On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 22:04 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
Hello hackers,
I would like to make the --suppress-license option of unopkg skip the
license in all cases instead of depending on what is in the extension's
description.xml //simple-licen...@suppress-if-required].
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Extensions/Description_of_XML_Elements#Element_.2Fdescription.2Fregistration.2Fsimple-license
According to this wiki page, this feature has been introduced in OOo
3.3... which isn't released yet.
Do you have any strong opinion against that? I would need this kind of
unconditional skip to run unopkg from within ooeclipse... where people
should develop their extensions and know the license ;)
IMO the principle of lease surprise dictates that, when given
--suppress-license, it should suppress license unconditionally no matter
what some file in undisclosed location has in it.
So, I'm with you on that.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
kyosh...@novell.com
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
