)